vovrВысшее образование в России (Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia)Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia0869-36172072-0459Moscow Polytechnic University10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-10-58-72vovr-1935Research ArticleНАПРАВЛЕНИЯ МОДЕРНИЗАЦИИ ВЫСШЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯAREAS OF EDUCATION MODERNIZATIONCDIO-FCDI-FFCD- рубрики для оценки трёхуровневых инженерных программThe CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Rubrics for Evaluation of Three-Cycle Engineering ProgramsЧучалинА. И.ChuchalinA. I.

Чучалин Александр Иванович – доктор технических наук, профессор

350072, г. Краснодар, ул. Московская, 2

Alexander I. Chuchalin – Dr. Sc. (Engineering), Prof.

2, Moskovskaya str., Krasnodar, 350072, Russian Federation

chai@kubstu.ruКубанский государственный технологический университетРоссияKuban State Technological UniversityRussian Federation20190111201928105872Copyright © Чучалин А.И., 20192019Чучалин А.И.Chuchalin A.I.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1935

В статье предложены рубрики для самооценки образовательных программ магистратуры и аспирантуры в области техники и технологий на основе стандартов FCDI (Forecast, Conceive, Design, Implement) и FFCD (Foresight, Forecast, Conceive, Design) по аналогии с рубриками для самооценки программ бакалавриата на основе стандартов CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate). Стандарты FCDI и FFCD разработаны для программ магистратуры и аспирантуры по техническим направлениям в результате эволюции подхода CDIO по аналогии со стандартами CDIO, изначально созданными для программ бакалавриата. Стандарты CDIO/FCDI/FFCD рекомендуется применять при проектировании и реализации трёхуровневых программ в области техники и технологий для подготовки выпускников, соответственно, к комплексной, инновационной и исследовательской инженерной деятельности, принимая во внимание особенности разделения труда в инженерной профессии. Рубрики с 6-уровневой шкалой полезно использовать для оценки степени соответствия инженерных программ бакалавриата, магистратуры и аспирантуры рекомендациям стандартов CDIO, FCDI и FFCD, соответственно.

The aim of the paper is to propose Rubrics for self-evaluation of graduate and postgraduate engineering programs based on the FCDI (Forecast, Conceive, Design, Implement) Standards and FFCD (Foresight, Forecast, Conceive, Design) Standards by analogy with Rubrics for self-evaluation of undergraduate engineering programs based on the CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate) Standards. The FCDI Standards and FFCD Standards were developed for Master’s and Doctoral engineering programs as a result of the CDIO approach evolution and by analogy with the CDIO Standards originally developed for Bachelor’s engineering programs. The CDIO/FCDI/FFCD Standards are recommended for the design and implementation of three-cycle engineering programs to train graduates for complex, innovative and research engineering activities, respectively, taking into account the features of the division of labor in the engineering profession. The 6-level scale Rubrics are helpful for evaluation the degree of Bachelor’s, Master’s and Doctoral engineering programs compliance with the recommendations of the CDIO, FCDI and FFCD Standards, respectively.

инженерное образованиеCDIO БакалавриатFCDI МагистратураFFCD Аспирантурарубрики для оценки программengineering educationCDIO BachelorFCDI MasterFFCD DoctorRubrics for evaluationReferencesCrawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education, the CDIO Approach. 2nd Edition. Springer, 311 p.Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education, the CDIO Approach. 2nd Edition. Springer, 311 p.Brodeur, D.R., Crawley, E.F. (2005). Program Evaluation Aligned with the CDIO Standards. Proceedings of the ASEE-2005, Portland, Oregon.Brodeur, D.R., Crawley, E.F. (2005). Program Evaluation Aligned with the CDIO Standards. Proceedings of the ASEE-2005, Portland, Oregon.Worldwide CDIO Initiative. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/aboutWorldwide CDIO Initiative. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/aboutAntokhina J., Olenev, V., Sheynin, Y. (2016). CDIO Implementation Experience for the Masters Training at SUAI. In: Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, June 12–16, 2016, pp. 668-676. Available at: http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522166104.pdfAntokhina J., Olenev, V., Sheynin, Y. (2016). CDIO Implementation Experience for the Masters Training at SUAI. In: Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, June 12–16, 2016, pp. 668-676. Available at: http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522166104.pdfChuchalin, A.I. (2019). CDIO Standards Implementation and Further Development in Russia. In: E. Smirnova, R. Clark (Eds). Handbook of Research on Engineering Education in a Global Context, pp. 80–88. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3395-5.ch008Chuchalin, A.I. (2019). CDIO Standards Implementation and Further Development in Russia. In: E. Smirnova, R. Clark (Eds). Handbook of Research on Engineering Education in a Global Context, pp. 80–88. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3395-5.ch008Lunev, A., Zaripova, V., Petrova, I. (2013). Implementation of CDIO Initiative Approach at a Russian Regional University. In: Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9–13, 2013. USA. Available at: http://cdio.org/files/document/file/m3c3_lunev_029.pdfLunev, A., Zaripova, V., Petrova, I. (2013). Implementation of CDIO Initiative Approach at a Russian Regional University. In: Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9–13, 2013. USA. Available at: http://cdio.org/files/document/file/m3c3_lunev_029.pdfLunev, A., Fedotova, A., Rybakov, A. (2014). Complex Strategy of CDIO Initiative Implementation in a Regional Russian University. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/117/117_Paper.pdfLunev, A., Fedotova, A., Rybakov, A. (2014). Complex Strategy of CDIO Initiative Implementation in a Regional Russian University. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/117/117_Paper.pdfPetrovskaya, T. (2013). Using CDIO Concept to Develop Engineering Education in Tomsk Polytechnic University. In: Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9–13, 2013. Available at: http://cdio.org/files/document/file/m1c4_petrovskaya_089.pdfPetrovskaya, T. (2013). Using CDIO Concept to Develop Engineering Education in Tomsk Polytechnic University. In: Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9–13, 2013. Available at: http://cdio.org/files/document/file/m1c4_petrovskaya_089.pdfRebrin, O., Sholina, I., Berestova, S. (2014). Interdisciplinary Project for Bachelor Engineering Program. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/14/14_Paper.pdfRebrin, O., Sholina, I., Berestova, S. (2014). Interdisciplinary Project for Bachelor Engineering Program. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/14/14_Paper.pdfRechistov, G., Plotkin, A. (2014). Computer Engineering Educational Projects of MIPT-Intel laboratory in the Context of CDIO. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/44/44_Paper.pdfRechistov, G., Plotkin, A. (2014). Computer Engineering Educational Projects of MIPT-Intel laboratory in the Context of CDIO. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/44/44_Paper.pdfBoden, D.G., Gray, P.J. (2007). Using Rubrics to Assess the Development of CDIO Syllabus Personal and Professional Skills and Attributes at the 2.x.x Level. Global Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 117–121.Boden, D.G., Gray, P.J. (2007). Using Rubrics to Assess the Development of CDIO Syllabus Personal and Professional Skills and Attributes at the 2.x.x Level. Global Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 117–121.Kontio, J. Roslöf, J., Edström, K., Naumann, S., Hussmann, P.M., Schrey-Niemenmaa, K., Karhu, M. (2012). Improving Quality Assurance with CDIO Self-Evaluation: Experiences from a Nordic Project. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education. Vol. 2, issue 2, pp. 55-66. DOI: 10.4018/ijqaete.2012040106Kontio, J. Roslöf, J., Edström, K., Naumann, S., Hussmann, P.M., Schrey-Niemenmaa, K., Karhu, M. (2012). Improving Quality Assurance with CDIO Self-Evaluation: Experiences from a Nordic Project. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education. Vol. 2, issue 2, pp. 55-66. DOI: 10.4018/ijqaete.2012040106Muñoz, M., Martínez, C., Cárdenas, C. (2017). CDIO Standards Compliance: Monitoring Perception of Students’ Proficiency Levels. In: Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, June 18–22 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/10230Muñoz, M., Martínez, C., Cárdenas, C. (2017). CDIO Standards Compliance: Monitoring Perception of Students’ Proficiency Levels. In: Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, June 18–22 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/10230Rouvrais, S., Lassudrie, C., Ech-Chantoufi, S., Bakrim, S. (2014). Educational Program Evaluations: Rationalizing Assessment Models and Processes for Engineering Education Quality Enhancement. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/44/44_Paper.pdfRouvrais, S., Lassudrie, C., Ech-Chantoufi, S., Bakrim, S. (2014). Educational Program Evaluations: Rationalizing Assessment Models and Processes for Engineering Education Quality Enhancement. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/44/44_Paper.pdfTio, F., Kong, J., Lim, R., Teo, E. (2014). Developing and Applying Rubrics for Comprehensive Capstone Project Assessment. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/44/44_Paper.pdfTio, F., Kong, J., Lim, R., Teo, E. (2014). Developing and Applying Rubrics for Comprehensive Capstone Project Assessment. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/44/44_Paper.pdfMalmqvist, J., Edström, K., Hugo, R.A. (2017). Proposal for Introducing Optional CDIO Standards. In: Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, June 18–22 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/10230Malmqvist, J., Edström, K., Hugo, R.A. (2017). Proposal for Introducing Optional CDIO Standards. In: Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, June 18–22 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/10230Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., Kjellberg, M. (2015). A Survey of CDIO Implementation Globally – Effects on Educational Quality. In: Proceedings of 11th International CDIO Conference. Chengdu, China, June 8–11, 2015. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2015/12/12_Paper.pdfMalmqvist, J., Hugo, R., Kjellberg, M. (2015). A Survey of CDIO Implementation Globally – Effects on Educational Quality. In: Proceedings of 11th International CDIO Conference. Chengdu, China, June 8–11, 2015. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2015/12/12_Paper.pdfChuchalin, A., Daneikina, N., Fortin, C. (2016). Application of CDIO Approach to Engineering BEng, MSc and PhD Programs Design and Implementation. In: Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, June 12–16, 2016, pp. 805-814. Available at: http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522166104.pdfChuchalin, A., Daneikina, N., Fortin, C. (2016). Application of CDIO Approach to Engineering BEng, MSc and PhD Programs Design and Implementation. In: Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, June 12–16, 2016, pp. 805-814. Available at: http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522166104.pdfChuchalin, A. (2018). Evolution of the CDIO Approach: BEng, MSc and PhD level. European Journal of Engineering Education. 04 Jan. Published online. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03043797.2017.1422694Chuchalin, A. (2018). Evolution of the CDIO Approach: BEng, MSc and PhD level. European Journal of Engineering Education. 04 Jan. Published online. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03043797.2017.1422694Chuchalin, A., Barkhatova T., Kalmanovich, S. (2018). Development and Implementation of the CDIO Approach at Kuban State Technological University. In: Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazava Institute of Technology, Kanazava, Japan, June 28 – July 2 2018. DOI: doi/10.24483/2018D010001Chuchalin, A., Barkhatova T., Kalmanovich, S. (2018). Development and Implementation of the CDIO Approach at Kuban State Technological University. In: Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazava Institute of Technology, Kanazava, Japan, June 28 – July 2 2018. DOI: doi/10.24483/2018D010001Chuchalin, A. (2018). Three-cycle Engineering Education Based on the CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Triad. In: Proceedings of the 46 th SEFI Annual Conference: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence, SEFI 2018. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept 17-21 2018, pp. 682-689. Available at: https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/SEFI-Proceedings-2-October-2018.pdfChuchalin, A. (2018). Three-cycle Engineering Education Based on the CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Triad. In: Proceedings of the 46 th SEFI Annual Conference: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence, SEFI 2018. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sept 17-21 2018, pp. 682-689. Available at: https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/SEFI-Proceedings-2-October-2018.pdfBennedsen, J., Georgsson, F., Kontio, J. (2014). Evaluating the CDIO Self-Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/44/44_Paper.pdfBennedsen, J., Georgsson, F., Kontio, J. (2014). Evaluating the CDIO Self-Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, June 16–19, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2014/44/44_Paper.pdfBennedsen, J., Georgsson, F., Kontio, J. (2016). Updated Rubric for Self-Evaluation (v.2.1). In: Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, June 12–16, 2016. Available at: http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522166104.pdfBennedsen, J., Georgsson, F., Kontio, J. (2016). Updated Rubric for Self-Evaluation (v.2.1). In: Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, June 12–16, 2016. Available at: http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522166104.pdfGeorgsson, F., Kontio, J., Bennedsen, J. (2015). Improving the CDIO Self-Evaluation by Updating Self-Evaluation Rubrics. In: Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, China, June 8–11, 2015. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2015/12/12_Paper.pdfGeorgsson, F., Kontio, J., Bennedsen, J. (2015). Improving the CDIO Self-Evaluation by Updating Self-Evaluation Rubrics. In: Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, China, June 8–11, 2015. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2015/12/12_Paper.pdf

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.