vovrВысшее образование в России (Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia)Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia0869-36172072-0459Moscow Polytechnic University10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-2-33-49vovr-2631Research ArticleВЫСШЕЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ: КРИТИЧЕСКИЙ ДИСКУРСHIGHER EDUCATION: CRITICAL DISCOURSEДистанционное обучение с позиции наук об учении. Часть 1Learning Sciences Perspective on Engineering of Distance Learning. Part 1ЧошановМ. А.TchoshanovM. A.

Чошанов Мурат Аширович – PhD, проф., кафедра высшей математики и кафедра подготовки учителей

EDU612, 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968

Mourat A. Tchoshanov – PhD, Prof. of Mathematics Education at the Division of STEM Education

EDU612, 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968

mouratt@utep.eduТехасский университет в Эль ПасоСоединённые Штаты АмерикиUniversity of Texas at El PasoUnited States2021220220213023349Copyright © Чошанов М.А., 20212021Чошанов М.А.Tchoshanov M.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2631

В литературе продолжаются дискуссии о концептуальных основаниях дистанционного обучения. Учёные рассматривают различные теоретические точки зрения, включая, помимо прочего, теорию независимости и автономии, теорию индустриализации и теорию взаимодействия и коммуникации, через призму традиционного подхода к теории обучения. Отсутствует обсуждение потенциальной роли недавно появившейся области – науки об учении (Learning Sciences) – в формировании теории дистанционного обучения. Таким образом, в этой статье мы предлагаем теоретический анализ направления наук об учении как нового подхода к пониманию дистанционного обучения в эпоху информационных и коммуникационных технологий (ИКТ). Эта инновационная область, изучающая преподавание и учение, включает, среди прочих, несколько дисциплин, таких как когнитивная наука, педагогическая психология, антропология, информатика и многие другие. Основная цель Learning Sciences – изучение и разработка эффективной обучающей среды, включая дистанционное обучение, на основе последних данных о процессах, связанных с тем, как человек познаёт и учится.

There is an on-going debate in the literature on theoretical underpinnings of distance learning. Scholars consider different theoretical perspectives including but not limited to theory of independence and autonomy, theory of industrialization, and theory of interaction and communication through the lens of a traditional Learning Theory approach. There is a lack of discussion on a potential role of a newly emerging field of Learning Sciences in framing the theory of distance learning. Thus, in this paper we provide a theoretical analysis of the Learning Sciences as a new approach to understand distance learning in the era of Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Learning sciences is an interdisciplinary field that studies teaching and learning. This emerging innovative field includes but is not limited to multiple disciplines such as cognitive science, educational psychology, anthropology, computer science, to name a few. The Learning Sciences’ major objective is to understand and design effective learning environments, including distance learning, based on the latest findings about the processes involved in human learning.

дистанционное обучениенауки об ученииконструктивизмконструкционизмконнективизмDistance learningLearning sciencesConstructivismConstructionismConnectivism‘Engineering of learning’ paradigmReferencesHerek, G. (1995). Developing a Theoretical Framework and Rationale for a Research Proposal. In: Pequegnat, W., Stover, E. (Eds.). How to Write a Successful Research Grant Application: A Guide for Social and Behavioral Scientists. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, pp. 85-91.Herek, G. (1995). Developing a Theoretical Framework and Rationale for a Research Proposal. In: Pequegnat, W., Stover, E. (Eds.). How to Write a Successful Research Grant Application: A Guide for Social and Behavioral Scientists. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, pp. 85-91.Anderson, T., Dron, J. (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 88-97, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890Anderson, T., Dron, J. (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 88-97, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3-10. Available at: https://jotamac.typepad.com/jotamacs_weblog/files/Connectivism.pdf (accessed 07.01.21).Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3-10. Available at: https://jotamac.typepad.com/jotamacs_weblog/files/Connectivism.pdf (accessed 07.01.21).Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., Zvacek, S. (2006). Teaching and Learning at a Distance (3rd edition ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 241 p.Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., Zvacek, S. (2006). Teaching and Learning at a Distance (3rd edition ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 241 p.Gunawardena, C.N., McIsaac, M.S. (2003). Distance education. In: Jonassen, D. (Ed.). Handbook for Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Simon and Schuster, pp. 355-396.Gunawardena, C.N., McIsaac, M.S. (2003). Distance education. In: Jonassen, D. (Ed.). Handbook for Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Simon and Schuster, pp. 355-396.Peters, O. (2001). Learning and Teaching in Distance Education. Analysis and Interpretations from an International Perspective. London: Kogan Page, 268 p.Peters, O. (2001). Learning and Teaching in Distance Education. Analysis and Interpretations from an International Perspective. London: Kogan Page, 268 p.Holmberg, B. (1987). The development of distance education research. The American Journal of Distance Education. Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 16-23. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/139179/ (accessed 07.01.21).Holmberg, B. (1987). The development of distance education research. The American Journal of Distance Education. Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 16-23. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/139179/ (accessed 07.01.21).Clark, R.C., Mayer, R.E. (2003). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 322 p.Clark, R.C., Mayer, R.E. (2003). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 322 p.Sapunov, M.B., Polonnikov, A.A. (2018). Academic Subject Problem: Epistemological Crisis and Its Overcoming. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 144-157, doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-12-144-157 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Sapunov, M.B., Polonnikov, A.A. (2018). Academic Subject Problem: Epistemological Crisis and Its Overcoming. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 144-157, doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-12-144-157 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Babaeva, M.A., Golubev, E.B. (2020). «Talgenism» in the Digital Age: A Domestic History of cMOOC. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 8-9, pp. 71-84, doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-8-9-71-84 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Babaeva, M.A., Golubev, E.B. (2020). «Talgenism» in the Digital Age: A Domestic History of cMOOC. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 8-9, pp. 71-84, doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-8-9-71-84 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Sawyer, K. (Ed.) (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 648 p.Sawyer, K. (Ed.) (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 648 p.Bransford, J., Brown, A., Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 206-230. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223290/ (accessed 07.01.21).Bransford, J., Brown, A., Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 206-230. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223290/ (accessed 07.01.21).Donovan, M., Bransford, J. (2005). How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom. National Research Council Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 336 p.Donovan, M., Bransford, J. (2005). How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom. National Research Council Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 336 p.Valverde, Y., Tchoshanov, M. (2013). Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Disposition Toward Challenge and its Effect on Teaching Practice and Student Performance. Kazanskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal = Kazan Pedagogical Journal. Vol. 3, pp. 25-33. Available at: https://kp-journal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2013-3.pdf (accessed 07.01.21).Valverde, Y., Tchoshanov, M. (2013). Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Disposition Toward Challenge and its Effect on Teaching Practice and Student Performance. Kazanskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal = Kazan Pedagogical Journal. Vol. 3, pp. 25-33. Available at: https://kp-journal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2013-3.pdf (accessed 07.01.21).Bruer, J. (1993). Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 336 p.Bruer, J. (1993). Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 336 p.Caine, R., Caine G. (1994). Making Connections. Teaching and the Human Brain. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.Caine, R., Caine G. (1994). Making Connections. Teaching and the Human Brain. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.Chabris, C., Kosslyn, S. (1998). How Do the Cerebral Hemispheres Contribute to Encoding Spatial Relations? Current Directions in Psychology. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 8-14, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11521809Chabris, C., Kosslyn, S. (1998). How Do the Cerebral Hemispheres Contribute to Encoding Spatial Relations? Current Directions in Psychology. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 8-14, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11521809Dehaene, S. (1996). The Organization of Brain Activations in Number Comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47-68, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.1.47Dehaene, S. (1996). The Organization of Brain Activations in Number Comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47-68, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.1.47Posner, M., Raichle, M. (1994). Images of Mind. N.Y.: Scientific American Library, 257 p.Posner, M., Raichle, M. (1994). Images of Mind. N.Y.: Scientific American Library, 257 p.Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the Brain in Mind. 2nd edition. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 187 p.Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the Brain in Mind. 2nd edition. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 187 p.Sousa, D. (1995). How the Brain Learns: A Classroom Teacher’s Guide. Reston, VA: NASSP, 143 p.Sousa, D. (1995). How the Brain Learns: A Classroom Teacher’s Guide. Reston, VA: NASSP, 143 p.Springer, S., Deutsch G. (1993). Left Brain, Right Brain. N.Y.: W.H. Freeman, 368 p.Springer, S., Deutsch G. (1993). Left Brain, Right Brain. N.Y.: W.H. Freeman, 368 p.Sylwester, R. (1995). A Celebration of Neurons. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 167 p.Sylwester, R. (1995). A Celebration of Neurons. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 167 p.Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 176 p.Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 176 p.Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., Norman, M.K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 301 p. Available at: https://firstliteracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/How-LearningWorks.pdf (accessed 07.01.21).Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., Norman, M.K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 301 p. Available at: https://firstliteracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/How-LearningWorks.pdf (accessed 07.01.21).Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N. (2005). A Region or Proximal of Learning Model of Study Time Allocation. Journal of Memory and Language. Vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 463-477, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.001Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N. (2005). A Region or Proximal of Learning Model of Study Time Allocation. Journal of Memory and Language. Vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 463-477, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.001Wolfe, P., Brandt R. (1998). What Do We Know from Brain Research? Educational Leadership. vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 8-13. Available at: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov98/vol56/num03/What-Do-We-Knowfrom-Brain-Research%C2%A2.aspx (accessed 07.01.21).Wolfe, P., Brandt R. (1998). What Do We Know from Brain Research? Educational Leadership. vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 8-13. Available at: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov98/vol56/num03/What-Do-We-Knowfrom-Brain-Research%C2%A2.aspx (accessed 07.01.21).Harp, S.F., Mayer, R.E. (1998). How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 414-434, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414Harp, S.F., Mayer, R.E. (1998). How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 414-434, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414Mautone, P.D., Mayer, R.E. (2001). Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 377-389, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.377Mautone, P.D., Mayer, R.E. (2001). Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 377-389, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.377Mayer, R.E. (2010). Applying the Science of Learning. Boston, MA: Pearson. 144 p.Mayer, R.E. (2010). Applying the Science of Learning. Boston, MA: Pearson. 144 p.Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., Sweller, J. (2001). When Problem Solving is Superior to Studying Worked Examples. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 579–588, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.579Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., Sweller, J. (2001). When Problem Solving is Superior to Studying Worked Examples. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 579–588, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.579Rouet, J. (2006). The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 248 p.Rouet, J. (2006). The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 248 p.Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., Coulson, R.C. (1991). Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains. Educational Technology. Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 24-33. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/44427517 (accessed 07.01.21).Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., Coulson, R.C. (1991). Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains. Educational Technology. Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 24-33. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/44427517 (accessed 07.01.21).Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher. Vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 354-379, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X09339057Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher. Vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 354-379, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X09339057Karau, S., Williams, K. (1993). Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 65, pp. 681-706, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681Karau, S., Williams, K. (1993). Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 65, pp. 681-706, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681Hodara, M. (2011). Reforming Mathematics Classroom Pedagogy: Evidence-Based Findings and Recommendations for the Developmental Math Classroom. Community College Research Center, New York, NY. Working Paper No. 27. Available at: https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/reforming-mathematicsclassroom-pedagogy.pdf (accessed 07.01.21).Hodara, M. (2011). Reforming Mathematics Classroom Pedagogy: Evidence-Based Findings and Recommendations for the Developmental Math Classroom. Community College Research Center, New York, NY. Working Paper No. 27. Available at: https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/reforming-mathematicsclassroom-pedagogy.pdf (accessed 07.01.21).Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist. Vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 43-52. Available at: https://faculty.washington.edu/farkas/WDFR/MayerMoreno9WaysToReduceCognitiveLoad.pdf (accessed 07.01.21).Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist. Vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 43-52. Available at: https://faculty.washington.edu/farkas/WDFR/MayerMoreno9WaysToReduceCognitiveLoad.pdf (accessed 07.01.21).Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M. (1985). Cognitive Coping Strategies and the Problem of “Inert Knowledge”. In: Chipman, S.F., Segal, J.W., Glaser, R. (Eds.). Thinking and Learning Skills. Vol. 2. Current research and open questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 65-80.Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M. (1985). Cognitive Coping Strategies and the Problem of “Inert Knowledge”. In: Chipman, S.F., Segal, J.W., Glaser, R. (Eds.). Thinking and Learning Skills. Vol. 2. Current research and open questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 65-80.Bjork, R.A. (1988). Retrieval Practice and Maintenance of Knowledge. In: Gruneberg, M.M., Morris, P.E., & Sykes, R.N. (Eds.). Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues. Vol. 1. NY: Wiley, pp. 396-401.Bjork, R.A. (1988). Retrieval Practice and Maintenance of Knowledge. In: Gruneberg, M.M., Morris, P.E., & Sykes, R.N. (Eds.). Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues. Vol. 1. NY: Wiley, pp. 396-401.Chinn, C.A., & Brewer, W.F. (1998). An Empirical Test of a Taxonomy of Responses to Anomalous Data in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 623-654, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6%3C623::AID-TEA3%3E3.0.CO;2-OChinn, C.A., & Brewer, W.F. (1998). An Empirical Test of a Taxonomy of Responses to Anomalous Data in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 623-654, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6%3C623::AID-TEA3%3E3.0.CO;2-OEryilmaz, A. (2002). Effects of Conceptual Assignments and Conceptual Change Discussions on Students’ Misconceptions and Achievement Regarding Force and Motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1001- 1015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10054Eryilmaz, A. (2002). Effects of Conceptual Assignments and Conceptual Change Discussions on Students’ Misconceptions and Achievement Regarding Force and Motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1001- 1015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10054Guzzetti, B. J. (2000). Learning Counter-Intuitive Science Concepts: What Have We Learned from over a Decade of Research? Reading & Writing Quarterly. Vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 89-98, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/105735600277971Guzzetti, B. J. (2000). Learning Counter-Intuitive Science Concepts: What Have We Learned from over a Decade of Research? Reading & Writing Quarterly. Vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 89-98, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/105735600277971Hynd, C.R. (2001). Refutational Texts and the Change Process. International Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 35, no. 7-8, pp. 699-714, doi: 10.1016/s0883-0355(02)00010-1Hynd, C.R. (2001). Refutational Texts and the Change Process. International Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 35, no. 7-8, pp. 699-714, doi: 10.1016/s0883-0355(02)00010-1Salden, R., Alaven, V., Renkl, A., Schwonke, R. (2009). Worked Examples and Tutored Problem Solving: Redundant or Synergistic Forms of Support? Topics in Cognitive Science. Vol. 1, pp. 203-213, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01011.xSalden, R., Alaven, V., Renkl, A., Schwonke, R. (2009). Worked Examples and Tutored Problem Solving: Redundant or Synergistic Forms of Support? Topics in Cognitive Science. Vol. 1, pp. 203-213, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01011.xSchworm, S., Renkl, A. (2002). Learning by Solved Example Problems: Instructional Explanations Reduce Self-Explanation Activity. In: Gray, W.D. Schunn, C.D. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 816-821.Schworm, S., Renkl, A. (2002). Learning by Solved Example Problems: Instructional Explanations Reduce Self-Explanation Activity. In: Gray, W.D. Schunn, C.D. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 816-821.Trafton, J.G., Reiser, B.J. (1993). The Contributions of Studying Examples and Solving Problems to Skill Acquisition. In: Polson, M. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1017-1022.Trafton, J.G., Reiser, B.J. (1993). The Contributions of Studying Examples and Solving Problems to Skill Acquisition. In: Polson, M. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1017-1022.Craig, S.D., Sullins, J., Witherspoon, A., Gholson, B. (2006). The Deep-Level-Reasoning-Question Effect: The Role of Dialogue and Deep-LevelReasoning Questions During Vicarious Learning. Cognition and Instruction, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 565-591, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s1532690xci2404_4Craig, S.D., Sullins, J., Witherspoon, A., Gholson, B. (2006). The Deep-Level-Reasoning-Question Effect: The Role of Dialogue and Deep-LevelReasoning Questions During Vicarious Learning. Cognition and Instruction, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 565-591, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s1532690xci2404_4Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K. (1994). Question Asking During Tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, vol. 31, no. 1, pp.104-137, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/1163269Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K. (1994). Question Asking During Tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, vol. 31, no. 1, pp.104-137, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/1163269Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V.E., Martin, V., King, A., Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging Mindful Use of Prior Knowledge: Attempting to Construct Explanatory Answers Facilitates Learning. Educational Psychologist. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 91-109, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_7Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V.E., Martin, V., King, A., Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging Mindful Use of Prior Knowledge: Attempting to Construct Explanatory Answers Facilitates Learning. Educational Psychologist. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 91-109, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_7Arum, R., Roksa, J. (2011). Limited Learning on College Campuses. Society. Vol. 48, 203, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-011-9417-8Arum, R., Roksa, J. (2011). Limited Learning on College Campuses. Society. Vol. 48, 203, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-011-9417-8Butler, A.C., Roediger, H.L. (2007). Testing Improves Long-Term Retention in a Simulated Classroom Setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. Vol. 19, no. 4-5, pp. 514–527, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326097Butler, A.C., Roediger, H.L. (2007). Testing Improves Long-Term Retention in a Simulated Classroom Setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. Vol. 19, no. 4-5, pp. 514–527, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326097Dempster, F.N. (1997). Distributing and Managing the Conditions of Encoding and Practice. In: Bjork, E.L. Bjork, R.A. (Eds.). Human Memory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 197-236.Dempster, F.N. (1997). Distributing and Managing the Conditions of Encoding and Practice. In: Bjork, E.L. Bjork, R.A. (Eds.). Human Memory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 197-236.Pyc, M.A., Rawson, K.A. (2010). Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis. Science. Vol. 330, issue 6002, p. 335, doi: 10.1126/science.1191465Pyc, M.A., Rawson, K.A. (2010). Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis. Science. Vol. 330, issue 6002, p. 335, doi: 10.1126/science.1191465Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 152 p.Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 152 p.Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C. (1988). Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning. Review of Educational Research. Vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 79-97, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543058001079Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C. (1988). Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning. Review of Educational Research. Vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 79-97, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543058001079Williams, L. (1983). Teaching for the Two-Sided Mind. A Guide for Right Brain/Left Brain Education. N.Y.: A Touchstone Book, 213 p.Williams, L. (1983). Teaching for the Two-Sided Mind. A Guide for Right Brain/Left Brain Education. N.Y.: A Touchstone Book, 213 p.Savinainen, A., Scott, P. (2002). The Force Concept Inventory: A Tool for Monitoring Student Learning. Physics Education. Vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 45-52, doi: https://www.per-central.org/items/Load.cfm?ID=2865Savinainen, A., Scott, P. (2002). The Force Concept Inventory: A Tool for Monitoring Student Learning. Physics Education. Vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 45-52, doi: https://www.per-central.org/items/Load.cfm?ID=2865American Psychological Association. (2011). Modules for Teachers: How Do I Get My Students over Their Alternative Conceptions (Misconceptions) for Learning. Available at: http://apa.org/education/k12/misconceptions.aspx (accessed 08.01.21).American Psychological Association. (2011). Modules for Teachers: How Do I Get My Students over Their Alternative Conceptions (Misconceptions) for Learning. Available at: http://apa.org/education/k12/misconceptions.aspx (accessed 08.01.21).Ainsworth, S., Loizou, A.T. (2003). The Effects of Self-Explaining When Learning with Texts or Diagrams. Cognitive Science. Vol. 27, pp. 669-681, doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00033-8Ainsworth, S., Loizou, A.T. (2003). The Effects of Self-Explaining When Learning with Texts or Diagrams. Cognitive Science. Vol. 27, pp. 669-681, doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00033-8Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., Glaser, R. (1989). Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 145-182, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(89)90002-5Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., Glaser, R. (1989). Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 145-182, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(89)90002-5De Bruin, A., Rikers, R., Schmidt, H. (2007). The Effect of Self-Explanation and Prediction on the Development of Principled Understanding of Chess in Novices. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 188-205, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006. 01.001De Bruin, A., Rikers, R., Schmidt, H. (2007). The Effect of Self-Explanation and Prediction on the Development of Principled Understanding of Chess in Novices. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 188-205, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006. 01.001Griffin, T.D., Wiley, J., Thiede, K.W. (2008). Individual Difference, Rereading, and SelfExplanation: Concurrent Processing and Cue Validity as Constraints on Metacomprehension Accuracy. Memory & Cognition. Vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 93-103, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3758/MC.36.1.93Griffin, T.D., Wiley, J., Thiede, K.W. (2008). Individual Difference, Rereading, and SelfExplanation: Concurrent Processing and Cue Validity as Constraints on Metacomprehension Accuracy. Memory & Cognition. Vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 93-103, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3758/MC.36.1.93Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.H. (2008). Tutor Learning: The Role of Explaining and Responding to Questions. Instructional Science. Vol. 36, pp. 321-350, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9034-5Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.H. (2008). Tutor Learning: The Role of Explaining and Responding to Questions. Instructional Science. Vol. 36, pp. 321-350, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9034-5Blerkom, M.L., Blerkom, D.L. (2004). Self-Monitoring Strategies Used by Developmental and Non-Developmental College Students. Journal of College Reading and Learning. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 45-60, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2004.10850161Blerkom, M.L., Blerkom, D.L. (2004). Self-Monitoring Strategies Used by Developmental and Non-Developmental College Students. Journal of College Reading and Learning. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 45-60, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2004.10850161Brown, D., Frank, A.R. (1990). “Let Me Do It”: Self-Monitoring in Solving Arithmetic Problems. Education & Treatment of Children. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 239-248.Brown, D., Frank, A.R. (1990). “Let Me Do It”: Self-Monitoring in Solving Arithmetic Problems. Education & Treatment of Children. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 239-248.Chang, M. (2007). Enhancing Web-Based Language Learning through Self-Monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 187-196, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00203.xChang, M. (2007). Enhancing Web-Based Language Learning through Self-Monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 187-196, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00203.xZimmerman, B.J. (2001). Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis. In: Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H. (Eds.). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1-38.Zimmerman, B.J. (2001). Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis. In: Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H. (Eds.). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1-38.Smith, S.M., Vela, E. (2001). Environmental Context-Dependent Memory: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Vol. 8, pp. 203-220, doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157Smith, S.M., Vela, E. (2001). Environmental Context-Dependent Memory: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Vol. 8, pp. 203-220, doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157Rohrer, D. (2009). The Effects of Spacing and Mixing Practice Problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Vol. 40, pp. 4-17. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40539318 (accessed 08.01.2021).Rohrer, D. (2009). The Effects of Spacing and Mixing Practice Problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Vol. 40, pp. 4-17. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40539318 (accessed 08.01.2021).Capeda, N.J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J.T., Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention. Psychological Science. Vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1095- 1102, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9280.2008.02209.xCapeda, N.J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J.T., Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention. Psychological Science. Vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1095- 1102, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9280.2008.02209.xKornell, N. (2009). Optimising Learning Using Flashcards: Spacing Is More Effective Than Cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 23, pp. 1297-1317, doi: 10.1002/acp.1537Kornell, N. (2009). Optimising Learning Using Flashcards: Spacing Is More Effective Than Cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 23, pp. 1297-1317, doi: 10.1002/acp.1537Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., Tescher-Romer, C. (2003). The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. Psychological Review. Vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 363-406, Available at: https://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/freakonomics/pdf/DeliberatePractice(PsychologicalReview).pdf (accessed 08.01.2021).Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., Tescher-Romer, C. (2003). The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. Psychological Review. Vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 363-406, Available at: https://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/freakonomics/pdf/DeliberatePractice(PsychologicalReview).pdf (accessed 08.01.2021).Rothkopf, E.Z., Billington, M.J. (1979). GoalGuided Learning from Text: Inferring a Descriptive Processing Model from Inspection Times and Eye Movements. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 310-327, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.71.3.310Rothkopf, E.Z., Billington, M.J. (1979). GoalGuided Learning from Text: Inferring a Descriptive Processing Model from Inspection Times and Eye Movements. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 310-327, doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.71.3.310Szupnar, K.K., McDermott, K.B., Roediger, H.L. (2007). Expectation of a Final Cumulative Test Enhances Long-Term Retention. Memory & Cognition. Vol. 35, pp. 1007-1013, doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193473Szupnar, K.K., McDermott, K.B., Roediger, H.L. (2007). Expectation of a Final Cumulative Test Enhances Long-Term Retention. Memory & Cognition. Vol. 35, pp. 1007-1013, doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193473Tchoshanov, M. (2013). Engineering of Learning: Conceptualizing e-Didactics. Moscow: UNESCO IITE. 192 p.Tchoshanov, M. (2013). Engineering of Learning: Conceptualizing e-Didactics. Moscow: UNESCO IITE. 192 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.