<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vovr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Высшее образование в России  (Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia)</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii  = Higher Education in Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0869-3617</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2072-0459</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Moscow Polytechnic University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-10-108-116</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vovr-3033</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ И ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND EDUCATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Философия образования и история философии: трансформация диалога педагогов и философов в XXI в.</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Philosophy of Education and History of Philosophy: Transformation of the Dialogue between Educators and Philosophers in the 21st Century</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-3652</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Власова</surname><given-names>О. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Vlasova</surname><given-names>O. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Власова Ольга Александровна – доктор философских наук, доцент, профессор кафедры истории философии</p><p>199034, Санкт-Петербург, Университетская наб., 7-9 </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Olga A. Vlasova – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Department of History of Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy</p><p>7-9, Universitetskaya emb., St. Petersburg, 199034</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">o.a.vlasova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Saint-Petersburg State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>10</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>30</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>108</fpage><lpage>116</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Власова О.А., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Власова О.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Vlasova O.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3033">https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3033</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья исследует проблему трансформации диалога педагогов и философов (в рамках научного диалога философии образования и истории философии) в XXI в. Работа реализует перспективистский подход, исследуя междисциплинарное поле философии образования и истории философии с позиции актора науки в измерении диалога педагогов и философов. Источниковым материалом исследования служат научные публикации 1990–2021 гг. в специализированных изданиях. В ходе исследования обоснован авторский подход к исследованию актуального состояния и дискуссий философии образования в перспективе диалога педагогов и историков философии. Обобщены особенности трансформации поля философии образования в 1990–2021 гг., выделены периоды изменения диалога философии образования и истории философии, общие направления современных дискуссий. Продемонстрировано, что в современных исследованиях диалог педагогов и историков философии происходит на всех уровнях философии образования: уровне методологии, практических наработок мыслителей прошлого, культурного, социального, ценностного контекста. Роль историка философии при этом состоит в углублении критики и интерпретации педагогического дискурса прошлого в ответ на конкретный запрос специалистов-педагогов, в прояснении отдельных аспектов философии и контекстуализации их в рамках образования. Сделан вывод о том, что исследование современной ситуации философии образования, её дискуссий, историко-философского пласта её современной проблематики не только показывает современное состояние педагогического дискурса, но и указывает на сохраняющуюся актуальность исследования философии прошлого и важность работы историка философии для специалистов других отраслей гуманитарных наук.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper examines the problem of transformation of the dialogue between educators and philosophers (within the framework of the scientific dialogue between the philosophy of education and the history of philosophy) in the 21st century. The work implements a perspectivist approach, exploring the interdisciplinary field of philosophy of education and history of philosophy from the position of an actor of science in measuring the dialogue between educators and philosophers. Monographs and scientific papers of 1990–2021 serve as a source material for the study. In the course of the study, the author’s approach to the study of the current state and discussions of the philosophy of education in the perspective of the dialogue between teachers and historians of philosophy has been substantiated. The article generalizes the features of the transformation of the field of philosophy of education in 1990–2021, identifies the periods of change in the dialogue between the philosophy of education and the history of philosophy, highlights the general directions of modern discussions. It is demonstrated that in modern research the dialogue between educators and historians of philosophy occurs at all levels of philosophy of education: the level of methodology; practical developments of thinkers of the past; cultural, social, value context. At the same time, the role of the historian of philosophy is to deepen criticism and interpretation of the pedagogical discourse of the past in response to a specific request from specialist educators, in clarifying certain aspects of philosophy and contextualizing them within the framework of the situation of education. The article shows the importance of studying the historical and philosophical layer of modern problems, indicates the continuing relevance of the study of the philosophy of the past and the work of the historian of philosophy for specialists in various branches of the humanities.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>история философии</kwd><kwd>философия образования</kwd><kwd>междисциплинарные дискуссии</kwd><kwd>педагогический дискурс</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>history of philosophy</kwd><kwd>philosophy of education</kwd><kwd>interdisciplinary discussions</kwd><kwd>pedagogical discourse</kwd><kwd>historian of philosophy</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено за счёт гранта Российского научного фонда (проект № 17–18–01440 «Антропологическое измерение истории философии»)</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project 17-18-01440 (“Anthropological dimension of the History of Philosophy”)</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Закутнов О.И., Чижма Н.В. История философии образования в мировой практике и России // Астраханский вестник экологического образования. 2015. № 2 (32). С. 156–161.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zakutnov, O.I., Chizhma, N.V. (2015). History of the Philosophy of Education in World Practice and in Russia. Astrakhanskii vestnik ekologicheskogo obrazovaniya = Astrakhan Bulletin of Environmental Education. No. 2 (32), pp. 156-161. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бибикова Л.В. Из истории философии образования // Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. 2011. № 1. С. 39–41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bibikova, L.V. (2011). From the History of Philosophy of Education. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Art History. Questions of Theory and Practice. No. 1, pp. 39-41. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лапшина В.С. Философия образования: на пути к формированию новой области знаний // Философия и общество. 2013. № 4. С. 135–147.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lapshina, V.S. (2013). Philosophy of Education: On the Way to the Formation of a New Field of Knowledge. Filosofiya i obshchestvo = Philosophy and Society. No. 4, pp. 135-147. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Базалук О.А. Современное понимание философии образования // Философская мысль. 2015. № 4. С. 248–271. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2015.4.15321</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bazaluk, O.A. (2015). Modern Understanding of the Philosophy of Education. Filosofskaya mysl’ = Philosophical Thought. Vol. 4, pp. 248-271, doi: 10.7256/2409-8728.2015.4.15321 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Power E.J. Educational Philosophy: A History from the Ancient World to Modern America. Taylor &amp; Francis, 1996. 242 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Power, E.J. (1996). Educational Philosophy: A History from the Ancient World to Modern America. Taylor &amp; Francis, 242 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rorty A. Philosophers on Education: Historical Perspective. London : Routledge, 1998. 480 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rorty, A. (Ed.) (1998). Philosophers on Education: Historical Perspective. London : Routledge, 480 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Murphy M. The History and Philosophy of Education: Voices of Educational Pioneers. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall, 2006. 402 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Murphy, M. (2006). The History and Philosophy of Education: Voices of Educational Pioneers. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall, 402 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">A Companion to the Philosophy of Education / Ed. by R. Curren. New York : Wiley, 2008. 656 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Curren, R. (2008). A Companion to the Philosophy of Education. New York : Wiley, 656 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Allen A., Goddard R. Education and Philosophy: An Introduction. London; New York : Sage, 2017. 240 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Allen, A., Goddard, R. (2017) Education and Philosophy: An Introduction. London; New York : Sage, 240 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Philosophy East-West: Exploring Intersections Between Educational and Contemplative Practices // Ed. by O. Ergas, Sh. Todd. West Sussex, UK : Wiley, Blackwell, 2016. 198 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ergas, O., Todd, Sh. (Eds.) (2016). Philosophy East-West: Exploring Intersections Between Educational and Contemplative Practices. West Sussex, UK : Wiley, Blackwell, 198 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hoyt M. Engaging Bodhisattva Compassion in Pedagogical Aporias // Paideusis. 2014. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 24–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1071563ar</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hoyt, M. (2014). Engaging Bodhisattva Compassion in Pedagogical Aporias. Paideusis. 2014. Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 24-31, doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/1071563ar</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blom R., Lu Ch. Contextualising Postmodernity in Daoist Symbolism: Toward a mindful education embracing eastern wisdom // Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2016. Vol. 48. No. 12. P. 1266–1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1190266</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blom, R., Lu, Ch. (2016). Contextualising Postmodernity in Daoist Symbolism: Toward a Mindful Education Embracing Eastern Wisdom. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 1266-1283, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1190266</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kristjánsson K. Aristotle, emotions, and education. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, VT : Ashgate, 2007. 194 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kristjánsson, K. (2007). Aristotle, Emotions, and Education. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, VT : Ashgate, 194 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caranfa A. Socrates, Augustine, and Paul Gauguin on the Reciprocity between Speech and Silence in Education // Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2013. Vol. 47. No. 3. P. 577–604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12042</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caranfa, A. (2013). Socrates, Augustine, and Paul Gauguin on the Reciprocity between Speech and Silence in Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education. Vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 577-604, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12042</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Besley A.C. Philosophy, Education and the Corruption of Youth – From Socrates to Islamic Extremists // Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2013. Vol. 45. No. 1. P. 6–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00790.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Besley, A.C. (2013). Philosophy, Education and the Corruption of Youth – From Socrates to Islamic Extremists. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 6-19, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00790.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gill N. Educational Philosophy in the French Enlightenment: From Nature to Second Nature. London : Routledge, 2010. 314 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gill, N. (2010). Educational Philosophy in the French Enlightenment: From Nature to Second Nature. London : Routledge, 314 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дьяков А.В. Феномен французского Просвещения как диалектическое единство образовательной дидактической практики и философской теории // Science for Education Today. 2020. № 4. С. 125–137. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2004.08</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dyakov, A.V. (2020). The Phenomenon of the French Enlightenment as a Dialectical Unity of Didactic Practice and Philosophical Theory. Science for Education Today. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 125-137, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2004.08 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schapira M. Kant versus the Managers: Historical Reconstruction and the Modern University // Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2019. Vol. 53. No. 1. P. 111–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12316</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schapira, M. (2019) Kant Versus the Managers: Historical Reconstruction and the Modern University. Journal of Philosophy of Education. Vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 111-126, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12316</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Munzel G.F. Kant’s Conception of Pedagogy. Toward Education for Freedom. Evanston, Illinois : Northwestern University Press, 2012. 438 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Munzel, G.F. (2012). Kant’s Conception of Pedagogy. Toward Education for Freedom. Evanston, Illinois : Northwestern University Press, 438 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hodge S. Martin Heidegger: Challenge to Education. Cham : Springer, 2015. 113 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hodge, S. (2012). Martin Heidegger: Challenge to Education. Cham : Springer, 113 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Koskela J., Siljander P. What is Existential Educational Encounter? // Paideusis. 2014. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 71– 80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1071567ar</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koskela, J., Siljander, P. (2014). What is Existential Educational Encounter? Paideusis. Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 71-80, doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/1071567ar</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roder J., Naughton Ch. Heidegger’s Reinscription of Paideia in the Context of Online Learning // Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2015. Vol. 47. No. 9. P. 949–957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1047166</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roder,J., Naughton, Ch. (2015) Heidegger’s Reinscription of Paideia in the Context of Online Learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 949-957, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1047166</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zembylas M. On the Unrepresentability of Affect in Lyotard’s Work: Towards Pedagogies of Ineffability // Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2020. Vol. 52. No. 2. P. 180–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1619172</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zembylas, M. (2020). On the Unrepresentability of Affect in Lyotard’s Work: Towards Pedagogies of Ineffability. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 180-191, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1619172</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewis T.E. On Study: Giorgio Agamben and Educational Potentiality. New York : Routledge, 2013. 174 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewis, T.E. (2013). On Study: Giorgio Agamben and Educational Potentiality. New York : Routledge, 174 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bingham Ch., Biesta G. Jacques Rancière: Education, Truth, Emancipation. London; New York : Continuum, 2010. 170 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bingham, Ch., Biesta, G. (2010). Jacques Rancière: Education, Truth, Emancipation. London; New York : Continuum, 170 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deleuze and Education / Ed. by I. Semetsky. Edinburg : Edinburgh University Press, 2013. 288 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Semetsky, I. (Ed.) (2013). Deleuze and Education. Edinburg : Edinburgh University Press, 288 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raaen F.D. Autonomy, Candour and Professional Teacher Practice: A Discussion Inspired by the Later Works of Michel Foucault // Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2011. Vol. 45. No. 4. P. 627–641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00824.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raaen, F.D. (2011). Autonomy, Candour and Professional Teacher Practice: A Discussion Inspired by the Later Works of Michel Foucault. Journal of Philosophy of Education. Vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 627-641, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00824.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Why Foucault? New Directions in Educational Research / Ed. by M.A. Peters, T. Besley. New York : Peter Lang, 2007. 243 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Peters, M.A., Besley, T. (Eds.) (2007). Why Foucault? New Directions in Educational Research. New York : Peter Lang, 243 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schwimmer M. Poststructuralisme et éducation: l’apport de Foucault et Derrida // Philosophical Inquiry in Education. 2017. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 159– 170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1070603ar</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schwimmer, M. (2017). Poststructuralisme et éducation: l’apport de Foucault et Derrida. Philosophical Inquiry in Education. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 159-170, doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/1070603ar</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Власова О.А. Статус истории философии в общегуманитарном поле и университетской системе: перспектива самосознания // Science for Education Today. 2019. Т. 9. №4. С. 93–105. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1904.06</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vlasova, O.A. (2019). The Status of the History of Philosophy in the Humanitarian Field and the University System: The Perspective of Self-Consciousness. Science for Education Today. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 93-105, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1904.06 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
