vovrВысшее образование в России (Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia)Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia0869-36172072-0459Moscow Polytechnic University10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-2-149-166vovr-4224Research ArticleИНЖЕНЕРНАЯ ПЕДАГОГИКАENGINEERING PEDAGOGYАдаптация или деградация: что происходит с образовательной инновацией в условиях типового образовательного процесса?Adaptation or Degradation: What’s Happen to Educational Innovation in a Typical Educational Process?https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9539-5011ИсаевА. П.IsaevA. P.

Исаев Александр Петрович – д-р эконом. наук, доцент, профессор кафедры «Системыуправления энергетикой и промышленными предприятиями»

Scopus ID: 56027986200

Alexandеr P. Isaev – Dr. Sci. (Economic), Professor of the “System energy management and industrial enterprises” Department

Scopus ID: 56027986200

ap_isaev@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-3607ПлотниковЛ. В.PlotnikovL. V.

Плотников Леонид Валерьевич – д-р техн. наук, доцент, профессор кафедры «Турбины и двигатели»

Scopus ID: 56993595200

620002, Екатеринбург, ул. Мира, 19

Leonid V. Plotnikov – Dr. Sci. (Technical), Professor of the “Turbines and engines” Department

Scopus ID: 56993595200

19, Mira str., Ekaterinburg, 620002

leonplot@mail.ruУральский федеральный университет имени первого Президента России Б. Н. Ельцина (УрФУ)РоссияUral Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. YeltsinRussian Federation202321022023322149166Copyright © Исаев А.П., Плотников Л.В., 20232023Исаев А.П., Плотников Л.В.Isaev A.P., Plotnikov L.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4224

Статья посвящена изучению процессов трансформации инновационной технологии обучения в условиях типового образовательного процесса. Исследование проведено на примере технологии сквозного проектирования, разработанной на основе методологии CDIO в соответствии с её стандартами, для бакалавриата по технических направлениям подготовки. В исследовании использовались методы экспертной оценки, письменного опроса, контент-анализа, структурно-логического и статистического анализа. В качестве экспертов выступали инженеры конструкторских подразделений промышленных предприятий, преподаватели инженерных дисциплин университета и студенты бакалавриата. Проведён обзорный анализ понимания образовательной инновации, имеющийся в научной литературе. Представлено сжатое описание технологии сквозного проектирования для учебно-производственного практикума, соответствующей критериям образовательной инновации. На основе экспертной оценки сделан детальный анализ влияния условий типового образовательного процесса вуза на изменение указанной технологии обучения на уровне характеристик учебной работы студентов и её результатов. Представлены данные об изменении инновационной технологии по критериям 12 стандартов CDIO, а также данные о её влиянии на формирование твёрдых и мягких навыков инженеров до и после адаптации. Проведён сравнительный анализ оценок изменений технологии обучения, сделанный студентами и экспертами, на основе которых обоснованы выводы о: 1) характере деградации образовательной инновации при внедрении её в типовой процесс обучения; 2) особой роли первых этапов технологии сквозного проектирования для формирования эффективных на выков учебно-практической работы, которые частично компенсируют недостатки учебного процесса, вызванные её адаптацией под условия типового вузовского обучения. Также выдвинута гипотеза о причинах низкой эффективности образовательных инноваций в учебном процессе вузов.

The article is devoted to the study of the processes of changing innovative learning technology in the conditions of a typical educational process. The study was conducted on the example of end-to-end design technology (based on the CDIO methodology in accordance with its standards) for bachelor’s degree in technical areas of training. The study used methods of expert assessment, written survey, content analysis, structural-logical and statistical analysis. The experts were engineers of design departments of industrial enterprises, teachers of engineering disciplines of the university and undergraduate students. A review analysis of the understanding of educational innovation available in the scientific literature is carried out. A concise description of the end-to-end design technology for a training and production workshop that meets the criteria of educational innovation is presented. Based on the expert assessment, a detailed analysis of the influence of the conditions of the typical educational process of the university on the change of the specified learning technology at the level of the characteristics of students’ academic work and its results is made. Data on changes in innovative technology according to the criteria of twelve CDIO standards, as well as its impact on the formation of hard and soft skills of engineers before and after adaptation are presented. A comparative analysis of the assessments of changes in teaching technology made by students and experts is carried out, on the basis of which conclusions are substantiated about: 1) the nature of the degradation of educational innovation when it is introduced into the standard learning process; 2) the special role of the first stages of end-to-end design technology for the formation of effective skills of educational and practical work, which partially compensate for the shortcomings of the educational process caused by its adaptation to the conditions of a typical university education. A hypothesis is also put forward about the reasons for the low efficiency of educational innovations in the educational process of universities.

образовательная инновациятехнология обученияинженерное обра- зованиеподход и стандарты CDIOадаптация инновационной образовательной технологиитиповой образовательный процессeducational innovationlearning technologyengineering educationCDIO approach and standardsadaptation of innovative educational technologystandard educational processReferencesКочетков М.В. Инновации в образовании. «Как отделить зёрна от плевел?» // Высшее образование в России. 2020. Т. 29. № 11. С. 153–166. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-153-166Kochetkov, M.V. (2020). Innovative in Education, or How to Separate the Wheat from the Chaff? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 153-166, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-153-166 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Коробцов А.С. Качество инженерного образования: лозунги и реальность // Инженерное образование. 2020. № 27. С. 27–36. EDN RYDZZE.Korobtsov, A.S. (2020). Quality of Engineering Education: Slogans and Reality. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. Vol. 27, pp. 27-36. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44676880 (accessed 03.10.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Шишарина Н.В. Инновации в образовании: сущность, функции, свойства и виды // Сибирский педагогический журнал. 2013. № 4. С. 45–49.Shisharina, N.V. (2013). Innovations in Education: Essence, Functions, Properties and Types. Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal = Siberian Pedagogical Journal. Vol. 4, pp. 45-49. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Yordanova Z., Stoimenova B. Smart educational innovation leads to university competitiveness // Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2021. Vol. 1168. P. 185–195.Yordanova, Z., Stoimenova, B. (2021). Smart Educational Innovation Leads to University Competitiveness. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 1168, pp. 185-195.Ramírez-Montoya D.M.-S., Lugo-Ocando J. Systematic review of mixed methods in the framework of educational innovation // Comunicar. 2020. Vol. 28. No. 65. P. 9–20. URL: https://www.academia.edu/78338507/Systematic_review_of_mixed_methods_in_the_framework_of_educational_innovation (дата обращения: 03.10.2022).Ramírez-Montoya, D.M.-S., Lugo-Ocando, J. (2020). Systematic Review of Mixed Methods in the Framework of Educational Innovation. Comunicar. Vol. 28, no. 65, pp. 9-20. URL: https://www.academia.edu/78338507/Systematic_review_of_mixed_methods_in_the_framework_of_educational_innovation (accessed 03.10.2022).Кочетков М.В. Инновации и псевдоинновации в высшей школе // Высшее образование в России. 2014. № 3. С. 41–47. URL: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/596?locale=ru_RU (дата обращения: 03.10.2022).Kochetkov, M.V. (2014). Innovations and Pseudo-innovations in Higher Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 3, pp. 41-47. Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/596?locale=ru_RU (accessed 03.10.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Nguyen H.D., Mai L.T., Anh Do D. Innovations in creative education for tertiary sector in Australia: present and future challenges // Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2020. Vol. 52. No. 11. P. 1149–1161. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1752190Nguyen, H.D., Mai, L.T., Anh Do, D. (2020). Innovations in Creative Education for Tertiary Sector in Australia: Present and Future Challenges. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1149-1161, doi: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1752190Morales-Avalos J.R., Heredia-Escorza Y. The academia–industry relationship: igniting innovation in engineering schools // International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing. 2019. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 1297–1312. URL: https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/the-academiaindustry-relationship-igniting-innovation-in-engine/16778482 (дата обращения: 03.10.2022).Morales-Avalos, J.R., Heredia-Escorza, Y. (2019). The Academia–industry Relationship: Igniting Innovation in Engineering Schools. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1297-1312. URL: https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/the-academia-industry-relationship-igniting-innovation-in-engine/16778482 (accessed 03.10.2022).Зеер Э.Ф., Новоселов С.А., Давыдова Н.Н. Институциональное обеспечение образовательных инноваций // Образование и наука. 2011. № 9 (88). С. 3–20.Zeer, E.F., Novoselov, S.A., Davydova, N.N. (2011). Institutional Support of Educational Innovations. Obrazovanie i nauka = Education and Science. Vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 3-20. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Lemaître D. Training engineers for innovation: Pedagogical initiatives for new challenges // European Journal of Education. 2019. Vol. 54. No. 4. P. 566–576. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12365Lemaоtre, D. (2019). Training Engineers for Innovation: Pedagogical Initiatives for New Challenges. European Journal of Education. Vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 566-576, doi: 10.1111/ejed.12365Arruabarrena R., Sánchez A., Blanco J.M., Vadillo J.A., Usandizaga I. Integration of good practices of active methodologies with the reuse of student-generated content // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 16. No. 1. Article no. 10. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0140-7Arruabarrena, R., Sánchez, A., Blanco, J.M., Vadillo, J.A., Usandizaga, I. (2019). Integration of Good Practices of Active Methodologies with the Reuse of Student-generated Content. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Vol. 16, no. 1, article no. 10, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0140-7Lavi R., Tal M., Dori Y.J. Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning // Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2021. Vol. 70. Article no. 101002. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002Lavi, R., Tal, M., Dori, Y.J. (2021). Perceptions of STEM Alumni and Students on Developing 21st Century Skills Through Methods of Teaching and Learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation. Vol. 70, article no. 101002, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002Varava I.P., Bohinska A.P., Vakaliuk T.A., Mintii I.S. Soft Skills in Software Engineering Technicians Education // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. Vol. 1946. Article no. 012012. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1946/1/012012Varava, I.P., Bohinska, A.P., Vakaliuk, T.A., Mintii, I.S. (2021). Soft Skills in Software Engineering Technicians Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 1946, article no. 012012, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1946/1/012012Дубров Д.В., Кочетков М.В., Стекольников В.Ю. Работодатель как актор студентоцентрированного образования: опыт реализации // Высшее образование в России. 2020. Т. 29. № 11. С. 141–152. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-141-152Dubrov, D.V., Kochetkov, M.V., Steklyannikov, V.Yu. (2020). Employer as an Actor of Student-centered Education: Implementation Experience. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 141-152, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-141-152Patil M.S., Kamerikar U.A. Learning by doing through project based active learning technique // Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 2020. Vol. 33. P. 125–129. DOI: 10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/150080Patil, M.S., Kamerikar, U.A. (2020). Learning by Doing Through Project Based Active Learning Technique. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. Vol. 33, pp. 125-129, doi; 10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/150080Tyflopoulos E., Haskins C., Steinert M. Topology-optimization-based learning: A powerful teaching and learning framework under the prism of the cdio approach // Education Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11. No. 7. Article no. 348. DOI: 10.3390/educsci11070348Tyflopoulos, E., Haskins, C., Steinert, M. (2021). Topology-optimization-based Learning: A Powerful Teaching and Learning Framework under the Prism of the CDIO approach. Education Sciences. Vol. 11, no. 7, article no. 348, doi: 10.3390/educsci11070348Julius Fusic S., Anandh N., Subbiah A.N., Bhaven Kumar Jain D. Implementation of the CDIO Framework in Engineering Courses to Improve Student-Centered Learning // Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 2022. Vol. 35. P. 19–26. DOI: 10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is1/22003Julius Fusic, S., Anandh, N., Subbiah, A.N., Bhaven Kumar Jain, D. (2020). Implementation of the CDIO Framework in Engineering Courses to Improve Student-Centered Learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. Vol. 35, pp. 19-26, doi: 10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is1/22003Santos Rego M.A., Mella Núñez Í., Naval C., Vázquez Verdera V. The Evaluation of Social and Professional Life Competences of University Students Through Service-Learning // Frontiers in Education. 2021. Vol. 6. Article no. 606304. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.606304Santos Rego, M.A., Mella Núñez, Í., Naval, C., Vázquez Verdera, V. (2021). The Evaluation of Social and Professional Life Competences of University Students Through Service-Learning. Frontiers in Education. Vol. 6, article no. 606304, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.606304Mtawa N., Fongwa S., Wilson-Strydom M. Enhancing graduate employability attributes and capabilities formation: a service-learning approach // Teaching in Higher Education. 2021. Vol. 26. No. 5. P. 679–695. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2019.1672150Mtawa, N., Fongwa, S., Wilson-Strydom, M. (2021). Enhancing Graduate Employability Attributes and Capabilities Formation: a Service-learning Approach. Teaching in Higher Education. Vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 679-695, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2019.1672150Sutil-Martín D.L., Javier Otamendi F. Soft skills training program based on serious games // Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021. Vol. 13. No. 15. Article no. 8582. DOI: 10.3390/su13158582Sutil-Martín, D.L., Javier Otamendi, F. (2021). Soft Skills Training Program Based on Serious Games. Sustainability (Switzerland). Vol. 13, no. 15, article no. 8582, doi: 10.3390/su13158582Pardo-Garcia C., Barac M. Promoting employability in higher education: A case study on boosting entrepreneurship skills // Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020. Vol. 12. No. 10. Article no. 4004. DOI: 10.3390/su12104004Pardo-Garcia, C., Barac, M. (2020). Promoting Employability in Higher Education: A Case Study on Boosting Entrepreneurship Skills. Sustainability (Switzerland). Vol. 12, no. 10, article no. 4004, doi: 10.3390/su12104004Boevé A.J., Meijer R.R., Beldhuis H.J.A., Bosker R.J., Albers C.J. On Natural Variation in Grades in Higher Education, and Its Implications for Assessing Effectiveness of Educational Innovations // Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 2019. Vol. 38. No. 4. P. 55–66. DOI: 10.1111/emip.12283Boevé, A.J., Meijer, R.R., Beldhuis, H.J.A., Bosker, R.J., Albers, C.J. (2019). On Natural Variation in Grades in Higher Education, and Its Implications for Assessing Effectiveness of Educational Innovations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 55-66, doi: 10.1111/emip.12283Исаев А.П., Валуева Л.В., Мартынова Е.В., Плотников Л.В. Инструмент оценки и повышения эффективности текущего учебного процесса в вузе // Вестник высшей школы. Alma mater. 2016. № 2. С. 77–83. EDN VLJXIR.Isaev, A.P., Valueva, L.V., Martynova, E.V., Plotnikov, L.V. (2016). A Tool for Evaluating and Improving the Effectiveness of the Current Educational Process at the University. Vestnik vysshej shkoly. Alma mater. = Bulletin of the Higher School. Alma mater. Vol. 2, pp. 77-83. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25470959 (accessed 03.10.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Schophuizen M., Kalz M. Educational innovation projects in Dutch higher education: bottom-up contextual coping to deal with organizational challenges // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2020.Vol. 17. No. 1. Article no. 36. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-020-00197-zSchophuizen, M., Kalz, M. (2020). Educational Innovation Projects in Dutch Higher Education: Bottom-up Contextual Coping to Deal with Organizational Challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Vol. 17, no. 1, article no. 36, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00197-zИсаев А.П., Плотников Л.В. «Учебный инжиниринг» в реализации идеологии CDIO // Высшее образование в России. 2016. № 12 (207). С. 45–52. URL: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/901 (дата обращения: 03.10.2022).Isaev, A.P., Plotnikov, L.V. (2016). “Educational Engineering” in the Context of the Implementation of the CDIO Ideology. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12 (207), pp. 45-52. URL: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/901 (accessed 03.10.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Исаев А.П., Плотников Л.В., Фомин Н.И. Технология сквозного проектирования в подготовке инженерных кадров // Высшее образование в России. 2017. № 5 (212). С. 59–67. URL: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1049/0 (дата обращения: 03.10.2022).Isaev, A.P., Plotnikov, L.V., Fomin, N.I. (2017). Technology of Open-Ended Engineering in Training of Engineers. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5 (212), рр. 59-67. Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1049/0 (accessed 03.10.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).Isaev A.P., Plotnikov L.V. Technology for Training Creative Graduates in Engineering Bachelor’s Programs // Higher Education in Russia. 2019. Vol. 28. No. 7. Р. 85–93. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-7-85-93Isaev, A.P., Plotnikov, L.V. (2019). Technology for Training Creative Graduates in Engineering Bachelor’s Programs. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 85-93, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-7-85-93Tran T.B., Phan T.H. Development of CDIOBased Programs from the Teacher Training Perspective // International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 2022. Vol. 21. No. 5. P. 204–219. DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.21.5.11Tran, T.B., Phan, T.H. (2022). Development of CDIO-Based Programs from the Teacher Training Perspective. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. Vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 204-219, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.21.5.11Чучалин А.И. Адаптация the Core CDIO Standards 3.0 к высшему STEM-образованию // Высшее образование в России. 2021. Т. 30. № 2. С. 9–21. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-2-9-21Chuchalin, A.I. (2021). Adaptation of the Core CDIO Standards 3.0 to STEM Higher Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 9-21, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-2-9-21 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.