vovrВысшее образование в России (Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia)Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia0869-36172072-0459Moscow Polytechnic University10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-9-22vovr-4322Research ArticleСтатьиChatGPT в высшем образовании и науке: угроза или ценный ресурс?ChatGPT in Higher Education and Science: a Threat or a Valuable Resource?ИвахненкоЕ. Н.IvakhnenkoE. N.

Ивахненко Евгений Николаевич – д-р филос. наук, проф.

119234, г. Москва, Ломоносовский просп., 27, корп. 4

Evgeniy N. Ivakhnenko – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., 

27, Lomonosovsky ave., Moscow, 119991

ivahnen@rambler.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4290-1443НикольскийВ. С.NikolskiyV. S.

Никольский Владимир Святославович – д-р филос. наук, проф., гл. редактор журнала «Высшее образование в России»

107023, г. Москва, ул. Б. Семёновская, 38

Vladimir S. Nikolskiy – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Chief Editor of the Journal of “Higher Education in Russia”

38, B. Semenovskaya str., Moscow, 107023

v.s.nikolskij@mospolytech.ruМосковский государственный университет им. М.В. ЛомоносоваРоссияLomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussian FederationМосковский государственный политехнический университетРоссияMoscow State Polytechnic UniversityRussian Federation202318042023324922Copyright © Ивахненко Е.Н., Никольский В.С., 20232023Ивахненко Е.Н., Никольский В.С.Ivakhnenko E.N., Nikolskiy V.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4322

Цель статьи обратить внимание авторов и читателей журнала на проблему использования искусственного интеллекта в высшем образовании и науке. Статья состоит из двух взаимосвязанных частей. В первой части авторы статьи обсуждают случай использования ChatGPT для написания выпускной квалификационной работы с точки зрения последствий для высшего образования. Во второй части авторы обращаются к реакции академического сообщества на появление генеративного искусственного интеллекта и рассматривают его недостатки и возможности для образования и науки. В заключение авторы приглашают читателей к академической дискуссии об искусственном интеллекте в высшем образовании и науке на страницах нашего журнала.

The purpose of the article is to draw the attention of the authors and readers of the journal to the problem of using artificial intelligence in higher education and science. The article consists of two interrelated parts. In the first part, authors of the article discuss the case of using ChatGPT for graduate writing in terms of implications for higher education. In the second part, the authors turn to the reaction of the academic community to the emergence of generative artificial intelligence and consider its shortcomings and opportunities for education and science. In conclusion, authors of the present work invite readers to an academic discussion about artificial intelligence in higher education and science on the pages of our journal.

искусственный интеллектChatGPTвысшее образованиенаукаartificial intelligenceChatGPThigher educationscienceReferencesГибсон Дж. Экологический подход к зрительному восприятию. М.: Прогресс, 1988. 464 с. ISBN: 5-01-001049-6.Gibson, J. (1988). Ekologicheskij podhod k zritel’nomu vospriyatiyu [Ecological Approach to Visual Perception]. Moscow: Progress, 464 p. ISBN: 5-01-001049-6. (In Russ.).Деланда М. Новая философия общества: Теория ассамбляжей и социальная сложность: пер. с англ. К.С. Майоровой. Пермь: ГилеПресс, 2018. 170 с.DeLanda, М. (2018). Novaya filosofiya obshchestva: Teoriya assamblyazhej i social’naya slozhnost’ [A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity]. Perm’: HylePress Publ, 170 p. (In Russ.).Аршинов В.И., Свирский Я.И. Кое-что о сложностности // Морен Э. О сложностности: пер. с англ. Я.И. Свирского. М.: Институт общегуманитарных исследований, 2019. С. 275.Arshinov, V.I., Svirskij, Ya.I. (2019). Koe-chto o slozhnostnosti. Morin E. O Slozhnostnosti [On Complexity]. Moscow: Institut obshchegumanitarnyh issledovanij, 275 p. (In Russ.).Zittrain J. The Generative Internet // Harvard Law Review. Vol. 119. May 2006. P. 70. DOI: 10.1145/1435417.1435426Zittrain, J. (2006). The Generative Internet. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 119, p. 70, doi: 10.1145/1435417.1435426Van der Tuin I. How Eva Louise Young (1861– 1939) Found Me. On the Performance of Metadata in Knowledge Production // Situating Data. Inquiries in Algorithmic Culture. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020. P. 189–206. DOI: 10.5117/9789463722971Van der Tuin, I. (2020). How Eva Louise Young (1861–1939) Found Me. On the Performance of Metadata in Knowledge Production. Situating Data. Inquiries in Algorithmic Culture. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pр. 189–206, doi: 10.5117/9789463722971Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. М., 1994. С. 384–391.Bart, R. (1994). Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika. Moscow, pp. 384-391. (In Russ.).Thorp H. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author // Science. Vol. 379. No. 6630. P. 313. DOI: 10.1126/science.adg7879Thorp, H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. Vol. 379, no. 6630, p. 313, doi: 10.1126/science.adg7879Frye B.L. Should Using an AI Text Generator to Produce Academic Writing Be Plagiarism? (December 3, 2022) // Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Forthcoming. URL at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4292283 (дата обращения 04.03.2023).Frye, B.L. (2022). Should Using an AI Text Generator to Produce Academic Writing Be Plagiarism? Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4292283 (accessed 04.03.2023).King М. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, T. 16. No. 1. February 2023 (2023). P. 1–2. DOI: 10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8King, М. (2023). A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering. Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-2, doi: 10.1007/s12195022-00754-8Hammad M. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programs on Writing Scientific Research // Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2023. No. 51. P. 459–460. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03140-1Hammad, M. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programs on Writing Scientific Research. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. Vol. 51, pp. 459-460, doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03140-1Biswas S.S. Potential Use of Chat GPT in Global Warming // Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03171-8Biswas, S.S. (2023). Potential Use of Chat GPT in Global Warming. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03171-8Van Dis E., Bollen J., van Rooij R., Zuidema W., Bockting C. ChatGPT: five priorities for research // Nature. 2023. No. 614. P. 224–22 6 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7Van Dis, E., Bollen, J., van Rooij, R., Zuidema, W., Bockting, C. (2023). ChatGPT: Five Priorities for Research. Nature. Vol. 614, pp. 224-226, doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7Chatterjee J., Dethlefs N. This new conversational AI model can be your friend, philosopher, and guide ... and even your worst enemy // Patterns. 2023. Vol. 4. No. 1. Article no. 100676. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100676Chatterjee, J., Dethlefs, N. (2023). This New Conversational AI Model Can Be Your Friend, Philosopher, and Guide ... and Even Your Worst Enemy.. Patterns, Vol. 4(1), 100676, doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100676Khalil M., Er E. Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of plagiarism detection. arXiv. 2023. DOI: 10.35542/osf.io/fnh48Khalil, M., Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT Get You Caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection. arXiv, doi: 10.35542/osf.io/fnh48Rudolph J., Tan S., Tan S. ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? // Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. 2023. Vol. 6. No. 1. DOI: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9Rudolph J., Tan S., Tan S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. Vol. 6, no.1, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9Atlas S. “ChatGPT for Higher Education and Professional Development: A Guide to Conversational AI.”, 2023. URL: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548 (дата обращения 30.03.2023).Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for Higher Education and Professional Development: A Guide to Conversational AI. Available at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548 (accessed 04.03.2023).Kasneci E., Seßler K., Küchemann S., Bannert M., Dementieva D., Fischer F., et al. ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. 2023, January 30. DOI: 10.35542/osf.io/5er8fKasneci E., Seßler K., Küchemann S.. Bannert M., Dementieva D., Fischer F., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education, doi: 10.35542/osf.io/5er8fKung T.H., Cheatham M., Medenilla A., Sillos C., De Leon L., Elepaсo C., Madriaga M., Aggabao R., DiazCandido G., Maningo J., Tseng V. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health. 2023. Vol. 2. No, 2. Article no. e0000198. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198Kung, T.H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon L., Elepaсo, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., DiazCandido, G., Maningo, J., Tseng, V. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health. Vol. 2, no. 2, article no. e0000198, doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198Halaweh M. ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary– Educational Technology. 2023. Vol. 15. No. 2. Article no. ep421. DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/13036Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in Education: Strategies for Responsible Implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology. Vol. 15, no. 2, article no. ep421, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/13036

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.