<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vovr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Высшее образование в России  (Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia)</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii  = Higher Education in Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0869-3617</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2072-0459</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Moscow Polytechnic University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-7-124-143</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vovr-5072</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СЕМЬЯ КАК КЛЮЧЕВОЙ ОБЪЕКТ ДЕМОГРАФИЧЕСКОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ И НАУЧНЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>FAMILY AS A KEY OBJECT OF DEMOGRAPHIC POLICY AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Исследовательская этика: представления и практики российских молодых учёных</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Research Ethics: Ideas and Practices of Russian Young Scientists</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1716-8849</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Попова</surname><given-names>Е. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Popova</surname><given-names>E. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Попова Евгения Владимировна – канд. политич. наук, доцент, заведующий кафедрой антропологии и этнологии, Researcher ID: O-5789-2014, Scopus ID: 56649029500.</p><p>634050, Томск, пр. Ленина, 36</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Evgeniya V. Popova – Cand. Sci. (Political Sciences), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Anthropology and Ethnology, Researcher ID: O-5789-2014, Scopus ID: 56649029500.</p><p>36 Lenin ave., Tomsk, 634050</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">iam.e.popova@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-082X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мацепуро</surname><given-names>Д. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Matsepuro</surname><given-names>D. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Мацепуро Дарья Михайловна – канд. истор. наук, директор Центра науки и этики, Researcher ID: AAF-6266-2019.</p><p>634050, Томск, пр. Ленина, 36</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Daria M. Matsepuro – Cand. Sci. (Historical Sciences), Director of the Center for Science and Ethics, Researcher ID: AAF-6266-2019.</p><p>36 Lenin ave., Tomsk, 634050</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">daria.matsepuro@mail.tsu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>National Research Tomsk State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>08</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>33</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>124</fpage><lpage>143</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Попова Е.В., Мацепуро Д.М., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Попова Е.В., Мацепуро Д.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Popova E.V., Matsepuro D.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/5072">https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/5072</self-uri><abstract><p>Недобросовестное поведение исследователей является важной проблемой для науки во многих странах, в том числе и в России. Оно приводит к негативным последствиям как для качества получаемого научного знания, так и для репутации исследователей и научных организаций. Однако до сих пор проведено небольшое число эмпирических исследований этой проблемы в России. В работе методом опроса исследуются представления молодых учёных из всех федеральных округов России об исследовательской этике и ситуациях, с которыми они сталкиваются в своей работе. В соответствии с выбранной теоретической рамкой: представлениями об этике как действии, которое носит ситуативный характер, определяется устойчивыми практиками и образцами, опрос проводился в два этапа: сначала был задан открытый вопрос о ситуациях этического выбора в исследовательской деятельности, на основе которого затем была создана развёрнутая анкета. В результате было выявлено, что подавляющее большинство молодых исследователей сталкиваются с ситуациями нарушения этических норм как в научных публикациях и коммуникациях, так и в процессах организации исследовательской работы. Нарушения исследовательских процедур, подгонка данных, фальсификация результатов исследований – это набор нарушений в организации исследований, с которым сталкивались почти три четверти респондентов сами или слышали о таких ситуациях от коллег. При этом нет консенсуса относительно источников знаний об этике и наблюдается дефицит таких институциональных практик регулирования нарушений как работа этических комитетов или этические стандарты.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Scientists’ misconduct in their research activities is an important problem for science in many countries, including Russia. It leads to negative consequences both for the quality of scientific knowledge obtained and for the reputation of researchers and scientific organizations. However, there is still a small number of empirical studies of this problem in Russia. This work is based on a survey method to explore the ideas of young scientists from all federal districts of Russia about research ethics and the situations of ethical dilemmas that they encounter in their work. In accordance with the chosen theoretical framework: ideas about ethics as an action that is situational by nature, determined by sustainable practices and patterns, the survey was conducted in two stages: an open question about situations of ethical choice in research activities, on the basis of which a detailed questionnaire was then created. As a result, it was revealed that the vast majority of young scientists are faced with situations of violation of ethical standards both in scientific publications and communications, and in the processes of organizing research work. Violations of research procedures, data manipulation, falsification of research results – this is a set of violations in the organization of research that almost three-quarters of respondents encountered themselves or heard about such situations from colleagues. However, there are gaps in consensus about the sources of knowledge about ethics and a lack of institutional practices to prevent violations such as the work of ethics committees or ethical standards.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>исследовательская этика</kwd><kwd>недобросовестное поведение</kwd><kwd>академическая честность</kwd><kwd>репутация</kwd><kwd>этические комитеты</kwd><kwd>этические стандарты</kwd><kwd>исследования науки</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>research ethics</kwd><kwd>misconduct</kwd><kwd>academic integrity</kwd><kwd>reputation</kwd><kwd>ethics committees</kwd><kwd>ethical standards</kwd><kwd>science studies</kwd><kwd>Russian academy</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Результаты были получены в рамках выполнения государственного задания Минобрнауки России, проект № FSWM-2024-0008. Авторы благодарят Координационный совет по делам молодёжи в научной и образовательной сферах Совета при Президенте Российской Федерации по науке и образованию за реализацию опроса, а также анонимных рецензентов</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">This research was supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, project No FSWM-2024-0008. The authors appreciate the Coordination Council for Youth Affairs of the Presidential Council for Science and Education, Russian Federation for the implementation of the survey, as well as anonymous reviewers</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">De Vries R., Anderson M.S., Martinson B.C. Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research // Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2006. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 43–50. DOI: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">De Vries, R., Anderson, M. S., Martinson, B. C. (2006). Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. Vol. 1, no. 1, pр. 43-50, doi: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pupovac V., Fanelli D. Scientists admitting to plagiarism: A meta-analysis of surveys // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2014. Vol. 21. P. 1331–1352. DOI: 0.1007/s11948-014-9600-6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pupovac, V., Fanelli, D. (2014). Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys. Science and Engineering Ethics. Vol. 21, pp. 1331-1352, doi: 0.1007/s11948-014-9600-6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chubin D.E. Open Science and Closed Science: Tradeoffs in a Democracy // Science, Technology &amp; Human Values. 1985. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 73–80. DOI: 10.1177/016224398501000211</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chubin, D.E. (1985). Open Science and Closed Science: Tradeoffs in a Democracy. Science, Technology, &amp; Human Values. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 73-80. doi: 10.1177/016224398501000211</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рожкова М.А., Исаева О.В. Плагиат и самоплагиат в научных произведениях в эру цифровых технологий // Цифровое право. 2022. Т. 3. № 2. С. 25–35. DOI: 10.38044/2686-9136-2022-3-2-25-35</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rozhkova, M.A., Isaeva, O.V. (2022). Plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism in Scientific Works in the Digital Age. Tsifrovoe pravo = Digital Law Journal. Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 25-35, doi: 10.38044/2686-9136-2022-3-2-25-35 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Altbach P.G. The question of corruption in academe // International Higher Education. 2004. No. 34. P. 8–10. DOI: 10.6017/ihe.2004.34.7399</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Altbach, P.G. (2004). The Question of Corruption in Academe. International Higher Education. No. 4, рp. 8-10, doi: 10.6017/ihe.2004.34.7399</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Israel M., Hay I. Research ethics for social scientists: Between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance. 2006. Sage Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781849209779</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Israel, M., Hay, I. (2006). Research Ethics for Social Scientists: Between Ethical Conduct and Regulatory Compliance. Sage Publications Ltd, doi: 10.4135/9781849209779</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bird S. Responsible research: What is expected? // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2010. No. 16. P. 693–696. DOI: 10.1177/1556264619858534</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bird, S. (2010). Responsible Research: What Is Expected? Science and Engineering Ethics. No. 16, pp. 693-696, doi: 10.1177/1556264619858534</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rehman A., Jinnah F. Academic Integrity and Quality of Research in Higher Education: Inclination and Confrontation for Young Scholars // Towards Consistency and Transparency in Academic Integrity. S. Razı, I. Glendinning, T. Foltýnek (eds.). 2018. 268 p. ISBN: 978-3-631-77985-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rehman, A., Jinnah, F. (2018). Academic Integrity and Quality of Research in Higher Education: Inclination and Confrontation for Young Scholars. Towards Consistency and Transparency in Academic Integrity. S. Razı, I. Glendinning, T. Foltýnek (eds.). 268 p. ISBN: 978-3-631-77985-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Anderson M.S., Horn A.S., Risbey K.R., Ronning E.A., De Vries R., Martinson B.C. What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists // Academic Medicine. 2007. No. 82. P. 853–860. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anderson, M.S., Horn, A.S., Risbey, K.R., Ronning, E.A., De Vries, R., Martinson, B.C. (2007). What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have to Do With Scientists’ Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists. Academic Medicine. Vol. 82, no. 9, рp. 853-860, doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Martinson B.C., Anderson M.S., de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly // Nature. 2005. No. 435. P. 737–738. DOI: 10.1038/435737a</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Martinson, B.C., Anderson, M.S., de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists Behaving Badly. Nature. Vol. 435, pp. 737-738, doi: 10.1038/435737a</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kennedy J.E. Grey matter: Ambiguities and complexities of ethics in research // Journal of Academic Ethics. 2006. No. 3. P. 143–158. DOI: 10.1007/s10805-006-9011-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kennedy, J.E. (2006). Grey Matter: Ambiguities and Complexities of Ethics in Research. Journal of Academic Ethics. Vol. 3, pp. 143-158, doi: 10.1007/s10805-006-9011-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mumford M.D., Murphy S.T., Connelly S., Hill J.H., Antes A. L., Brown R.P., Devenport L.D. Environmental influences on ethical decision making: Climate and environmental predictors of research integrity // Ethics and Behavior. 2007. Vol. 17. No. 4. P. 337–366. DOI: 10.1080/10508420701519510</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mumford, M.D., Murphy, S.T., Connelly, S., Hill, J.H., Antes, A.L., Brown, R.P., Devenport, L.D. (2007). Environmental Influences on Ethical Decision Making: Climate and Environmental Predictors of Research Integrity. Ethics and Behavior. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 337-366, doi: 10.1080/10508420701519510</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boyd E.A., Bero L.A. Assessing Faculty Financial Relationships With Industry: A Case Study // The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000. Vol. 284. No. 17. P. 2209–2214. DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.17.2209</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boyd, E.A., Bero, L.A. (2000). Assessing Faculty Financial Relationships with Industry: A Case Study. The Journal of the American Medical Association. Vol. 284, no. 17, pp. 2209-2214, doi: 10.1001/jama.284.17.2209</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blumenthal D. Quality of care--what is it? // N Engl J Med. 1996. Vol. 19. No. 335 (12). P. 891–894. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199609193351213</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blumenthal, D. (1996). Quality of Care – What Is It? N Engl J Med. Vol. 19, no. 335 (12), pp. 891-894, doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609193351213</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Плещенко В.И. О плагиате в научных публикациях и выпускных работах // Высшее образование в России. 2018. Т. 27. № 8-9. С. 62–70. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-8-9-62-70</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pleshchenko, V.I. (2018). The Problem of Plagiarism in Scientific Publications and Graduation Research Papers. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 8-9, pp. 62-70, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-8-9-62-70 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Губа К.С., Словогородский Н.А. Publish or Perish в российских социальных науках: паттерны соавторства в «хищных» и «чистых» журналах // Вопросы образования. 2022. № 4. C. 80–106. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-4-80-106</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guba, K.S., Slovogorodsky, N.А. (2022). Publish or Perish in Russian Social Sciences: Co-Authorship Patterns in Non-Problematic and Predatory Journals. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 4, pp. 80-106, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-4-80-106 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Главчева Ю.Н., Канищева О.В., Главчев М.И. Оценка качества научной деятельности: исследование оригинальности // Научные и технические библиотеки. 2018. № 10. C. 5–21. DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2018-10-5-21</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glavcheva, Yu.N., Kanishcheva, O.V., Glavchev, M.I. (2018). Evaluating the Quality of Research Activities: Investigating into the Uniqueness. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki = Scientific and Technical Libraries. No. 10, pp. 5-21, doi: 10.33186/1027-3689-2018-10-5-21 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Викторук Е.Н.. Этика науки: практико-прикладной модус // Высшее образование в России. 2013. № 8-9. С. 149–166. EDN: RAERGZ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Viktoruk, E.N. (2013). Ethics of Science: Practical and Applied Model. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8-9, pp. 149-166. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_20206537_83632790.pdf (accessed 30.03.2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Macfarlane B., Zhang J., Pun A. Academic integrity: a review of the literature // Studies in Higher Education. 2012. Vol. 39. No. 2. P. 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2012.709495</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., Pun, A. (2012). Academic Integrity: A Review of the Literature. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1-20, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2012.709495</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bonn N.A., Pinxten W. A Decade of Empirical Research on Research Integrity: What Have We (Not) Looked At? // The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 338–352. DOI: 10.1101/567263</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bonn, N.A., Pinxten, W. (2019). A Decade of Empirical Research on Research Integrity: What Have We (Not) Looked At? The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. Vol. 14, no. 4, рp. 338-352, doi: 10.1101/567263</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nia M.G., Harandi M.F., de Vries M. J. Technology development as a normative practice: A meaning-based approach to learning about values in engineering-damming as a case study // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2019. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 55–82. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9999-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nia, M.G., Harandi, M.F., de Vries, M.J. (2019). Technology Development as a Normative Practice: A Meaning-Based Approach to Learning about Values in Engineering-Damming as a Case Study. Science and Engineering Ethics. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 55-82, doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9999-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clegg S. R., Kornberger M., Rhodes C. Business ethics as practice // British Journal of Management. 2007. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 107–122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00493.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clegg, S.R., Kornberger, M., Rhodes, C. (2007). Business Ethics as Practice. British Journal of Management. Vol. 18, no. 2, pр. 107-122, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00493.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Valkenburg G., Dix G., Tijdink J., de Rijcke S. Expanding Research Integrity: A CulturalPractice Perspectiv e// Science and engineering ethics. 2021. Vol. 27. No. 1. Article no. 10. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00291-z</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Valkenburg, G., Dix, G., Tijdink, J., de Rijcke, S. (2021). Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective. Science and engineering ethics. Vol. 27, no. 1, article no. 10, doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00291-z</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hackett E.J. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct // Journal of Higher Education. 1994. Vol. 65. No. 3. P. 242–260. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.1994.11778499</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hackett, E.J. (1994). A Social Control Perspective on Scientific Misconduct. Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 242-260, doi: 10.1080/00221546.1994.11778499</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brumfiel G. Turkish physicists face accusations of plagiarism // Nature. 2007. Vol. 449. Article no. 8. DOI: 10.1038/449008b</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brumfiel, G. (2007). Turkish Physicists Face Accusations of Plagiarism. Nature. Vol. 449, article no. 8, doi: 10.1038/449008b</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferguson K., Masur S., Olson L., Ramirez J., Robin E., Schmeling K. Enhancing the culture of research ethics on university campus// Journal of Academic Ethics. 2007. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 189–198. DOI: 10.1007/s10805-007-9033-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ferguson, K., Masur, S., Olson, L., Ramirez, J., Robyn, E., Schmaling, K. (2007). Enhancing the Culture of Research Ethics on University Campus. Journal of Academic Ethics. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 189-198, doi: 10.1007/s10805-007-9033-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Becher T. The significance of disciplinary differences // Studies in Higher Education. 1994. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 151–161. DOI: 10.1080/03075079412331382007</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Becher, T. (1994). The Significance of Disciplinary Differences. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 151-161, doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382007</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guba K.S., Tsivinskaya A.O. Ambiguity in Ethical Standards: Global Versus Local Science in Explaining Academic Plagiarism // Sci Eng Ethics. 2024. Vol. 30 No. 1. Article no. 4. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-024-00464-6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guba, K.S., Tsivinskaya, A.O. (2024). Ambiguity in Ethical Standards: Global Versus Local Science in Explaining Academic Plagiarism. Sci Eng Ethics. Vol. 30, no. 1, article no. 4, doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00464-6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Радаев В.В., Чириков И.С. Отношение студентов и преподавателей к наказаниям за плагиат и списывание // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2006. № 4. С. 77–82. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2020.04.033</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Radaev, V.V., Chirikov, I.S. (2006). The Attitude of Students and Teachers to Penalties for Plagiarism and Cheating. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University management: practice and analysis. No. 4, pp. 77-82, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2020.04.033 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Малошонок Н.Г. Как восприятие академической честности среды университета взаимосвязано со студенческой вовлечённостью: возможности концептуализации и эмпирического изучения // Вопросы образования. № 1. С. 35–60. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-4-59-83</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maloshonok, N. (2016). How Using the Internet and Multimedia Technology in the Learning Process Correlates with Student Engagement. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 1, pp. 35-60, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-4-59-83 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reason J. Human error: Models and management // BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2000. Vol. 320. No. 7237. P. 768–770. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reason, J. (2000). Human Error: Models and Management. BMJ: British Medical Journal. Vol. 320, no. 7237, pp. 768-770, doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fasser C.E., McGuire A.L., Erdman K.M., Nadalo D., Scott S., Waters V.S. The Ethics Workup: A Case-Based Approach To Ethical Decision-Making Instruction // The Journal of Physician Assistant Education. 2007. No. 18. P. 34–41. DOI: 10.1097/01367895-200718010-00006</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fasser, C.E., McGuire, A.L., Erdman, K.M., Nadalo, D., Scott, S., Waters, V.S. (2007). The Ethics Workup: A Case-Based Approach to Ethical Decision-Making Instruction. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education. No. 18, pр. 34-41, doi: 10.1097/01367895-200718010-00006</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shamoo A.E., Resnik D.B. Responsible Conduct of Research. 2015. Journal of Biomedical Optics. Vol. 12. No. 3. Article no. 39901. DOI: 10.1117/1.2749726</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shamoo, A.E., Resnik, D.B. (2015). Responsible Conduct of Research. Journal of Biomedical Optics. Vol. 12, no. 3, article no. 39901, doi: 10.1117/1.2749726</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
