Academic Subject Problem: Epistemological Crisis and Its Overcoming

The paper focuses on the analysis of ontological, epistemological and pedagogical terms of changes in education, first of all – on the status of an academic subject. From the ontological perspective, they are related to transfer from “object” ontology to communication-and-activity one, in terms of epistemological approach – from naturalism to transcendentalism, whereas with regard to pedagogical perspective – from autocratic-disciplinary organization of the academic process to a student-oriented pattern. The first part of the article describes academic subject’s functions in the process of educational reproduction. An academic subject is interpreted not so much from the perspective of the knowledge it contains, but as a complex linguistic code which organizes and regulates educational interaction. Its basics and structure, a mechanism of constituting educational reality are described, as well as the design specifics that hamper changes in education. The authors dwell on the distinction between an academic and scholarly subject. Part two of the article contains criticism of an academic subject practice in the university education. The central event here is attributed to differentiation and diversification of the form of academic subject, disintegration of its integrity into local autonomous linguistic fields. The conclusion formulates the idea how to overcome an academic subject crisis, which heart is discursive transformation of its representation practice. Based on Gilles Deleuze’s ideas, the authors consider the transformation of discursive practices in which an academic subject is embodied to be the condition for education change.

1. Gasparyan, D.E. (2017). [Sacrament of Natural Semantics: The Transcendental Dimension of Meaning and the Problem of Artificial Intelligence]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of philosophy. No. 4, pp. 82-95. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. White, H. (1973). Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (Russian Translation: Ekaterinburg: Ural. State Univ. Publ., 2002. 528 p.

3. Sapunov, M.B. (2012). [To the Problem of Reality in History and Philosophy of Science]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 147-155. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Zuev, V.V. (2016). [Theory and Methodology of Science and Technology]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki = Philosophy of Science and Technology. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 36-54. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Heidegger, M. (1961). Was heißt Denken? Niemeyer, Bad Vilbel (Russian Translation: Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1991)

6. Bernstein, B. Socjolingwistyka a społeczne problemy kształcenia. In: Głowiński M. (Ed.) Język i społeczeństwo. Warszawa: Czytelnik Publ., 1980. S. 83-119.

7. Vygotsky, L.S. (1982). [Thinking and Speech]. In: Vygotsky, L.S. Collected works in 6 vol. Vol. 2. Problems of general psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., pp. 5-361. (In Russ.)

8. Davydov, V.V. (Ed.) (1999). Rossiiskaya pedagogicheskaya entsiklopediya [Russian Pedagogical Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Bolshaya Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya Publ. (In Russ.)

9. Davydov, V.V. (1996). Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [The Theory of Developmental Learning]. Moscow: INTOR Publ. 544 p. (In Russ.)

10. Rozov, M.A. (2005). [In Search of Firebird]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. No. 6, pp. 63-82. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

11. Mikeshina, L.A. (2010). [Epistemological Justification of Hypostatization and Reification]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of philosophy. Vol. 12, pp. 44-54. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

12. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Autonomie et droit d’entreé. In: Bourdieu P. Science de la science et reflexivité. Paris: Raison d’agir, pp. 91-109.

13. Girard, R.N. Eating Disorders and Mimetic Desire. Available at: www.uibk.ac.at/theol/cover/contagion/contagion3/contagion03_girard.pdf

14. Bourdieu, P. (2001). The Field of Politics, the Field of Social Sciences, the Field of Journalism. In: Sociological analysis of Pierre Bourdieu. Almanac of the Russian-French Center for Sociology and Philosophy of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., pp. 108-138 (In Russ.)

15. Ball, S.J. Bourdieu’s Method. An Exposition and Application. Institute of Education, University of London. Available at: www.deptedu.ccu.edu.tw/blog/file/090508ball.ppt

16. Bourdieu, P. (1984) Sociology of social space (Russian Translation: Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology, St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., 2007, 288 p.)

17. Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, Codes and Control: Vol. 4 – The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Russian Translation: Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ., 2008, 272 p.)

18. Klus-Stańska, D. (2016). [School Education Without Art: Towards the Destruction of the Cognitive Subjectivity of the Child]. In: Szatan E., Muzioł A., Komorowska-Zielony A. Emil JaquesDalcroze i jego idee w edukacji, sztuce i terapii [Emil Jaques-Dalcroze and his ideas in education, art and therapy], Gdansk: UG Publ., pp. 241-260. (In Polish)

19. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C. (1970). The Reproduction. Elements for a theory of the educational system. Editions de Minuit, Paris (Russian Translation: Moscow: Progress Publ., 2007. 267 p.)

20. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La reproduction. Elèments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement. Paris: Minuit.

21. Man, de P. (1971). Blindness & Insight. Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (Russian Translation: St. Petersburg: Gumanitarnaya akademiya Publ., 2002, 256 p.)

22. Grochala, J.M. (2014). [Liberal Education in the Context of University Education]. Paedagogia Christiana, no. 1/33, pp. 165-182. (In Polish)

23. Schütz, A. (1962). Collected Papers. Springer, Berlin (Russian Translation: Moscow: Rosspen

24. Publ., 2004, 1054 p.)

25. Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England (Russian Translation: Minsk: Belarus State Univ. Publ., 2009, 248 p.)

26. Tkhagapsoev, Kh.G., Sapunov, M.B. (2016). [Russian Educational Reality and Its Converted Forms]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6 (202), pp. 87-97. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

27. Senashenko, V.S., Mednikova, T.B. (2014). [Competency-Based Approach in Higher Education: A Myth and Reality]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5 (202), pp. 34-46. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

28. Polonnikov, A. (2017). [The Modern Educational Situation: Descriptive Approaches and Discursive Responsibility]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 209 (2), pp. 26-36. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

29. Dyakov, A.V. (2012). Gilles Deleuze. Filosofiya razlichiya [Gilles Deleuze. Philosophy of Difference]. St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., 504 p. (In Russ.)

30. Deleuze, G. (2002). The Method of Dramatization. In: Deleuze, G. L’Ile déserte et autres textes, Paris: Minuit, pp. 131-162.