TOP-200 Higher Education Institutions in Four International Ratings: Comparative Analysis
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-3-85-95
Abstract
Rating places of 200 higher education institutions according to ARWU, THE, QS and Moscow International Rating (MosIR) are compared. The authors give an interpretation of a phenomenon of domination of English-language higher education institutions on the top positions and as well as higher education institutions of Europe and North America. The paper dwells on the main ranking parameters in Moscow International University Ranking (MosIR) and its innovative charac teristics, in particular the new parameter “University and Society”. The ranking “Three University Missions” focuses on the social openness of higher education institutions, their communications with society. Special attention is paid to the ranking paradoxes. The authors come to a conclusion that the introduction of Moscow International University Ranking improves the competitive environment in the global educational space.
About the Authors
Ivan E. Zadorozhnyuk
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy)
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy)
Larisa Yu. Korosteleva
Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Senior Researcher
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Senior Researcher
Boris K. Tebiyev
Moscow Regional Social and Economic Institute
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Pedagogics), Dr. Sci. (Economics), Vice-rector
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Pedagogics), Dr. Sci. (Economics), Vice-rector
References
1. Sheregi, F.E., Arefiev, A.L. (Eds) (2014). Izmerenie reitingov universitetov: mezhdunarodnyi i rossiiskiy opyt [University Ranking: International and Russian Experience]. Vol. 1. Moscow: RF Ministry of Education and Science, Center for Sociological Researches Publ. 504 p. (In Russ.)
2. Osipov, G.V., Arefiev, A.L. (Eds) (2015). Izmerenie reitingov universitetov: mezhdunarodnyi i rossiiskiy opyt [University Ranking: International and Russian Experience]. Vol. 2. Center for Sociological Researches. 588 p. (In Russ.)
3. Sheregi, F.E., Arefiev, A.L. (Eds) (2015). Metodicheskie voprosy otsenki realizatsii proekta 5-100 po reitingam universitetov [Methodical Issues of the Project 5-100 Implementation Evaluation According to University Rankings]. Moscow: Center for Sociological Researches. 312 p. Available at: http://socioprognoz-ru.1gb.ru/files/File/2014/Metodika_5_100.pdf (In Russ.)
4. Zadorozhnyuk, I.E., Kalashnik, V.M., Kireev, S.V. (2018). [Moscow International University Ranking “The Three University Missions” in the Global Educational Space]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27. No. 6, pp. 31-40. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Gaisenok, V.A., Naumovich, O.A., Samokhval, V.V. (2018). [Correlational Relationships between International Rankings for Higher Education Institutions]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27. No. 12, pp. 20-28. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Humanities Paper: Epistemological and Historical-Cultural Perspective: Round Table Discussion (Part 2). (2017). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8/9 (215), pp. 74-99 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Korosteleva, L.Yu. (2016). [The Paradoxes of the System of Rating Schools: A View from the Perspective of a Political Scientist]. Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya = Sociology of Education. No. 12, pp. 4-11. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Zadorozhnyuk, I.E., Kireev, S.V. (2016). [University Ranking: Sociological Support]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11 (206), pp. 55-65. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Tebiyev, B.K. (1999). [At the Turn of the Century. Government Policy in Education Sphere and the Public and Pedagogical Movement in Russia at the End of the XIX – the Beginning of the XX Centuries]. Moscow: Intelligence Publ. 256 p. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
616
Email this article 