Two-Semester Physics Course for Bachelors at Technical University
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-8-9-91-99
Abstract
The article discusses two major problems in teaching physics for students majoring in IT at a technical university: 1) the forced change in the course structure and content due to the reduction in the time allotted for studying physics from three to two semesters, and 2) the uneven educational background of applicants, due to the fact that when entering a university, the results of the Unified State Examination in physics are not taken into account. The article analyzes the experience of the Physics Training Center at the ITMO University in St. Petersburg on conducting additional consultations on the school curriculum materials and on the development and using of electronic educational materials. The relevance of courses that are concentric in their structure, created by colleagues from the other universities, is noted. The authors propose to organize training for first-year students in various educational tracks, depending on their starting level. The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining completeness and ideological value of the course when revising the structure and content. The following conceptual scheme of the course is proposed: elementary physics as axiomatic science, statistical physics, quantum physics, quantum field theory (general concepts). The experience of the development and using of electronic educational materials (lecture presentations, electronic summaries of lectures and exercises) at ITMO University is analyzed. Despite the fact that, in general, e-learning elements make it possible to compensate the lack of class time caused by the program changes, students learn e-courses at different levels. It is noted that the reason, apparently, lies in the psychological unreadiness of a number of students to switch to “blended learning”. It is emphasized that in the mixed course creation the development of materials for assessing student performance and their final certification is a fundamentally new and time-consuming task, the preference is given to the traditional full-time exam. The authors consider that it expedient to preserve the traditional structure of the physics course at technical university.
About the Authors
S. В. PeresleginRussian Federation
Sergey B. Pereslegin – Director, Center for Knowledge Economics
9, Prospekt 60-letiya Oktyabrya, Moscow, 117312
A. A. Korolev
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Korolev – Cand. Sci. (Phys. and Math.), Аssoc. Prof.
49, Kronverkskiy prosp., Saint-Petersburg, 197101
S. A. Kurashova
Russian Federation
Svetlana A. Kurashova – Senior Lecturer
49, Kronverkskiy prosp., Saint-Petersburg, 197101
References
1. Brazhnikov, M.A., Purysheva, N.S. (2017). Self-Education and the Development of Distance Learning Physics in Russia. Fizicheskoe obrazovanie v vuzakh = Physics in Higher Education. Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 34-50. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Lapanik, O.F., Slabzhennikova, I.M. (2018). Features of the Organization of the Educational Process on the Discipline “Physics” in the Technical University at the Present Stage. Fizicheskoe obrazovanie v vuzakh = Physics in Higher Education. Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 12-22. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Bugaev, A.I. (1981). Metodika prepodavaniya fiziki [Methods of Teaching Physics. Theoretical Basis]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ., 288 p. (In Russ.)
4. Bondarev, B.V., Kalashnikov, N.P., Spirin, G.G. (2003). Kurs obshchei fiziki. Uchebnoe posobie [General Physics Course: Textbook]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 1010 p. (In Russ.)
5. Kuznetsov, S.I. (2013). Kurs fiziki s primerami resheniya zadach [Physics Course with Examples of Problem Solving]. Tomsk: Tomsk Polytechnic Univ. Publ., 423 p. (In Russ.)
6. Popov, N.I., Nikiforova, E.N. (2018). Methodological Approaches to Experimental Teaching of Mathematics to University Students. Integratsiya Obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. Vol. 22, no. 1(90), pp. 193-206. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Stanojević, D., Cenić, D., Cenić, S. (2018). Application of Computers in Modernization of Teaching Science. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 89-106. DOI:10.5937/ijcree1802089S
8. Wu-Yuin, Hwang, Yueh-Min, Huang, Rustam, Shadiev, Sheng-Yi, Wu, Shu-Lin, Chen. (2014). Effects of Using Mobile Devices on English Listening Diversity and Speaking for EFL Elementary Students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 503-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.237
9. Gary, Cheng, Yuanyuan, Guan, Juliana, Chau (2016). An Empirical Study Towards Understanding User Acceptance of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) in Higher Education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2792
10. Osipova, N.G., Kolodeznaya, G.V. Shevtsov, A.N. (2018). [About the Factors and Reasons of University Student Expulsions and Student Motivation for Educational Activities]. Obrazovanie i Nauka = Education and Science. Vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 158-182. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Jeanette, Lyn Fung Choy, Choon Lang, Quek (2016). Modelling Relationships Between Students’ Academic Achievement and Community of Inquiry in an Online Learning Environment for a Blended Course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 106-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2500
12. Chapin, L.A. (2018). Australian University Students’ Access to Web-Based Lecture Recordings and the Relationship with Lecture Attendance and Academic Performance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2989
13. Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigation the Effect of Learning Styles in a Blended E-Learning System: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2741
14. Lyaptsev, A.V. (2017). The Correctness of the Models Used in a Thought Experiment and the Danger of Falsification of Experience. Fizicheskoe obrazovanie v vuzah = Physics in Higher Education. Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 51-60. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Alonso-Diaz, L., Yuste-Tosina, R. (2015). Constructing a Grounded Theory of E-Learning Assessment. Journal of Educational Computing Research. Vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 315-344. DOI:10.1177/0735633115597868
16. Khenner, E.K. (2018). [Professional Knowledge and Professional Competencies in Higher Education]. Obrazovanie i Nauka = Education and Science. Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 9-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-2-9-31 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)