How Russian Doctoral Education Fulfills Its Main Mission: Scientometric Assessments (Article 2)

Change management in the field of training and certification of academic personnel implies a reliable information support in the form of statistical and sociological data that enable the monitoring of the effectiveness of the institution of doctoral education. The current system for monitoring the activities of doctoral schools does not fully meet these requirements, thus making it difficult to assess objectively the implementation of doctoral education’s main function – the training of researchers and faculty for higher education. The article attempts to fill this information lacuna by presenting an analysis of the database created by the authors which contains information about the defense of dissertations and research results of PhD students who graduated in 2013 from nine Russian universities over the five-year period after their graduation (N = 1178). Information on the results of each graduate’s research activities was obtained from open sources: the portal of the Higher Attestation Commission, the electronic catalog of the Russian State Library, Scopus and eLibrary.ru databases, as well as the database of the Industrial Property Institute. As a result of our research, it was established that the actual timeframe of doctoral students’ advancement to their academic degree is determined by discipline-related factors. In the sample as a whole, the share of persons who defended their dissertations was 45% of the total number of graduates, which is 1.7 times higher than the share of graduates who defended their dissertations in the course of their studies at the doctoral school. Approximately 90% of graduates defend their dissertations no later than two years after graduation from the doctoral school. The quantitative data of doctoral school graduates’ retention in the academic field are given, with the breakdown by discipline. On average, more than 60% of Candidate of Sciences degree holders continue their careers in academic positions. The obtained data on Russian doctoral school graduates are in good agreement with the results of monitoring doctoral programs’ graduates in Europe and the USA. The results of this work make it possible to take a fresh look at the methodology for diagnosing the effectiveness of university doctoral schools.

1. Nerad, M. (2012). Conceptual Approaches to Doctoral Education: A Community of Practice. Alternation. No. 19(2), pp. 57-72.

2. Maloshonok, N., Terentev, E. (2019). National Barriers to the Completion of Doctoral Programs at Russian Universities. Higher Education. No. 77, pp. 195-211. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-018-0267-9

3. Bednyi, B.I., Rybakov, N.V., Sapunov, M.B. (2017). Doctoral Education in Russia in the Educational Field: Interdisciplinary Discourse. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. No. 9, pp. 125-134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7868/50132162517090148 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Borrell-Damian, L., Morais, R., Smith, J.H. (2015). Collaborative Doctoral Education in Europe: Research Partnerships and Employability for Researchers. Report on DOC-CAREERS II Project. European University Association, Brussels, Belgium. 70 p. Available at: https://www.eua-cde.org/downloads/publications/2015_borrell-damianl_collaborative-doctoral-doc-ii-project.pdf

5. Bednyi, B.I., Mironos, A.A., Rybakov, N.V. (2019). Doctoral Education as an Institutional Resource for Training Research and Higher Education Personnel (Article 1). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 8-9, pp. 44-54. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-8-9-44-54 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Hasgall, A., Saenen, B., Borrell-Damian, L. (2019). Doctoral Education in Europe Today: Approaches and Institutional Structures. European University Association (Council for Doctoral Education). University Gent. 35 p. Available at: https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/on-line%20eua%20cde%20survey%2016.01.2019.pdf

7. Byrne, J., Jorgensen, T., Loukkola, T. (2013). Quality Assurance in Doctoral Education – Results of the ARDE Project. Brussels: EUA Publications. 60 p. Available at: https://www.eua-cde.org/downloads/publications/2013_byrnej_quality-assurance-arde-project-results.pdf

8. Terentiev, E.A., Bekova, S.K., Maloshonok, N.G. (2018). The Crisis of Postgraduate Studies in Russia: What Bears Problems and How to Overcome Them. Universitetskoe upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 54-66. DOI:10.15826/umpa.2018.05.049 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

9. Bekova, S.K., Dzhafarova, Z. (2019). Who Is Happy at Doctoral Programs: The Connection between Employment and Learning Outcomes of PhD Students. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow . No. 1, pp. 87-108. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2019-1-87-108 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

10. Bednyi, B.I., Chuprunov, E.V. (2019). Modern Doctoral Education in Russia: Current Directions of Development. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 9-20. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-3-9-20 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

11. Bednyi, B., Gurbatov, S., Mironos, A. (2010). Effectiveness Indicators of PhD Programs in the Field of Exact and Natural Science. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 7, pp. 11-23. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

12. Ushakov, D.V., Yurevich, A.V., Gavrilova, E.V., Golysheva, E.A. (2015). Publication Activity and Scientists Citedness: Differences of Scientific Domains and Age Cohorts. Sotsiologia nauki i tekhnologii = Sociology of Science and Technology. No. 1, pp. 16-28. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

13. Rabotnov, Yu. (2005). How a Scientist Is Born. Alma Mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly) = Alma Mater (Higher School Herald) . No. 9, pp. 28-29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

14. Mironos, A.A., Bednyi, B.I., Ostapenko, L.A. (2015). Employment of PhD Program Graduates in Russia: A Study of the University of Nizhni Novgorod Graduates’ Careers. SpringerPlus. No. 4:230 (15 May 2015). DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1003-x

15. Sivak, E., Yudkevich, M. (2015). Academic Immobility and Inbreeding in Russian University Sector. In: M. Yudkevich, P.G. Altbach, L. E. Rumbley (Eds). Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education. Global Perspectives. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 130-155.

16. Auriol, L., Misu, M., Freeman, R.A. (2013). Careers of Doctorate Holders: Analysis of Labour Market and Mobility Indicators. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2013/04. Paris: OECD Publishing, 61 p. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5k43nxgs289w-en.pdf?expires=1562137661&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=-7963D579A9E9958F8EB3AEC8A05F5842

17. Castelló, M., Pardo, M., Sala-Bubaré, A., Suñe-Soler, N. (2017). Why Do Students Consider Dropping Out of Doctoral Degrees? Institutional and Personal Factors. Higher Education. Vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1053-1068. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9

18. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2018. Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2017. Special Report NSF 19-301. Alexandria, VA. Available at: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19301/

19. Ushakova, S.E., Boychenko T.A. (2018). The Analysis of the Dynamics of Russian Researchers’ Age Structure. Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie = Science. Innovations. Education. No. 1 (27), pp. 5-25. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)