About Innovative Content of Subject-Oriented Pedagogical Education
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-10-106-117
Abstract
The continuous modernization of the education system makes the problems of the quality of teacher training increasingly relevant. Moreover, the measures taken to improve the system of teacher education are largely confined to the introduction of new organizational and managerial mechanisms and practically do not affect the internal content and technological structure of the teacher training process.
Modern pedagogical universities are constantly looking for innovative models of training teachers that will be able to solve non-standard social and professional tasks. However, recent studies in this area do not fully take into account the nature of pedagogical activity and conditions of its formation. Thus, the need arises for a special study of the processes and means of updating the content and technologies of teacher training in order to control the level of students’ professional competencies development, as required by educational and professional standards. This means the creation of a special educational system in a pedagogical university, which can provide a harmonious and synchronous mastering by future specialists of both subject knowledge and methods of pedagogical activity.
The article provides a theoretical study aimed at identifying key patterns of designing a new content for teacher education, the basis of which is the formation of a future teacher as a subject of his own professional activity. The author describes the experience of using a subject-oriented model of education, implemented at Bashkir State Pedagogical University n.a. M. Akmulla. The effectiveness of this model is confirmed by the high level of students’ mastery of designing methods and constructing the educational process, as well as their positive experience in the implementation of educational activities.
About the Author
R. M. Asadullin
Bashkir State Pedagogical University n.a. M. Akmulla
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Rail M. Asadullin – Dr. Sci. (Education), Prof.
3a, Oktyabrskoy Revolutsii str., Ufa, 450008, Russian Federation
References
1. Rubtsov, V.V., Guruzhapov, V.A. (2016). Designing the Master Research Program Taking into Account the Results of Approbation and Implementation of the Teacher Professional Standard. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 12-21 (In Russ., аbstract in Eng.). DOI: 10.17759/pse.2016210203
2. Margolis, A.A. (2015). Teacher Training Models in Applied Bachelor and Pedagogical Master Programs. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. Vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 45-64 (In Russ., аbstract in Eng.). DOI: 10.17759/pse.2015200505
3. Verbitskiy, A.A. (2010). Context-Competency-Based Approach to the Modernization of Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5, pp. 32-37. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Bondarevskaya, E.V. (2007). [Valuable Foundations of Personality-oriented Education ]. Pedagogika = Russian Education and Society. No. 3, pp. 3-14. (In Russ.)
5. Ibragimov, G.I. (2014). Actual Methodological Problems of Didactics of a Professional School . Obrazovanie i nauka = Education and Science. No. 6, pp. 3-19. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Lazarev, V.S. (2005). [ Link between Logic and Psychology in the Activity Theory of V.V. Davydov]. Voprosy philosophii = Russian Studies in Philosophy. No. 9. pp. 71-82 (In Russ.)
7. Kraevskiy, V.V. (1977). Sootnoshenie pedagogicheskoy nauki i pedagogicheskoy praktiki [Correlation of Pedagogical Science and Pedagogical Practice]. Moscow: Znanie Publ., 64 p. (In Russ.)
8. Kraevskiy, V.V. (2008). Obshchie osnovy pedagogiki [General Foundations of Pedagogy]. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 256 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kraevskiy, V.V. (2009). [Sciences about Education, and Educational Science]. Voprosy filosofii = Russian Studies in Philosophy. No. 3, pp. 77-82. (In Russ.)
10. Asadullin, R.M. (2017). [Teacher Education: A New Look]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie. Stolitsa [Professional Education. The Capital]. No. 4. pp. 13-19. (In Russ.)
11. Davydov, V.V. (1972). Vidy obobshcheniya v obuchenii: logiko-psikhologicheskie problemy postroeniya uchebnykh predmetov [ Types of Generalization in Teaching: Logical and Psychological Problems of Building Subjects]. Moskow: Pedagogika Publ., 423 p. (In Russ.)
12. Zagvyazinskiy, V.I. (2006). Teoriya obucheniya. Sovremennaya interpretatsiya [Theory of Learning. Modern Interpretation]. Moskow: Akademiya Publ., 192 p. (In Russ.)
13. Lednev, V.S. (1991). Soderzhaniye obrazovaniya: suschnost, struktura, perspektivy [The Content of Education: Essence, Structure, Perspectives]. Moskow: Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 224 p. (In Russ.)
14. Rakhimov, A.Z. (2003). Pedagogicheskaya tekhnologiya tvorcheskogo razvitiya [Pedagogical Technology of Creative Development]. Ufa: Tvorchestvo Publ., 140 p. (In Russ.)
15. Reshetova, Z.A. (1985). Psikhologicheskiye osnovy professionalnogo obucheniya [The Psychological Foundations of Vocational Training]. Moskow: MGU Publ., 207 p. (In Russ.)
16. Shchedrovitskiy, G.P. (1995). [The System of Pedagogical Research: Methodological Analysis]. In: Shchedrovitskiy G., Rozin V., Alekseev N., Nepomnyashchaya N. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov “Pedagogika i logika” [Pedagogy and Logic. Collection of Scientific Papers]. Moskow: Kastal Publ., pp. 16-200. (In Russ.)
17. Leontiev, A.N. (1959). Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Problems of Development of the Psyche]. Moskow: Akademiya pedagogicheskih nauk RSFSR Publ., 345 p. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
529
Email this article 