Peer Learning Project for Teachers
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-10-128-139
Abstract
The paper deals with the issue of the faculty development at ITMO University by means of informal education in the context of implementation of new educational technologies in Russian institutions of higher education. The project team of the University designed and implemented a peer learning project which enables educators to share their experiences with technology and train each other to use new tools, methods, and techniques in their professional practice. The article describes the first results of the ITMO.EXPERT project, provides the analysis of its current state, and proposes measures for improving the efficiency of the project. The special focus in the paper is made on the analysis of such aspects of the ITMO.EXPERT project as the competencies that the participants are supposed to develop; the key characteristics of the target audience of the project that should be taken into consideration when planning improvements; the structure of a single workshop and the structure of the whole project.
About the Authors
D. A. Mezentceva
Saint-Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Daria A. Mezentceva – Cand. Sci. (Education), Senior Specialist at the Office of Educational Technologies
49, Kronverkskiy prosp., Saint-Petersburg, 197101, Russian Federation
E. S. Dzhavlakh
Saint-Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina S. Dzhavlakh – Head of the Office of Educational Technologies
49, Kronverkskiy prosp., Saint-Petersburg, 197101, Russian Federation
O. V. Eliseeva
Saint-Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Eliseeva – Cand. Sci. (Education), Assoc. Prof., Head of the Department of Educational Quality Assurance
49, Kronverkskiy prosp., Saint-Petersburg, 197101, Russian Federation
A. Sh. Bagautdinova
Saint-Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aliya Sh. Bagautdinova – Cand. Sci. (Education), Assoc. Prof., Head of the Department of Academic Affairs
49, Kronverkskiy prosp., Saint-Petersburg, 197101, Russian Federation
References
1. Starodubtsev, V.A., Isaeva, E.V. (2017). Personalization of Professional Development of University Pedagogical Staff. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1(208), pp. 93-98. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Bednyi, B.I. (2016). On the Issue of the Goal of Postgraduate Training (Dissertation vs Qualification). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 3 (199), pp. 44-52. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Ivanov, V.G., Sazonova, Z.S., Sapunov, M.B. (2017). Engineering Pedagogy: Facing Typology Challenges. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8/9, pp. 32-42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
4. Ignatyeva, G.A., Tulupova, O.V., Molkov A.S. (2016). Educational Co-working as a New Format of Building an Educational Ground for Continuous Professional Education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. No. 5(134), pp.139-157. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Сhicherina, N.V., Zaitsevskaya, A.A. (2016). Module-based Accrual System of University Staff In-service Training. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6 (202), pp. 34-41. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Chuchalin, A.I. (2019). The CDIO++ Approach to University Faculty Advanced Training for Research and Teaching Activities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 18-36 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Teaching Staff Training, Higher School Pedagogy, and Engineering Pedagogy: Round Table Discussion (2016). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 62-86. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Bandura, A. (2000). Teoriya sotsialnogo naucheniya [Social Learning Theory]. St. Petersburg: Evrasia Publ., 320 p. (In Russ.)
9. Verbitsky, A.A. (2010). Context and Competence Approach to Modernization of Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 1, pp. 10-25. (In Russ.)
10. Eddy, P., Hao, Y., Markiewicz, C., Iverson, E. (2019). Faculty Change Agents as Adult Learners: The Power of Situated Learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. Vol. 43(8), pp. 539-555. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2018.1507848
11. Mishra P., Koehler M. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record. Vol. 10, issue 6, pp. 1017-1054.
12. Zmeyev, S.I. (2002). Tekhnologiya obucheniya vzroslykh [Technology of Teaching Adults]. Moscow: Academia Publ., 128 p. (In Russ.)
13. Kolesnikova, A.I., Maron, A.E., Tonkonogaya, E.P. (2003). Osnovy andragogiki [Basics of Andragogy]. Moscow: Academia Publ., 240 p. (In Russ.)
14. Knowles, M., Holton, E., Swanson, R. (2005). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, 378 p.
15. Gagne, R., Briggs, L., Golas, K., Keller, J. (2004). Principles of Instructional Design. Boston: Cengage Learning, 387 p.
16. Keller, J. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance. NY: Springer, 353 p.
17. Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research. Vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 68-72.
18. Chuchalin, A.I., Petrovskaya, T.S., Kulyukina, E.S. (Eds) (2011). Vsemirnaya initsiativa CDIO: standards. [Worldwide CDIO Initiative: Standards].Transl. from Eng. Tomsk: Tomsk Polytechnic University Publ., 17 p. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
711
Email this article 