Web Accessibility Analysis of Massive Open Online Courses in Mathematical Disciplines
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-10-157-166
Abstract
The paper studies the problem of developing the massive open online courses (MOOCs) that conform to the content accessibility principles for persons with disabilities. Using the browsing of MOOCs platform catalogues, a total of 56 Russian-language free MOOCs in mathematical disciplines hosted on 5 platforms has been received. By automatic testing using Web Accessibility Checker, the accessibility of the functional and informational content of the MOOCs was evaluated. 73% of MOOCs were found to conform to the syllabus subjects “Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics”, “Discrete Mathematics” and “Algebra and Geometry”; 8 basic disciplines of higher mathematics education are not covered by online education; 96,4% of the courses have accessibility limitations, especially for people with visual impairment. Accessibility problems are related to shortcomings of the platforms and MOOC developers’ errors. The results show a weak coverage by MOOCs of the basic mathematical disciplines included in the higher education curriculum in Russia and indicate the low content accessibility of the mathematical MOOCs for students with disabilities. The results of the work imply the need for: expanding the range of MOOCs to cover all basic mathematical disciplines; troubleshooting the accessibility in existing courses (pursuant to WCAG); prescription to platforms and developers to strictly adhere to WCAG in future courses.
About the Authors
E. A. Kosova
Taurida Academy of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Kosova – Cand. Sci. (Education), Assoc. Prof.
4, Prospect Vernadskogo, Simferopol, 295007, Russian Federation
M. Yu. Khalilova
Taurida Academy of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Milera Yu. Khalilova – Master’s degree program (Applied Mathematics)
4, Prospect Vernadskogo, Simferopol, 295007, Russian Federation
References
1. Policar, L., Crawford T., Alligood, V. (2017). Accessibility Benefits of E-Learning for Students with Disabilities. Available at: https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/education/postsecondary/e-learning.php
2. Kent, M. (2015). Disability and eLearning: Opportunities and Barriers. Disability Studies Quarterly. Vol. 35, no 1. Available at: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3815/3830
3. De Waard, I., Gallagher, M.S., Zelezny-Green, R., Czerniewicz, L., Downes, S., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Willems J. (2014). Challenges for Conceptualising EU MOOC for Vulnerable Learner Groups. Proceedings of the eMOOCs Conference. Edited by P.A.U. Education (Laussane, Switzerland), pp. 33-42.
4. Kurbangaleyeva, Е.Sh., Veretennikov, D.N. (2017). Accessibility of Higher Education for Students with Disabilities. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 169180. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Iniesto, F., Rodrigo, C. (2016). A Preliminary Study for Developing Accessible MOOC Services. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 102-124.
6. Iniesto, F., McAndrew, P., Minocha, S., Coughlan, T. (2016). Accessibility of MOOCs: Understanding the Provider Perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. No. 1, p. 20. Available at: http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.430
7. Gay, G., Djafarova, N., Zefi, L. (2017). Teaching Accessibility to the Masses. Proceedings of the 14th Web for All Conference “The Future of Accessible Work”. Article No. 15. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3058555.3058563
8. Iniesto, F., McAndrew, P., Minocha, S., Coughlan, T. (2017). Auditing the Accessibility of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). In: 14th AAATE Congress. Available at: http://www.aaate2017.eu/
9. Sanchez-Gordon, S., Lujan-Mora, S. (2016). How Could MOOCs Become Accessible? The Case of edX and the Future of Inclusive Online Learning. Journal of Universal Computer Science. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 55-81.
10. Accommodations for Learners with Disabilities. Available at: https://learner.coursera.help/hc/en-us/articles/208280056-Accommodations-for-learners-with-disabilities
11. Enhance Accessibility Documentation. Available at: https://open.edx.org/features/enhance-accessibility-documentation
12. Trebovaniya i rekomendatsii po razrabotke onlayn-kursov, publikuemykh na natsionalnoy platforme otkryitogo obrazovaniya = Requirements and Recommendations for the Development of Online Courses Published on the National Platform of Open Education]. Available at: http://npoed.ru/docs (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Semenova, T., Vilkova, K., Shcheglova, I. (2018). The MOOC Market: Prospects for Russia. Voprosyi obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 2, pp. 173-197. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-2-173-197 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Lowe, T., Mestel, B., Williams, G. (2016). Perceptions of Online Tutorials for Distance Learning in Mathematics and Computing. Research in Learning Technology. Vol. 24, article no. 30630. Available at: http://oro.open.ac.uk/46797/
15. Ramírez-Vega, A., Iniesto, F., Rodrigo, C. (2017). Raising Awareness of the Acc Essibility Challenges in Mathematics MOOCs. TEEM 2017 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, ACM, New York, NY, USA. Article no. 92. Available at: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/50954
16. Bohnsack, M., Puhl, S. (2014). Accessibility of MOOCs. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Penaz, P., Zagler, W. (Eds.) (2014). Proc. 14th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, ICCHP 2014, Paris, France, July 9–11, 2014. Springer International Publishing, pp. 141–144. Available at: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319085951
17. Iniesto, F., Rodrigo, C. (2014). Accessibility Assessment of MOOC Platforms in Spanish: UNED COMA, COLMENIA and MiriadaX. In: Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), Logrono, Spain, 12–14 Nov. 2014. Pp. 169–172. DOI:10.1109/siie.2014.7017724
18. Al-Mouh, N., Al-Khalifa, A., Al-Khalifa, H. (2014). A First Look into MOOCs Accessibility: The Case of Coursera. In: Miesenberger K., Fels D., Archambault D., Peňáz P., Zagler W. (Eds). Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8547. Springer, Cham, pp. 145-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08596-8_22
19. Ferati, M., Mripa, N., Bunjaku, R. (2016). Accessibility of MOOCs for Blind People in Developing Non-English Speaking Countries. In: Di Bucchianico G., Kercher P. (Eds). Advances in Design for Inclusion. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 500. Springer, Cham. Pp. 519–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41962-6_46
20. Martin, J.L., Amado-Salvatierra, H.R., Hilera, J.R. (2016). MOOCs for All: Evaluating the Accessibility of Top MOOC Platforms. Int. J. Eng. Educ. Vol. 32, no. 5-B, pp. 2374-2383.
21. Akgül, Y. (2018). Accessibility Evaluation of MOOCs Websites of Turkey. Journal of Life Economics. No. 5, pp. 23-36.
22. Shutova, A.S. (2018). Open Education for People with Disabled Health Opportunities: Design Objectives. Akademicheskiy vestnik URALNIIPROEKT RAASN = Academic Bulletin URALNIIPROEKT RAASN. No. 1, pp. 85-91. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
23. Sanchez-Gordon, S., Luján-Mora, S. (2015). Adaptive Content Presentation Extension for Open edX. ACHI 2015: The Eighth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions. Pp. 2374-2383.
24. Sanchez-Gordon, S., Luján-Mora, S. (2016). How Could MOOCs Become Accessible? The Case of edX and the Future of Inclusive Online Learning. Journal of Universal Computer Science. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 55–81. DOI: 10.3217/jucs-022-01-0055
Review
Views:
934
Email this article 