Selection of Candidates for Positions in Higher Education Institution from the Standpoint of Their Potential Loyalty to Employer

The article focuses on the personal characteristics of candidates for employment in higher education institutions. The presence of a number of features in a candidate, with high probability, determines their potential disloyalty to any employer in the system of higher education. The authors explore the personal qualities, psychological types, habits and inclinations of lecturers, as well as other employees of University, which can provoke various threats to its reputation, information and property security. The article makes the case for using special HR-technologies as a necessary element of the recruitment procedure in modern University. HR-technologies such as stress interview questions, 16PF Questionnaire, Questionnaire of K. Leonhard - S. Shmishek, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Buss-Durkey Inventory and others make it possible to identify the above negative qualities and, thus, to prevent most of possible threats to the personnel security of higher education institution. The article formulates the practice-oriented recommendations on the solution ofthe considered problem.

1. Magura, M. (2010). Poisk i otbor personala [Search and Selection of Personnel]. Moscow: Intel-synthes Publ., 511p. (In Russ.)

2. Kartashov, S., Odegov, Yu., Kokorev, I. (2012). Rekruting: naem personala [Recruitment]. Yu. G. Odegov (Ed). Moscow: Ekzamen Publ., 292p. (In Russ.)

3. Jouve, D., Massoni, D. (2004). Le Recrutement. Paris: PUF. (Russian Translation: St. Petersburg: Neva Publ., 96 p.)

4. Alaverdov, A. (2012). Problemy obespecheniya kadrovoy bezopasnosti rossiiskikh vuzov [Problems of Ensuring Personnel Security of Russian Universities]. Moscow: University “Synergy” Publ., 368 p. (In Russ.)

5. Kravchenko, A., Prokopenko, A. (2016). Features of Corruption Forms in Higher Education System of Russia. Filosofiyaprava = Philosophy of Law. No. 1 (74), pp. 34-38. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Ekman, P. (2009). Telling lies. Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics and Marriage. W.W. Norton & Company, 416 p. (Russian translation by Isupova, N., Malgina, N. & Mironova, N., St. Petersburg: Peter Publ., 304 p.)

7. Poroykov, S. (2018). Psikhologicheskie tipy [Psychological Types]. Moscow: Infra-M Publ., 597 p. (In Russ.)

8. McWilliams, N. (1994). Psychoanalytic Diagnosis. Understanding Personality in the Clinical Process. 2nd ed. N.Y.; L.: The Guilford Press. (Russian translation: Moscow: Klass Publ., 2001, 480 p.)

9. Makushina, O. (2014). Some Aspects of Drug Abuse Prevention among University Students. Peda,gogicheskoe obmzovanie i nauka = Pedagogical Education and Science. No. 6, pp. 108-111. (In Russ.)

10. Samokhvalova, E. (2014). Organization of Work on Drug Abuse Prevention among Students. Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniya = Humanities Scientific Researches. No. 11. Available at: http://human.snauka.ru/2014/11/8315. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

11. Zaitsev, V., Shaidullina, A. (2003). Kak izbavit’sya ot pristmstiya k a,zartnym igram [How to Get Rid of Gambling Addiction]. St. Petersburg: Neva Publ., 128 p. (In Russ.)

12. Beloglazova, L. (2012). [Gambling as a Phenomenon of Alienated Reality]. Vestnik Voronezh-skogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Voronezh State Technical University. No. 2, pp. 99-102. (In Russ.)