On the Role of the Institute of Headmen of Academic Groups in Russian Universities

The institute of headmen of academic groups is an auxiliary tool for improving the educational process in higher education. This tool is traditional for Russian Universities, but it practically is not used abroad. Based on empirical data, the article highlights its current state, formulates key problems and justifies measures to overcome them.

The goal is the formation of a set of sound scientific and practical measures to improve the educational process in Russian higher education by developing the institute of headmen of academic groups.

Methodology and methods. On the basis of the questionnaire developed by the author, a student survey was conducted to explore how the institute of headmen of academic groups is functioning in one of the Russian economic universities. The total number of students who were invited to participate in the survey was 238 people (12 academic groups); the actual number of respondents was 193 (81% of students). The questionnaire was anonymous, remote, electronic, free of charge.

The results and scientific novelty. The author has formulated a number of key problems characterizing functioning of the institute of headmen of academic groups at the present stage: a) the lack of proper interaction between deans and headmen; b) the lack of real authority among the headmen; c) the lack of candidates for the role of headmen; d) the lack of systems in domestic universities for: d1) attracting students with high organizational skills and leadership to perform the functions of headmen; d2) the formation of a personnel reserve of headmen; d3) supporting headmen’s activities including the development of their personal and business qualities. To overcome them, a number of recommendations have been proposed: a) to formalize the status of the institute of headmen of academic groups as an auxiliary tool for improving the educational process in order to specify the conceptual task of its functioning; b) to intensify the interaction between the organizational and educational units of deans headmen of academic groups; c) to empower councils of headmen so that they can take part in consideration of certain issues related to the implementation of the educational process; d) to create a working system for the selection, preparation and support of the activities of headmen of academic groups; e) to increase the motivation of headmen.

Practical relevance. The given recommendations can be used in Russia and abroad at the state and local levels in order to improve the quality of the educational process in higher education institutions.

1. Gryazev, M.V., Rudnev, S.A., Anisimova, M.A., Blyakherov, I.S. (2014). Modular Plans for the Effective Implementation of University Educational Programs Based on FSES 3+. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11, pp. 5-17. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Voznesenskaya, N.V., Safonov, V.I. (2011). The Individually-Focused Organization of Educational Process in the Educational and Informational Environment Higher School. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie = The Humanities and Education. No. 3 (7), pp. 6-9. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

3. Sazonov, B.A. (2011). Individually-Oriented Organization of the Educational Process as a Condition for the Modernization of Higher Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 4, pp. 10-24. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Baidenko, V.I., Selezneva, N.A. (2017). Optics of Looking to the Future (Article 3). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12, pp. 120-132. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

5. Klemeshev, A.P., Kuksa, I.Yu. (2016). Administration of Academic Programmes as a Factor of University Modernization. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5, pp. 10-20. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Ezrokh, Y.S. (2019). Personnel Perspectives of Russian Universities: Who Will Be Teaching in the Near Future? Obrazovanie i nauka = Education and Science. Vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 9-40. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. Kotova, S.S., Khasanova, I.I. (2016). The Quality of the Educational Process at the University through the Eyes of Students. Obmzovaniye i nauka = Education and Science. No. 9, pp. 43-61. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Ezrokh, Yu. (2018). Increase Quality of Higher Education: Viewing ofStudents-Economists. Ob-shchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economy. No. 4, pp. 92-109. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

9. Bochkareva, A.B. (2014). Formation of the United Student Group: Conditions and Factors. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya,: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 5 (123), pp. 200-209. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

10. Shkaberina, G.Sh., Tovbis, E.M. (2014). Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Method to Selecting the Head of the Study Group. Obmzovatel’nyye tekhnologii i obshchestvo = Educational Technology and Society. No. 2, pp. 360-370. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

11. Kapezina, T.T. (2016). Research of Interpersonal Relations in Student Groups. Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo = Science. Society. State. No. 1, pp. 95-102. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

12. Gorodetskaya, I.V., Gorbachev, V.V., Klopov, N.A. (2014). [The Problem of Leadership in the Student Environment of Voronezh State Medical University]. Vestnik Vitebskogo gosudarst-vennogo meditsinskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Vitebsk State Medical University. No. 1, pp. 121-128. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

13. Shchetinina, D.P., Zinchenko, S.S. (2016). Forming “Leadership” Competency in Institutes of Higher Education. Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Psychological Journal. Vol. 13, no. 4. pp. 269-283. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

14. Corrales, J. (1999.) The Politics ofEducation Reform: Bolstering the Supply and Demand; Overcoming Institutional Blocks (English). The Education Reform and Management Series. Vol. 2, no. 1. Washington, D.C.

15. Hrnciar, M., Madzik, P. (2013). Improving the Quality of Higher Education in Central Europe: Approach Based on GAP Analysis. Higher Education Studies. Vol. 3, no. 4. DOI: 3.10.5539/hes.v3n4p75

16. Bunglowala, A., Asthana, N. (2016). A Total Quality Management Approach in Teaching and Learning Process. International Journal ofManagement (IJM). Vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 223-227.

17. Ibrahim, Y., Arshad, R., Salleh, D. (2017). Stakeholder Perceptions of Secondary Education Quality in Sokoto State, Nigeria. Quality Assurance in Education. No. 25 (2), pp. 248-267.

18. Telford, R., Masson, R. (2005). The Congruence of Quality Values in Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 109-118.

19. Gruber, T., Fufi, S., Voss, R., Glasser-Zikuda, M. (2010). Examining Student Satisfaction with Higher Education Services: Using a New Measurement Tool. International Journal of Public Sector Management. Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 105-123.

20. Garwe, E. (2015). Student Voice and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 385-399. DOI: 7.10.1108/JAR-HE-05-2014-0055

21. Walsh, E. (2010). A Model of Research Group Microclimate: Environmental and Cultural Factors Affecting the Experiences of Overseas Research Students in the UK. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 35, pp. 545-560.

22. Galeeva, N.A. (2016). Interrelationships in Developing Self-Organizational and Organizational Skills of High School Students. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo peda,gogichesko-go universiteta im. V.P. Astafyeva = Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafiev. No. 4, pp. 191-195. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

23. Selivanova, M.N. (2016). [The Contest “The Best Headman” as a Means of Developing Professionally Important Qualities of Students]. Obmzovaniye. KaEyera. Obshchestvo [Education. Career. Society]. No. 3, pp. 62-63. (In Russ.)