University-Industry Interaction as an Element of the University’s «Third Mission»

In the context of the transformation of education, characterized by the rapid obsolescence of knowledge, the increasing role of technological and social innovations, the globalization of the economy and education, it is becoming increasingly important to ensure successful cooperation between universities and business. At the same time, the state gains an advantage due to the rapid transfer of new knowledge, research and innovation, enterprises and organizations increase opportunities for effective development.

The aim of the study is to identify the most successful forms of interaction between educational organizations and enterprises, the mechanisms of influence of the University on the development of the region of its location, participation in socio-economic processes. The problem is considered through the prism of the concept of the “third mission” for universities, which involves active interaction of educational organizations with society, including employers. Besides, the authors use the provisions of the theory of stakeholders, which describes the parameters taking into account the interests of various actors in the process of University management.

On the example of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, the article analyzes the existing experience and successful practices of organizing such interaction, as well as the emerging problems. The information base of the study was a survey on the satisfaction of employers with the quality of University graduates’ training, conducted in SAFU in 2019.

As findings, the article states the main systemic problems of interaction between universities and the sphere of production such as the lack of coordinated strategies for training in various specialties, discrepancies in understanding the sets of competencies and skills of graduates, the fragmented university-industry interaction in research and development areas, different motivations and values.

The authors come to a conclusion that the University must undergo a path of transformation to ensure strategic interaction with business and industry, including the development of a common “entrepreneurial” culture in the team, as well as the expansion of interaction with public institutions and socio-economic actors in the framework of the “third mission”.

1. Marhl, M., Pausits, A. (2011). Third Mission Indicators for New Ranking Methodologies. Evaluation in Higher Education. No. 5, рр. 43-64. DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2013.1949

2. Medushevskiy, N.A., Perfilieva, O.V. (2016). A Contemporary Interpretation of the Universities’ Third Role at Present. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Zarubezhnoe regionovedenie. Vostokovedenie» = RGGU Bulletin. Series “Political Science. History. International relations. Foreign regional studies. Orientalism”. No. 3, pp. 19-31 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

3. Jongbloed, B. (2008). Seven Indicators for Mapping University Regional Interactions. In: ENID PRIME Indicators Conference in Oslo, 26-28 May 2008. Oslo, pp. 32-56.

4. Dan, M.C. (2012). The Third Mission of Universities in the Development Strategy of Vienna City. Informatica. Economica. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 49-56.

5. Perfilieva, O.V. (2011). The University in the Region: Steps Towards Third Mission. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii = International Organisations Research Journal. No. 1(32), pp. 133-144. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Klyachko, T.A., Semionova, E.A. (2018). [Contribution of Education to the Socio-Economic Development of the Subjects of the Russian Federation. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 791-805. DOI: 10.17059/2018-3-8 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. Kogan, E.Ya. (2019). Models of Interaction of Higher Education Institutions with the Economy and Social Sphere of the Region. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 9-18. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Kondratieva M.N., Balandina, E.V. (Eds). (2011). Ekonomika predpriyatiya: uchebnoe posobie [Economics of Enterprise: Textbook]. Ulyanovsk: UlSTU Publ., 174 p. (In Russ.)

9. Santoro, M., Chakrabarti, A. (2001). Firm Size and Technology Centrality in Industry University Interactions: MIT IPC Working Paper IPC 01–001. Available at: https://ipc.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2019-01/01-001.pdf

10. Belousov, K.Yu. (2013). Evolution of Perspectives upon the Role of Management of the Interested Parties in the Sustainable Development of a Company: Identification of Stakeholders. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics. No. 4, pp. 418-422 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

11. Nagornov, V.A., Perfilieva, O.V. (2010). Assessing the Role of Higher Educational Institutions in Regional Development. Sustainable Partnership for Development. Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizacij: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika = International Organisations Research Journal. No. 4, pp. 60-86. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

12. Shutaeva, E.A. (2015). Knowledge and Technology Transfer as a Main Aspect of Formation of “New Economy” in European Countries. Nauka i mir = Science and World. No. 8, pp. 90-92. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

13. Leydesdorff, L. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. Science and Public Policy. Vol. 25(3), pp. 195-203.

14. Unger, M., Wagner-Schuster, D., Polt, W. (2016). Austria: Place-Based Dimension in Higher Education Policy Making. In: Enhancing the Contributions of Higher Education and Research Institutions to Innovation. Case Studies Background Document for the OECD High Level Event on the Knowledge Triangle, 15-16 September 2016, Paris. Paris: OECD, pp. 12-14.

15. Medovnikov, D.S., Savelenok, E.A. (2013). [University as a Key Element of a Regional Cluster: Conditions and Opportunities]. In: Resursnyi sbornik «Programma «EVRIKA». Universitet – Region – Biznes: na putyakh integratsii [Resource collection “EUREKA PROGRAM”. University-Region-Business: On the Path to Integration]. Moscow, 296 p. (In Russ.)

16. Goncharov, A.Yu., Polyakov, A.V., Sirotkina, N.V. (2015). [Trends and Prospects of Interaction of Agents of Innovative Environment of the Region in the Conditions of Cognitive Economy]. Del’ta nauki [Delta Science]. Vol. 1, no. 1 (1), pp. 4-17 (In Russ.)

17. Balatskiy, E.V. (2017). Universitetskie endaumenty i konkurentosposobnost’ rossijskikh vuzov [University Endowments and Competitiveness of Russian Universities]. Moscow: Buki Vedi Publ., 84 p. (In Russ.)

18. Baryshnikova, M.Yu., Vashurina, E.V., Sharykina, E.A., Sergeev, Yu.N., Chinnova, I.I. (2019). The Role of Flagship Universities in a Region: Transformation Models. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 1, pp. 8-43. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2019-1-8-43 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)