Pedagogical Bioethics Initiatives
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-6-122-128
Abstract
The peculiarity of bioethics is the development of such invariant principles and rules that allow predictable variational interpretation depending on specific axiological and communicative formats of situations. The noted semiotic peculiarity is updated in connection with the project of collaboration of various universities within one region. The authors consider the success of the project in satisfying the request for the training of unique specialists. In this regard, the authors interpret the pedagogical bioethics as the training of self-defense of the individuality and as education of the desire to acquire unique experience. The authors present the directions of pedagogical bioethics, which enable: (1) to overcome the standardization of personality; (2) to become consulting for the formation of individual educational trajectories; (3) to perform the function of informed consent in the context of the implementation of innovative educational technologies based on the achievements of neurophysiology and cognitive sciences; (4) in the context of university integration, to play the role of a dominant of education in the humanities to overcome “moral color vision deficiency”. The listed initiatives of pedagogical bioethics are put forward on the base of the results of the research in the field of visual semiotics.
About the Authors
M. S. Gorbuleva
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria S. Gorbuleva – Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Senior researcher, the Research and Education Theories Center
Address: 60, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634061
I. V. Melik-Gaykazyan
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina V. Melik-Gaykazyan – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Head of the Research and Education Theories Center
Address: 60, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634061
N. A. Pervushina
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nina A. Pervushina – Researcher, the Research and Education Theories Center
Address: 60, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634061
References
1. Potter, V.R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Englwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 205 p. (Russian Translation: S.V. Vekovshininа, V.L. Kulinichenko (Eds), Kiev, 2002, 216 p.)
2. Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., Behrens, W.W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books, 205 p. (Russian translation: G.A. Yagodyn, Moscow: MSU Publ., 1991, 208 p.)
3. Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. (1994). Theory of Self-organization – the Basis of Modern Ecological Education. Obrazovaniye v Sibiri [Education in Siberia]. No. 1, pp. 35-43. (In Russ.)
4. Roco, M., Bainbridge, W. (2003). Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 465 p.
5. Gorbuleva, M.S. (2019) The Visual Part of Bionic Technologies in Prosthetics. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. No. 4, pp. 92-109. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-92-109 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Shestakova, M.A. (2018). Visualization of the Philosophical and Conceptual Foundations of Modern Natural Sciences in Renaissance Painting. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. No. 4, pp. 263-272. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2018-4-263-272 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Belyaletdinov, R.R. (2019). Moral Bioenhancement and Autonomy: The Risk of a Visualized Good. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. No. 4, pp. 254-267. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-254-267 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Foucault, M. (1977). The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1. In: The Will to Knowledge. London: Penguin. (Russian translation: S. Tabachnikova, Moscow: Castal Publ., 1996, 446 p.)
9. Tishchenko, P.D. (2001). Bio-vlast’ v epokhu biotekhnologiy [Bio-Power in the Era of Biotechnology]. Moscow: IFRAN Publ., 177 p. (In Russ.)
10. Kovkel, N.F., Popova, O.V. (2019). Problems of Applying a Semiotic Methodology in Modern Jurisprudence and Bioethics. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. No. 4, pp. 126-155. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-126-155 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Mikhel, D.V. (2011). Medicalization as a Social Phenomenon. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik Saratov State Technical University. Vol. 4, no. 2 (60), pp. 256-263. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Joussellin, C., Mailenova, F.G. (2018). L’objectivation du Corps et Nouvelles Technologies. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. No. 4, pp. 142-147. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2018-4-142-147
13. Tischenko, P.D., Yudin, B.G. (2015). Finest Hour of Philosophy. Voprosy filosofii = Russian Studies in Philosophy. No. 12, pp. 198-203. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Harris, J. (2019). Moral Blindness – the Gift of the God Machine (Translation by R.R. Belyaletdinov). ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. No. 4, pp. 244-253. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-244-253 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V., Pervushina, N.A., Smyshlyaeva, L.G. (2019). The Research Program of Pedagogical Bioethics in the Conditions of Uncertainty of Social Scenarios. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal. No. 448. pp. 83-90. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/448/10 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. Avanesov, S.S. (2019). University and Formation of Urban Reality. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. No. 3, pp. 268-276. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-3-268-276 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
17. Pervushina, N.A. (2018). Pedagogical Bioethics: A Semiotic Aspect. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. No. 4, pp. 186-201. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2018-4-186-201 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
18. Pervushina, N.A. (2019). A Semiotic Diagnostics of Study Kits in the Era of Neuropedagogy. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki = ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. No. 4, pp. 194-205. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-194-205 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
19. Kosslyn, S.M., Koenig, O.M. (1992). Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: The Free Press. 548 p.
20. Levitin, D. (2014). Organized Mind. How to Think and Make Decisions in the Era of Information Overload. Dutton, 512 p. (Russian Translation: N. Bragina, T. zemlerub, Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber Publ., 2019, 544 p.)
21. Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. Penguin, 528 p. (Russian Translation: G. Borodina, Moscow: Alpine Nonfiction Publ., 2018, 608 p.)
Review
Views:
485
Email this article 