Innovations in Education, or How to Separate the Wheat from the Chaff?
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-153-166
Abstract
The article focuses on the criteria of pedagogical innovation. Along with such criteria as an obvious novelty and effectiveness, the author dwells on the adequacy of the considered pedagogical experience to ensure the advanced scientific and technological challenges of the time, as well as the solution of priority social problems. This implies that the tasks are reflected primarily in the conceptual documents of the country’s development. This criterion corresponds to a narrow understanding of innovation, which is associated with the system of «scientific novelty – technological (social) project – development – implementation». The broad understanding of the category «innovation» is determined by the development and preservation of the anthropological potential of society and education in particular. The relevance of the proposed basic criterion is revealed as a result of a critical analysis of a scientific publication devoted to the pedagogical experience within the system of military education. The article justifies the real anti-innovative systemic effects of the so called «Innovative approach».
In the context of the growing pace of the scientific and technological revolution, the concept of «Asymmetric response» to the innovative challenges of the time is introduced. As a result of the analysis of the achievements of domestic and foreign scientists, a set of «Asymmetric measures» is proposed. They stemmed from the development of universal basic information, creative competencies, and polytechnic skills, as well as humanitarian and economic orientation of training, the development of primarily STEM-areas in school education, simulation and distance learning tools, innovative pedagogical technologies.
About the Author
M. V. Kochetkov
Norilsk State Industrial Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maksim V. Kochetkov – Сand. Sci. (Engineering), Assoc. Prof.
7, 50 let Oktyabrya str., Norilsk, 663310
References
1. Çevikbaş, M., Argün, Z. (2017). An Innovative Learning Model in Digital Age: Flipped Classroom. Journal of Education and Training Studies. Vol. 5, no. 11, рр. 189-200. DOI:10.11114/jets.v5i11.2322
2. Ghernaout, D., Touahmia, M., Aichouni, M., Alghamdi, A., Messaoudene A.N. (2018). Fostering Students’ Creativity Through Innovative Learning Tools. Higher Education Research. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9-14. DOI: 10.11648/j.her.20180301.13
3. Inzelt, A., Csonka, L. (2017). The Approach of the Business Sector to Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 11, no. 4, рр. 63-73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.63.73
4. Khan, R. (2016). How Frugal Innovation Promotes Social Sustainability. Sustainability. Vol. 10, no. 8, рр. 1-16. DOI: 10.3390/su8101034
5. Linton, J. (2018). Quiet Contributors: The Role of the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences in Innovation. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 12, no. 3, рр. 6-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.3.6.12
6. Kochetkov, M.V., Noskov, M.F. (2019). [Flipped Classroom Technology in Engineering Education: Criteria of Educational Innovation]. Science for Education Today. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 185- 199. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1903.11 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Kochetkov, M.V. (2014). Innovations and Pseudoinnovations in Higher School. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 3, рр. 41-47. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Zadorozhnyuk, I.E. (2018). 75 years of MEPhI’s History: Continuity of Educational Innovations. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 5, рр. 160-164. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Strongin, R.G., Chuprunov, E.V. (2018). Towards University Innovation Belt: Problems of Management. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 3, рр. 16-22. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Dobrovolsky, V.S., Shpakov, G.G. (2018). Innovative Approach to Improving the Quality of Students’ Military Training. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 5, рр. 141-151. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Monakhov, I.A. (2017). [Educational Practices of Technical Orientation for Training of Future Engineers in the United States]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. No. 22, рр. 102-108. (In Russ.)
12. Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview. Neural Networks. Vol. 61, pp. 85-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003
13. Fofanov, G.A. (2018). Problems of Neural Networks Training Published. In: 19th International Conference of Young Specialists on Micro/Nanotechnologies and Electron Devices (EDM). Erlagol, Russia, pp. 6403-6405. DOI: 10.1109/EDM.2018.8434935
14. Larina, L.S., Ovchinskiy, V.S. (2018). [Fermi Paradox and Threats of the Future]. Izborskiy klub [Izborsky Club: Internet Resource]. August 27. Available at: https://izborsk-club.ru/15732 (In Russ.)
15. Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., Edström K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9
16. Crawley, E.F., Brodeur, D.R., Soderholm, D.H. (2006). The Education of Future Aeronautical Engineers: Conceiving, Designing, Implementing and Operating. 25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 18 p. Available at: http://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS2006/PAPERS/804.PDF
17. Solovyev, A.N., Prikhodko, V.M. (2018). The International Society for Engineering Pedagogy: The Achievements for 45 Years. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 3, рр. 85-95. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
18. Baranova, I.A., Putilov, A.V. (2017). [Formation of Competencies and Innovative Trends in Distance Engineering Education]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. No. 22, рр. 10-18. (In Russ.).
19. Rudskoy, A.I., Borovkov, A.I., Romanov, P.I., Kolosova, O.V. (2019). Ways to Reduce Risks When Building the Digital Economy in Russia. Educational Aspect. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 9-22. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-2-9-22 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
20. Bogdanov, K.A. (2014). [Philology and Anthropology: Literary Studies in the Age of Internet]. Russkaya literatura [Russian Literature]. No. 1, pp. 5-17. (In Russ.)
21. Likholetov, V.V., Shmakov, B.V. (2016). [Interdisciplinary FCA- and TRIZ-Based Projects: Experience and Prospects in Training Teacher]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. No. 20, рр. 231-242. (In Russ.)
22. Moiseeva, O.A., Firstov, Yu.P., Timofeev, I.S. (2017). [Features of Engineering Education in Innovative Economy]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. No. 22, рр. 59-67. (In Russ.)
23. Romanchenko, M.K. (2017). [Development of Technical Creativity in the System of Training]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. No. 22, рр. 68-73. (In Russ.)
24. Vasilieva, O.N., Konovalova, N.V. (2018). Engineering Classes as a Tool of Professional Navigation. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no.12, рр. 136-143. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-12-136-143 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
25. Zhuravleva, M.V., Ovsienko, L.V., Bashkirtseva, N.Yu., Ibrasheva, L.R., Emelyanova, O.P. (2018). Pre-University Engineering Training in International Multi-Partner Educational Environment. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 1, рр. 54-60. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
26. Sorokin, S.V., Sorokina, I.V., Soldatenko, I.S. (2017). [Using of Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. No. 21, рр. 127-132. (In Russ.)
27. Comber Darren, P.M., Brady-Van den Bos, М. (2018). Too Much, Too Soon? A Critical Investigation into Factors That Make Flipped Classrooms Effective. Higher Education Research & Development. Vol. 37, no. 4, рр. 683-697. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1455642
28. Zainuddin, Z., Halili, S.H. (2016). Flipped Classroom Research and Trends from Different Fields of Study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Vol. 17, no. 3, рр. 314-340. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274
29. Barabanova, S.V., Kaybiyaynen, A.A., Kraysman, N.V. (2019). Digitalization of Education in the Global Context. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 1, рр. 94-103. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-1-94-103 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
Review
Views:
755
Email this article 