Imaginary Units of Publication Activities in Consumer Society
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-12-86-94
Abstract
Consumer society is associated with abundance of goods and services. Usually the scientific activity is not among them. Meanwhile, with scientometric indicators introduction, science activity acquired characteristics of consumer society in which it runs. The publication activity in modern circumstances got in track of consumer focus: authors, journals and mediators became economical actors, and scientific text became the product of “sings absorption and absorbed by signs”. Was it possible to avoid it? - this question is without answer. It is clear that imposing quantitative scientometric indicators became the catalyst of this process.
About the Authors
N. G. BagdasaryanRussian Federation
Nadezda G. Bagdasaryan - Dr. Sci. (Philosophy.), Cand. Sci. (History), Prof.
5/1, 2-ya Baumanskaya str., 105005, Moscow.
L. A. Sonina
Russian Federation
Lidiya A. Sonina - Senior lecturer.
64, Leningradsky prospect, 125319, Moscow.
References
1. Feigelman, M.V., Tsirlina, G.A. (2013). Bibliometric Passion as a Consequence of the Lack of Scientific Expertise. In: Novikov, D.A., Orlov, A.I., Chebotarev, P.Yu. (Eds.). Upravlenie bol'shimi sistemami [Management of Large Systems]. Special Issue 44. Moscow: V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS Publ., pp. 332-346. (In Russ.).
2. Yurevich, M.A., Erkina, D.S. (2017). “Publication Rally”: Direct Threat or Opportunity for Scientific Community? Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii = Sociology of Science and Technology. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 104-117. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Mironov, V. (2016). Scientometrics as a Kind of Madness. Sokrat = Socrates. Sept., special Issue. Pp. 8-12. (In Russ.).
4. (2016). Idei i chisla. Osnovaniya i kriterii otsenki rezul'tativnosti filosofskikh i sotsiogumanitarnykh issledovanii [Ideas and Numbers. Grounds and Criteria for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Philosophical and Socio-Humanitarian Research]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 272 p. (In Russ.).
5. Bondar, V.V., Grigoryan, L.A., Ennan, A.A. (2013). Scientometric Ratings: A Guiding Thread or a Compass with a Broken Arrow? In: Problemy naukometrii: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsya [Problems of Scientometrics: State and Development Prospects. International Conference]. Moscow: Institute of Science Development Problems, RAS, pp. 53-56. (In Russ.).
6. Mikhailov, O.V., Mikhailova, T.I. (2010). Hirsch Index in Assessing Scientist's Activity at a National Research University. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Kazan Technological University. No. 11, pp. 485-487. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Bolotov, V., Kvelidze-Kuznetsova, N., Laptev, V., Morozova, S. (2014). The h-Index in the Russian Science Citation Index. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 1, pp. 241-262. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. (2011). Igra v tsyfir', ili kak teper' otsenivayut trud uchenogo (sbornik statei o bibliometrike) [Playing with Numbers, or How the Work of a Scientist is Now Evaluated (Collection of Articles on Bibliometrics)]. Moscow: Moscow Center for Continuous Mathematical Education Publ., 72 p. (In Russ.).
9. Robotova, A.S. (2013). Invisible Laboratory of University Lecturer's Mental Work. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 10, pp. 28-34. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
10. Rubtsov, A.V. (Ed). (2012). Izmerenie filosofii. Ob osnovaniyakh i kriteriyakh otsenki rezul'tativnosti filosofskikh i sotsiogumanitarnykh issledovanii [Measurement of Philosophy. On the Grounds and Criteria for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Philosophical and Socio-Humanitarian Research]. Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy Publ., 159 p. (In Russ.).
11. Novikov, D.A., Orlov, A.I., Chebotarev, P.Yu. (Eds.). (2013). Upravlenie bol'shimi sistemami [Management of Large Systems]. Special Issue - 44. Moscow: V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS Publ., 568 p. (In Russ.).
12. Novikov, D.A. (2015). Compete by «Hirsch's»? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 5-12 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
13. Churin, V.V. (2015). On the Issue of the Need for a Scientific Citation Index. In: III Vserossi-iskaya konferentsiya po naukovedeniyu i naukometrii [III All-Russian Conference on Science Studies and Scientometrics, 27-29 Oct 2015, Moscow]. Moscow: Scientific Research Center “Engineer” LLC. pp. 146-149. (In Russ.).
14. Baudrillard, J. (1970). La societe de consommation, ses mythes, ses structures. Paris: Editions Dencel, 304 p. (Russian translation by E.A. Samarskaya, Moscow: Respublika Publ., 2006, 269 p.)
15. Samarskaya, E.A. (2006). [Jean Baudrillard and his Universe of Signs: Afterword]. In: Baudrillard J. Obshchestvo potrebleniya: Mify i struktury [The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. Moscow: Respublika Publ., pp. 251-264. (In Russ.).
16. Weber, M. (1990). Science as a Vocation. In: Davydov, Yu.N. (Ed). M. Weber. Izbrannye proizvedenia [Selected Works]. Moscow: Progress Publ., pp. 707-735. (In Russ.).
17. Solodkin, D.L. (2013). On the Formation and Development of Scientometrics. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Omsk University. No. 3, pp. 185-189. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
18. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes for Science. Science. No. 122 (3159), pp. 108-111.
19. Moskovkin, V. (2017). [The Dark Side of Scientific Communications]. Informatsiya i innovatsii = Information and Innovations. No. 5, pp. 126-132. (In Russ.).
20. Rostovtsev, А.А. (2017). The Russian and International Practices of Identification of Irresponsible Journals and Authors. Nauchnyi redaktor i izdatel' = Science Editor and Publisher. No. 2(1), pp. 30-37, doi: 10.24069/2542-0267-2017-1-30-37 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
21. Bagdasar'yan, N.G., Korol', M.P. (2013). Scientific Communication in the Information Landscape of Modern Russia. Uchenyi sovet = Academic Council. No. 7, pp. 18-22. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).