Humanitarian Contexts of Technical Education in Russia

The article deals with the problem of formation of social and humanitarian competen[1]cies in Russian engineering education. The author shows how different views on the relationship between man and machine, as well as between society and the technosphere, were translated into various public initiatives and analyzes the impact of these initiatives on the evolution of approaches to engineering education. Special attention is paid to the promotion of the ideology of design think[1]ing and the movement for the humanitarization of engineering education. Both gained a consider[1]able popularity in the last quarter of the twentieth century. However, in modern conditions, the relationship between technological progress and the development of human society is taking on new forms that require new answers. There are also new risks – in particular, the risk of complete de[1]humanization of technological progress and the unclear prospect of the formation of a so-called post-human civilization. Social assessment of technology and the development of value-based tech[1]nologies are possible answers. They have received a very significant support in the United States and Western Europe. In particular, several European conferences on this topic have already been held within the EU (the latest one took place in Bratislava in 2019). However, due to some features of the Russian intellectual tradition, as well as the pronounced techno-optimism of mass consciousness, the Russian academic environment has not yet shown sufficient interest to implant these approaches in technical education. The possibility of managing the current technological progress on the basis of a dialogue with civil society, which is popular in the European Union, is also not considered in Russian intellectual environments. At the same time, the leading technical universities in Russia are gradually developing a network of enthusiasts who are studying the European practice of social assessment of technology and its adaptation to Russian conditions. Such adapted practices may become the con[1]ceptual guidelines for Russian engineering education.

1. von Wright, G.H. (2000). Nikolai Berdyaev’s Philosophy of Technology. Russian Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 70-86, doi: 10.2753/RSP1061-1967390170

2. Stoyukhina, N.Yu. (2016). Psikhologiya vozdeistviya v sovetskoi psikhotekhnike: 1920–1930- kh gg. [Psychology of Influence in Soviet Psychotechnics: 1920–1930s]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University Publ., 427 p. ISBN 978-5-00089-131-5 (In Russ.).

3. Cubbin, T. (2018). Soviet Critical Design: Senezh Studio and the Communist Surround (Cultural Histories of Design). Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 224 p. ISBN 9781350021976

4. Snow, C.P. (1959). The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. N.Y. : Cambridge University Press, 59 p. (Russian edition in: Snow C.P. Portrety i razmyshleniya [Portraits and Reflections]. Moscow : Progress Publ., 1985, pp. 195-226).

5. Piskoppel’, A.A., Rokityanskiy, V.R., Shchedrovitskaya, L.P. (Eds). (2013). Problemy postroeniya teorii myshleniya. Dizainerskoe dvizhenie i perspektivy ego razvitiya [Problems of Constructing a Theory of Thinking. Design Movement and Prospects for Its Development]. Series: Annals of MMK: 1979. Moscow: Nasledie MMK, 334 p. ISBN 978-5-98808-016-9 (In Russ.)

6. Bagdasaryan, N.G., Gavrilina, E.A. (2010). Once Again about the Competencies of Graduates of Engineering Programs, or The Concept of Culture in the Competencies of Engineers. Vysshee obra zovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 23-28. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

7. Slobodchikov, V.I. (2011). Formation of the Human in Man – An Imperative of National Edu cation. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie www.psyedu.ru = Psychological Science and Education www.psyedu.ru. No. 3, pp. 81-90. Available at: http://psyedu.ru/files/articles/2477/ pdf_version.pdf (accessed 09.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

8. Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford Univ. Press, 468 p. ISBN-10: 0199256055

9. Miller, P., Wilsdon, J. (Eds). (2006). Better Humans? The Politics of Human Enhancement and Life Extension. London : Demos Medical Publishing. ISBN 1 84180 155 0

10. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. N.Y.: Viking, 672 p. ISBN-10: 0143037889

11. Andreev, A.L., Malinovskaya, N.M. (2021). [Prospects for Technology Assessment: The Experience of the European Union]. Vestnik MEI = Bulletin of MPEI. No. 1, pp. 100-107, doi: https:// doi.org/10.24160/1993-6982-2021-1-100-107 (In Russ.).

12. Artificial Intelligence Journey 2020: online conference. Moscow region, Novo-Ogarevo, 2020 December 4. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64545 (accessed 09.03.2021). (In Russ.).

13. Special Eurobarometer 401. (2013). Responsible Research and Innovation, Science and Tech nology. Report. Brussels : Directorate-General for Communication. Available at: https://ec.eu ropa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_401_en.pdf (accessed 09.03.2021).

14. Vakhshtain, V., Stepantsov, P., Chursina, Yu., Bardina, S. (2016). Publichnyi otchet po rezul’ta tam sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya povedencheskikh i institutsional’nykh predposylok tekh nologicheskogo razvitiya regionov RF [Public Report on the Results of a Sociological Study of Behavioral and Institutional Prerequisites for Technological Development of the Regions of the Russian Federation]. Moscow : RVK, Moscow Higher School of Social and Economic Sciences. 102 p.

15. Lukov, V.A. (2012). From Social Expertise to Human Expert Evaluation. Znanue. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. No. 2, pp. 114-118.

16. Dreher, R., Kondratyev, V.V., Kuznetsova, M.N. (2021). Social-Ecologic Oriented Curricula in Engineering Education: “Leonardo’s Oath” as an Answer to Janus-Headedness in Engineering Work. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 30, no. 1. pp. 115-124, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-1-115-124. (In Russ., abstract in Eng .)