Influence of University Education on Changes in Students’ Value Orientations

Value orientations of young people are an issue that does not lose relevance in the agenda of  social and humanitarian  sciences and youth policy. Students are the driving  force of youth. Having  activity  and  reactivity,  as well  as  a  certain  intellectual background, namely  students  can stimulate social transformations. The University, as an agent of socialization, carries out not only educational activities, but also pedagogical and socializing work, that is why it is able to influence on the development of values and characteristics of students. The article is an analytical review of the data of a unique monitoring conducted since 2015 at the RUDN University in order to assess the effectiveness of pedagogical work at the University. In 2015 and 2019, 60% of 1st-year and 4th-year (graduate) students were surveyed using online questionnaires, respectively, which represents a quasi-panel. The theoretical framework is determined by the concept of M. Rokich about instrumental and terminal values, as well as Yu.A. Zubok’s and V.I. Chuprov’s concept about meaning-in-life values. The article presents data related to the value orientations of Russian students in the context of their changes in the course of study at the University, namely, issues of patriotism, life values, “idols” as models that students strive for, as well as personal characteristics, which determine the value orientations and other characteristics of an individual (instrumental). The main conclusion: life values and value orientations remain almost unchanged after 4 years of training, while personal characteristics may change throughout the process of training and education. The University can also affect such values as patriotism and the presence of an “idol”. For students of the RUDN University, the questions of patriotism are “difficult”, and idols are most often either family members or no one at all, which is confirmed by data from other surveys. The proposed conceptual model of monitoring may be of interest to employees of other universities and specialists in the field of education, youth work and youth sociology.

1. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values: A Theory of Organization and Change. San Francisco : JosseyBass, Inc. (JosseyBass Behavioral Science Series), 214 p.

2. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. N. Y. : Free Press, 438 p.

3. Rokeach, M. (1980). Some Unresolved Issues in Theories of Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. In: Howe, H.E., Page, M.M. (Eds). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979. Vol. 27: Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. Lincoln, NE : University of Nebraska Press, pp. 261-304.

4. Zubok, Yu.A., Chuprov, V.I. (2019). Self-Regulation of the Image of Labor in Young People’s Cultural Space. Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie = Research Result. Sociology and Management. Vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 243-259, doi: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.14 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

5. Zubok Yu.A., Chuprov, V.I. (2020). Molodezh’ v kul’turnom prostranstve: samoregulyatsiya zhiznedeyatel’nosti [Youth in the Cultural Space: Self-Regulation of Life Activity]. Moscow: Norma Publ., 304 p. ISBN 978-5-00156-082-1

6. Nazarova, I.B., Zelenskaya, M.P. (2019). Marriage, Family, Students’ Social Attitudes and Representations. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. No. 7, pp. 78-89, doi: 10.31857/S013216250005795-7 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). 7. Skosarev, S.A. (2012). [Сreativity Management in a Modern Organization]. In: Korsakova, A.A., Yakhontova, E.S. (Eds). Innovatsionnye tekhnologii upravleniya chelovecheskimi resursami [Innovative Human Resource Management Technologies]. Moscow: Moscow State University of Economics, Statistics and Informatics, pp. 72-86. (In Russ.).

7. Shcherbakova, M.V. (2013). Diagnosis of Creativity Development Levels Among Design Students. Vestnik NGTU im. R.E. Alekseeva. Seriya «Upravlenie v sotsial’nyh sistemakh. Kommunikativnye tekhnologii [Bulletin of NSTU named after R.E. Alekseev]. No. 4, pp. 102-113. (In Russ.).

8. Novoselya, N.V., Kokueva, O.V. (2016). Assessment Level of Sociability Among Students of Medical. International Research Journal. Vol. 50, no. 8-2, pp. 130-132, doi: 10.18454/IRJ.2016.50. 227 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

9. Martynov, M.Yu., Gaberkorn, A.I. (2019.) How Do We Measure Patriotism? On the Conceptualization of the Concept. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya = Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science. No. 4, doi: 10.17072/2218-1067-2019-4-31-43 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Moskalenko, I.V., Akhmetgaleeva, Z.M., Grigorenko, N.N (2019). Patriotism as the Basic National Value and Its Development for the Youth. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya = The World of Science, Culture, and Education. No. 2 (75), pp. 231-233. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

11. Ilyinsky, I.M., Lukov, V.A. (2020). Moscow Students: Changes in Value Orientations. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya=RUDN Journal of Sociology. Vol. 20, no 1, pp. 50-63, doi: 10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-1-50-63 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).