Online Course: Application Models in the Educational Process
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-4-120-130
Abstract
Digitalization of education and the development of electronic pedagogy as a branch of pedagogical science are the conditions that actualize the analysis of online courses application mo-dels which is the purpose of this study. Based on the analysis of scientific pedagogical literature, the article addresses the typology of online courses integration models implemented in the traditional (face-to face) educational process. The author has studied and summarized the various approaches to selecting integration models of online courses in Russian and foreign scientific and pedagogical literature and developed a typology of patterns of online courses application based on three criteria: the organization of the educational process (characteristics: the character of the online course incorporating in the educational process, a way of organizing the educational process), the contents of traditional face-to-face and online components in the learning content (characteristics: a change in the structure of educational process, forms and methods of training), and the organization of interaction between the subjects of the educational process (characteristics: organization of pedagogical support, organization of pedagogical interaction between the subjects). This approach made it possible to pinpoint thirty-four models of online courses application and integration. Each model implemented in practice can be identified unambiguously when typologizing by one characteristic of the corresponding criterion and refer to several types when considering its different characteristics.
About the Author
N. V. Grechushkina
Ryazan Institute of Moscow Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nina V. Grechushkina – Senior Lecturer
26/53, Pravo-Lybedskaya str., Ryazan 390000
References
1. Lapchik, M.P. (Ed) et al. (2017). Sovremennye problemy informatizatsii obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Education Informatization]. Omsk: Omsk State Pedagogical Univ. Publ., 404 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bowen, W.G. (2013). Higher Education in the Digital Age. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. 192 p.
3. Grechushkina, N.V. (2018). Online Course: Definition and Classification. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 125-134. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Veledinskaya, S.B., Dorofeeva, M.Yu. (2015). Blended Learning Course Design Technology. Otkrytoe i Distantsionnoe Obrazovanie = Open and Distance Education. No. 2 (58), pp. 12-19. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
5. Mozhaeva, G.V. (2015). Massive Open Online Courses: New Vector in the Development of Continuing Education. Otkrytoe i Distantsionnoe Obrazovanie = Open and Distance Education. No. 2 (58), pp. 56-65. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). педагогика высшей школы
6. Semenova, T.V., Vilkova, K.A. (2017). Types MOOC Integration into Universities’ Educational Process. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 114-126, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2017.06.080 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Israel, M.J. (2015). Effectiveness of Integrating MOOCs in Traditional Classrooms for Undergraduate Students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 133-160, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222
8. Kang, S.J., Li, Y., Tseng, C. (2016). The Effect of Soft Classroom: A New Learning Environment Integrating MOOCs into Conventional Classrooms for College Students. In: Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, USA, 26–29 June 2016, pp. 165-179, doi: 10.18260/p.26138
9. Delgado Kloos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., Alario-Hoyos, C., Ayres, I.E. (2015). Mixing and Blending MOOC Technologies with Face-to-Face Pedagogies. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, Tallinn, Estonia, 18–20 March 2015, pp. 967-971, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2015.7096090
10. Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R.A., Lozano, J.B. (2015). Virtually Unlimited Classrooms: Pedagogical Practices in Massive Open Online Courses. The Internet and Higher Education. Vol. 24, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001
11. Horn, M.B., Staker, H. (2011). The Rise of K-12 Blended Leaning. Washington, USA : Innosight Institute, 2011. 17 p. Available at: https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-rise-of-K-12-blended-learning.pdf (accessed 18.03.2021).
12. Perez-Sanagustin, M., Hilliger, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Delgado Kloos, C. (2017). The H-MOOC Framework: Reusing MOOCs for Hybrid Education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 47-64.
13. Sandeen, C. (2013). Integrating MOOCS into Traditional Higher Education: The Emerging “MOOC 3.0” Era. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. Vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 34-39, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2013.842103
14. Griffiths, R., Chingos, M., Mulhern, C., Spies, R. (2014). Interactive Online Learning on Campus: Testing MOOCs and Other Platforms in Hybrid Formats in the University System of Maryland. Maryland : ITHAKA. 79 p., doi: https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.22522
15. Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T. (2014). Case Study: Using MOOCs for Conventional College Coursework. Distance Education. Vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 178-201, doi: 10.1080/01
16. 2014.917707
17. Holotescu, C., Grosseck, G., Cretu, V., Naaji, A. (2014). Integrating MOOCs in Blended Courses. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific Conference of eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, Romania 24-25 April 2014, pp. 243-250, doi: 10.12753/2066-026X-14-034
18. Bruff, D.O., Fisher, D.H., McEwen, K.E., Smith, B.E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student Perceptions of an Experiment in Blended Learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. Vol. 9 (2), pp. 187-199. Available at: https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/bruff_0613.htm (accessed 18.03.2021).
19. Bates, A.W. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age. Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. Vancouver, B.C. : Tony Bates Associates Ltd., 617 p. Available at: https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage (accessed 18.03.2021).
20. Lazarus, J. (2019). Hacking the MOOC: Towards a Postdigital Pedagogy of Critical Hope. Postdigital Science and Education. Vol. 1, pp. 391-412, doi: 10.1007/s42438-019-00063-w
Review
Views:
997
Email this article 