The Engineering Pedagogy Evolution: The Foundation and Three Measurements

The status, subject area and structure of engineering pedagogy are still at the center of the academic and scientific community. It develops as a professional pedagogy section, although it tended to be viewed as an educational module, as a field of teacher practical activity. The role of engineering pedagogy in developing engineering thinking should become increasingly important, taking into account the integration processes – inter-disciplinary, inter-subject, trans-professional, and the transformations in the industrial sphere in general and in engineering in particular. The transfer of its accumulated experience and ideas to new application areas can enrich other branches of knowledge with ideas, principles and cognitive approaches. Both methods of acquiring scientific knowledge and heuristic and practical technologies are equally essential for the system of continuous fundamental engineering and technical education development. Engineering pedagogy’s goals revision and clarification lead to a multidimensional space for engineering thinking development, including training of engineering educators for a lifelong learning system. Based on the general foundations and laws of pedagogy, three measurements of engineering pedagogy enable to reveal its interdisciplinary strategy in different subject areas. Engineering pedagogy can participate in various formats– as teacher training technology both for school and university teachers.

1. Kondratyev, V.V., Ivanov, V.G. (2014). Engineering Education and Engineering Pedagogy: Problems and Solutions. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Kazan Technological University. Vol. 17, no. 24, pp. 262-271. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Senashenko, V.S., Verbitsky, A.A., Ibragimov, G.I., Osipov, P.N. et al. (2017). Engineering Pedagogy: Methodological Issues. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11 (217), pp. 137-157. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

3. Ivanov, V.G., Sazonova, Z.S., Sapunov, M.B. (2017). Engineering Pedagogy: Facing Typology Challenges. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8-9, pp. 32-42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

4. Danilaev, D.P., Malivanov, N.N. (2020). Cross Fields as a Vector of Engineering Education Development. Upravlenie ustoichivym razvitiem [Management of Sustainable Development]. No. 5 (30), pp. 85-93. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

5. Kirsanov, A.A., Ivanov, V.G., Kondratyev, V.V. (2010). Methodological Problems of Engineering Pedagogy as an Independent Direction of Professional Pedagogy. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Kazan Technological University. No. 4, pp. 228-249. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

6. Osipov, P.N. (2017). Engineering Pedagogy as a Science and Educational Subject. Upravlenie ustoichivym razvitiem [Management of Sustainable Development]. No. 5 (12), pp. 84-88. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

7. Tkhagapsoev, Kh.G., Yakhutlov, М.М. (2020). Search for Reserves in the Grip of the “Imputed”: Paradoxes of Our Education Strategy. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 95-103, doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-12-95-103 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

8. Sazonova, Z.S., Chechetkina, N.V. (2007). Razvitie inzhenernogo myshleniya – osnova povysheniya kachestva obrazovaniya: Uchebnoe posobie [The Development of Engineering Thinking as a Basis for Improving the Quality of Education: Textbook]. Moscow: MADI Publ., 195 p. (In Russ.).

9. Lebedeva, T.N. (2015). [Engineering Thinking: Definition and Composition of Its Components]. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [Topical Problems of the Humanities and Natural Sciences]. No. 4-3, pp. 66-68. (In Russ.).

10. Gapontsev, V.L., Fedorov, V.A., Dorozhkin, Y.M. (2021). A Look at the Global Educational Crisis through the Lens of Experience of the History of Science. Part II. The Structure of General Education Content. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 11-43, doi https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-11-43 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

11. Zeer, E.F., Tretyakova, V.S., Miroshnichenko, V.I. (2019.) Strategic Directions of Pedagogical Personnel Training for the System of Continuing Vocational Education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. Vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 93-121, doi: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-6-93-121 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

12. Barber, M., Murshed, M. (2007). Consistently High Performance: Lessons from the World’s Top Performing School Systems. McKinsey&Company, June, 62 p. (Russian translation in: Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2008, no. 3, pp. 7-60).

13. Efimova, G.Z., Sorokin, A.N., Gribovskiy, M.V. (2021). Ideal Teacher of Higher School: Personal Qualities and Socio-Professional Competencies. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 202-230, doi: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-202-230 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

14. Danilaev, D.P., Malivanov, N.N. (2020). Technological Education and Engineering Pedagogy. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. Vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 55-82, doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-3-55-82 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

15. Dorozhkin, E.M., Сhernoskutova, I.A. (2020). The Problems of Formation of the National System of Personnel Training for Vocational Schools: Historical and Genetic Analysis. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. Vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 172-204, doi: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-3-172-204 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

16. Dorozhkin, E.M., Zeer, E.F. (2014). Methodology of Professional Pedagogical Education: Theory and Practice (Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Vocational Teacher Education). Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. No. 10, pp. 18-30, doi: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2014-10-18-30 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

17. Novikov, A.M. (2010). Osnovaniya pedagogiki [Foundations of Pedagogy]. Moscow : Egves Publ., 208 p. (In Russ.).

18. Prikhodko, V.M., Polyakova, T.Yu. (2015). IGIP. Mezhdunarodnoe obshchestvo po inzhenernoi pedagogike: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee [IGIP. International Society for Engineering Education: Past, Present, and Future]. Moscow : Technical Polygraph Center Publ., 143 p. (In Russ.).

19. Novikov, A.M. (2008). Postindustrial’noe obrazovanie [Post-Industrial Education]. Moscow : Egves Publ., 136 p. (In Russ.).

20. Danilaev, D.P., Malivanov, N.N., Pol’skiy, Yu.E. (2011). The Possibilities in Concording the Interests of the Subjects of Higher Technical Education System. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11, pp. 99-104. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

21. Dorozhkin, E.M., Zeer, E.F., Shevchenko, V.Y. (2017). Research and Educational Panorama of Modernization of Training Teachers of Continuous Vocational Education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. Vol. 19, no. 1 (140), pp. 65-84, doi: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-1-63-81 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

22. Vishnevskiy, Yu.R., Narkhov, D.Yu., Didkovskaya, Ya.V. (2018). Trends in Higher Vocational Education: Professionalization or Deprofessionalization? Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. Vol. 20, no. 1, pp.152-170, doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2018-1-9-170 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

23. Kirsanov, A.A. (2004). [The Integrity of the Psychological and Pedagogical Training of Teachers]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5, pp. 104-109. (In Russ.).

24. Danilaev, D.P., Malivanov, N.N. (2021). The Technology Education System Staffing: Problems and Solutions. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 60-72, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-1-60-72 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).