Expert Methods for Developing University Graduates’ Professional Competencies
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-11-139-146
Abstract
The article addresses the expert methods for developing the graduates’ professional competencies in specialty programs in the conditions of predetermined specializations within particular specialties in the absence of professional standards. The authors analyze the features of obtaining and processing data from experts, which are specialists in this field of professional activity. Special attention is paid to expert commission forming using the expert competence criteria and the cost of the survey. Based on the developed expert method, a comparative analysis on the importance of professional competencies of specialists in the chosen field of activity is carried out. The authors propose a method of matching the experts’ assessments obtained as a result of the survey. The article finds that it is necessary to include formalized procedures for the development of the graduates’ professional competencies in the indicative basic educational program.
About the Authors
M. A. Skvaznikov
Military Space Academy named after A.F. Mozhaisky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail A. Skvaznikov – Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Assoc. Prof.
13, Zhdanovskay str., St. Petersburg, 197198, Russian Federation
A. M. Rakhmatulin
Military Space Academy named after A.F. Mozhaisky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexey M. Rakhmatulin – Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Assoc. Prof.
13, Zhdanovskay str., St. Petersburg, 197198, Russian Federation
A. A. Shekhonin
Saint-Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr A. Shekhonin – Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Prof., Advisor at Rector’s office
49, Kronverkskiy prosp., St. Petersburg, 197101, Russian Federation
References
1. Altukhov, A.I., Skvaznikov, M.A., Shekhonin, A.A. (2020). Features of the Development of the Federal State Educational Standard for Level and Continuous Higher Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 74-84, doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-74-84 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
2. Altukhov, A.I., Kuzhekin, N.S., Kuleshov, Yu.V., Skvaznikov, M.A., Cheburkov, M.A. (2012). [The Concept of Innovative Technology of Training Professional Disciplines Cycle to the Specialists in the Field of Remote Sensing of the Earth Data Processing in Educational Institutions of Higher Professional Education]. Trudy Voenno-kosmicheskoi akademii imeni A.F. Mozhaiskogo [Proceedings of Mozhaisky Military Space Academy]. No. 636, pp. 54-57. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Shekhonin, A.A., Tarlykov, V.A., Voznesenskaya, A.O., Bakholdin, A.V. (2017). Harmonization of Qualifications in the System of Higher Education and the Sphere of Labor in the Conditions of the Qualifications National System Formation. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 11 (217), pp. 5-11. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Kudryashova, E.V., Sorokin, S.E., Bugayenko, O.D. (2020). Interaction of Universities with the Production Sphere as an Element of the “Third Mission” Implementation. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii=Higher Education in Russia.Vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 9-21, doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-5-9-21(In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
5. Dubrov, D.V., Kochetkov, M.V., Steklyannikov, V.Yu. (2020). Employer as an Actor of Studentcentered Education: Implementation Experience. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 141-152, doi: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-141-152 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
6. Danilov, A.N., Gitman, M.B., Stolbov, V.Yu., Gitman, E.K. (2018). System of Training of Engineering Personnel in Modern Russia: Educational Trajectories and Quality Control. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 5-15. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Florya, V.M., Volkova, O.A., Kravtsova, L.A. (2018). Value-Competence Synergy in the Design and Implementation of the University Educational Programs. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 5-11. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
8. Senashenko, V.S. (2018). Conjugation Levels of the System of Higher Education and the Labor Sphere. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 38-47. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
9. Karavaeva, E.V. (2017). Qualifications of Higher Education and Professional Qualifications: Harmonization with Efforts. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12 (218), pp. 5-12. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
10. Pilipenko, S.A., Zhidkov, A.A., Karavaeva, E.A., Serova, A.V. (2016). Conjugation of FSES and Professional Standards: Identified Problems, Possible Approaches, Recommendations for Updating. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6 (202), pp. 5-15. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
11. Litvak, B.G. (1982). Ekspertnaya informatsiya: Metody polucheniya i analiza [Expert Information: Methods of Obtaining and Analyzing]. Moscow : Radio i svyaz’ Publ., 184 p.
12. Helmer, O. (1967). Analysis of the Future: The Delphi Method. California, Santa Monica : The RAND Corporation, 13 p. (Russian translation in: Bright, J.R. (Ed). Nauchno-tekhnicheskoe prognozirovanie dlya promyshlennosti i pravitel’stvennykh uchrezhdenii [Scientific and Technical Forecasting for Industry and Government Agencies]. Moscow: Progress Publ., pp. 172-201.
Review
Views:
575
Email this article 