Inversion of the main trends of digitalization in the educational space.

The modern space is increasingly determined by the trends of digitalization. Today we can talk about such consequences of digitalization as the appearance of scattered identity and distancing – a new kind of socialization in the conditions of spatial separation and overcoming social deprivation and virtual transgression. These trends manifest themselves in all spheres – cultural, economic, political, etc. But at the same time, processes of a different kind are also taking place in the field of education: processes that represent a kind of inversion of the main trends of the influence of digitalization on our perception of the world, self-perception and the sphere of our everyday life. The article examines three such major trends and their inversions in the educational space of our time: 1. the tendency characteristic of digitalization to eliminate the intermediary in the educational space leads to the opposite effect of multiplying intermediaries and awareness of the teacher's unavoidability as one of the main participants in education, both due to the complexity and inaccessibility for direct study of educational material, and due to the fact that education is not based on transmission (in which the intermediary could theoretically be eliminated), but creation based on the phenomenon of meeting; 2. the transgressive tendency as "going beyond" and even erasing boundaries is transformed in the educational space into a tendency of distancing as a double movement of alienation (delineation) and inclusion (communion), in which the blurring of the boundary between the public and intimate, the space of self-organization in the order of the norm and the space of spontaneity, real and virtual, etc. is accompanied by the establishment of a new type of socialization in conditions of spatial disunity and social deprivation; 3. the tendency to the appearance of a diffuse identity, reinforced by the tendency to glocalization in the socio-political sphere and the transition to a transmedia narrative in the cultural and entertainment sphere, in the digital space of education is transformed into the possibility of self-actualization, self-expression, turning the modern educational space into a mythopoetical "world of all kinds" and anthropological singularity.

1. Weiser, M. (1991) The сomputer for the 21st century. Scientific American, September 1991, no. 265, pp. 94—104

2. Galloway, A. (2018) Mir ne kazhetsja mne cifrovym do samogo osnovanija [The world doesn't seem to me to be fundamentally digital]. Artgid, 24.09.2018 (In Russian) URL: https://artguide.com/posts/1571

3. Ruckriem, G. (2010) Digital technology and Mediation — a Callenge to Activity Theory/ Kul'turno-istoricheskaja psihologija = Cultural - historical psychology- 2010. № 4 - pp. 30—38. (In Eng., abstract in Russ.)

4. Derrida, J. (1967) De la grammatologie. Paris, Ed. de Minuit. (Russian translation: Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 2000, 512p.)

5. Lord, A.B. (1960) The singer of Tales. Harvard University Press Cambridge (Mass.), I960 [Russian translation: Moscow: Vostochnaja literaturа Publ, 1994 – 368p. (Issledovanija po fol'kloru i mifologii Vostoka)]

6. Lotman, Ju.M. (2000) Al'ternativnyj variant: bespis'mennaja kul'tura ili kul'tura do kul'tury? [Alternative option: non-written culture or culture before culture?]/ Lotman, Ju.M. Semiosfera. [Semiosphere] — S.-Peterburg: «Iskusstvo—SPB» , 2000. — 704 р. (In Russian)

7. Kozolupenko, D.P. (2009) Mifopojeticheskij narrativ kak odno iz osnovanij preemstvennosti = Mythopoetical Narrative as One of the Basis of World Perception Successiveness. Filosofskie nauki = Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 2009 № 3 – pp.125-140. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Kozolupenko, D.P. (2009) Problema vybora v mifopojeticheskom i analiticheskom tipah mirovosprijatija = The problem of the choice in the mythopoetical and in the analytical apprehension of the world. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni M.I.Lobachevskogo. Serija Social'nye nauki, 2009, № 1 (13), pp. 106–113. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

9. Cherches, T.E. (2006) Osobennosti vosprijatija soderzhanija rechi pri ee sovmeshhenii s videorjadom [Features of perception of the content of speech when combined with the video sequence] // Psihologija 21 veka. [Psychology of the 21st century.] - S.-Peterburg: SPbGU Publ, 2006, pp.46-48 (In Russian)

10. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multi-Modal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London, Arnold, 2001. – 142p.

11. Jewitt, C. (2015) Multimodal analysis/ The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. London: Routledge, 2015, pp. 69-84

12. Lebedeva, M. Yu., Veselovskaya, T. S., & Kupreshchenko, O. F. (2020). Features of perception and understanding of digital texts: interdisciplinary view. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania = Perspectives of Science and Education, 46 (4), 74-98. doi: 10.32744/pse.2020.4.5 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

13. Beljaev, R.V., Kolesov, V.V., Men'shikova, G.Ja., Popov, A.M. and Rjabenkov, V.I. (2011) Issledovanie osobennostej vosprijatija videoinformacii pri pomoshhi fraktal'nogo analiza traektorii dvizhenija glaz [Investigation of the peculiarities of perception of video information using fractal analysis of the trajectory of eye movement]. Radiojelektronika-Nanosistemy-Informacionnye tehnologii = [Radio Electronics-Nanosystems-Information Technologies] - Moscow: RAEN Publ., 2011, T.3, №1, pp.56-68 (In Russian)

14. Medina, J. (2014) Brian Rules. 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School. Seattle, WA : Pear Press, 2014 (Russian translation: Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber Publ., 2014 – 304p.)

15. Marchuk, N. Yu. (2013) Psychological and pedagogical peculiarities of distance education. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical education in Russia] - 2013, №4 – pp.78-85 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

16. Rozanov, V.V. (1899) Tri glavnyh principa obrazovanija. [Three main principles of education] // Rozanov, V.V. Sumerki prosveshhenija [Twilight of Enlightenment] - St. Petersburg: Printing house of M.Merkushev, 1899 - pp. 83-94 (In Russian)

17. Kozolupenko, D.P. (2009) Mifopojeticheskoe mirovosprijatije [The mythopoetical apprehension of the world]. - Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2009 – 432p. (In Russian)

18. Sokolov, A.G. (2004) Priroda jekrannogo tvorchestva: psihologicheskie zakonomernosti. [The nature of screen creativity: psychological patterns]. - Moscow: A. Dvornikov Publishing House, 2004. - 638 p. (In Russian)

19. Erchak, N.T. (2004) Psihologija professional'noj rechi uchitelja. [Psychology of professional speech of a teacher]. - Minsk: MGLU, 2004. – 143 p. (In Russian)

20. Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R. and Brønnick K. (2013) Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International journal of educational research, 2013, vol. 58, pp. 61-68

21. Singer, L. M. and Alexander, P. A.(a) (2017) Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The journal of experimental education, 2017, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 155-172

22. Coiro, J. and Dobler, E. (2007) Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth‐grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet //Reading research quarterly. 2007. Vol. 42. № 2. – pp. 214-257

23. Ackerman, R., Goldsmith, M. (2011) Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2011, vol. 17, no. 1, p.23

24. Lutovinova, O.V. (2009) Gipertekst: ponyatie, osnovnye harakteristiki, vozmozhnye podhody k lingvisticheskomu analizu [Hypertext: concept, basic characteristics, possible approaches to linguistic analysis]. Vestnik VGPU [VSPU Vestnik]. 2009, № 1, pp. 4—7 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)

25. Dedova, O.V. (2001) Lingvisticheskaya koncepciya giperteksta: osnovnye ponyatiya i terminologicheskaya paradigma [Linguistic concept of hypertext: basic concepts and terminological paradigm]. Vestnik MGU. Seriya 9. Filologiya [MSU Vestnik. Series 9. Phylology], 2001, №. 4, pp. 22—36 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)

26. Voiskunskii, A.E. (2002) Internet — novaya oblast’ issledovanii v psihologicheskoi nauke [The Internet as a new field of research in psychological science]. Uchenye zapiski kafedry obshchej psihologii MGU [Scientific notes of the Department of general psychology, Moscow State University]. Moscow: Smysl, 2002. Vol. 1, pp. 82—101 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)

27. Rubtsova, О.V. (2019) Digital Media as a New Means of Mediation (Part Two). Кul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Culturalhistorical psychology, 2019. Vol. 15, № 4, pp. 100—108. doi: 10.17759/chp.2019150410 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

28. Carr, N. (2010) The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. (Russian translation: Saint Petersburg: BestBusinessBooks, 2012 - 256 p.

29. Il'in, I.A. (1993) Put' k ochevidnosti. [The Path to Evidence] Moscow: Respublika Publ., 1993 – 432 p. (In Russian)

30. Scolari, C.A. (2009) Transmedia Storytelling: Implicit Consumers, Narrative Worlds and Branding in Contemporary Media Production . International Journal of Communication - 2009. Vol. 3. № 4, pp. 586-606

31. Jenkins, H. (2003) Transmedia Storytelling. MIT Technology Review. – 2003 January 15 URL: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/401760/transmedia-storytelling

32. Long, G.A. (2007) Transmedia Storytelling − Business, Aesthetics and Production at the Jim Henson Company. Master Thesis. - Cambridge, 2007 – 185 p.

33. Kozolupenko, D.P. (2022) Illjuzija soprichastnosti [The illusion of belonging]. // Filosofija transmedia. [Philosophy of transmedia] – Moscow: Prospekt Publ., 2022 – pp.20-27 (In Russian)

34. Altbach, Ph. G. (2016) Global Perspectives on Higher Education. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 2016. (Russian translation: Moscow: Publishing House of The Higher School of Economics, 2018, 548p.)

35. Altbach, Ph. G. and de Wit H. (2015) Internationalization and Global Tension: Lessons from History. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2015. Vol. 19. №. 1 (February) - pp. 4–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1028315314564734

36. Wildavsky, B. (2012) The Great Brain Race: How Global Universities Are Reshaping the World. - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012 - 272 p.

37. Kuz'minov, Ja.I. and Peskov, D.N. (2017) Discussion “What Tomorrow Holds for Universities”. Voprosy obrazovanija = Educational Studies Moscow. - 2017. № 3, рр. 202–233. DOI: http://doi. org/10.17323/1814-9545-2017-3-202-233

38. Biggle-Jr., L. …And Madly Teach. The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, May 1966 – pp.4-31 (Russian translation in: Biblioteka sovremennoj fantastiki. Tom 10. Antologija fantasticheskih rasskazov anglijskih i amerikanskih pisatelej [Library of modern fiction. Volume 10. An anthology of fantastic stories by English and American writers] Moscow, Molodaja gvardija Publ., 1967 – pp. 295-333).

39. Baudriillard, J. (1983) Les strategies fatales. Ed. Grasset & Fasquelle, 1983 (Russian translation: Moscow, Ripol-klassik, 2017 – 288p).

40. Kozolupenko, D. P. (2021) Distancing in the socialization of a modern human. Izvestija RAO = IZVESTIA of The Russian Academy of Education, №4 (56), 2021 – pp.70-83 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).