How to Retain Quality under Expansion: Practices to Overcome Negative Consequences of Massification in Doctoral Education Original article

As Russian and international experience shows, the massification of doctoral education is not only a driver of socio-economic development, but also a significant challenge for national policy in the field of higher education and research. The increase in demand for doctoral studies can lead to an enormous decrease in the quality of training unless particular measures for quality assurance and support are implemented. There are dozens of such practices worldwide. In this article, we consider three of them: 1) diversification of doctoral programs; 2) collaboration with industry and business; and 3) improving the quality of supervision. These practices have not yet been implemented in Russian doctoral programs on a systemic level. However, we believe that they are the most relevant and potentially useful for the Russian context, as they can improve the efficiency of doctoral training in terms of the number and quality of defenses, as well as increase the level of graduates’ preparation for the labor market.

1. (2016). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/25186167

2. Nerad, M. (2006). Globalization and Its Impact on Research Education: Trends and Emerging Best Practices for the Doctorate of the Future. In: Kiley, M., Mullins, G. (Eds). Quality in Postgraduate Research: Knowledge Creation in Testing Times. Part 2. Canberra: ANU, pp. 5-12. Available at: https://www.education.uw.edu/cirge/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/globalization-and-its-impact-on-research.pdf (accessed 13.04.2022).

3. Nerad, M. (2010). Increase in PhD Production and Reform of Doctoral Education Worldwide. Research Institute for Higher Education Hiroshima University. Vol. 7, pp. 69-84. Available at: https://www.education.uw.edu/cirge/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Increase-in-PhD-Production-and-Reform-of-Doctoral-Education-Worldwide.pdf (accessed 13.04.2022).

4. Nerad, M., Evans, B. (Eds). (2014). Globalization and Its Impacts on the Quality of PhD Education: Forces and Forms in Doctoral Education Worldwide. Series: Global Perspectives on Higher Education, vol. 28, Rotterdam : Sense Publishers. Available at: https://www.doctoraleducation.info/dl/Preface_Globalization_impacts_2007.pdf (accessed 14.04.2022).

5. Bednyi, B.I., Mironos, A.A. (2018). Podgotovka nauchnykh kadrov v vysshej shkole. Sostoyanie i tendentsii razvitiya aspirantury [Training of PhD Students in Higher Education System. Situation and Development Trends of PhD Programs]. N. Novgorod : Lobachevsky University Publ., 219 p. ISBN: 978-5-91326-100-7 (In Russ.).

6. Terentiev, E.A., Bekova, S.K., Maloshonok, N.G. (2018). The Crisis of Postgraduate Studies in Russia: What Bears Problems and How to Overcome Them. Universitetskoe upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 54-66, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2018.05.049 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

7. Terentev, E.A., Kuzminov, Ya.I., Frumin, I.D. (2021). Nauka bez molodezhi? Krizis aspirantury i vozmozhnosti ego preodoleniya [Science without Youth? Crisis of Doctoral Education and the Possibilities of Overcoming It]. Moscow : HSE Publ. Available at: https://ioe.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/469469351.pdf (accessed 14.04.2022). (In Russ.).

8. Balabanov, S.S., Bednyi, B.I., Kozlov, E.V., Maksimov, G.A. (2003). Multidimensional Typology of Doctoral Students. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal = Sociological Journal. No. 3, pp. 7185. Available at: https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/socjour/article/view/803/757 (accessed 14.04.2022). (In Russ.).

9. Vodozhdokova, Z.N. (2010). Motivation and Values in the System of Reproduction Scientific and Pedagogical Staff. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Regionovedenie: filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul’turologiya = Bulletin of Adyghe State University. Series: Region Studies: Philosophy, History, Sociology, Jurisprudence, Political Science and Culturology. No. 2, pp. 87-93. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15140132 (accessed 14.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Bednyi, B.I., Mironos, A.A., Serova, T.V. (2006). [The Efficiency of Post-Graduates’ Research Work (Scientific Assessment)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 7, pp. 20-36. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9588460& (accessed 14.04.2022). (In Russ.).

11. Guba, K., Sokolov, M., Sokolova, N. (2020). The Dynamics of Dissertation Industry in Russia, 2005–2015. Did New Institutional Templates Change Academic Behavior? Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya = Journal of Economic Sociology. Vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 13-46, doi: 10.17323/17263247-2020-3-13-46 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

12. Maloshonok, N., Terentev, E. (2019). National Barriers to the Completion of Doctoral Programs at Russian Universities. Higher Education. Vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 195-211, doi: 10.1007/s10734-0180267-9

13. Herman, C. (2011). Expanding Doctoral Education in South Africa: Pipeline or Pipedream? Higher Education Research & Development. Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 505-517, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010. 527928

14. Nerad, M. (2009). The Context for Increasing the Quantity and Assuring the Quality of Doctoral Education in South Africa: What We Know about the Increase in PhD Production and Reform of Doctoral Education Worldwide. Unpublished Paper Presented at the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf) Panel on the PhD. Pretoria, SA. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.516.8600&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 14.04.2022).

15. Bednyi, B.I., Mironos, A.A., Ostapenko, L.A. (2015). Professional Employment of PhD Program Graduates and Some Ways for Improving PhD Programs. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 3, pp. 5-16. Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/140/90 (accessed 14.04.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

16. Gruzdev, I., Terentev, E., Dzhafarova, Z. (2020). Superhero or Hands-Off Supervisor? An Empirical Categorization of PhD Supervision Styles and Student Satisfaction in Russian Universities. Higher Education. Vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 773-789, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00437-w

17. Wildy, H., Peden, S., Chan, K. (2015). The Rise of Professional Doctorates: Case Studies of the Doctorate in Education in China, Iceland and Australia. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 761-774, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842968

18. Archbald, D. (2011). The Emergence of the Nontraditional Doctorate: A Historical Overview. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. Vol. 2011, no. 129, pp. 7-19, https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.396

19. Moghadam-Saman, S. (2020). Collaboration of Doctoral Researchers with Industry: A Critical Realist Theorization. Industry and Higher Education. Vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 36-49, https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219865098

20. McWilliam, E., Taylor, P., Thomson, P., Green, B., Maxwell, T., Wildy, H., Simons, D. (2002). Research Training in Doctoral Programs-What Can be Learned from Professional Doctorates? Commonwealth Dept of Education, Science & Training. Australia. Available at: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A1824 (accessed 14.04.2022).

21. Bao, Y., Kehm, B.M., Ma, Y. (2018). From Product to Process. The Reform of Doctoral Education in Europe and China. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 524-541, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1182481

22. Hasgall, A., Saenen, B., Borrell-Damian, L., Van Deynze, F., Seeber, M., Huisman, J. (2019). Doctoral Education in Europe Today: Approaches and Institutional Structures. Berlin : EUACDE, 35 p. Available at: https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/online%20eua%20cde%20survey%2016.01.2019.pdf (accessed 14.04.2022).

23. Park, C. (2005). New Variant PhD: The Changing Nature of the Doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 189-207, doi: 10.1080/13600800500120068

24. Potolea, D., Toma, S., Mosoiu, O. (2012). Emergence of a New Type of Doctorate; Professional Doctorate. Studia Doctoralia. 2012. Vol. 1, no. 1-2, pp. 7-25, https://doi.org/10.47040/sd/sdpsych.v1i1-2.1

25. Jones, M. (2018). Contemporary Trends in Professional Doctorates. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 814-825, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1438095

26. Kot, F.C., Hendel, D.D. (2012). Emergence and Growth of Professional Doctorates in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia: A Comparative Analysis. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 345-364, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.516356

27. Maxwell, T.W., Shanahan, P.J. (2001). Professional Doctoral Education in Australia and New Zealand: Reviewing the Scene. In: Green, B., Maxwell, T.W., Shanahan, P. (Eds). Doctoral Education and Professional Practice: The Next Generation? Kardoorair Press. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/983 (accessed 14.04.2022).

28. Mason, S., Merga, M.K., Morris, J.E. (2020). Typical Scope of Time Commitment and Research Outputs of Thesis by Publication in Australia. Higher Education Research & Development. Vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 244-258, https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1674253

29. Mason, S., Merga, M. K. (2018). A Current View of the Thesis by Publication in the Humanities and Social Sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. Vol. 13, pp. 139-154, doi: 10.28945/3983

30. Churchill, M.P., Lindsay, D., Mendez, D.H., Crowe, M., Emtage, N., Jones, R. (2021). Does Publishing During the Doctorate Influence Completion Time? A Quantitative Study of Doctoral Candidates in Australia. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. Vol. 16, pp. 689-713, doi: 10.28945/4875

31. Yung-Chi Hou, A., Morse, R., Wang, W. (2017). Recognition of Academic Qualifications in Transnational Higher Education and Challenges for Recognizing a Joint Degree in Europe and Asia. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1211-1228, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1085010

32. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations. Research Policy. Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109-123, doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

33. Assbring, L., Nuur, C. (2017). What’s in It for Industry? A Case Study on Collaborative Doctoral Education in Sweden. Industry and Higher Education. Vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 184-194, doi: 10.1177/0950422217705245

34. Roberts, A.G. (2018). Industry and PhD Engagement Programs: Inspiring Collaboration and Driving Knowledge Exchange. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education. Vol. 22, no. 4. pp. 115-123, doi: 10.1080/13603108.2018.1456492

35. Mills, D., James, D. (2020). Reconceptualising Organisational Collaborations in Social Science Doctoral Education. Higher Education. Vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 791-809, doi: 10.1007/s10734-01900438-9

36. D’Este, P., Patel, P. (2007). University–Industry Linkages in the UK: What Are the Factors Underlying the Variety of Interactions with Industry? Research Policy. Vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 12951313, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002

37. Auriol, L. (2007). Labour Market Characteristics and International Mobility of Doctorate Holders: Results for Seven Countries. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper 2007/2. Paris: Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, OECD, doi: 10.1787/310254328811

38. Johnston, B., Murray, R. (2004). New Routes to the PhD: Cause for Concern? Higher Education Quarterly. Vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 31-42, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00258.x

39. Metcalfe, J. (2006). The Changing Nature of Doctoral Programmes. In: Teichler, U. (Ed.). The Formative Years of Scholars. London: Portland Press Ltd. Vol. 83, pp. 79-84. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.598.3607&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 14.04.2022).

40. Moguérou, P. (2001). Knowledge Diffusion, Bridging Institutions and the Scientific Labour Market in the French Innovation System. In: DRUID’s Nelson and Winter Conference. Aarlborg, Denmark. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.198.3166&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 14.04.2022).

41. Thune, T. (2010). The Training of “Triple Helix Workers”? Doctoral Students in University–Industry–Government Collaborations. Minerva. Vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 463-483, doi: 10.1007/s11024010-9158-7

42. Chen, R.J.C. (2018). Doctoral Education in Taiwan: Balancing Market Demands and Supply. Doctoral Education for the Knowledge Society. Springer, Cham, pp. 223-236, doi: 10.1007/9783-319-89713-4_13

43. Patricio, M.T., Santos, P. (2020). Collaborative Research Projects in Doctoral Programs: A Case Study in Portugal. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 2311-2323, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1607282

44. Nerad, M. (2011). What We Know About the Dramatic Increase in PhD Degrees and the Reform of Doctoral Education Worldwide: Implications for South Africa. Perspectives in Education. Vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1-12, doi: abs/10.10520/EJC87639

45. Lahenius, K., Ikävalko, H. (2014). Joint Supervision Practices in Doctoral Education – A Student Experience. Journal of Further and Higher Education. Vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 427-446, doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2012.706805

46. Pole, C. (1998). Joint Supervision and the PhD: Safety Net or Panacea? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 259-271, doi: 10.1080/0260293980230303

47. Posselt, J. (2018). Normalizing Struggle: Dimensions of Faculty Support for Doctoral Students and Implications for Persistence and Well-Being. The Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 988-1013, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2018.1449080

48. Barnes, B.J., Austin, A.E. (2009). The Role of Doctoral Advisors: A Look at Advising from the Advisor’s Perspective. Innovative Higher Education. Vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 297-315, doi: 10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x

49. McCormack, C., Pamphilon, B. (2004). More Than a Confessional: Postmodern Groupwork to Support Postgraduate Supervisors’ Professional Development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23-37, doi: 10.1080/1470329032000172694

50. Conrad, L. (1998). Enhancing Research Through Academic Staff Development. International Journal for Academic Development. Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 114-123, doi: 10.1080/1360144980030204

51. McCulloch, A., Loeser, C. (2016). Does Research Degree Supervisor Training Work? The Impact of a Professional Development Induction Workshop on Supervision Practice. Higher Education Research & Development. Vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 968-982, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2016.1139547

52. European University Association (2010). Salzburg II Recommendations: European Universities’ Achievements Since 2005 in Implementing the Salzburg Principles. Available at: https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/salzburg%20ii%20recommendations%202010.pdf (accessed 14.04.2022).

53. Guerin, C., Walker, R., Aitchison, C., Laming, M., Padmanabhan, M.C., James, B. (2017). Doctoral Supervisor Development in Australian Universities: Preparing Research Supervisors to Teach Writing. Journal of Academic Language and Learning. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. A88-A103. Available at: https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/446 (accessed 14.04.2022).

54. Nefedova, A., Dyachenko, E. (2019). The Reform of Postgraduate Education in Russia in the Context of Global Trends. Mir Rossii: Sotsiologiya, etnologiya = Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology. No. 28(4), pp. 92-111, doi: 10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28-4-92-111 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

55. Bednyi, B.I., Bekova, S.K., Rybakov, N.V., Terentev, E.A., Khodeeva, N.A. (2021). Professional Doctorates: International Experience and Russian Context. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 9-21, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-10-921 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

56. Bekova, S.K., Gruzdev, I.A., Dzhafarova, Z.I., Maloshonok, N.G., Terent’ev, E.A. (2017). Portret sovremennogo rossiiskogo aspiranta [Portrait of a Modern Russian Postgraduate Student]. Series: Sovremennaya analitika obrazovaniya [Modern Education Analytics]. Issue 7 (15). Moscow : HSE Publ., 60 p. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/books/212734203 (accessed 14.04.2022). (In Russ.).

57. Bednyi, B.I., Mironos, A.A., Rybakov, N.V. (2019). How Russian Doctoral Education Fulfills Its Main Mission: Scientometric Assessments (Article 2). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 9-24, https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-201928-10-9-24 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

58. Bekova, S. (2021). Does Employment During Doctoral Training Reduce the PhD Completion Rate? Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1068-1080, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1672648

59. Bekova, S., Smirnov, I. (2020). Determinants of Doctoral Degree Aspirations: Insights from a Nationally Representative Panel Study. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond. Vol. 4, no. 25, pp. 14-16. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/en/articles/429127781 (accessed 14.04.2022).

60. Dezhina, I. (2018). Innovation Policy in Russia and the Development of University–Industry Linkages. Industry and Higher Education. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 245-252, doi: 10.1177/0950422218774974

61. Roud, V., Vlasova, V. (2020). Strategies of Industry-Science Cooperation in the Russian Manufacturing Sector. The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 870-907, doi: 10.1007/s10961-018-9703-3

62. Gershman, M., Gokhberg, L., Kuznetsova, T., Roud, V. (2018). Bridging S&T and Innovation in Russia: A Historical Perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 133, pp. 132-140, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.014

63. Sverdlik, A., Hall, N.C., McAlpine, L., Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD Experience: A Review of the Factors Influencing Doctoral Students’ Completion, Achievement, and Well-Being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. Vol. 13, pp. 361-388, doi: 10.28945/4113