Giving up to Gain: Towards the Benchmarks of the “Post-Bologna” Development of Higher Education in Russia
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-10-44-55
Abstract
The article focuses on the strategies and mechanisms for the development of higher education practiced in modern Russia. They are analyzed in terms of their effectiveness and adequacy to the needs of the country’s development. The authors emphasize the inertial predominance of the ideological impulses of radical liberalism of the 1990s in these strategies, including managerialism. The article raises the question about the need to adjust the general course, goals and mechanisms for the development of domestic higher education, taking into account the pressing challenges to the country and education, the features of the current stage of Russia’s development. The authors propose the concrete measures in this direction. At the same time, special attention is paid to the differentiation of strategies for the development of educational institutions, increasing the role of democratic mechanisms in the life of the university and in the management of the university.
About the Authors
K. G. Tkhagapsoev
Kabardino-Balkarian State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Khazhismel G. Tkhagapsoev – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof.
173, Chernyshevsky str., Nalchik, 360004
M. M. Yakhutlov
Kabardino-Balkarian State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Martin M. Yakhutlov – Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Prof.
173, Chernyshevsky str., Nalchik, 360004
References
1. Tret'yakova, E.M. (2011). [Two-Level Engineering Education: Requirements to Competences and Contents of Education]. Vektor nauk Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Science Vector of Togliatti State University. Series: Pedagogy, Psychology. No. 3, pp. 309–313. EDN PFIZKL. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
2. Ogorodova, L.M., Kress, V.M., Pokholkov, Yu.P. (2012). Engineering Education and Engineering in Russia: Problems and Solutions. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. No. 11, pp. 18-23. Available at: https://www.aeer.ru/files/io/m11/art_3.pdf (accessed 07.07.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Abramov, R.N. (2011). Managerialism and Academic Profession. Conflict and Interaction. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. No. 7 (327), pp. 37-47. Available at: https://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/2011-7/Abramov.pdf (accessed 07.07.2022). (In Russ.).
4. Varshavskiy, A.E., Kamkina, T.A. (2011). [Analysis of Two Main University Rankings]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika = Applied Econometrics. No. 3 (23), pp. 57-63. EDN OFXGID. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
5. Bolotov, V.A, Motova, G.N., Navodnov, V.G. (2021). Global Aggregated Ranking of HEIs: Russian Footprint. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 9-25, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-3-9-25 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
6. Romanov, E.V. (2021). Evaluation of the Efficiency of Russian Universities: Do We Need to Change the Paradigm? Obrazovaniye i nauka = Journal of Education and Science. Vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 84-125, doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-6-83-125 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Berestov, A.V., Guseva, A.I., Kalashnik, V.M., Kaminskiy, V.I., Kireyev, S.V., Sadchikov, S.M. (2020). Flagship Universities as Development Potential of Regions and Industries. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 8-9, pp. 9-25, doi: 10.31992/92/0869-3617-2020-29-8-9 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
Review
Views:
827
Email this article 