Intellectual Virtues in Education: Digital Challenges
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-10-56-68
Abstract
The study discusses the issue arising at the intersection of the virtue epistemology, the philosophy of education, and the contemporary philosophy of technology. Education turns out to be a field of application of the virtue epistemology, and attention to digital technologies gives it an expanded character. From an epistemological point of view, it is obvious that intellectual virtues have advantages in the field of education, concretizing its goals, justifying the acquisition of knowledge, endowing educational practices with value meaning. However, from a pedagogical point of view, there are doubts on the possibility of including intellectual virtues in specific educational strategies. The hypothesis is that it is precisely because of the interaction of digital technologies and intellectual virtues that the latter can become a distinct concern in education. In the first section, we analyze the intellectual virtues in relation to education and explicate the issue. In the second, we clarify the approach of the virtue epistemology to the education by including digital technologies in these practices. We demonstrate that the action of digital technologies provokes the “breaking” of intellectual virtues, which makes it necessary and concrete to move towards them. We relate the understanding of such provocative action with not only instrumental, but also social character of technologies. As a result, we expand the virtue epistemology, which does not consider this aspect, by referring to the critical theory of technology and offer the basis for improving specific educational strategies.
About the Authors
L. V. Shipovalova
St. Petersburg University; Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lada V. Shipovalova – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Head of the Department of Philosophy of Science and Technology, the Leading Researcher
7/9, Universitetskaya emb., St. Petersburg, 199034
12, bldg. 1, Goncharnaya str., Moscow, 109240
R. I. Gallyamov
Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Roman I. Gallyamov – Research Assistant
12, bldg. 1, Goncharnaya str., Moscow, 109240
References
1. Patarakin, Е.D. (2009). Sotsial’nye vzaimodeistviya i setevoe obuchenie 2.0. [Social Interactions and Networked Learning 2.0.]. Мoscow : Sovremennye tehnologii v obrazovanii i kul’ture Publ., 236 p. (In Russ.).
2. Pashkov, M.V., Pashkova, V.M. (2022). Problems and Risks of Digitalization in Higher Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 40-57, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-3-40-57 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Ignatieva, N.Yu. (2017). Obrazovanie v tsifrovuyu epokhu. [Education in the Digital Age]. Nizhny Tagil : NTI: (filial) UrFU. 128 p. (In Russ.)
4. Alfano, M. (2021). Virtues for Agents in Directed Social Networks. Synthese. Vol. 199, pp. 8423-8442., doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03169-6
5. Siegel, H. (2016). Critical Thinking and Intellectual Virtues. In: Baehr, J. (Ed.) Intellectual Virtues and education: Essays in applied virtue epistemology. Routledge, pp. 95-112.
6. Baehr, J. (2016). Is Intellectual Character Growth a Realistic Educational Aim? Journal of Moral Education. Vol. 45 (2), pp. 1-15, doi: 10.1080/03057240.2016.1174676
7. Turri, J. Alfano, M., Greco, J. (2021). Virtue Epistemology. In: Zalta, E.N. (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/epistemology-virtue/ (accessed 01.09.2022).
8. Marin, L., Steinert, S. (2022). Twisted Thinking: Technology, Values and Critical Thinking. Prometheus. Vol. 38 (1), pp. 124-140, doi: 10.13169/prometheus.38.1.0124
9. Kotzee, B., Carter, J.A., Siegel, H. (2019). Educating for Intellectual Virtue: A Critique from Action Guidance. Episteme. Vol. 18 (2), pp. 177-199, doi: 10.1017/epi.2019.10
10. Karimov, А.R. (2019). Epistemologiya dobrodetelei [Virtue Epistemology]. St. Petersburg : Aleteiya, 428 p. (In Russ.).
11. Kasavin, I.T. (2019). Virtue Epistemology: On the 40th Anniversary of the Turn in Analytical Philosophy. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. Vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 6-19, doi: 10.5840/eps201956341 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
12. Sosa, E. (2009). A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 168 p.
13. Battaly, H. (2016). Responsibilist Virtues in Reliabilist Classrooms. In: Baehr J. (Ed.). Intellectual Virtues and Education: Essays in Applied Virtue Epistemology. London : Routledge, pp. 163-183.
14. Heersmink, R. (2018). A Virtue Epistemology of the Internet: Search Engines, Intellectual Virtues and Education. Social Epistemology. Vol. 32 (1), pp. 1-12, doi: 10.1080/02691728.2017.1383530
15. Baehr, J. (2013). Educating for Intellectual Virtues: From Theory to Practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education. Vol. 47, pp. 248–262, doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12023
16. Pritchard, D. (2020). Educating for Intellectual Humility and Conviction. Journal of Philosophy of Education. Vol. 54 (2), pp. 398-409. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12422
17. Kotsonis, А. (2020). What Can We Learn from Plato about Intellectual Character Education? Educational Philosophy and Theory. Vol. 52 (3), pp. 251-260, doi: 10.1080/00131857.2019.1631157
18. Pritchard, D. (2016). Intellectual Virtue, Extended Cognition and the Epistemology of Education. In: Baehr, J. (Ed.) Intellectual Virtues and Education: Essays in Applied Virtue Epistemology. Routledge, pp. 113-127.
19. Heersmink, R., Knight, S. (2018). Distributed Learning: Educating and Assessing Extended Cognitive Systems. Philosophical Psychology. Vol. 31 (6), pp. 969-990, doi: 10.1080/09515089.2018.1469122
20. Clark, A., Chalmers, D.J. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis. No. 58 (1), pp. 7-19. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3328150?origin=JSTOR-pdf (accessed 01.09.2022).
21. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. 402 p.
22. Shevchenko, S.Yu. (2021). Extended Mind and Epistemic Responsibility in a Digital Society. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. Vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 209–227, doi: 10.5840/eps202158470 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
23. Schwengerer, L. (2020). Online Intellectual Virtues and the Extended Mind. Social Epistemology. Vol. 35 (3), pp. 312–322, doi: 10.1080/02691728.2020.1815095
24. Kotsonis, A. (2020). Social Media as Inadvertent Educators. Journal of Moral Education. Vol. 51 (2), pp. 155-168, doi: 10.1080/03057240.2020.1838267
25. Feenberg, A. (2012). The Mediation is the Message: Rationality and Agency in the Critical Theory of Technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7-24, doi: 10.5840/techne20131712 (Russian translation in: Stolyarova, O.E. (Ed.). Ontologii artefaktov: vzaimodejstvie «estestvennykh» i «iskusstvennykh» komponentov zhiznennogo mira [Ontologies of Artifacts: The Interaction of “Natural” and “Artificial” Components of the Life World.] Moscow: Delo, pp. 214-248).
26. Mair, K. (2016). Participatory Culture and Distributed Expertise: Breaking Down Pedagogical Norms or Regulating Neoliberal Subjectivities? The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy. No. 9. Available at: http://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/participatoryculture-and-distributed-expertise-breaking-down-pedagogical-norms-or-regulating-neoliberalsubjectivities (accessed 01.09.2022).
Review
Views:
684
Email this article 