Grant Activities and Sustainability of Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from Russia
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-2-25-42
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a quantitative analysis of the contribution of grant activities to ensuring the sustainable development of higher education institutions in the Russian Federation. The authors consider sustainability in five aspects of activity: educational, research, international, financial and social. Results of higher educational institutions performance monitoring (2014-2022) formed the empirical basis of the study. In this research, we used the quantile regression model to identify the effects of inertial development and the effects associated with grant activities in the dynamics of universities performance indicators. We estimated the model parameters separately in each of the decile groups. Thus, we tested the central hypothesis of the study about the quantile heterogeneity of the sensitivity of university target indicators to the intensity and effectiveness of grant funding. This paper provides evidence of significant contributions the inertial nature of the development of universities, representing advanced development groups, into the sustainability of target performance indicators. However, in terms of sensitivity to the effectiveness and intensity of grant activities, they are inferior to universities from catch-up development groups in almost all aspects of their activities. The identified patterns of sensitivity to grant funding indicate a high potential for convergence (“catch-up development effect”) in the higher education system of the Russian Federation. These patterns can improve the effectiveness of management decisions in higher education by focusing on growth points with high sensitivity to grant support.
About the Authors
D. A. EndovitskyRussian Federation
Dmitry А. Endovitsky – Dr. Sci. (Economics), Full Prof., Rector; Vice-President and a member of the executive board of the Russian Rectors’ Union; Chairman of the Regional Council of University Rectors; Chairman of Association of Higher Education Institutions in Chernozem Region
ResearcherID: ABB-6534-2020
V. V. Korotkikh
Russian Federation
Viacheslav V. Korotkikh – Cand. Sci. (Economics), Assoc. Prof.
ResearcherID: ABB-5766-2020
E. Y. Bubnova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina Y. Bubnova – graduate student
1, University sq., Voronezh, 394018
References
1. Feliciani, T., Morreau, M., Luo, J., Lucas, P., Shankar, K. (2022). Designing Grant-review Panels for Better Funding Decisions: Lessons from an Empirically Calibrated Simulation Model. Research Policy. Vol. 51, no. 4, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104467
2. Fong, E.A., Wilhite, A.W. (2021). The Impact of False Investigators on Grant Funding. Research Policy. Vol. 50, no. 10, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104366
3. Dzieżyc, M., Kazienko, P. (2022). Effectiveness of Research Grants Funded by European Research Council and Polish National Science Centre. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 16, no. 1, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101243
4. Belyavskiy, O.V. (2018). Problems of Legal Regulation of the Grant Support of Fundamental Scientific Research in the Russian Federation. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 170-189 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
5. Bubnova, E.Y. (2022). Challenges and Development Pathways for the Expert Examination of Grants. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management. No. 2, pp. 112-122, doi: 10.17308/econ.2022.2/8324 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
6. Treschevsky, Y.I., Rudnev, E.A., Ivanov, I.S. (2020). The Role of Universities in the Realization of Opportunities and Curbing Threats to Innovative Economic Development – Expert Opinions. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management. No. 3, pp. 58-69, doi: 10.17308/econ.2020.3/3105 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Leonova, T.N. (2014). Efficiency of Grant’s Funding of Research Work: International Experience and Prospects of Russia. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. No. 4, pp. 89-101. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
8. Aleskerov, F.T., Belousova, V.Y., Petruschenko, V.V. (2015). Models of Shell Data Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis in the Problem of Evaluating the Efficiency of Universities. Problemy upravleniya = Control Sciences. No. 5, pp. 2-19. (In Russ.).
9. Belyakov, N.S., Belyakov, S.A. (2018). Evaluation of Efficiency of Education: Overview of International Experience. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 105-117, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2018.01.010 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
10. Friedman, L., Sinuany-Stern, Z. (1997). Scaling Units via the Canonical Correlation Analysis in the DEA Context. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 629-637.
11. Kempkes, G., Pohl, C. (2010). The Efficiency of German Universities Some Evidence from Nonparametric and Parametric Methods. Applied Economics. Vol. 42, no. 16, pp. 2063-2079. doi: 10.1080/00036840701765361
12. Allen, D.O., Flegg, A.T. (2007). Does Expansion Cause Congestion? The Case of the Older British Universities, 1994-2004. Education Economics. Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 75-102. doi: 10.1080/09645290601133928
13. Johnes, J. (2008). Efficiency and Productivity Change in the English Higher Education Sector from 1996/97 to 2004/5. The Manchester School. Vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 653-674, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2008.01087.x
14. Katharakis, G., Katharaki, M. (2010). A Comparative Assessment of Greek Universities’ Efficiency Using Quantitative Analysis. Intern. Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 49, no. 4-5), pp. 115-128.
15. Johnes, J., Yu, L. (2008). Measuring the Research Performance of Chinese Higher Education Institutions Using Data Envelopment Analysis. China Economic Review. Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 679-696, doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2008.08.004
16. Cherchye, L., Vanden Abeele, P. (2005). On Research Efficiency: A Micro-analysis of Dutch University Research in Economics and Business Management. Research Policy. Vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 495-516, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.005
17. Koenker, R.W., Bassett, G.W. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica. Vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 33-50, doi: 10.2307/1913643
18. Koenker, R.W., D’Orey, V. (1987). Computing Regression Quantiles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society. Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 383-393, doi: 10.2307/2347802
19. Cox, D.R., Snell, E.J. Analysis of Binary Data. London: Chapman & Hall, 1989.
20. Endovitsky, D.А., Korotkikh, V.V., Voronova, M.V. (2020). Competitiveness of Russian Universities in the Global System of Higher Education: Quantitative Analysis. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 9-26, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-2-9-26 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
21. Endovitsky, D.А., Korotkikh, V.V., Krivosheev, A.V. (2021). Financial Sustainability of the Russian Higher Education Institutions: Quantitative Analysis. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 22-37, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-10-22-37 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
22. Zinchenko, D.I., Egorov, A.A. (2019). Efficiency Modeling of Russian Universities. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal VShE = HSE Economic Journal. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 143-172, doi: 10.17323/1813-8691-2019-23-1-143-172 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
23. Ivanov, D.Yu., Dmitriev, P.A. (2020). The Dynamics of Some Market Indicators of “Paid” Scientific Publications. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 75-79, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-7-75-79 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
24. Orlov, A.I. (2017). Contemporary Challenges to the Study of Science and Scientometrics. Biocosmology neo-Aristotelism. Vol. 7, no. 3-4, pp. 389-410. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
25. Orlov, A.I. (2016). Number of Citations as a Key Performance Indicator of Scientific Activity of Researchers and Organizations. Politematicheskii setevoi elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Scientific Journal of KubSAU. No. 124 (10), pp. 984-1009 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
26. Orlov, A.I. (2014). About the Indicators of Scientific Activities. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. No. 7 (358), pp. 21-29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
27. Trubnikova, E.I. (2017). The Information Asymmetry and Tendencies of the Market of Scientific Publications. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 3 (210), pp. 26-36. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
28. Safonova, M.A., Safonov, A.A. (2021). Transformation of Academic Writing in the Digital Age Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 144-153, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-2-144-153 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).