Risk-based Regulation of Russian Universities: Risk Indicators and Their Use for State Control Purposes
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-2-43-60
Abstract
The article is devoted to the identification and analysis of indicators of the risk of low-quality education in Russian universities. In 2021-2022, the approach to higher education inspections has changed significantly: accreditation monitoring has been introduced, it includes eight indicators. However, this monitoring was formed by the expert community, so the results of its testing in practice have yet to be analyzed. The purpose of this work is to identify risk factors for estimation the likelihood of violations of mandatory requirements by universities, and to develop recommendations for expanding the set of risk indicators included in accreditation monitoring. The main methods used in the work are methods of quantitative analysis, including econometric modeling. The novelty of the work is determined by the approach used: risk indicators are identified using a quantitative econometric analysis of data on the observed characteristics and results of inspections of Russian universities in 2015-2019. The results of the study indicate the possibility of supplementing the set of accreditation monitoring indicators. As additional indicators, first of all, various characteristics of research activities of universities can be used. Such a change in accreditation monitoring will increase its effectiveness as a preliminary assessment tool used in the implementation of a risk-based approach to state control. In cases where the assessment of even extended monitoring is ambiguous, the quantitative model proposed by the authors can be used.
Keywords
quality of higher education,
state control in higher education,
accreditation monitoring,
risk indicators,
risk-based regulation
Supporting agencies: The article was written on the basis of the RANEPA state assignment research programme.
About the Authors
E. A. Ponomareva
Laboratory of socioeconomic problems of regulation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Ponomareva – Cand. Sci. (Economics), Head of Laboratory
Researcher ID: Y-9057-2018
A. D. Savina
Laboratory of socio-economic problems of regulation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexandra D. Savina – Junior researcher
N. S. Antonenko
Institute of Control and Supervision; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Antonenko – Junior researcher, Laboratory of socio-economic problems of regulation, Institute of Control and Supervision
82, Vernadskogo ave., Moscow, 119571
References
1. Svechnikova, V.V. (2022). The Evolution of Legal Regulation of State Accreditation of Educational Activities in Russia. Administrativnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo = Administrative and Municipal Law. No. 4, pp. 34-50, doi: 10.7256/2454-0595.2022.4.39233 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
2. Zhevlakovich, S.S. (2022). On the Issue of New Accreditation Indicators for Educational Programs of Higher Education. Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti = Bulletin of Economic Security. No. 3, pp. 318-325, doi: 10.24412/2414-3995-2022-3-318-325 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Nikiforova, L.Kh. (2022). [Prospects for the Use of New Accreditation Indicators in Transport Universities of the Russian Federation]. In: Materialy pula nauchno-prakticheskikh konferentsiy [Materials of the Pool of Scientific and Practical Conferences]. Pp. 432-436. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47912295 (accessed 03.03.2022). (In Russ.).
4. Goryachko, V.V., Zernov, V.A., Darda, I.V. (2022). International Ratings and State Accreditation: Common Goals and Different Approaches. Vyssheye obrazovaniye segodnya = Higher education today. No. 3-4, pp. 13-21, doi: 10.18137/RNU.HET.22.03-04.P.013 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
5. Rubin, Yu.B., Soboleva, E.Yu. (2021). Independence of Higher Education Quality Assurance: Criteria, Principles, Realities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 3, pp. 26-42, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-3-26-42 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
6. Prakash, G. (2018). Quality in Higher Education Institutions: Insights from the Literature. The TQM Journal. Vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 732-748, doi: 10.1108/TQM-04-2017-0043
7. Sunder, V.M. (2016). Constructs of Quality in Higher Education Services. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. Vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1091-1111, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2015-0079
8. Lindsay, A. (1992). Concepts of Quality in Higher Education. Journal of Tertiary Educational Administration. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 153-163, doi: 10.1080/1036970920140203
9. Liu, O.L. (2011). Value-added Assessment in Higher Education: A Comparison of Two Methods. Higher Education. Vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 445-461, doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9340-8
10. Cunha, J.M., Miller, T. (2014). Measuring Value-added in Higher Education: Possibilities and Limitations in the Use of Administrative Data. Economics of Education Review. Vol. 42, pp. 64-77, doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.06.001
11. Camilleri, M.A. (2021). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Performance Management Tool in Higher Education. Management in Education. Vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 10-21, doi: 10.1177/0892020620921412
12. Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society: Vol. 1 and Vol. 2. (2008). OECD, Paris. Pp. 259-324.
13. Krcal, A., Glass, A., Tremblay, K. (2014). Monitoring and Enhancing Quality in Higher Education: Developing a Quality Framework. In: Glass A. (ed.), The State of Higher Education. OECD, Paris.
14. Harvey, L., Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 9-34, doi: 10.1080/0260293930180102
15. Tasopoulou, K., Tsiotras, G. (2017). Benchmarking Towards Excellence in Higher Education. Benchmarking: An International Journal. Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 617-634, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-03-2016-0036
16. Hides, M.T., Davies, J., Jackson, S. (2004). Implementation of EFQM Excellence Model Selfassessment in the UK Higher Education Sector–lessons Learned from Other Sectors. The TQM magazine. Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 194-201, doi: 10.1108/09544780410532936
17. Mok, J.K. (2002). From Nationalization to Marketization: Changing Governance in Taiwan’s Higher-education System. Governance. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 137-159, doi: 10.1111/1468-0491.00183
18. Sahney, S., Banwet, D. K., Karunes, S. (2008). An Integrated Framework of Indices for Quality Management in Education: a Faculty Perspective. The TQM Journal. Vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 502-519, doi: 10.1108/17542730810898467
19. Harvey, L. (2007). Epistemology of Quality. Perspectives in Education. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1-13. Available at: https://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/Harvey%20papers/Harvey%202007%20Epistemology%20of%20Quality.pdf (accessed 03.03.2022).
20. Koedel, C., Rockoff, J.E. (2015). Value-added Modeling: A Review. Economics of Education Review. Vol. 47, pp. 180-195, doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.006
21. Loukkola, T., Peterbauer, H., Gover, A. (2020). Exploring Higher Education Indicators. European University Association. Available at: https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/indicators%20report.pdf (accessed 03.03.2022).
Review
Views:
881
Email this article 