The Concept “Student Experience” from the Point of View of Philosophical Anthropology and Developmental Psychology

An actual topic in higher education research today is the study of student experiences. It is believed that knowledge of educational settings, the degree of student involvement in educational and extracurricular activities, satisfaction with the quality of courses or practices offered, etc. helps to retain the student population, modernize educational programs, university campus services, etc. The study presents a new concept of student experience, corresponding to the key position of the university as an institution for the development of human and society. Research methods are conceptual analysis and conceptual design.
Ideas about the “student experience” and the need to study its components are determined by the models of relations between the university and students. Currently, universities widely use the “instruction-based” and “consumer” models, and new models such as the “co-production” or “transformative learning” model are also being tested.
The article examines the “anthropic” model of relations between the university and students, which 1) reflects the civilizational mission of the university; 2) is based on philosophical and anthropological ideas about the formation of an individual person as a “path” on which he/she discovers new realities (“horizons”) of personal and professional existence; 3) sets a new direction for research on student experience.
A new concept of student experience is proposed, correlated with the “anthropic” model of relations between the university and students. Significant components of such experience are: “discovering others” who are carriers of a new (for the student) self-determination, thinking, worldview, and way of action; “shift of the horizon” – the discovery of new meanings, objects, transformation of consciousness (changing its schematisms and categories); mastering a new life world; overcoming the existing ways and patterns of thinking and action, personal limitations and building a new self; reflection of one’s path and “assembling oneself” through personal history.
This concept of student experience will allow us to build educational practices that are adequate to the needs of active students focused on complex educational experiences – the path of discovery and transformation of consciousness and thinking

1. Klemenčič, M., Ashwin, P. (2015). Teaching and Learning: An Overview of the Thematic Section [Overview Paper]. In: Curaj, A., Matei, L., Pricopie, R., Salmi, J., Scott, P. (eds). The European Higher Education Area: Between Critical Reflections and Future Policies. Springer International Publishing, pp. 315-324, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_21

2. Mamardashvili, M.K. (1997). Psikhologicheskaia topologiia puti: M. Prust. “V poiskakh utrachennogo vremeni [Psychological topology of the path: M. Proust. “In Search of Lost Time”]. St. Petersburg, Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute Publ.; Magazine “Neva”, 572 p. Available at: https://studall.org/all-158768.html (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

3. Efimov, V.S., Lapteva, A.V., Viaznikov, V.N. (2022). Krasnoiarskii obrazovatel’nyi fenomen. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskii fakul’tet KGU: istoriia, liudi, smysly [Krasnoyarsk Educational Phenomenon. Faculty of Psychology and Pedagogy of KSU: History, People, Meanings]. Moscow, MAKS Press LLC, 2022, 712 p., doi: 10.29003/m2630.978-5-317-06772-4 (In Russ.).

4. Buckley, P., Lee, P. (2021). The Impact of Extra-Curricular Activity on the Student Experience. Active Learning in Higher Education. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 37-48, doi: 10.1177/1469787418808988

5. Maloshonok, N.G., Shcheglova, I.A. (2020). Modeli organizatcii obucheniia studentov v universitete: osnovnye predstavleniia, preimuschestva i ogranicheniia [Models of Organization of Teaching Students at the University: Basic Assumptions, Advantages and Limitations]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 107-120, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2020.02.017 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

6. Korneenko, T.N., Shcheglova, I.A. (2021). Otsenka obrazovatel’nogo opyta studentov kak instrument priniatiia upravlencheskikh reshenii v universitete [Assessment of the Student’s Educational Experience as a Tool For Making Management Decisions in the University]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 82-99, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2021.03.029 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

7. Zinchenko, A.P. (1996). Uchebnyi plan i traektoriia stanovleniia cheloveka [Curriculum and Trajectory of Human Development]. Kentavr [Centaur]. No. 2, pp. 50-55. Available at: https://www.kentavr.mathedu.ru/text/kentavr_1996_2/p51/ (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

8. Krokinskaya, О.K., Trapitsin, S.Yu. (2015). Student kak “potrebitel’ obrazovaniia”: soderzhanie kategorii [Student as “an Education Consumer”: Content of the Concept]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 65-75. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_23929718_47024972.pdf (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

9. Balyasin, M., Carvalho, L., Mihut, G. (2016). Opyt obuchaiuschikhcia: issledovanie-opros kak novyi podkhod k otsenke programm Erasmus Mundus [Student Experience: A New Approach to Evaluate the Quality of Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees Through Survey Research]. Voprosy obrazovaniia = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 1, pp. 110-134, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-110-134 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Lyz’, N.A., Golubeva, E.V., Istratova, O.N. (2022). Obrazovatel’nyi opyt studentov: kontseptualizatsiia i razrabotka instrumenta otsenki kachestva obrazovaniia [Students’ Educational Experience: The Conceptualization and Development of a Tool for the Assessment of Education Quality]. Voprosy obrazovaniia = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 3, pp. 67-98, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-67-98 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

11. Lomas, L. (2007). Are Students Customers? Perceptions of Academic Staff. Quality in Higher Education. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 31-44, doi:10.1080/13538320701272714

12. McMillan, J., Cheney, G. (1996). The Student as Consumer: The Implications and Limitations of a Metaphor. Communication Education. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1-15, doi:10.1080/03634529609379028

13. McCulloch, A. (2009). The Student as Co-Producer: Learning from Public Administration about the Student–University Relationship. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 171-183, doi: 10.1080/03075070802562857

14. Ashwin, P. (2016). Mozhet li universitetskoe obrazovanie izmenit’ cheloveka? [Why Would Going to University Change Anyone? The Challenges of Capturing the Transformative Power of Higher Education in Comparisons of Quality]. Voprosy obrazovaniia = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 1, pp. 21-34, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-21-34 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

15. Mezirow, J. (2018). Transformative Learning Theory. In: K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists ... in their own words (2nd ed., pp. 114-128). Routledge. Doi: 10.4324/9781315147277

16. Hoggan, C.D. (2016). Transformative Learning as a Metatheory: Definition, Criteria, and Typology. Adult Education Quarterly. Vol. 66, iss. 1, pp. 57-75, doi: 10.1177/0741713615611216

17. O’Sullivan, E., Morrell, A., O’Connor, M. (Eds.) (2002). Expanding the boundaries of transformative learning: Essays on theory and praxis. New York, NY, Palgrave. 280 p., doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-63550-4

18. Christie, M., Carey, M., Robertson, A., Grainger, P. (2015). Putting Transformative Learning Theory into Practice. Australian Journal of Adult Learning. Vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 9-30. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1059138.pdf (accessed 14.03.2024).

19. Newman, J.G. (2006). Ideia Universiteta [The Idea of the University], trans. from English S.B. Benediktov; under general ed. M.A. Gusakovsky. Minsk, BSU, 208 p. Available at: https://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/4525/1/Ньюмен.pdf (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

20. Jaspers, K. (2006). Ideia Universiteta [The Idea of a University], trans. from German T.V. Tyagunova; ed. translation by O.N. Shparaga; under general ed. M.A. Gusakovsky. Minsk, BSU, 159 p. Available at: https://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/4530/1/Ясперс.pdf (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

21. Rybakov, S.K. (2019). Asketika kak marshrutnaia karta zhiznennogo puti [Asceticism as a Roadmap of a Life Course]. Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’nye, gumanitarnye, mediko-biologicheskie nauki [Izvestiya of the Samara Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, Humanitarian, Medicobiological Sciences]. Vol. 21, no. 65, pp. 79-84. Available at: http://www.ssc.smr.ru/media/journals/izvestia_hum/2019/2019_2_79_84.pdf (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

22. Piatigorskii, A.M. (1992). Filosofiia odnogo pereulka [The Philosophy of One Lane]. Moscow, Progress, 160 p. Available at: https://vtoraya-literatura.com/pdf/pyatigorsky_filosofiya_odnogo_pereulka_1989_text.pdf (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

23. Genisaretskii, O.I. (2001). Navigator: metodologicheskie rasshireniia i prodolzheniia [Navigator: methodological extensions and continuations]. Moscow, Put’, 526 p. (Available at: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01000954101 (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

24. Genisaretskii, O.I. (1995). Kul’turno-antropologicheskaia perspektiva [Cultural-anthropological perspective]. Moscow: Russian Institute, 215 p. Available at: http://old.russ.ru/antolog/inoe/genis.htm (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

25. El’konin, B.D. (1994). Vvedenie v psikhologiiu razvitiia (v traditsii kul’turno-istoricheskoi teorii L.S. Vygotskogo) [Introduction to Developmental Psychology (in the Traditions of the Culture-Historical Theory of L.S. Vygotsky)]. Moscow, Trivola, 168 p. Available at: https://psychlib.ru/mgppu/EVp-1994/EVP-001.HTM#$p1 (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

26. Rubinshtein, S.L. (2002). Osnovy obschei psikhologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. St. Petersburg, Piter, 720 p. Available at: http://www.nicevt.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/rubinshteynosnovu_obzhey_psc.pdf (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

27. Anan’ev, B.G. (2001). Chelovek kak predmet poznaniia [Human as an Object of Knowledge]. St. Petersburg, Piter, 288 p. Available at: http://www.dou4sun.ru/files/File/biblioteka_ananievman-reflection.pdf (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

28. Hogan, D.P. (1978). The Variable Order of Events in the Life Course. American Sociological Review. Vol. 43, pp. 573-586, doi: 10.2307/2094780

29. Müller, W. (1972). Bildung und Mobilitätsprozeß – Eine Anwendung der Pfadanalyse. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. No. 1, ss. 65-84, doi: 10.1515/zfsoz-1972-0106

30. Tykanova, E.V., Khokhlova, A.M. (2016). Osnovnye poniatiia i podkhody v sotsiologicheskom izuchenii zhiznennykh putei [Key Concepts and Approaches in Sociological Life Course Studies]. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriia 12. Sotsiologiia [Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 12. Sociology]. Iss. 3, pp. 4-19, doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu12.2016.301 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

31. Blossfeld, H.-P., Huinink, I. (2006). Issledovaniia zhiznennikh putei v sotsial’nykh naukakh: temy, kontseptsii, metody i problemy [Research of Life Paths in the Social Sciences: Topics, Concepts, Methods and Problems]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. Vol. IX, no. 1 (34), pp. 15-43. Available at: http://jourssa.ru/files/volumes/2006_1/Blossfeld_Huinink_2006_1.pdf (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

32. Shchedrovitsky, P.G. (2021). Kritika pedagogicheskogo razuma. Raboty 1985–2004 godov [Criticism of Pedagogical Intelligence. Works 1985–2004]. Moscow, Politicheskaia entsiklopediia [Political Encyclopedia], 551 p. Available at: https://rosspen.su/kritika-pedagogicheskogorazuma-raboty-19852004-godov/ (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).

33. Kovaleva, T.M. (2016). T’iutorstvo kak antropopraktika [Tutoring as Anthropopractice]. Chelovek.RU. No. 11, pp. 71-81. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_25925596_53430001.pdf (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

34. Efimov, V.S., Lapteva, A.V. (2017) Universitet 4.0: filosofsko-metodologicheskii analiz [University 4.0: Philosophical and Methodological Analysis]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. No. 1, pp. 16-29, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2017.01.002 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

35. Khasan, B.I. (2018). Konstruktivnaia psikhologiia konflikta: uchebnoe posobie dlia bakalavriata i magistratury. 2-e izd. [Constructive Psychology of Conflict: Textbook Manual for Bachelor’s and Master’s Degrees / 2nd ed.]. Moscow, Izd-vo Iurait [Yurayt Publishing House], 204 p. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37501261 (accessed 14.03.2024). (In Russ.).