Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

“What Scares Me Is the Speed at Which Artificial Intelligence Is Developing”: Students' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-4-63-83

Abstract

   As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes an integral part of our daily lives, the concern of the teaching community about the illegal use of these technologies in the educational process is increasing. In order to adapt the education system and teaching practices to new technological challenges, it is necessary to analyze the opinions of all the parties concerned.

   The purpose of this study is to identify the attitude of students of Kazan Federal University to the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the educational process and the practice of their application in foreign languages learning process.

   To achieve this goal, an online survey of students of Kazan Federal University was conducted. The survey touched upon the practical aspects of the use of artificial intelligence in language teaching, the advantages and disadvantages of AI tools from the students’ point of view, as well as their opinion regarding the prospects of AI in education. As a result of the study, we came to the conclusion that at the moment AI tools are not widespread enough in teaching foreign languages. Only one-fifth of the respondents use these tools, but the respondents’ comments suggest that the number of users will grow. The attitude of students towards the use of AI is ambiguous, with responses ranging from enthusiastic to skeptical. Students’ positive impressions are mainly related to saving time and effort, as well as to the ability of AI to present complex materials with understandable language. Among the main disadvantages, the respondents noted unreliability of data and fake content. Despite the fact that students are generally positive about the use of AI, a significant part of respondents do not trust software products such as ChatGPT, since, in their opinion, it provides answers of average quality that need to be corrected. Based on the data obtained, the authors attempted to formulate recommendations on improving the methods of teaching and control in the process of teaching foreign languages at universities.

About the Authors

N. V. Tikhonova
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation

Nataliya V. Tikhonova, Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor

Institute of International Relations; Department of
European Languages and Cultures

420008; 18, Kremlyovskaya str.; Kazan

Researcher ID: G-3513-2017



G. M. Ilduganova
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation

Gulnara M. Ilduganova, Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor

Institute of Management, Economics and Finance; Department of Foreign Languages and Professional Communication

420008; 18, Kremlyovskaya str.; Kazan

Researcher ID: R-9294-2016



References

1. Benuyenah, V. (2023). Commentary: ChatGPT Use in Higher Education Assessment: Prospects and Epistemic Threats. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 134-135, doi: 10.1108/JRIT-03-2023-097

2. Sysoyev, P.V. (2024). Ethics and AI-Plagiarism in an Academic Environment: Students’ Understanding of Compliance with Author’s Ethics and the Problem of Plagiarism in the Process of Interaction with Generative Artificial Intelligence. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 31-53, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-2-31-53 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

3. Zashikhina, I.M. (2023). Scientific Article Writing: Will ChatGPT Help? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 24-47, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-8-9-24-47 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

4. Else, H. (2023). Abstracts Written by ChatGPT Fool Scientists. Nature. Vol. 613, no. 7944, pp. 423, doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7

5. Vázquez-Cano, E., Ramírez-Hurtado, J.M., Sáez-López, J.M., López-Meneses, E. (2023). Chat-GPT: The brightest student in the class. Thinking Skills and Creativity. Vol. 49, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101380

6. Nikolaev, V.V., Rakhkonen, M.E. (2023). The Use of Various Tools and the Use of the ChatGpt Chat-bot when Writing Scientific Papers Tested in the Antiplagiate Program. Professionalnoe yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka = Professional Legal Education and Science. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 78-81. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_50434808_22022836.pdf (accessed 20. 02. 2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

7. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal. Vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 537–550, doi: 10.1177/00336882231162868

8. Ivakhnenko, E.N., Nikolskiy, V.S. (2023). ChatGPT in Higher Education and Science: a Threat or a Valuable Resource? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 9-22, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-9-22 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

9. Rezaev, A.V., Tregubova, N.D. (2023). ChatGPT and AI in the Universities: An Introduction to the Near Future. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 19-37, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-6-19-37 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

10. Sysoyev, P.V. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Awareness, Readiness and Practice of Using Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Professional Activities by University Faculty. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 9-33, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-10-9-33 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

11. Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in Education and Research: A Critical Examination of Ethical Implications and Solutions. Sustainability. Vol. 15, no. 7, article no. 7, doi: 10.3390/su15075614

12. Makhlouf, M.K.I. (2021). Effect of Artificial Intelligence-Based Application on Saudi Preparatory-Year Students’ EFL Speaking Skills at Albaha University. International Journal of English Language Education. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 36-56, doi: 10.5296/ijele.v9i2.18782

13. Zou, B., Guan, X., Shao, Y., Chen, P. (2023). Supporting Speaking Practice by Social Network-Based Interaction in Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Language Learning. Sustainability. Vol. 15, no. 4, doi: 10.3390/su15042872

14. Sysoyev, P.V., Filatov, E.M. (2023). Method of the Development of Students’ Foreign Language Communication Skills Based on Practice with a Chatbot. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania = Perspectives of Science and Education. Vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 201-218, doi: 10.32744/pse.2023.3.13 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

15. Greenwald, O.N., Islamov, R.S., Resenchuk, A.A., Saveleva, I.V. (2023). Linguadidactic Potential of a Chatbot in Teaching a Foreign Language at University. Pedagogical Sciences. No. 11, pp. 109-113, doi: 10.17513/snt.39829 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

16. Budnikova, A.S., Babenkova, O.S. (2020). [Use of Chatbots in Learning a Foreign Language]. Uchenye zapiski. Electrony nauchny jurnal Kerskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Electronic scientific journal of Kursk State University]. No. 3 (55), pp. 146-150. (In Russ.).

17. Cotton, D.R.E., Cotton, P.A., Shipway, J.R. (2024). Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 228–239, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

18. Illingworth, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Students Could Use AI to Cheat, but It’s a Chance to Rethink Assessment Altogether. The Conversation. URL: https://theconversation.com/chatgptstudents-could-use-ai-to-cheat-but-its-a-chance-to-rethink-assessment-altogether-198019 (accessed: 06. 02. 2024).

19. Bermous, A.G. (2023). Academic Cheating and Imitation at Higher School as an Ontological Challenge to the Education of the XXI Century. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek = Lifelong education: The 21<sup>st</sup> Century. Vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 2-13, doi: 10.15393/j5.art.2023.8244 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

20. Hopp, C., Speil, A. (2021). How Prevalent is Plagiarism Among College Students? Anonymity Preserving Evidence from Austrian Undergraduates. Accountability in Research. No. 28(3), pp. 133-148, URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343380569_How_prevalent_is_plagiarism_among_college_students_Anonymity_preserving_evidence_from_Austrian_undergraduates

21. Dakakni, D., Safa, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in the L2 Classroom: Implications and Challenges on Ethics and Equity in Higher Education: A 21<sup>st</sup> Century Pandora’s Box. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 5, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100179

22. Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F.F., Al-shami, S.A., Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the Students’ Views, Concerns, and Perceived Ethics about Chat GPT Usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 5, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180

23. Hornberger, M., Bewersdorff, A., Nerdel, C. (2023). What Do University Students Know about Artificial Intelligence? Development and Validation of an AI Literacy Test. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 5, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100165

24. Malmström, H., Stöhr, C., Ou, W. (2023). Chatbots and Other AI for Learning: A Survey of Use and Views Among University Students in Sweden. Chalmers University of Technology. Chalmers Studies in Communication and Learning in Higher Education. 19 p., doi: 10.17196/CLS.CSCLHE/2023/01

25. Chan, C.K.Y. (2023). A Comprehensive AI Policy Education Framework for University Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Vol. 20 (38), doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

26. Gavrilova, Yu.V., Motorina, I.E., Pavlova, T.E. (2022). Social Expectations of the Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Education (on the Materials of a Questionnaire Survey of Students of the Moscow State Technical University Named after N. E. Bauman). Meditzina. Sotziologia. Filosofia. Prikladnie issledovania = Medicine. Sociology. Philosophy. Applied research. No. 1, pp. 20-25. Available at: https://medsociofil.ru/upload/iblock/61d/6yi1lyxop7rrlw8sehe28fuk8klnrwew/МСФ%20№1%202022.pdf (accessed 20. 02. 2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

27. Garaev, T.K., Novik, N.S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in the Eyes of Students. Mir obrazobania – obrazovanie v mire = World of Education — Education around the World. Vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 221-229, URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=drrkxd (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

28. Vygotsky, L.S. (2008). Pedagogicheskaya psihologia [Pedagogical psychology]. Moscow: AST; Astrel, 672 p. ISBN 978-5-17-049976-2 (АСТ). (In Russ.).

29. Garcнa-Peсalvo, F.J. (2023). La percepciуn de la Inteligencia Artificial en contextos educativos tras el lanzamiento de ChatGPT: disrupciуn o pбnico. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS). Vol. 24, e31279, doi: 10.14201/eks.31279

30. Tikhonova, N.V., Ilduganova, G.M., Lukina, M.S. (2018). Implemented Teaching Methods Based on Interactive Learning Process in Order to Increase the Ability of Learning Foreign Language. The Journal of Social Sciences Research. Special Issue 5, pp. 473-478, doi: 10.32861/jssr.spi5.473.478


Review

Views: 981


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)