Preview

Высшее образование в России (Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia)

Расширенный поиск

Картографическая компетентность в исследованиях высшего географического образования: обзор предметного поля

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-4-144-168

Аннотация

   Формирование картографической компетентности является актуальной задачей высшего географического образования.

   Цель исследования – обзор современных тенденций обобщения результатов исследований, имеющихся в литературе, охарактеризовать предметное поле исследований картографической компетентности и выявить пробелы в научном знании относительно картографической компетентности.

   Для достижения данной цели решались следующие задачи: раскрыть суть концепта «картографическая компетентность» и близких к нему понятий «картографическая грамотность», «навыки чтения географических карт», «пространственное мышление»; на основе анализа литературы выявить наиболее исследованные вопросы и пробелы в научном знании в области картографической компетентности; определить перспективные направления дальнейших исследований. Обзор исследований, посвящённых формированию картографической компетентности, проводился на основе методов анализа и метаанализа согласно критериям PRISMA 2020 путём выборки литературы по ключевым словам.

   Результаты исследования: осуществлён обзор исследований определений концепта «картографическая компетентность» и связанных с ним понятий; определены наиболее исследованные проблемы по картографической компетентности и эмпирические данные, полученные в рамках данной тематики; определены существующие в научном знании пробелы; обозначены наиболее перспективные направления дальнейших исследований в области картографической компетентности.

Об авторах

К. Д. Каймулдинова
Казахский национальный педагогический университет им. Абая
Казахстан

Куляш Дуйсенбаевна Каймулдинова, д-р геогр. наук, профессор

кафедра географии и экологии

050010; пр-кт Достык, 13; Алматы



А. Н. Бейкитова
Казахский национальный педагогический университет им. Абая
Казахстан

Альбина Нурахмятовна Бейкитова, магистр, старший преподаватель

кафедра географии и экологии

050010; пр-кт Достык, 13; Алматы



Г. М. Сабденалиева
Казахский национальный педагогический университет им. Абая
Казахстан

Гульнарай Мусиралиевна Сабденалиева, канд. пед. наук, доцент

кафедра географии и экологии

050010; пр-кт Достык, 13; Алматы



Г. О. Жандосова
Казахский национальный педагогический университет им. Абая
Казахстан

Гулим Омирхановна Жандосова, магистр, старший преподаватель

кафедра географии и экологии

050010; пр-кт Достык, 13; Алматы



Список литературы

1. Донченко Л., Непша О., Завьялова Т., Иванова В. Педагогіка формування творчої особистості у вищій і загальноосвітній школах // Педагогика формирования творческой личности в высшей и средней школе. 2020. Т. 2. № 69. С. 112–117. DOI: 10.32840/1992-5786.2020.69-2.22

2. Шмигирилова И.Б., Рванова А.С., Таджигитов А.А. Педагогическая мастерская как форма развития оценочной компетентности учителя математики // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2020. № 6. DOI: 10.17513/spno.30408

3. Ахмедов М., Худойбердиев А., Юнусов Н., Маматова Н. О факторах повышения уровня знаний студентов на основе требований инновационной образовательной среды // Universum: Психология и образование : электрон. научн. журн. 2019. № 1 (67). DOI: 10.32743/unipsy.2020.67.1

4. Simon M., Budke A. How Geography Textbook Tasks Promote Comparison Competency – An International Analysis // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. No. 20. Article no. 8344. DOI: 10.3390/su12208344

5. Astuti Y. Assessment concept of geographical skills on senior high school in Indonesia // American Journal of Educational Research. 2017. Vol. 5. No. 8. Р. 879–886. DOI: 10.12691/education-5-8-7

6. Zhang Y., Llorente A., Sánchez-Gómez M. Digital competence in higher education research : a systematic literature review // Computers & Education. 2021. Vol. 168. Article no. 104212. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212

7. Gužmundsdóttir G.B., Hatlevik O.E. Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education // European Journal of Teacher Education. 2018. Vol. 41. No. 2. Р. 214–231. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085

8. Efremova N. Conceptual model of evaluation of competence of students // Современные Наукоёмкие Технологии (Modern High Technologies). 2019. No. 7. P. 169–174. DOI: 10.17513/snt.37607

9. Borys U. Formation of the future primary schoolteachers’ science competence under the conditions of the pedagogical professional college // Mountain School of Ukrainian Carpaty. 2022. No. 26. Р. 66–69. DOI: 10.15330/msuc.2022.26.66-69

10. Zhanguzhinova M., Magauova A., Kertayeva K., Yessimova D., Toktarbayev D., Kassenov K. Formation of the professionally-pedagogical competence in preparation of future teachers in Kazakhstan // Society Integration Education Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. 2018. Vol. 1. Р. 611–619. DOI: 10.17770/sie2018vol1.3345

11. Margolis A., Panfilova A., Shishlyannikova L. Testing of assessment tools of future teachers professional competence // Psychological Science and Education. 2015. Vol. 20. No. 5. Р. 77–92. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2015200507

12. Khodyreva E. Improving the assessment system of professional competencies of future teachers // The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2020. Р. 129–139. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.01.18

13. Bendl T., Marada М., Havelková L. Preservice Geography Teachers’ Exposure to Problem Solving and Different Teaching Styles // Journal of Geography. 2023. Vol. 122. No. 3. Р. 66–76. DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2023.2220114

14. Popov N., Shustova E. Application of the axiomatic method for introducingthe exponential function in training future teachersof mathematics //Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Pedagogics). 2020. No. 3. Р. 86–94. URL: https://www.academia.edu/77893820/Application_of_the_Axiomatic_Method_for_Introducingthe_Exponential_Function_in_Training_Future_Teachersof_Mathematics?uc-sb-sw=9143577

15. Martínez-Hernández C., García M. The anthropocene and the sustainable development goals: key elements in geography higher education? // International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2023. Vol. 24. No. 7. Р. 1648–1667. DOI: 10.1108/ijshe-09-2022-0316

16. Cho C., Kim B. Development and application of environmental education program for inservice geography teachers using community mapping and photovoice // Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 2022. Vol. 18. No. 11. Article no. em2171. DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/12487

17. Cichoń M., Piotrowska I. Level of academic and didactic competencies among students as a measure to evaluate geographical education and preparation of students for the demands of the modern labour market // Quaestiones Geographicae. 2018. Vol. 37. No. 1. Р. 73–86. DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2018-0006

18. Fokdal J., Čolić R., Rodić D. Integrating sustainability in higher planning education through international cooperation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2020. Vol. 21. No. 1. Р. 1–17. DOI: 10.1108/ijshe-01-2019-0045

19. Fernández-Arias P., Antón-Sancho Á., Vergara D., Barrientos A. Soft skills of american university teachers: self-concept // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 22. Article no. 12397. DOI: 10.3390/su132212397

20. Piotrowska I., Cichoń M., Abramowicz D., Sypniewski J. Challenges in geography education – a review of research problems // Quaestiones Geographicae. 2019. Vol. 38. No. 1. Р. 71–84. DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2019-0009

21. Martínez-Hernández C., Stoffelen A., Piskorski R. Obtaining geographical competences through online cartography of familiar and unfamiliar urban heritage: lessons from student workshops // Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2022.2155935

22. Solem M., Kollasch A., Lee J. Career goals, pathways and competencies of geography graduate students in the USA. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 37. No. 1. Р. 92–116. DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2012.729563

23. Yang X., Chen P. Applying active learning strategies to develop the professional teaching competency of chinese college student teachers in the context of geography education // International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research. 2022. Vol. 21. No. 7. Р. 178–196. DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.21.7.10

24. Nursa’ban M., Siasah M., Arif N. Various online geography learning assessment with critical spatial thinking during the COVID-19 pandemic in indonesian high schools // The Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Social Science and Education, ICSSED 2020, August 4-5 2020, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. DOI: 10.4108/eai.4-8-2020.2302508

25. Honcharuk V., Rozhi I., Dutchak O., Poplavskyi M., Rybinska Y.,Horbatiuk N. Training of future geography teachers to local lore and tourist work on the basis of competence approach // Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 3. Р. 429–447. DOI: 10.18662/rrem/13.3/460

26. Ferizat M., Kuat B. The effectiveness of interactive teaching methods in the professional training of pre-service geography teachers // Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 4. Р. 1976–1996. DOI: 10.18844/cjes.v16i4.6066

27. Ningrum E. Mapping of pedagogic competency of geography teacher in scientific learning basedon curriculum 2013 // Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science. 2019. Vol. 286. No. 1. Article no. 012007. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/286/1/012007

28. Nazarenko Т., Topuzov O., Chasnikova O., Dubrovina І. Role of geography teacher in forming the pupils’ cartographic competence. Prace I Studia Geograficzne. 2021. Vol. 66. No. 2. Р. 43–53. DOI: 10.48128/pisg/2021-66.2-03

29. Абилмажинова C., Каймулдинова К. География : учебник для 8 классов общеобразовательных школ. Рекомендовано Министерством образования и науки Республики Казахстан, Алматы, Мектеп, 2018. 265 с. ISBN: 9786010709645.

30. Каймулдинова К., Абилмажинова C. География : учебник для 10 классов общеобразовательных школ. Рекомендовано Министерством образования и науки Республики Казахстан, Алматы, Мектеп, 2019. 289 с. ISBN: 9786010712164.

31. Каймулдинова К., Абдиманапов Б., Абилмажинова C. География : учебник для 11 классов общеобразовательных школ. Рекомендовано Министерством образования и науки Республики Казахстан, Алматы, Мектеп, 2020. 290 с. ISBN: 9786010715134.

32. Bezugly V., Lisicharova G. Peculiarities of cartographic competence formation in 10<sup>th</sup> grade students by means of a geography textbook // Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University Series Pedagogy and Psychology. 2021. Vol. 2. No. 22. P. 85–94. DOI: 10.32342/2522-4115-2021-2-22-10

33. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C. et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021. Vol. 134. Р. 103–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003

34. Браславська О., Барвінок Н. Formation of cartographic competence of future teachers of geography in studying disciplines of fundamental training // Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Modern School. 2021. Vol. 1. No. 5. Р. 5–14. DOI: 10.31499/2706-6258.1(5).2021.234755

35. Oliveira É., Ferreira M., Oliveira R., Maciel V. Usual and unusual maps: a playful introduction to the basic concepts of cartography in high school // South Florida Journal of Development. 2021. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 738–751. DOI: 10.46932/sfjdv2n1-053

36. Vasileva M. The map – “evergreen” in geography education // Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society. 2019. No. 41. Р. 94–100. DOI: 10.3897/jbgs.2019.41.17

37. Oстроух В., Свір Р. Використання інтерактивних карт як новітній підхід в організації навчання з географії у сучасній школі // Geographical Education and Cartography. 2019. № 29. С. 71–77. DOI: 10.26565/2075-1893-2019-29-08

38. Hess J. Cultural competence or the mapping of racialized space: cartographies of music education //Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education. 2021. 227. Р. 7–28. DOI: 10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.227.0007

39. Kerski J. A National Assessment of GIS in American High Schools, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 2001. Vol. 10. No. 1. Р. 72–84. DOI: 10.1080/10382040108667425

40. Kraak M.-J., Ormeling F.J. Cartography: Visualization of Spatial Data (3<sup>rd</sup> ed.). Routledge. 2009. 216 р. DOI: 10.4324/9781315847184

41. Сухинин С. Компетенции картографической грамотности школьников: сущность и методические базы формирования // Проблемы непрерывного географического образования и картографии. 2019. № 29. С. 87–95. DOI: 10.26565/2075-1893-2019-29-10

42. Santee J. Cartographic composition across the curriculum //Prompt a Journal of Academic Writing Assignments. 2022. Vol. 6. No. 2. Р. 87–101. DOI: 10.31719/pjaw.v6i2.95

43. Hus V., Hojnik T. Comparative analysis of cartographic literacy in the selected curricula at the primary level // Creative Education. 2013. Vol. 4. No. 12. Р. 757–761. DOI: 10.4236/ce.2013.412107

44. Soares L., Lobato K. Concepções e abordagens do ensino da geografia // Revista Brasileira De Educação Em Geografia. 2021. Vol. 11. No. 21. Р. 5–27. DOI: 10.46789/edugeo.v11i21.462

45. Chu G., Hwang C., Choi J. Teaching spatial thinking with the national atlas of korea in u.s. secondary level education // Proceedings of the Ica. 2018. Vol. 1. Р. 1–5. DOI: 10.5194/ica-proc-1-22-2018

46. Cerqueira E., Nascimento D. O lugar da cartografia no ensino de geografia: perspectivas a partir de um projeto de extensão // Geotextos. 2013. Vol. 9. No. 1. DOI: 10.9771/1984-5537geo.v9i1.8354

47. Bružienė J. Semiotics of cartographic discourse: analysis of the 1613 map of grand duchy of Lithuania // Semiotika. 2013. No. 9. Р. 13–76. DOI: 10.15388/semiotika.2013.16760

48. Gartner G. Towards a research agenda for increasing trust in maps and their trustworthiness // Kartografija I Geoinformacije. 2023. No. 21. Р. 48–58. DOI: 10.32909/kg.21.si.4

49. Canto T. Cartography, new technologies and geographic education: theoretical approaches to research the field // Proceedings of the Ica. 2018. Vol. 1. Р. 1–6. DOI: 10.5194/ica-proc-1-31-2018

50. Barbosa L., Sá L. Mapvoice: computational tool to aid in learning cartography for the visually impaired // Boletim De Ciкncias Geodйsicas. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 1. Р. 58–68. DOI: 10.1590/s1982-21702018000100005

51. Conceição A. Concurso de desenhos // Revista Brasileira De Educação Em Geografia. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 20. P. 635–644. DOI: 10.46789/edugeo.v10i20.901

52. Beitlova M., Popelka S., Voženílek V., Fačevicová K., Janečková B., Matlach V. The importance of school world atlases according to czech geography teachers // Isprs International Journal of Geo-Information. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 8. Article no. 504. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10080504

53. Ostroukh V., Lepetiuk V. The teacher’s electronic cartographic online platform as a modern tool and resource for studying geography // Information Technologies and Learning Tools. 2022. Vol. 90. No. 4. Р. 32–45. DOI: 10.33407/itlt.v90i4.5025

54. Tanarro L., Úbeda J., Andrés N., Fernández-Fernández J., Marcos J. et al. Design of three-dimensional cartographical didactic materials for physical geography teaching // 6<sup>th</sup> International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’20) Universitat Politecnica de Val`encia, Val`encia. 2020. Р. 1055–1063. DOI: 10.4995/head20.2020.11195

55. Uyar Ş., Yayla O., Zünber H. Examination of map reading skills with orienteering activity: an example of many facet rasch model // International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2022. Vol. 9. Special Issue. Р. 258–282. DOI: 10.21449/ijate.1116273

56. Cui X., Xia Z., McBride C., Li P., Pan J., Shu H. Shared neural substrates underlying reading and visual matching: a longitudinal investigation // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2020. Vol. 14. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.567541

57. Mills N., Pajares F., Herron C. A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency // Foreign Language Annals. 2006. Vol. 39. No. 2. Р. 276–295. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02266.x

58. Dong W., Jiang Y., Zheng L., Liu B., Meng L. Assessing map-reading skills using eye tracking and bayesian structural equation modelling // Sustainability. 2018. Vol. 10. No. 9. Article no. 3050. DOI: 10.3390/su10093050

59. Clarke D. Are you functionally map literate? // Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference. 2003. Р. 713–719. URL: http://lazarus.elte.hu/cet/publications/088.pdf (дата обращения 09. 01. 2024).

60. Hanley C., Davis H., Davey B. The impact of professional development in natural resource investigations using geospatial technologies // Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education. 2012. Vol. 41. No. 1. Р. 68–78. DOI: 10.4195/jnrlse.2011.0008k

61. Adanali R. How geogames can support geographical education? //Review of International Geographical Education Online. 2021. Vol. 11. Iss. 1. Р. 215–235. DOI: 10.33403/rigeo.855550

62. Ratinen I., Keinonen T. Student-teachers’ use ofgoogle earthin problem-based geology learning. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 2011. Vol. 20. No. 4. Р. 345–358. DOI: 10.1080/10382046.2011.619811

63. Cohrssen C., Quadros-Wander B., Page J., Klarin S. Between the big trees: a project-based approach to investigating shape and spatial thinking in a kindergarten program // Australasian Journal of Early Childhood. 2017. Vol. 42. No. 1. Р. 94–104. DOI: 10.23965/ajec.42.1.11

64. Bodzin A. The implementation of a geospatial information technology (git)-supported land use change curriculum with urban middle school learners to promote spatial thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2010. Vol. 48. No. 3. Р. 281–300. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20409

65. Kastens K., Ishikawa T. Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: a cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields //Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn about the Earth, Cathryn A. Manduca, David W. Mogk. 2006. Р. 53–76. DOI: 10.1130/2006.2413(05)

66. Bednarz S., Bednarz R. Brave new world: citizenship in geospatially enriched environments // Gi_forum, 2015. Vol. 1. Р. 230–240. DOI: 10.1553/giscience2015s230

67. Комиссарова Т.С. Теоретические основы картографической подготовки учителя географии. Автореф. дисс... д-ра пед. наук в форме науч. докл. Санкт-Петербург, 2000. 70 с. РГБ ОД, 71 02-13/81-4

68. Ooms K., Maeyer P., Fack V. Study of the attentive behavior of novice and expert map users using eye tracking //Cartography and Geographic Information Science. 2013. Vol. 41. No. 1. Р. 37–54. DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2013.860255

69. Носаченко В.Н. Картографическая компетентность будущих учителей географии как предмет научных исследований // Научно-методический электронный журнал «Концепт». 2016. № 4. C. 173–181. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2016/16085.htm (дата обращения 09. 01. 2024).

70. Санкова Е.А. Анализ педагогической теории и практики формирования картографической компетентности студентов в вузе // Учёные записки Орловского государственного университета. 2014. № 2 (58). С. 342–352.

71. Hanus M., Havelková L. Teachers’ Concepts of Map-Skill Development // Journal of Geography. 2019. Vol. 118. No. 3. Р. 101–116. DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2018.1528294

72. Kramáreková H., Nemčíková M., Rampašeková Z., Svorad A., Dubcová A., Vojtek M. Cartographic competence of a geography teacher – current state and perspective // Proceedings, 6<sup>th</sup> International Conference on Cartography and GIS, 13-17 June 2016, Albena, Bulgaria ISSN: 1314-0604, Eds: Bandrova T., Konecny M. P. 200–209. URL: https://cartography-gis.com/docsbca/iccgis2016/ICCGIS2016-20.pdf (дата обращения 09. 01. 2024).

73. Cherney I., Brabec C., Runco D. Mapping out spatial ability: sex differences in way-finding navigation // Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2008. Vol. 107. No. 3. Р. 747–760. DOI: 10.2466/pms.107.3.747-760

74. Astriani D., Susilo H., Suwono H., Lukiati B., Purnomo A. Mind mapping in learning models: a tool to improve student metacognitive skills // International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet). 2020. Vol. 15. No. 06. P. 4–17. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v15i06.12657

75. Liu T., Yuizono T., Wang Z., Gao H. Application of ai thinking visualization tool in the foreign language reading teaching // E3s Web of Conferences, 2020. Vol. 179. Article no. 02092. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202017902092

76. Komissarova T., Gadzhieva E. Cartographic training for bachelors of tourism in the context of professional competence // Universities for Tourism and Service Association Bulletin, 2016. Vol. 10. No. 2. Р. 4–11. DOI: 10.12737/19541

77. Zhang H., Zherdeva K., Ekstrom A. Different “routes” to a cognitive map: dissociable forms of spatial knowledge derived from route and cartographic map learning // Memory & Cognition. 2014. Vol. 42. No. 7. Р. 1106–1117. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0418-x

78. Gartner G., Kraak M., Burghardt D., Meng L., Cron J., Elzakker C., Ricker B. Envisioning the future of academic cartographic education // Abstracts of the Ica. 2019. Vol. 1. No. 1-2. DOI: 10.5194/ica-abs-1-89-2019

79. Fairbairn D. Contemporary challenges in cartographic education // Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc. 2019. Vol. 1. No. 72. DOI: 10.5194/ica-abs-1-72-2019

80. Medyńska-Gulij B., Forrest D., Cybulski P. Modern cartographic forms of expression: the renaissance of multimedia cartography // ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 7. Article no. 484. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10070484

81. Scherer L., Grisci C. Cartography as a research method for work and subjectivity studies // Revista De Administração Contemporвnea. 2022. 26 (suppl 1). DOI: 10.1590/1982-7849rac2022210202.en

82. Petry P., Hernández-Hernández F., Sánchez-Valero J. Using cartographies to map time and space in teacher learning in and outside school // International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2021. Vol. 20. Article no. 160940692199290. DOI: 10.1177/1609406921992906

83. Gilmartin P. The interface of cognitive and psychophysical research in cartography // Cartographica the International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization. 1981. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 9–20. DOI: 10.3138/bn50-8gu9-226r-62k1

84. Ruitenberg C. Here be dragons: exploring cartography in educational theory and research //Complicity an International Journal of Complexity and Education. 2007. Vol. 4. No. 1. DOI: 10.29173/cmplct8758

85. Siepmann N., Edler D., Dickmann F. A software tool for the experimental investigation of cognitive effects in audiovisual maps // KN – Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information. 2019. Vol. 69. Р. 29–39. DOI: 10.1007/s42489-019-00005-3

86. Rossetto T. The skin of the map: viewing cartography through tactile empathy // Environment and Planning D Society and Space. 2018. Vol. 37. No. 1. Р. 83–103. DOI: 10.1177/0263775818786251

87. McDaniel P.N. Teaching, Learning, and Exploring the Geography of North America with Virtual Globes and Geovisual Narratives // Journal of Geography. 2022. Vol. 121. No. 4. Р. 125–140. DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2022.2119597

88. Wu L., Li L., Liu H., Cheng X., Zhu T. Application of ArcGIS in Geography Teaching of Secondary School: A Case Study in the Practice of Map Teaching // Wireless Personal Communications. 2018. Vol. 102. Р. 2543–2553. DOI: 10.1007/s11277-018-5276-6

89. Berendsen M., Hodza P., Hamerlinck J.D. Researching Student Interaction with GIS Software While Learning Spatial Concepts: Toward a Standard Measure of GIS Interaction // Journal of Geography. 2023. Vol. 122. No. 4. Р. 81–92, DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2023.2220328

90. Metoyer S., Bednarz R. Spatial thinking assists geographic thinking: Evidence from a study exploring the effects of geospatial technology // Journal of Geography. 2017. Vol. 116. No. 1. Р. 20–33. DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2016.1175495

91. Nazareth A., Newcombe N.S., Shipley T.F., Velazquez M., Weisberg S.M. Beyond small-scale spatial skills: Navigation skills and geoscience education // Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2019. Vol. 4. No. 1. Article no. 17. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-019-0167-2

92. Jant E.A., Uttal D.H., Kolvoord R., James K., Msall C. Defining and measuring the influences of GIS-Based instruction on students’ STEM-relevant reasoning // Journal of Geography. 2020. Vol. 119. No. 1. Р. 22–31. DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2019.1676819

93. Jadallah M., Hund A.M., Thayn J., Studebaker J.G., Roman Z.J., Kirby E. Integrating geospatial technologies in fifth-grade curriculum: Impact on spatial ability and map-analysis skills // Journal of Geography. 2017. Vol. 116. No. 4. Р. 139–151. DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2017.1285339

94. Healy G., Walshe N. Real-world geographers and geography students using gis: relevance, everyday applications and the development of geographical knowledge // International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 2019. Vol. 29. No. 2. Р. 178–196. DOI: 10.1080/10382046.2019.1661125

95. Mathews A.J., DeChano-Cook L.M., Bloom C. Enhancing Middle School Learning about Geography and Topographic Maps Using Handson Play and Geospatial Technologies // Journal of Geography. 2023. Vol. 122. No. 5. Р. 115–125. DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2023.2226156

96. Mkhongi F., Musakwa W. Perspectives of gis education in high schools: an evaluation of Umgungundlovu district, Kwazulu-natal, South Africa // Education Sciences. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 5. Article no. 131. DOI: 10.3390/educsci10050131

97. Wikle T., Fagin T. GIS course planning: a comparison of syllabi at us college and universities // Transactions in GIS, 2013. Vol. 18. No. 4. Р. 574–585. DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12048

98. Simmons M., Wu X., Knight S., Lopez R. Assessing the influence of field- and gis-based inquiry on student attitude and conceptual knowledge in an undergraduate ecology lab // Cbe – life Sciences Education. 2008. Vol. 7. No. 3. Р. 338–345. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.07-07-0050


Рецензия

Просмотров: 430


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)