Parenting During the Student Period: the Possibilities of Combining Life Strategies

The demographic challenges that Russia is facing today require more and more new measures aimed at increasing the birth rate. In the context of an increase in the age of first childbearing, modern youth have stable ideas that the age of 18-24 is not “suitable” for childbearing. The authors’ review of existing and proposed measures to support student families suggests the active development of this area. The key areas of implemented and planned support are highlighted: assistance to student families in solving housing issues; financial support for student parents; organizational measures aimed at combining parental and educational responsibilities. Our analysis focused on the problem of creating the necessary conditions for the implementation of the parental life strategy by young people during their student years. The aim of the study was to develop potential tools to minimize the difficulties of parenthood that arise during parental leave for student families. To achieve this goal, two tasks were set: to identify the totality of difficulties and contradictions experienced by parents during parental leave, and to develop proposals based on the results obtained aimed at increasing the birth rate of students during their higher education. The research method was semi-formalized interviews with 40 parents whose families use the right to parental leave. According to the results of the analysis, two levels of complexity have been identified: institutional (difficulties related to government regulation, infrastructure, labor market) and personal (social attitudes, relationships with the environment, health status). For student parents, the situation during parental leave is even more difficult, and support is more in demand. Based on this, recommendations have been developed that are aimed at mitigating the difficulties of student families on parental leave and can be implemented in the Russian higher education system.

1. Arhangel’skij, V.N., Kalachikova, O.N. (2020). Maternal Age at First Birth: Dynamics, Regional Differences, Determination. Jekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. Vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 200-217, doi: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.12 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Balbo, N., Billari, F.C., Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research. European Journal of Population. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-38, doi: 10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y

3. Goisis, A. (2023). Maternal Age at First Birth and Parental Support: Evidence From the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Population Research and Policy Review. Vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 75, doi: 10.1007/s11113-023-09818-7

4. Shherbakova, E.M. (2023). Youth of the CIS, Demographic Strokes of the Statistical Portrait of 2021. Demoskop Weekly = Demoscope Weekly. No. 979-980, pp. 1-30. Available at: https://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2022/0969/barom01.php (accessed 02.02.2024). (In Russ.).

5. Kim, K.W., Nho, J-H., Kim, S., Park, B., Park, S. (2021). Comparison of Infant Mortality and Associated Factors Between Korean and Immigrant Women in Korea: An 11-Year Longitudinal Study. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. Vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 286-296, doi: 10.4069/KJWHN.2021.12.12.2

6. Sarvarova, A.D., Tupicyn, S.S., Tupicyna, L.S. (2022). The Dynamic of the Fertility Age Model in the Two Regions of Russia. Regionologija = Russian Journal of Regional Studies. Vol. 4, no. 121, pp. 924-944, doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.121.030.202205.924-944 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

7. Attali, E., Yogev, Ya. (2021). The Impact of Advanced Maternal Age on Pregnancy Outcome. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Vol. 70, pp. 2-9, doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.06.006 16

8. Correa-de-Araujo, R., Yoon, S.S. (2021). Clinical Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies Due to Advanced Maternal Age Published. Journal of Women’s Health. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 160-167, doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8860

9. Rostovskaja, T.K., Knjaz’kova, E.A., Shirshova, T.M (2022). Student Family as an Object of Scientific Research (Review of Scientific Research on the Problems of Student Families). Alma mater. No. 11, pp. 106-113, doi: 10.20339/AM.11-22.106 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Rostovskaja, T.K., Kuchmaeva, O.V., Zolotareva, O.A. (2023). Student Family in Russia: Determinants of Marriage. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Sociologija = Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 40-60, doi: 10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-1-40-60 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

11. Bagirova A.P., Bannikova L.N., Blednova N.D., Boronina, L.N., Vishnevsky, Yu.R. et al. (2021). Molodezh’ o budushhem Rossii i o sebe: vyzovy nastojashhego i konstruirovanie gorizontov grjadushhego (po materialam VIII jetapa monitoringa dinamiki sociokul’turnogo razvitija ural’skogo studenchestva 1995–2020 gg.) [Youth about the future of Russia and about themselves: challenges of the present and the construction of horizons of the future (based on the materials of the VIII stage of monitoring the dynamics of socio-cultural development of Ural students 1995-2020)]. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Press. 372 p. Available at: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/105775 (accessed 02.02.2024). (In Russ.).

12. Kuchmaeva, O.V., Zolotareva, O.A. (2022). Student Family in Modern Russia: Demo-Graphic and Social Characteristics According to Sample Survey Data. Vestnik Juzhno-Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Social’no-jekonomicheskie nauki = Bulletin of the South Russian State Technical University. Series: Socio-economic Sciences. Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 135-149, doi: 10.17213/2075-2067-2022-1-135-149 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

13. Moreau, M.P., Kerner, C. (2017). Care in Academia: An Exploration of Student Parents’ Experiences. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 215-233, doi: 10.1080/01425692.2013.814533

14. Evans, C. (2024). Parenting by Day, Studying by Night: Challenges Faced by Student-Parents in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Educational Review. Doi: 10.1080/00131911.2024.2309986

15. Pearson, F. (2019). Back in School: How Student Parents Are Transforming College and Family. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 198 p. Available at: https://www.aaup.org/article/understanding-students-who-are-parents (accessed 01.03.2024).

16. Gerrard. E., Roberts. R. (2006). Student Parents, Hardship and Debt: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Further and Higher Education. Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 393-403, doi: 10.1080/03098770600965409

17. Estes, D.K. (2011). Managing the Student-Parent Dilemma: Mothers and Fathers in Higher Education. Symbolic Interaction. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 198-219, doi: 10.1525/si.2011.34.2.198

18. Scharp, K.R., Cooper, A., Worwod, J., Hall, E.D. (2020). “There’s Always Going to Be Uncertainty”: Exploring Undergraduate Student Parents’ Sources of Uncertainty and Related Management Practices. Communication Research. Vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1059-1084, doi: 10.1177/0093650220903872

19. Lin, H.-C., Zeanah, P., Olivier, D., Bergeron, M., Liu, C. (2021). Responding to the Pressing Yet Unrecognized Needs of Student-Parents Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of American College Health. Vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 2276-2280, doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1870474

20. Arowoshola, L. (2020). Medical Education Engagement during the COVID-19 Era – a Student Parents Perspective. Medical Education Online. Vol. 25, no. 1, article no. 1788799, doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1788799

21. Nikiforidou, Z., Holmes, S. (2022). Student Parents or Parent Students in Lockdown Pandemic? A Third Space Approach. Journal of Family. Vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 2009-2024, doi: 10.1177/0192513X211067524

22. Reynolds, M.M., Avendano, M. (2018). Social Policy Expenditures and Life Expectancy in HighIncome Countries. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 72-79, doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.09.001

23. Bičakova A., Kališkova K. (2019). (Un)intended Effects of Parental Leave Policies: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Labour Economics. Vol. 61, article no. 10174, doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2019.07.003

24. Koslowski, A., Blum, S., Dobrotić, I., Kaufman, G., Moss, P. (2022). 18th International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2022. 545 p, doi: 10.18445/20220909-122329-0

25. Albrecht, J., Björklund, A., Vroman, S. (2023). Is There a Glass Ceiling in Sweden? Journal of Labor Economics. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 145-177, doi: 10.1086/344126

26. Ferragina,E.(2017).DoesFamilyPolicyInfluenceWomen’sEmployment?:ReviewingtheEvidence in the Field. Political Studies Review. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 65-80, doi: 10.1177/1478929917736438

27. Ekberg, J., Eriksson, R., Friebel, G. (2013). Parental Leave – a Policy Evaluation of the Swedish “Daddy-month” Reform. Journal of Public Economics. Vol. 97, pp. 131-143, doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.09.001