Experience in Assessing Competencies in Self-Regulted Learning in Blended Learning Environments

The article deals with the issues related to the definition of students’ competenc-es in the field of self-regulated learning and their assessment in a mixed environment in the con-text of Kazakhstani higher education institution. The aim of the study is to develop an approach to the assessment of self-regulated learning competences of students studying in a blended envi-ronment. The descriptors of competences characterising students’ appropriation of ways of activi-ty were formed; assessment tools have been developed in the form of practice-oriented tasks using the assessment methodology developed by the Samara branch of the RANEPA.The experiment was conducted with the participation of 51 students in the 1st year of the educational programme “Pedagogy and Psychology”. The results of the study allowed us to draw the following conclu-sions: students’ internal resources for regulating their own learning are general competences, which include the following aspects of activity: determining the request for information, extract-ing and primary processing (systematisation) of information, processing information, planning the learning process, evaluating the product and results of learning activities, evaluating and planning their own progression; methods and assessment tools are practice-oriented tasks.

1. López-Reyes, L.J., Jiménez-Gutiérrez, A.L., Costilla-López, D. (2022). The Effects of Blended Learning on the Performance of Engineering Students in Mathematical Modeling. Education Sciences. Vol. 12, no. 12, article no. 931, doi: 10.3390/educsci12120931

2. Ginestie, J., Impedovo M.A. (2020). International Teachers Professional Developing: Blended Learning Between Europe and Asia. Voprosy Obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 2. pp. 114-27, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2020-2-114-127

3. Akbarov, A., Gönen, K., Aydoğan, H. (2018). Students’ Attitudes toward Blended Learning in EFL Context. Acta Didactica Napocensia. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 61-68, doi: 10.24193/adn.11.1.5

4. Rasheed, R.A., Kamsin, A., Abdullah, N.A., Kakudi, H.A., Ali, A.S., Musa, A., Yahaya, A.S. (2020). Self Regulated Learning in Flipped Classrooms: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. Vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 848-853, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.11.1469

5. Smirnov, A.A.; Kalinina, I.F.(2021). Online Learning at a University at the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye tekhnologii = Social and humanitarian technologies. No. 1, pp. 115-122. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_46198279_83837411. pdf (accessed 14.02.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

6. Berman, N., Bezmaternykh, K. (2023). Support for Self-Regulated Learning in the Online Environment. CIT 2023. No. 2 (36), pp. 335-344, doi: 10.15350/2409-7616.2023.2.29 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

7. Lai, C.L., Hwang, G.J. (2016). A Self-Regulated Flipped Classroom Approach to Improving Student Performance in a Mathematics Course. Computers and Education. Vol. 100, pp. 126-140, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006

8. Shabnam Ara, S.J., Tanuja, R. (2024). Exploring Key Parameters Influencing Student Performance in a Blended Learning Environment Using Learning Analytics. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 77-89, doi: 10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5330

9. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective in Handbook of Self-Regulation. Eds M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (San Diego, CA: Academic Press). Pp. 13-40, doi: 10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7

10. Zimmerman, B.J. (2013). From Cognitive Modeling to Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Career Path. Educational Psychology. No. 48, pp. 135-147, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2013.794676

11. Winne, P.H., Hadwin, A.F. (2008). The Weave of Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research and Applications. Eds D.H. Schunk, B.J. Zimmerman. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates). Pp. 297-314.

12. Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning in Handbook of Self-Regulation. Eds M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (San Diego, CA: Academic Press). Pp. 452-502, doi: 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3

13. Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of Metacognition with Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model. Educational Psychology. No. 46, pp. 6-25, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.538645

14. Boekaerts, M. (2011). Emotions, Emotion Regulation, and Self-Regulation of Learning in Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Eds B.J. Zimmerman, D.H. Schunk. New York, NY: Routledge. Pp. 408-425.

15. Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J. et al. (2015). Enhancing Socially Shared Regulation in Collaborative Learning Groups: Designing for CSCL Regulation Tools. Educational technology. Research and Development. No. 63, pp. 125-142, doi: 10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1

16. Panadero, E.A. (2017). Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 8, article no. 422, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

17. De Corte, E. (2019). Learning Design: Creating Powerful Learning Environments for SelfRegulation Skill. Voprosy Obrazovaniya. = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 4 (December), pp. 30-46, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2019-4-30-46

18. Li, J., Ye, H., Tang, Y., Zhou, Z., Hu, X. (2018). What Are the Effects of Self-Regulation Phases and Strategies for Chinese Students? A Meta-Analysis of Two Decades Research of the Association Between Self-Regulation and Academic Performance. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 9, article no. 2434, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02434

19. Vilkova, K.A. (2020). Measuring Self-Regulated Learning: A Review of Questionnaires. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology. Vol. 9, pp. 123-133, doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2020090211 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

20. Margolis, A.A., Sorokova, M.G., Shvedovskaya, A.A. (2022). Face-to-Face, Blended or Online: How Do Students Prefer to Study? Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. Vol. 27, pp. 5-20, doi: 10.17759/pse.2022270501 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

21. Yerimpasheva, А.T., Tarakbaeva, R.E., Zakirova, А.А., Koilybaeva, M.T. (2022). Prospects for Distance Learning in Kazakhstani Universities in the Context of Active Digitalization Due to the COVID–19. Vestnik universiteta “Turan” = Bulletin of “Turan” University. Pp. 276-283, doi: 10.46914/1562-2959-2022-1-1-276-283 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

22. Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing Online and Blended Learner’s Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Academic Performance. The Internet and Higher Education. Vol. 33, pp. 24-32, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004

23. Islam Md.K., Sarker Md.F.H., Islam M.S. (2022). Promoting Student-Centred Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Model. E-Learning and Digital Media. Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 36-54, doi: 10.1177/20427530211027721

24. Tzimas, D.E., Demetriadis, S.N. (2024). Impact of Learning Analytics Guidance on Student SelfRegulated Learning Skills, Performance, and Satisfaction: A Mixed Methods Study. Education Sciences. Vol. 14, no. 1, article no. 92, doi: 10.3390/educsci14010092

25. Andreyeva, N.V. (2020). Pedagogy of Effective Blended Learning. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology. Vol. 9, pp. 8-20, doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2020090301 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

26. Anthonysamy, L., Koo, A.C., Hew, S.H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: A one-decade review. Education and Information Technologies. Vol. 25, pp. 3677-3704, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10134-2

27. Abdyhalykova, J.E., Malik, U.B. (2022). Metacognitive Instruction in A Blended Learning Environment. Vestnik Toraigyrov universiteta. Pedagogicheskaya seriya = Bulletin of Toraighyrov University Pedagogics Series. No. 1, pp. 215-227, doi: 10.48081/NIUS7438 (In Russ.).

28. Fomina, T.G. (2022). Conceptual Approaches to the Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning in Foreign Psychology. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology. No. 1, pp. 27-37,doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2022110303 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

29. Koryakina, Ya.V., Lomteva, T.N., Kamensky, M.V. (2019). Self-Regulated Learning in the Context of Digitalization of Education. Vestnik Severo-Kavkazskogo federal’nogo universiteta = Bulletin of the North Caucasus Federal University. No. 2, pp. 141-148, doi: 10.37493/2307-907X-2019-71-2-141-148 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

30. Nikolaeva, N.V. (2022). Information and Educational Environment of the University in the Context of Blended Learning. Kollektsiya gumanitarnykh issledovanii = Humanities Research Collection. No. 4, pp. 24-30, doi: 10.21626/j-chr/2022-4(33)/3 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

31. Radulović, B., Dorocki, M., Olić Ninković, S., Stojanović, M., Adamov, J. (2023). The Effects of Blended Learning Approach on Student Motivation for Learning Physics. Journal of Baltic Science Education. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 73-82, doi: 10.33225/jbse/23.22.73

32. Nwabueze, A.I., Isilebo, N.B. (2022). Modern Trends in the Development of Education. In: Y.M. Abdulrahman, R.O. Anyaogu, N.J., Izuagba, R. Osim (Eds.). International and comparative education: A cross-cultural approach. Pp. 545-558. Port Harcourt: Celwil Publishing. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Akachukwu-Nwabueze-2/publication/360108214 (accessed 14.02.2023).

33. Ko Young Chul, Kim Young Suk (2021). Theoretical Aspects and Essence of Self-Directed Learning. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya = The World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology. Vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1-19. Available at: https://mir-nauki.com/35PDMN621.html (accessed 06.06.2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

34. Golub, G.B., Kogan, E.Ya., Postaluk, N.Yu., Fishman, I.S. et al. (2014). Competence-Oriented Education. Methodology and Practice. Publishing house “Fedorov”. 184 p. (In Russ.).

35. Morosanovа, V.I. (2021). Conscious Self-Regulation as a Metaresource for Achieving Goals and Solving the Problems of Human Activity. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya = Bulletin of the Moscow University. Episode 14. Psychology. Pp. 4-37, doi: 10.11621/vsp.2021.01.01 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

36. Lyz’, N.A., Golubeva, E.V., Istratova, O.N. Students’ Educational Experience: The Conceptualization and Development of a Tool for the Assessment of Education Quality. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 3, pp. 67-98, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-67-98 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

37. Bakhisheva, S.M., Tikhonyuk, E.V., Mukhtar, Z.G., Kinzhekova, R.S., Kemeshova, A.M. (2024). Unified Blended Learning Environment: The Kazakh Context. Obrazovanie i nauka= Education and science. Vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 12-41, doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2024-3371 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

38. Baidenko, V.I. (2009). The Bologna Process: European and national qualifications frameworks. Under the scientific editorship of V.I. Baydenko. Moscow: Issledovatel’skii tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov. 220 p. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

39. Golub, G.B., Fishman, I.S. (2019). Planning the Formation of General Competences in the Professional Educational Program of the Spo on the Basis of Level Differentiation of Activity. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Education. No. 1, pp. 118-134. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_37278392_77112405.pdf (accessed 06.06.2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

40. Fishman, I.S., Golub, G.B. (2015). Competence-Oriented Education: Evaluation of Results. Federal’nyi institut razvitiya obrazovaniya = Federal Institute for Education Development. 118 p. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

41. Ewell, P.T. (2005). Can Assessment Serve Accountability? It Depends on the Question in Achieving Accountability in Higher Education. Edited by J.C. Burke and Associates, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Pp. 1-24.

42. Schoenfeld, A.H. (2010). How We Think: A Theory of Goal-Oriented Decision Making and Its Educational Appli-Cations. New York, NY: Routledge. 264 p., doi: 10.4324/9780203843000

43. Benjamin, R. (2013). The Principles and Logic of Competency Testing in Higher Education. In: S. Blцmeke, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C. Kuhn, J. Fege. Eds. Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education: Tasks andchallenges, Boston, MA: Sense. Pp. 127-136, doi: 10.1007/978-94-6091-867-4_9

44. Anayatova, D., Kostaubayeva, Z. (2020). Applying Project-Based Learning Principles on Blended Learning Classroom: Students’perception. SDU Bulletin: Pedagogy and Teaching methods. Vol. 1, no. 52, pp. 11-24, doi: 10.47344/sduBulletin.v52i1.37

45. Wang, C.H., Shannon, D.M., Ross, M.E. (2013). Students’ Characteristics, Self-Regulated Learning, Technology Self-Efficacy, and Course Outcomes in Online Learning. Distance Education. Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 302-323, doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.835779