The Model and Practices of Human Potential Development
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-12-50-79
Abstract
The article presents the model and practices of human potential development. Human potential is considered in three contexts: the context of development, emerging markets (innovation and creative industries, entrepreneurship, etc.); the context of human “mightiness”, his or her ability to act in conditions of uncertainty, to create something new and unexpected; and the context of searching for the human in human potential, emphasizing the value-semantic aspects of human potential and cultural practices of its development. By human potential is meant the subject’s capabilities in cooperation with Significant Others to open prospects for self-development and self-realization in the described contexts. The developed model is based on the concept of “productive action”, supplemented by reflective practices of constructing opportunities and one’s own path, developing the ability to be a cultural, social, and economic subject. The development of human potential is proposed to be carried out along three vectors: “working with the ideal” (searching for one’s own meanings and developing reflection), “self-positioning in society” (social positions, connections, communities, reputation, career position, occupation, and types of activity), and “mightiness” (building the ability to “overcome one’s inability”, i.e., the ability to act on the frontier). The model allows researching, describing, and constructing practices of human potential development. The proposed model of practice and the structure of its description are presented, as well as examples of significant practices for the purposes of the study from the field of higher, secondary, and additional education.
Keywords
human-centeredness,
human potential,
agency,
subjectivity,
productive action,
creative initiative action,
educational model,
innovative activity
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared in the framework of a research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant ID: 075-15-2022-326). The authors express their sincere gratitude for the cooperation during the research and work on the article: A.G. Asmolov, B.M. Ostrovsky, and A.A. Popov. Special thanks go to the journal’s editorial team and anonymous reviewers.
About the Authors
P. D. Rabinovich
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavel D. Rabinovich – Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Director of the School of Anthropology of the Future, Institute for Social Sciences.
82, Vernadsky ave., Moscow, 119571
Researcher ID: N-7024-2015
K. E. Zavedenskiy
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kirill E. Zavedenskiy – Head of the Laboratory of Project and Digital Education Development, School of Anthropology of the Future, Institute for Social Sciences.
82, Vernadsky ave., Moscow, 119571
E. A. Lopatina
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena A. Lopatina – Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Junior Researcher of the School of Anthropology of the Future, Institute for Social Sciences.
82, Vernadsky ave., Moscow, 119571
G. D. Emelin
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gleb D. Emelin – Trainee Researcher of the School of Anthropology of the Future, Institute for Social Sciences.
82, Vernadsky ave., Moscow, 119571
Researcher ID: IAM-8750-2023
D. N. Dolganov
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitrij N. Dolganov – Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Professor of the Department of General and Social Psychology.
6, Volodarskogo str., Tyumen, 625003
References
1. Sarin, C. (2009). Analyzing Skill Gap between Higher Education and Employability. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. No. 10, pp. 941-948, doi: 10.5958/2321-5828.2019.00154.2
2. Yemelina, N.K., Rozhkova, K.V., Roshchin, S.U., Solntsev, S.A., Travkin, P.V. (2022). Vypuskniki vysshego obrazovaniya na rossijskom rynke truda: trendy i vyzovy. Doklad HSE. K XXIII Yasinskoj (Aprel’skoj) mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva [Graduates of higher education in the Russian labor market: trends and challenges. Reports to the XXIII Yasinskaya (April) International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development]. Moscow: HSE, 160 p. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_49362710_29047219.pdf (accessed 05.09.2024). (In Russ.).
3. Sorokin, P., Maltseva, V. (2024). From Discrete Skills to Holistic Creative Human Potential: An Emerging Approach in Theory and Practice. Forsait = Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 6-17, doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2024.1.6.17
4. Graeber, D. (2014). Anthropology and the Rise of the Professional-Managerial Class. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. No. 4(3), pp. 73-88, doi: 10.14318/hau4.3.007
5. Asmolov, A.G., Shekhter, E.D., Chernorizov A.M. (2022). The Anthropological Turn: the Ascent to Complexity. Chelovek kak otkrytaya celostnost’ [Human as open integrity]. Novosibirsk: Akademizdat, pp. 33-53, doi: 10.24412/cl-36976-2022-1-33-53 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
6. Gusel’ceva, M.S. (2022). Background of Anthropological Turn in Education. Obrazovatel’naya politika = Educational Policy. Vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 25-41, doi: 10.22394/2078–838Х-2022–1-26-40 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
7. Gordeeva, T.O., Leontiev, D.A., Osin, E.N. (2011). Vklad lichnostnogo potenciala v akademicheskie dostizheniya. Lichnostnyj potencial: struktura i diagnostika [Contribution of Personal Potential to Academic Achievement. Personal Potential: Structure and Diagnosis]. Moscow: Smysl, pp. 642-668. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/folder/x9smbigg21/59044245.pdf?ysclid=m4ndiur0m2100425528 (accessed 05.09.2024). (In Russ.).
8. Rasskazova, E.I., Gordeeva, T.O., Osin, E.N. (2023). Coping Strategies in the Structure of Activity and Self-Regulation: Psychometric Characteristics and Possibilities of Using the COPE Technique. Psihologiya. Zhurnal vysshej shkoly ekonomiki = Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 82-118. Available at: https://psy-journal.hse.ru/data/2013/10/31/1283222771/Rasskazova_et_al_10-01pp82-118.pdf (accessed 05.09.2024). (In Russ.).
9. Vygotski, L.S. (2005). Сhild Development Psychology. Moscow: Eksmo, 512 p. ISBN: 5-699-13731-9. Available at: https://ds232.centerstart.ru/sites/ds232.centerstart.ru/files/archive/Выготский%20Л.С.%20Психология%20развития%20ребёнка.pdf (accessed 05.09.2024). (In Russ.).
10. Rogers, C.R., Freiberg, J. (1994). Freedom to Learn. Pearson College Div., 352 p. ISBN: 0024031216. (Russian translation: Мoscow: Smysl, 2019. 527 p. ISBN: 978 5 89357 398 5).
11. Klochko, V.E. (2014). Systemic Ontopedagogy: Psychological and Psychophysiological Rationale. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. No. 6, pp. 52-63, doi: 10.15293/2226-3365.1406.05 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
12. Leontiev, D.A. (2011). Vvedenie: lichnostnyj potencial kak ob”ekt izucheniya. Lichnostnyj potencial: struktura i diagnostika [Introduction: personal potential as an object of study. Personal potential: structure and diagnosis]. Moscow: Smysl, pp. 5-11. Available at: https://cppm.kuromo.ru/images/личностный_потенциал_Структура_и_диагностика_леонтьев.pdf?ysclid=m4nfsvj0uf210809283 (accessed 05.09.2024). (In Russ.).
13. Prigogine, I. (1989). The Philosophy of Instability. Futures. No. 21, pр. 396-400, doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(89)80009-6
14. Bernshtein, N.A. (1966). Essays on Movement Physiology and Activity Physiology. Moscow: Medicine, 349 p. Available at: https://a-mov.ru/books/bernstein-ocherki-po-fiziologii-dvizhenij-i-fiziologii-aktivnosti.html (accessed 05.09.2024). (In Russ.).
15. Allport, G.W. (1955). Becoming: Basic Considerations for a Psychology of Personality. New Haven: Yale University Press. (Russian translation: Мoscow: Smysl, 2002. 462 p. ISBN: 5-89357-098-7).
16. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 555 с. ISBN 0-521-28414-7 (Russian translation: Kharkov: Publishing House Institute of Applied Psychology “Humanitarian Center”, 632 p. ISBN: 966-8324-14-5).
17. Elkonin, B.D. (2019). Productive Action. Кul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology. Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 116-122, doi: 10.17759/chp.2019150112 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
18. Shchedrovicki, P.G. (1993). Essays on the Philosophy of Education. M.: Experiment, 154 p. Available at: https://www.eduportal44.ru/koiro/dno/Pl/DocLib13/Тема_2.1/Щедровицкий_Очерки_по_фил_образования.pdf (accessed 05.09.2024). (In Russ.).
19. Nikolsky, V.S., Rubin, Yu.B., Sorokin, P.S., Morozova, E.V., Gazieva, I.A., et al. (2023). Entrepreneurial Education as a Subject of Scientific Research. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 38-53, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-10-126-143 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
20. Sorokin, P.S., Vyatskaya, Yu.A., Chernenko, S.E. (2023). Success Factors of Entrepreneurial Projects of Students and Graduates of Russian Universities. Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya: informacionnyj byulleten’. [Education Economics Monitoring: Newsletter]. M.: HSE, 31 p., doi: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2747-4 (In Russ.).
21. Sorokin, P.S., Pozdnuhova, E.A. (2023). [“Human Potential”: Conceptualization of the Concept and Review of Modern Multidisciplinary Discussions through the Prism of Sociology]. In: Ovcharova, L.N., Anikina, V.A., Sorokina, P.S. Chelovecheskij potencial: sovremennye traktovki i rezul’taty issledovanij [Human Potential: Modern Interpretations and Research Results]. Moscow: VTSIOM, pp. 26-39. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_56660090_34615914.pdf (accessed 05.09.2024). (In Russ.).
22. Sushchencova, M.S., Anikin, V.A. (2023). Evolution of the Concept of Human Potential in Economic Science. In: Ovcharova, L.N., Anikina, V.A., Sorokina, P.S. Chelovecheskij potencial: sovremennye traktovki i rezul’taty issledovanij [Human Potential: Modern Interpretations and Research Results]. Moscow: VTSIOM, pp. 9-27. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_56660090_34615914.pdf (accessed 05.09.2024). (In Russ.).
23. Sen, A. (2005). Possibility of Public Choice. World Economic Thought. Through the Prism of the Ages. Worldwide Recognition: Lectures by Nobel Laureates. Moscow: Thought. 2005. Vol. 5. 258 p., doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2007-3-152-154 (In Russ.).
24. Asmolov, A.G., Rabinovich, P.D., Zavedensky, K.E. (2023). Anthropological Turn: Cultural Practices of Co-action to the Development of Human Complexity. Integraciya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. Vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 591-610, doi:10.15507/1991-9468.113.027.202304.591-610 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
25. Kuzminov Ya., Sorokin P., Froumin I. (2019). Generic and Specific Skills as Components of Human Capital: New Challenges for Education Theory and Practice. Foresight. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 19-41, doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.2.19.41
Review
Views:
318
Email this article 