Demand and Status of a Scientific Degree in the Non-Academic Labour Market: Regional Case

Technological leadership and innovation-driven growth have actualized the request for highly qualified personnel, which have recently been associated with holders of a scientific degree. In the academic field, a scientific degree is a testimony to the occupational status and an integral feature of professional growth and advancement. The reasonableness and significance of a scientific degree in the non-academic market are ambiguous. The purpose of this article is to investigate the opinion and assessments of the non-academic sphere representatives about the demand for the employees with a scientific degree and the status of a scientific degree outside the academic labour market. The research was conducted using the method of semi-structured interview with employers and representatives of seven enterprises in the south of Russia in the machine engineering, metalworking, ferrous metallurgy and IT sectors (n = 13). As a result of the study it was established that: in employment a scientific degree does not give competitive advantages to the applicant; a scientific degree has no value in the non-academic labour market, does not contribute to the advancement and occupation of a higher position in the enterprise; a scientific degree and the presence of employees with a scientific degree in the staff are considered as image-building, status marker and reputation capital of the enterprise; employers have stereotypes regarding scientific employees, which are associated both with the individual organization of labour processes and the compatibility of the scientific, creative and production process; the non-academic sector lacks a human resources strategy for dealing with such employees and a system of their incentives. The authors conclude that the demand for a scientific degree in the non-academic labour market is caused largely by a political request related with the belief that technological and innovative breakthroughs can provide highly qualified personnel with a scientific degree. The authors focus on the probable risks associated with the massification of degree holders, that can lead to a blurring of academic culture and loss of identity of the scientific community.

1. Gokhberg, L., Shmatko, N., Auriol, L. (2016). Rethinking the Doctoral Degrees in the Changing Labor Market Context. In: Gokhberg, L., Shmatko, N., Auriol, L. (Eds). The Science and Technology Labor Force. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham, pp. 1-17, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27210-8_1

2. Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., Yahia, M. (2011). Education: The PhD Factory. Nature. Vol. 472, no. 7343, pp. 276–279, doi:10.1038/472276

3. Enders, J. (2004). Research Training and Careers in Transition: A European Perspective on the Many Faces of the Ph.D. Studies in Continuing Education. Vol. 26б, no, 3, pp. 419-429, doi: 10.1080/0158037042000265935

4. Germain-Alamartine, E., Moghadam-Saman, S. (2020). Aligning Doctoral Education with Local Industrial Employers’ Needs: A Comparative Case Study. European Planning Studies. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 234-254, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1637401

5. Haapakorpi, A. (2015). Doctorate Holders Outside the Academy in Finland: Academic Engagement and Industry-Specific Competence. Journal of Education and Work. Vol. 30, no 1, рр. 1-16, doi: 10.1080/13639080.2015.1119257

6. Roach, M., Sauermann, H. (2010). A Taste for Science? Phd Scientists’ Academic Orientation and Self-Selection into Research Careers in Industry. Research Policy. Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 422-434, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.004

7. Borrell-Damian, L., Brown, T., Dearing, A., Font, J., Hagen, S., et al. (2010). Collaborative Doctoral Education: University-Industry Partnerships for Enhancing Knowledge Exchange. Higher Education Policy. Vol. 23, pp. 493-514, doi: 10.1057/hep.2010.20

8. Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., Shmatko, N. (2017). Myths and Realities of Highly Qualified Labor and What It Means for PhDs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Vol. 8, pp. 758-767, doi: 10.1007/s13132-016-0403-7

9. Paolo, A.D., Mañé, F. (2016). Misusing Our Talent? Overeducation, Overskilling and Skill Underutilisation Among Spanish PhD Graduates. The Economic and Labour Relations Review. Vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 432-452, doi: 10.1177/1035304616657479

10. Kyvik, S., Olsen, T.B. (2012). The Relevance of Doctoral Training in Different Labour Markets. Journal of Education and Work. Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 205-224, doi: 10.1080/13639080.2010.538376

11. De Grande, H., De Boyser, K., Vandevelde, K. et al. (2014). From Academia to Industry: Are Doctorate Holders Ready? Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Vol. 5, pp. 538-561, doi: 10.1007/s13132-014-0192-9

12. Suomi, K., Kuoppakangas, P., Kivistö, J. et al. (2020). Exploring Doctorate Holders’ Perceptions of the Non-Academic Labour Market and Reputational Problems They Relate to Their Employment. Tertiary Education and Management. Vol. 26, pp. 397-414, doi: 10.1007/s11233-02009061-1

13. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital In: Richardson J.G. (Eds). Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood Press, New York. Available at: https://home.iitk. ac.in/~amman/soc748/bourdieu_forms_of_capital.pdf (accessed 20.09.2024).

14. Kulkarni, M., Lengnick-Hall, M.L., Martinez, P.G. (2015). Overqualification, Mismatched Qualification, and Hiring Decisions: Perceptions of Employers. Personnel Review. Vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 529-549, doi: 10.1108/PR-11-2013-0204

15. Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., Shmatko, N. (2017). Myths and Realities of Highly Qualified Labor and What It Means for PhDs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Vol. 8, pp. 758-767, doi: 10.1007/s13132-016-0403-7

16. Senashenko, V.S. (2017). On the Prestige of the University Teacher Profession, Postgraduate Academic Degrees and Titles. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2 (209), pp. 36-44. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28371910_40662515.pdf (accessed 20.09.2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

17. Gokhberg, L. (ed.). (2023). Russian Regional Innovation Scoreboard. No. 8. Moscow: HSE University, 260 p, ISBN: 978-5-7598-3000-9. (In Russ.).

18. Teslenko, V.A., Melnikov, R.M. (2020). Prospects for Collaborative Industrial Doctoral Education in Russia. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 157-167, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-5-157-167 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

19. Jones, M. (2018). Contemporary Trends in Professional Doctorates. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 814-825, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1438095

20. Kehm, B.M., Freeman, R.P.J., Locke, W. (2018). Growth and Diversification of Doctoral Education in the United Kingdom. In: Shin, J., Kehm, B., Jones, G. (Eds). Doctoral Education for the Knowledge Society. Knowledge Studies in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. P. 105-121, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-89713-4_7

21. Kehm, B.M. (2020). Reforms of Doctoral Education in Europe and Diversification of Types. In: Cardoso, S., Tavares, O., Sin, C., Geraldo Carvalho, M.T. (Eds.). Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 85-104, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5_4

22. Rudskoу, A.I., Borovkov, A.I., Romanov, P.I., Grishina, N.S. (2022). Scientific and Professional Degrees in Russia: Developing Traditions into the Future. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 48-66, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-12-48-66 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

23. Rudskoy, A.I., Borovkov, A.I., Romanov, P.I. (2018). Engineering Education: Experience and Prospects of Development in Russia. St. Petersburg: Polytechnic Univ. Publ., 224 p. ISBN: 978-5-7422-6074-5. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

24. Rudskoy, A.I., Borovkov, A.I., Romanov, P.I., Kiseleva, K.N. (2017). The Candidate Engineering Academic Degree Required Now. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 10, pp. 109-121. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28371910_40662515. pdf (accessed 20.09.2024). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

25. Bourne, T., Bowden, R., Laing, S. (2001). Professional Doctorates in England. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 65-83, doi: 10.1080/03075070124819

26. Park, C. (2005). New Variant PhD: The Changing Nature of the Doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 189-207, doi: 10.1080/13600800500120068

27. Grudtsyna, L.Yu. (2013). Reforming the System of Attestation of Scientific and Scientific Pedagogical Personnel: Some Proposals. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law. No. 3, pp. 5-19. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18968704 (accessed 20.09.2024). (In Russ.).

28. Bednyi, B.I., Bekova, S.K., Rybakov, N.V., Terentev, E.A., Khodeeva, N.A. (2021). Professional Doctorates: International Experience and Russian Context. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 9-21, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-10-9-21 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

29. Dolgova, E.A. (ed.). (2023). Science of a Big Country: the Soviet Governance Experience. Moscow: RGGU, 625 p. ISBN: 978-5-7281-3334-6. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

30. Vodenko, K.V., Ivanchenko, O.S. (2020). Nauchno-innovacionnaya deyatel‘nost‘ rossijskoj molodezhi: sociokul‘turnye determinanty i strategicheskie orientiry razvitiya. [Scientific and Innovative Activity of Russian Youth: Socio-Cultural Determinants and Strategic Development Guidelines]. Moscow: Letnij Sad Publ., 138 p. ISBN: 978-5-98856-445-4. (In Russ.).

31. Varkhotov, T.A. Technoscience – Science without Scientists? Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki = Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2020. Vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 32-37, doi: 10.5840/eps20205713 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

32. Jamison, A. (2012). Turning Engineering Green: Sustainable Development and Engineering Education. In: Christensen, S., Mitcham, C., Li, B., An, Y. (eds). Engineering, Development and Philosophy. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 11. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 7-21, doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5282-5_1

33. Professional’naya kul’tura: opyt sociologicheskoj refleksi [Professional Culture: The Experience of Sociological Reflection]. In: Yarskaya-Smirnova E. (ed.). (2014). Library of the Journal of Social Policy Studies. Moscow: Variant, 148 p. ISBN 978-5-00080-014-0 (In Russ.).

34. Sokolov, M. M. A few remarks on the devaluation of academic degrees: an economic and sociological analysis of the dynamics of symbols of academic status. Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya = Journal of Economic Sociology. 2020. No. 4, pp. 14-30. Available at: https://ecsoc.hse.ru/data/2011/12/08/1208204981/ecsoc_t10_n4.pdf (accessed 20.09.2024) (In Russ.).

35. Bednyi, B.I., Rybakov, N.V., Khodeeva, N.A. (2023). On the Question of the Demand for Professional Postgraduate Studies in Russia: Analysis of Data on the Thesis Defenses in Technical Sciences. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 4, pp. 25-54, doi: 10.17323/vo-2023-16712 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).