Do Individual Educational Trajectories Contribute to Better Student Skill Development: An Empirical Study in Russian Universities

In recent decades, an increasing number of educational programs offering students individual educational trajectories (IET) have appeared in Russian universities. It is believed that such programs better contribute to the development of students’ generic skills due to a personalized approach and providing students with wide opportunities to choose courses that match their interests. However, at this moment, there is no empirical evidence to support this thesis. In this work, based on survey data (N=1647 students) collected at seven Russian universities combining traditionally fixed-group programs with IET programs, the authors examined the relationship between students’ assessment of their universal skills development and their learning in IET programs. According to student evaluations, IET-based curricula fostered higher levels of cognitive, communicative, socioemotional and self-organization skills. These findings can be explained by the fact that such programs afford students broad opportunities for choice, which may more effectively enhance intrinsic motivation for university studying, as well as provide novel experiences distinct from those encountered in school, thereby facilitating more intensive development of the aforementioned skills. In the concluding section, we discuss recommendations for higher education institutions aimed at potentially augmenting the contribution of IET programs to students’ transferable skill development. The work is of interest to researchers in the field of higher education, university administrators, and university teachers aimed at developing student generic skills. 

1. Gavrilyuk, T.V, Pogodaeva, T.V. (2023). Transition to individual learning paths trajectories in the opinions of students and teachers: the case of Tyumen State University. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal = Sociological Journal. No. 29(2), pp. 51-73, doi: 10.19181/socjour.2023.29.2.3 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Klimova, T.A., Kim, A.T., Ott, M.A. (2023). Individual Educational Trajectories of Students as a Condition for High-Quality University Education. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 23-33, doi 10.15826/ umpa.2023.01.003 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

3. Sazonov, B.A. (2020). Organization of the educational process: opportunities for individualization of training. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 35-50, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-29-6-35-50 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

4. Carpenter, H.C. (1951). Emerson, Eliot, and the Elective System. The New England Quarterly. No. 24(1), pp. 13–34, doi: 10.2307/361254

5. Elliott, R.W., Paton, V.O. (2018). U.S. higher education reform: Origins and impact of student curricular choice. International Journal of Educational Development. No. 61, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.11.008

6. Eliot, C.W. (1885). How to Transform a College with One Uniform Curriculum into a University. The Elective System. Available at: https://higher-ed.org/resources/charles_eliot/ (accessed: 25.04.2025).

7. Druganova, E. (2021). Role of free choice disciplines in the formation of applicants of higher education “soft skills”. The Scientific Notes of the Pedagogical Department. No. 48, doi: 10.26565/2074-8167-2021-48-03

8. Goulart, V.G., Liboni, L.B., Cezarino, L.O. (2021). Balancing skills in the digital transformation era: The future of jobs and the role of higher education. Industry and Higher Education. Vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 118-27, doi: 10.1177/09504222211029796

9. McGarry, B.J., Theobald, K., Lewis, P.A., Coyer, F. (2015). Flexible learning design in curriculum delivery promotes student engagement and develops metacognitive learners: An integrated review. Nurse Education Today. Vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 966-973, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.06.009

10. Shumylo, M. (2019). The role of elective courses in higher medical education during pre-clinical years. Science and Education a New Dimension. Vol. VII, no. 209, pp. 45-48, doi: 10.31174/SEND-PP2019-209VII86-10

11. Muzyka, P.A. (2024). Aspects of Individualization Implementation in Higher Education in Russia. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 67-81, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2024.04.035 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

12. Riley, S., Gibbs, T., Ferrell, W., Nelson, P., Smith, W., Murphy, M. (2009). Getting the most out of Student Selected Components: 12 tips for participating students. Medical Teacher. No. 31, pp. 895-902, doi: 10.3109/01421590903175361

13. Riley, S., Murphy, M. (2013). Student choice in the undergraduate curriculum: Student-selected components. In K. Walsh (ed.). Oxford Textbook of Medical Education. Chapter 5, pp. 50-62, doi: 10.1093/med/9780199652679.003.0005

14. Kuz’minov, Ya., Yudkevich, M. (2021). Universitety v Rossii: kak eto rabotaet [Universities in Russia: how it works], Moscow, HSE, 616 p., doi: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2373-5 (In Russ.).

15. Kapuza, A., Kersha, Y., Zakharov, A., Khavenson, T. (2017). Educational Attainment and Social Inequality in Russia: Dynamics and Correlations with Education Policies. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 4, pp. 10-35, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2017-4-10-35 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

16. Butler, H.A., Pentoney, C., Bong, M.P. (2017). Predicting real-world outcomes: Critical thinking ability is a better predictor of life decisions than intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity. No. 25, pp. 38-46, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.005

17. Deming, D.J. (2017). The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 1593-1640, doi: 10.1093/qje/qjx022

18. OECD Skills Outlook 2023. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-skillsoutlook-2023_27452f29-en.html (accessed: 25.04.2025).

19. OECD Skills Outlook 2017. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-skillsoutlook-2017_9789264273351-en.html (accessed: 25.04.2025).

20. OECD Skills Strategy 2019. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-skillsstrategy-2019_9789264313835-en.html (accessed: 25.04.2025).

21. OECD Skills Outlook 2021. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-skillsoutlook-2021_0ae365b4-en.html (accessed: 25.04.2025).

22. Patall, E.A., Cooper, H., Robinson, J.C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychol Bull. Vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 270-300, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270

23. Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. Group decision and social change. In T.M. Newcomb, E.L. Hartley (Eds.). Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Holt.

24. Cordova, D.I., Lepper, M.R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 715-730, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715

25. Iyengar, S.S., Lepper, M.R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 349-366, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.349

26. Williams, S. (1998). An organizational model of choice: a theoretical analysis differentiating choice, personal control, and self-determination. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. Vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 465-491, pmid: 9848266

27. Labzina, P., Dobrova, V., Menshenina, S., Ageenko, N. (2019). Soft Skills Enhancement through Interdisciplinary Students Engagement. Proc. of the International Conference Communicative Strategies of Information Society (CSIS 2018). Pp. 340-344, doi: 10.2991/csis-18.2019.6928

28. Bradshaw, D. (1989). Higher Education, Personal Qualities and Employment: Teamwork. Oxford Review of Education. No. 15(1), pp. 55-71, doi: 10.1080/0305498890150105

29. Denton, H.G. (1997). Multidisciplinary team-based project work: planning factors. Design Studies. No. 18(2), pp. 155-170, doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(97)85458-0

30. van Woerden, R, van Goch, M.M., Schruijer, S.G.L., and van der Tuin, I. (2025). Students’ teamwork behaviour in multidisciplinary student teams: an ethnographic case study. Higher Education Research & Development. No. 44(1), pp. 1-16, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2025.2468394

31. Figueiredo, S., Ganoo, A., Eriksson, V., Ekman, K. (2022). Future-ready skills development through experiential learning: perceptions from students working in multidisciplinary teams. CERN IdeaSquare Journal of Experimental Innovation. No. 6(2), pp. 12-19, doi: 10.23726/cij.2022.1397

32. Assessing Cognitive Skills. Assessing 21st Century Skills: Summary of a Workshop. (2011). National Research Council. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US), 154 p. ISBN-13: 978-0-309-21790-3, doi: 10.17226/13215

33. Lai, E.R., Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: Integrating Research Findings. Pearson. Available at: https://allchildrenlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Assessing_21st_Century_Skills_NCME-1.pdf (accessed: 14.04.2025).

34. Baumann, N.A. (2017). The Importance of Effective Communication: Some Food for Thought. The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine. No. 1(4), pp. 460-461, doi: 10.1373/jalm.2016.021865

35. Gimbert, B.G., Miller, D., Herman, E., Breedlove, M., Molina, C.E. (2021). Social Emotional Learning in Schools: The Importance of Educator Competence. Journal of Research on Leadership Education. No. 18(7), doi: 10.1177/19427751211014920

36. Xu, Z., Zhao, Y., Liew, J., Zhou, X., Kogut, A. (2023). Synthesizing research evidence on self-regulated learning and academic achievement in online and blended learning environments: A scoping review. Educational Research Review. No. 39: 100510, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100510

37. Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Front Psychol. No. 8, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

38. Borgonovi, F., Han, S.W., Greiff, S. (2023). Gender differences in collaborative problemsolving skills in a cross-country perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 747-766, doi: 10.1037/edu0000788

39. Bowman, N.A. (2010). Can 1st-year college students accurately report their learning and development? American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 466-496, doi: 10.3102/0002831209353595

40. Conway, J.M., Lance, C.E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 325-334, doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6

41. Zilvinskis, J., Masseria, A.A., Pike, G.R. (2017). Student engagement and student learning: Examining the convergent and discriminant validity of the revised National Survey of Student Engagement. Research in Higher Education. Vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 880-903, doi: 10.1007/s11162-017-9450-6

42. Thomson, G., Douglass, J. (2009). Decoding Learning Gains: Measuring Outcomes and the Pivotal Role of the Major and Student Backgrounds. SERU Project and Consortium Research Paper. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.5.09. Center for Studies in Higher Education. Available at: https://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/decoding-learning-gains-measuring-outcomes-and-pivotal-role-major-and-student (accessed: 14.04.2025).

43. Thomson, G. (2017). Self-Reported Learning Outcomes and Assessment: Making the Case. 43rd Annual Meeting of the California Association for Institutional Research.Concord, CA.

44. Cullen, S., Oppenheimer, D. (2024). Choosing to learn: The importance of student autonomy in higher education. Science Advances. No. 10(29): eado6759, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado6759

45. Chirkov, V.I. (1996). Samodeterminatsiya i vnutrennyaya motivatsiya povedeniya cheloveka [Self-determination and intrinsic motivation of human behaviour]. Voprosy psikhologii = Voprosy Psychologii. No. 3, pp. 116-130. Available at: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1996/ 963/963116.htm (accessed: 14.04.2025).

46. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. Vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68-78, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

47. Conti, R. (2000). College goals: Do self-determined and carefully considered goals predict intrinsic motivation, academic performance, and adjustment during the first semester? Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal. No. 4(2), pp. 189-211, doi: 10.1023/A:1009607907509

48. Ackerman, P.L., Bowen, K.R., Beier, M.E., Kanfer, R. (2001). Determinants of individual differences and gender differences in knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 797-825, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.797

49. Gorges, J., Maehler, D.B., Koch, T., Offerhaus, J. (2016). Who likes to learn new things: measuring adult motivation to learn with PIAAC data from 21 countries. Large-scale Assessments in Education. No. 4(1): 9, doi: 10.1186/s40536-016-0024-4

50. Maehler, D.B., Martin, S., Gorges, J., Scherer, R. (2025). Determinants of cognitive skills in adulthood: Age cohort patterns. International Journal of Lifelong Education. Vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 131-152, doi: 10.1080/02601370.2024.2390070

51. Adrian, J.A.L., Zeszotarski, P., Ma, C. (2015). Developing Pharmacy Student Communication Skills through Role-Playing and Active Learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. Vol. 79, no. 3: 44, doi: 10.5688/ajpe79344

52. Stephenson, T., Mayes, L., Combs, E.M., Webber, K. (2015). Developing Communication Skills of Undergraduate Students through Innovative Teaching Approaches. NACTA Journal. Vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 313-318. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/nactajournal.59.4.313 (accessed: 14.04.2025).

53. Spataro, S.E., Bloch, J. (2018). “Can you repeat that?” teaching active listening in management education. Journal of Management Education. Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 168-198, doi: 10.1177/1052562917748696

54. Iyengar, S.S., Lepper, M.R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol. Vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 995-1006, doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.995

55. Stevens, M., Harrison, M., Thompson, M., Lifschitz, A., Chaturapruek, S. (2018). Choices, Identities, Paths: Understanding College Studentss Academic Decisions. SSRN Electronic Journal. April 10, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3162429

56. Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pyläдs, L., Nokelainen, P. (2019). The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education. Education Sciences. No. 9(4): 276, doi: 10.3390/educsci9040276

57. Børte, K., Nesje, K., Lillejord, S. (2023). Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 597-615, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746