Falling Behind and Getting Ahead: Student Use of Generative AI in Education

With the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the relationship between these emerging technologies and education, as well as educational practices, has become a central topic of scholarly debate. Research in this area is rapidly expanding, particularly regarding the potential benefits and drawbacks of AI use by students in education. However, despite the growing interest, certain gaps remain. Firstly, research often lacks a strong empirical foundation with rigorous hypothesis testing using validated methodologies, especially within the Russian context. Secondly, existing studies tend to focus primarily on opportunities for development rather than potential challenges. The authors believe that identifying these challenges is crucial for effectively managing the integration of AI into education, and this serves as the primary goal of this study. The core objective of this research is to provide empirical evidence supporting the existence of such challenges and to delineate their specific nature. To achieve this, we analyze data from a survey conducted by the authors in 2025, involving students from leading Russian universities (N=4207). One of the most significant challenges identified by the study is the exacerbation of inequality within the educational landscape. This is particularly evident in the disparate AI usage patterns between students in STEM fields and those in non-STEM disciplines. Furthermore, significant heterogeneity exists among students with varying academic performance (GPA). For highachieving students, AI tends to serve as a tool for enhancement, whereas for others, the opposite effect is observed. These findings are partially consistent with existing literature reviews, both domestic and international, as well as other surveys conducted on the topic. However, they contribute to a more defined understanding of the challenges associated with increasing educational inequality due to AI. Addressing the divisions within the educational sphere resulting from unequal levels of AI integration and utilization represents a crucial first step toward developing appropriate educational strategies that leverage AI as a tool to empower students, rather than the contrary.

1. Kazakova, E.I., Kuzminov, Ya.I. (2025). We Should Foster a Culture of Critical Attitude toward Artificial Intelligence. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 1, pp. 8-24, doi: 10.17323/vo-2025-25882 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B.L., Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal. Vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 537-550, doi: 10.1177/00336882231162868

3. Bozkurt, A. Xiao, F., Farrow, R., Bai, J.Y.H. (2024). The Manifesto for Teaching and Learning in a Time of Generative AI: A Critical Collective Stance to Better Navigate the Future. Open Praxis. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 487-513, doi: 10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777

4. Abd-Alrazaq, A., AlSaad, R., Alhuwail, D., Ahmed, A., Healy, P. M. et al. (2023). Large Lan- guage Models in Medical Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions. JMIR Medical Education. Vol. 9, no. 1, article no. e48291, doi: 10.2196/48291

5. Sallam, M. (2023). Chatgpt Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare. Vol. 11, article no. 887, doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060887

6. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D. et al. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences. Vol. 103, article no. 102274, doi: 10.1016/J.LINDIF.2023.102274

7. Simaremare, M.E.S. Pardede, С., Tampubolon, I.N.I., Simangunsong, D.A., Manurung, P.E. (2024). The Penetration of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Survey. 2024 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). Pp. 1-5. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/docu- ment/10664825 (accessed 15.04.2025).

8. Chiu, M.C., Hwang, G.J., Hsia, L.H., Shyu, F.M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence-Supported Art Education: A Deep Learning-Based System for Promoting University Students’ Artwork Appreciation and Painting Outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments. Vol. 32, no. 3, pр. 824-842, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2100426

9. Escotet, M.A. (2024). The Optimistic Future of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. MA Escotet. Prospects (00331538). Vol. 54, no. 3, рр. 531-540, doi: 10.1007/s11125-023-09642-z

10. Kalmus, J.E., Nikiforova, A. (2024). Generative AI Adoption in Higher Education. Exploring Educator Resistance in Estonian Universities. Proceedings of the 2024 Pre-ICIS SIGDSA Symposium. No. 12. 16 р. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=sigdsa2024 (accessed 15.04.2025).

11. Ivakhnenko, E.N., Nikolskiy, V.S. (2023). ChatGPT in Higher Education and Science: a Threat or a Valuable Resource? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 9-22, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-9-22 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

12. Rezaev, A.V., Stepanov, A.M., Tregubova, N.D. (2024). Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 49-62, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-4-49-62 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

13. Rezaev, A.V., Tregubova, N.D. (2023). ChatGPT and AI in the Universities: An Introduction to the Near Future. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 19-37, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-6-19-37 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

14. Sheinbaum, V.S., Nikolskiy, V.S. (2024). Engineering Activity and Engineering Thinking in the Context of Artificial Intelligence Expansion. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 9-27, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-6-9-27 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

15. Haleem, A., Mohd J., Ravi, P. S. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a Significant Futuristic Sup- port Tool: A Study on Features, Abilities, and Challenges. Bench Council Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations. Vol. 2, no. 4, article no. 100089, doi: 10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089

16. Kavadella, A., Dias da Silva, M.A., Kaklamanos, E.G., Stamatopoulos, V., Giannakopoulos, K. (2024). Evaluation of ChatGPT’s Real-Life Implementation in Undergraduate Dental Education: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Medical Education. Vol. 10, no. 1, article no. e51344, doi: 10.2196/51344

17. Malik, A.R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I.W., Suharti, S. et al. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open. Vol. 5, article no. 100296, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296

18. Crawford, J., Cowling, M., Allen, K. (2023). “Leadership is Needed for Ethical ChatGPT: Char- acter, Assessment, and Learning Using Artificial Intelligence (AI)”. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. Vol. 20, no. 3, article no. 02, doi: 10.53761/1.20.3.02

19. Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Klisarova-Belcheva, S., Dimitrov, A., Bratkov, M., Angelov, D. (2023). Effects of Generative Chatbots in Higher Education. Information. Vol. 14, no. 9, article no. 492, doi: 10.3390/info14090492

20. Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J.L., Pallant, J.I., Pechenkina E. (2023). Generative AI and the Future of Education: Ragnarök or Reformation? A Paradoxical Perspective from Manage- ment Educators. The International Journal of Management Education. Vol. 21 no. 2, article no. 100790, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790

21. Lo, C.K. (2023). What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Litera- ture. Education Sciences. Vol. 13, no. 4, article no. 410, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040410

22. Stojanov, A. (2023). Learning with ChatGPT 3.5 as a More Knowledgeable Other: An Autoeth- nographic Study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Vol. 20, no. 1, article no. 35, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00404-7

23. Salah, M., Abdelfattah, F., Halbusi, H.A. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT & Bard) in Public Administration Research: A Double-Edged Sword for Street- Level Bureaucracy Studies. International Journal of Public Administration. Pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2023.2274801

24. Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, Sh., Gašević, D., Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI Assistance on Student Agency. Computers & Education. Vol. 210, article no. 104967, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967

25. Belkina, M., Daniel, S., Nikolic, S., Haqued, R., Lydene, S. et al. (2024). Systematic Literature Review of GenAI Integration in Higher Education and Analysis of Opportunities for Engineer- ing Education. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE 2024). Christchurch, New Zealand: Engineers Australia. Рp. 111-120. ISBN: 9781925627992. (In Russ.).

26. Bulathwela, S., Pérez-Ortiz, М., Holloway, С., Cukurova, М. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Alone Will Not Democratise Education: On Educational Inequality, Techno-Solutionism and Inclusive Tools. Sustainability. Vol. 16, no. 2, article no. 781, doi: 10.3390/su16020781

27. Von Garrel, J., Mayer, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Studies – Use of ChatGPT and AI- Based Tools among Students in Germany. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. Vol. 10, no. 1. pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02304-7

28. Balabdaoui, F., Dittmann-Domenichini, N., Grosse, H., Schlienger, C. Kortemeyer, G. (2024). A Survey on Students’ Use of AI at a Technical University. Discover Education. Vol. 3, no. 1, article no. 51, doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00136-4

29. Lepik, K. (2023). Trust, but Verify: Students’ Reflections on Using Artificial Intelligence in Writ- ten Assignments. European Conference on Information Literacy. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. Pp. 27-38, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-53001-2_3

30. Dwivedi, Y.K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E.L., Jeyaraj, A. et al. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So What if ChatGPT Wrote It?” Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy. Interna- tional Journal of Information Management. Vol. 71, article no. 102642, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

31. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D. et al. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences. Vol. 103, article no. 102274, doi: 10.1016/J.LINDIF.2023.102274

32. Bernabei, M., Colabianchi, S., Falegnami, A., Costantino, F. (2023). Students’ Use of Large Lan- guage Models in Engineering Education: A Case Study on Technology Acceptance, Perceptions, Efficacy, and Detection Chances. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 5, artiсle no. 100172, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100172

33. Shue, E., Liu, L., Li, B., Feng, Z., Li, X., Hu, G. (2023). Empowering Beginners in Bioinformatics with ChatGPT [Preprint]. Bioinformatics. Doi: 10.1101/2023.03.07.531414

34. Zhu, G., Fan, X., Hou, C., Zhong, T., Seow, P., Shen-Hsing, A.C. et al. (2023). Embrace Opportunities and Face Challenges: Using Chatgpt in Undergraduate Students’ Collaborative Interdisciplinary Learning. arXiv. Computers and Society. Doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.18616

35. Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., Drachsler, H. (2021). Are We There Yet? Asystematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 4, article no. 6454924, doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.654924

36. Zhang, T., Schoene, A.M., Ji, S., Ananiadou, S. (2022). Natural Language Processing Applied to Mental Illnessdetection: A Narrative Review. npj Digital Medicine. Vol. 5, no. 1, article no. 46, doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00589-7

37. Liu, H., Peng, H., Song, X., Xu, C., Zhang, M. (2022). Using AI Chatbots to Provide Self-Help Depression In-Terventions for University Students: A Randomized Trial of Effectiveness. Inter- net Interventions. Vol. 27, article no. 100495, doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100495

38. Wu, R., Yu, Z. (2024). Do AI Chatbots Improve Students Learning Outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 10-33, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13334

39. Chen, S.-Y., Lin, P.-H., Chien, W.C. (2022). Children’s Digital Art Ability Training System Based on AI-Assisted Learning: A Case Study of Drawing Color Perception. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 13, article no. 823078, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823078

40. Lee, Y.F., Hwang, G.J., Chen, P.Y. (2022). Impacts of an AI-Based Chatbot on College Students’ After- Classreview, Academic Performance, Self-Efficacy, Learning Attitude, and Motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development. Vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1843-1865, doi: 10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8

41. Mageira, K., Pittou, D., Papasalouros, A., Kotis, K., Zangogianni, P., Daradoumis, A. (2022). Educational AI Chatbots for Content and Language Integrated Learning. Applied Sciences. Vol. 12, no. 7, article no. 7, doi: 10.3390/app12073239

42. Fidan, M., Gencel, N. (2022). Supporting the Instructional Videos with Chatbot and Peer Feedback Mechanismsin Online Learning: The Effects on Learning Performance and Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research. Vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1716-1741, doi: 10.1177/07356331221077901

43. Salas-Pilco, S.Z. (2020). The Impact of AI and Robotics on Physical, Social- Emotional and In- tellectual Learningoutcomes: An Integrated Analytical Framework. British Journal of Educa- tional Technology. Vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1808-1825, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12984

44. Han, D.E. (2020). The Effects of Voice-Based AI Chatbots on Korean EFL Middle School Stu- dents’ Speaking Competence and Affective Domains. Asia-Pacific Journal of Convergent Re- search Interchange. Vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 71-80, doi: 10.47116/apjcri.2020.07.07

45. Yin, J., Goh, T.T., Yang, B., Xiaobin, Y. (2021). Conversation Technology with Micro- Learning: The Impact Ofchatbot- Based Learning on Students’ Learning Motivation and Performance. Journal of Educational ComputingResearch. Vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 154-177, doi: 10.1177/0735633120952067

46. Gökoрlu, S., Erdoрdu, F. (2025). The Effects of GenAI on Learning Performance: A Meta-Analy- sis Study. Educational Technology & Society. Vol. 28, no. 3. Available at: https://www.research-gate.net/publication/387110151_The_effects_of_GenAI_on_learning_performance_A_meta-analysis_study (accessed 15.04.2025).

47. Dong, L., Tang, X., Wang, X. (2025). Examining the Effect of Artificial Intelligence in Relation to Students’ Academic Achievement in Classroom: A Meta-Analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 8, article no. 100400, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100400

48. Wang, J., Fan, W. (2025). The Effect of ChatGPT on Students’ Learning Performance, Learning Perception, and Higher-Order Thinking: Insights from a Meta-Analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-21, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04787-y

49. Deschenes, А., McMahon, M. (2024). A Survey on Student Use of Generative AI Chatbots for Academic Research. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Vol. 19, no. 2, рp. 2-22, doi: 10.18438/eblip30512

50. Hirabayashi, S., Jain, R., Jurković, N., Wu, G. (2024). Harvard Undergraduate Survey on Gen- erative AI. An Inaugural Report Commissioned by the Harvard Undergraduate Association. Computers and Society. arXiv:2406.00833v2 [cs.CY], 26 р., doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.00833

51. Martynenko, T.S., Dobrinskaya, D.E. (2021). Social Inequality in the Age of Algorithms: From Digital to Algorithmic Divide. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 1, рр. 171-192, doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.1.1807 (In Russ.).

52. Xiao, L., Pyng, H.S, Ayub, A.F.M., Zhu, Z., Gao, J., Qing, Z. (2025). University Students’ Usage of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability: A Cross-Sectional Survey from China. Sustainability. Vol. 17, no. 8, article no. 3541, doi: 10.3390/su17083541

53. Aleshkovski, I.A. Gasparishvili, А.Т., Narbut, N.P., Kruhmaleva, О.V., Savina, N.Е. (2024). Rus- sian Students on Opportunities and Limitations of Using Artificial Intelligence in Education. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya = RUDN Journal of Sociology. Vol. 24, no. 2, рр. 335-353. Available at: https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/39929/23650 (accessed 15.04.2025). (In Russ.).

54. Stöhr, C., Ou, A.W., Malmström, H. (2024). Perceptions and Usage of AI Chatbots among Stu- dents in Higher Education Across Genders, Academic Levels and Fields Of Study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 7, article no. 100259, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259

55. Chan, C.K.Y., Lee, K.K.W. (2023). The AI Generation Gap: Are Gen Z Students More Interested in Adopting Generative AI Such as ChatGPT in Teaching and Learning Than Their Gen X and Millennial Generation Teachers? Smart Learning Environments. Vol. 10, no. 1, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.02878

56. Cho, C., Ofosu-Anim, D. (2024). Navigating the Technology Divide: The Role of Educational Leadership in Generative AI Usage among Diverse Age Groups. Open Journal of Leadership. Vol. 13, no. 4, pр. 515-531, doi: 10.4236/ojl.2024.134027

57. Freeman, J. (2025). Student Generative AI Survey 2025. HEPI Policy Note. Vol. 61. Available at: https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/HEPI-Policy-Note-61.pdf (accessed 15.04.2025).

58. Chan, C.K.Y., Hu, W. (2023). Students’ Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Vol. 20, no. 1, article no. 43, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

59. Sysoyev, P.V. (2025). Personalized Learning Based on Artificial Intelligence: How Ready Are Modern Students for New Educational Opportunities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = High- er Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 51-71, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-51-71 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

60. Ananin, D.P., Komarov R.V., Remorenko, I.M. (2025). “When Honesty is Good, for Imitation is Bad”: Strategies for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Russian Higher Education Institu- tions. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 31-50, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-31-50 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

61. Sysoyev, P.V. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Awareness, Readiness and Practice of Using Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Professional Activities by University Faculty. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 9-33, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-10-9-33 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

62. Potemkina, T.V., Avdeeva, Yu.A., Ivanova, U.Yu. (2024). Interaction with Artificial Intelligence as a Potential of Foreign Language Teaching Program in Graduate School. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 67-85, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-5-67-85 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

63. Tikhonova, N.V., Ilduganova, G.M. (2024). “What Scares Me Is the Speed at Which Artificial Intelligence Is Developing”: Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 63-83, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-4-63-83 (In Russ., abstract In Eng.).

64. Ofem, U., Arikpo, А.М., Ovat, S.V., Nwogwugwu, С.E., Anake, Р.М. et al. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Academic Research. A Multi-Group Analysis of Students’ Awareness and Perceptions Using Gender and Programme Type. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 76-92, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.9