Preview

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia

Advanced search

Subject Reassembly and Subjective Membrane: Philosophical Reflection on Education in the Neural Network Era

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-6-136-151

Abstract

The article examines the transformation of subjectivity in the educational process under conditions of neural network integration. The author proposes a post-non-classical approach to understanding human-artificial intelligence interaction through the concept of “subject reassembly”, complemented by the introduced concept of “subjective membrane”. This concept characterizes the selective permeability of subject boundaries while maintaining internal homeostasis. The paper traces the evolution of educational paradigms: from subject-object, through subject-subject, to a network model of distributed pedagogy. The author demonstrates how neural networks transform not only teaching methods but also the very ontology of educational space, creating a new form of distributed subjectivity. It is noted that interaction with neural networks unfolds in a mode of “being between”, forming a special diffractive space where traditional epistemological boundaries become blurred. Special attention is given to the productive paradox of “educational autoimmunity”, where interaction with neural networks requires partial reconsideration of established cognitive schemes to form new, more adaptive thinking structures. The article also proposes a new understanding of the teacher’s role as a mediator between human and machine intelligence in a hybrid educational space. Ethical issues related to AI integration in education are considered, and conceptual foundations for forming a new educational ethics in the context of digital transformation are proposed.

About the Author

R. R. Karneev
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Rodion R. Karneev – Cand. Sci. (Philosophy) 

12/1 Goncharnaya str., Moscow, 109240 



References

1. Budanov, V.G. (2024). On the Typology of Activity Rationality in the Digital Age. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. No. 12, pp. 41-51, doi: 10.21146/0042-8744-2024-12-41-51 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Ivakhnenko, E.N., Nikol’skii, V.S. (2023). ChatGPT in Higher Education and Science: Threats or Valuable Resource? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 9-22, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-9-22 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

3. Karneev, R.R. (2022). The Project of Reconceptualizing the Subject: An Unfinished Assembly. Kontsept: filosofiya, religiya, kul’tura = Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7-19, doi: 10.24833/2541-8831-2022-1-21-7-19 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

4. Karneev, R.R. (2023). Problema peresborki sub”ekta kak sposob ego rekontseptualizatsii [The Problem of Reassembling the Subject as a Way of Its Reconceptualization: Cand. Sci. Thesis (Philosophy)]. Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 145 p. URL: https://dissovet.msu.ru/dissertation/2729 (accessed: 06.04.2025). (In Russ.).

5. Kuznetsov, V.Yu. (2017). Reassembling Subjects and the Problem of Development. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki = Philosophy of Science and Technology. Vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 148-156, doi: 10.21146/2413-9084-2017-22-2-148-156 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

6. Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1980). Mille Plateaux. Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 645 p. ISBN: 978-0816614028 (Russian translation: Moscow: RIPOL klassik, 2025, 768 p. ISBN: 978-5-386-15310-6).

7. Varela, F., Thompson, E., Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 308 p. ISBN: 9780262720212 (Russian translation: Moscow: Fond “Sokhranim Tibet”, 2023, 456 p. ISBN: 978-5-905792-50-2).

8. Arshinov, V.I., Yanukovich, M.F. (2024). Neural Networks as Embodied Observers of Complexity: An Enactive Approach. Technology and Language. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 11-25, doi: 10.48417/technolang.2024.02.02

9. Nikolaeva, E.M., Kamaleeva, A.M., Nikolaev, M.S. (2023). Hybrid Subjectivity: Integration of Natural and Artificial in the Modern Socio-Technical Space. Kazanskii sotsial’no-gumanitarnyi vestnik = Kazan Social-Humanitarian Bulletin. Vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 46-50, doi: 10.26907/2079-5912.2023.1.46-50 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Derrida, J. (2003). Autoimmunity: Real and Symbolic Suicides. In: Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 85-136. ISBN: 0-226-06666-5.

11. Silverstein, A. (2006). Autoimmunity: A History of the Early Struggle for Recognition. In: The Autoimmune Diseases. New York: Academic Press, pp. 31-52, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384929- 8.00002-2

12. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3-10. Available at: https://scispace.com/pdf/connectivism-a-learning-theory-for-the-digital-age-4fg2fhdvqi.pdf (accessed: 05.04.2025).

13. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press. 296 p. ISBN 9780822362142. Available at: https://media.icamiami.org/2020/07/c93615e4-haraway.-staying-with-the-trouble_-making-kin-in-the-chthulucene. pdf (accessed: 05.04.2025).

14. Shipovalova, L.V. (2019). Distributed Cognition and Its Boundaries in the Context of Public Scientific Communication. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii = Sociology of Science and Technology. No. 3, pp. 56-71, doi: 10.24411/2079-0910-2019-13003 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

15. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 381 p. ISBN: 9780262581462.

16. Maturana, H.R. (2002). Autopoiesis, Structural Coupling and Cognition: A History of These and Other Notions in the Biology of Cognition. Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 5-34. Available at: https://reflexus.org/wp-content/uploads/Autopoiesis-structural-coupling-and-cognition.pdf (accessed: 05.04.2025).

17. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill, 359 p. (Russian translation: Moscow: Giperboreya; Kuchkovo pole, 2007, 464 p. ISBN: 978-5-901679-58-6).

18. Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogia do Oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 218 p. (Russian translation: Moscow: KoLibri, 2018, 288 p. ISBN: 978-5-389-12189-8).

19. Ivanova, E.O., Osmolovskaya, I.M. (2011). Teoriya obucheniya v informatsionnom obshchestve [Learning Theory in the Information Society]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ., 190 p. ISBN: 978-5-09-022055-2 (In Russ.).

20. Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum. Innovate: Journal of Online Education. Vol. 4, no. 5, article no. Available at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol4/iss5/2 (accessed: 03.04.2025).

21. Sakana AI. (2025). AI Scientist: First Publication. Available at: https://sakana.ai/ai-scientistfirst-publication/ (accessed: 03.04.2025).

22. Andersen, L.M., Martinez-Saito, M. (2024). Tracing the Thoughts of a Large Language Model. Journal of Cognitive Science. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 312–336.

23. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press. ISBN: 109780822339175.

24. Tobias, S., Everson, H.T. (2002). Knowing What You Know and What You Don’t: Further Research on Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring. College Board Research Report. No. 3. New York: College Entrance Examination Board. Available at: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/59/knowing-what-you-know-what-what-you-don-further-research-metacognitive.pdf (accessed: 03.04.2025).

25. Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving. In: Resnick, L.B. (Ed.). The Nature of Intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 231-235, doi: 10.4324/9781032646527-16

26. Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising Critical Digital Literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.1080/01596306.2014.942836

27. Latour, B. (2002). What is Iconoclash? Or Is There a World Beyond the Image Wars? In: Latour, B., Weibel, P. (Eds). Iconoclash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion and Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 16-40. (Russian translation by R.R. Karneev: Moscow: Kanon+ROOI “Reabilitatsiya”, 2024, pp. 143-182).

28. Galison, P., Daston, L. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 501 p. (Russian translation: Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2018, 584 p. ISBN: 978-5-4448-0932-7).


Review

Views: 57


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-3617 (Print)
ISSN 2072-0459 (Online)