Science as Perceived by Russian Classical University Faculty

The article explores the self-reflection of faculty employed at leading Russian universities about the state and trends in the development of scientific research. The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of scientific work as perceived by faculty members at universities. This approach facilitates the identification of “pressing points” within the scientific community. The research was conducted via in-depth interviews, in which all questions were open-ended. The informants themselves identified the subjects that, in their opinion, best characterize the state of university science. A total of 60 individuals from four universities participated in the interviews. The subsequent analysis of the results employed the thematic coding method.

The study identified three themes that emerged in the majority of the interviews: the bureaucratization of reporting, funding issues (including grants and government assignments), and difficulties in attracting new researchers to science. A review of interviews suggests a correlation between the increasing administrative burden associated with research reporting and the potential for it to impede the fulfillment of teaching obligations. A decline in research funding has been observed due to the impact of inflation. Ensuring the continued influx of young individuals into science has been identified as a pressing concern. The problems of attracting young people to science are related both to financial aspects and to the prestige of the profession. The study yielded several proposals aimed at mitigating the identified problems of research in universities.

1. Kurbatova, M.V., Donova, I.N. (2023). Effective Contract in Higher Education: Intentions and Outcomes. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 2341, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-23-41 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Balatsky, E.V. (2017). The Institution of Efficient Contract in Science: Problems and Solutions. Upravleniye naukoy i naukometriya = Science Governance and Scientometrics. No. 3, pp. 3560. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_30060454_61866128.pdf (accessed 10.04.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

3. Kraynov, G.N. (2017). [Whether There Will Be an Effect from the Effective Contract in System of Higher Education?]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 5 (212), pp. 52-58. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_29154958_35167977.pdf (accessed 10.04.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

4. Nikulina, I.E. (2018). [Effective Contract at the University as a Driver of Work Quality Improvement of Scientific and Pedagogical Workers]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 9-19. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_34933078_86671883.pdf (accessed 10.04.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

5. Prakhov, I., Rudakov, V. (2018). The Determinants of Faculty Pay in Russian Universities: Incentive Contracts. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 47/EDU/2018, 30 p., doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3247107

6. Dezhina, I.G. (2020). Science Policy in Leading Russian Universities: Effects of “New Managerialism”. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 13-26, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2020.03.023 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

7. Kalinina, I.A. (2016). Designing Target Programs Aimed at Realization of Research Potential of Research and Pedagogical Staff of the University. Vestnik REU imeni G.V. Plekhanova = Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. No. 3, pp. 37-44, doi: 10.21686/24132829-2016-3-37-44 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

8. Guba, K.S. (2022). Scientometric Indicators in the Evaluation of Russian Universities: a Literature Review. Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia. Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49-73, doi: 10.17323/1811038X-2022-31-1-49-73 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

9. Kuzminov, Y.I., Yudkevich, M.M. (2021). Universitety v Rossii: kak eto rabotaet [Russian Universities: How the System Works]. Moscow: HSE, 616 p., doi: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2373-5 (In Russ.).

10. Lind, J.K. (2019). The Missing Link: How University Managers Mediate the Impact of a Performance-Based Research Funding System. Research Evaluation. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 84-93, doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvy038

11. Derkachev, P.V., Varakina, Zh.L., Guseva, N.S., Klishevich N.S. (2022). Subjective Assessment by University Teachers of the Effective Contract Impact in Universities on Improving the Indicators of Their Research Work. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 54-67, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2022.01.004 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

12. Fursov, K., Roschina, Y., Balmush, O. (2016). Determinants of Research Productivity: An Individual-level Lens. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 44-56, doi: 10.17323/1995459X.2016.2.44.56

13. Vinogradova, N.L., Volkov,S.K., Leontyeva, L.Yu. (2021). Lecturer or Scientist: How to Involve Young People in Science? Teoreticheskaya ekonomika = Theoretical Economics. No. 3, pp. 7182. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_46208420_22941567.pdf (accessed 10.04.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

14. Dezhina, I.G., Sorokin, A.N. (2022). The Perception of the Project 5-100 by University Employees. Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia. Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 74-90, doi: 10.17323/1811-038X-202231-1-74-90 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

15. Romanov, E.V. (2016). Regulating Workload of Lecturers: Challenges and Search for Solution. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. No. 4, pp. 64-81, doi: 10.15826/umj.2016.104.029 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

16. Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I., Yudkevich, M. (2019). The Russian University Excellence Initiative: Is It Really Excellence that Is Promoted? Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 49/EDU/2019, 35 p., doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3391182

17. Agasisti, T., Shibanova, E., Platonova, D., Lisyutkin, M. (2020). The Russian Excellence Initiative for Higher Education: A Nonparametric Evaluation of Short-Term Results. International Transactions in Operational Research. Vol. 27. no. 4, pp. 1911-1929, doi: 10.1111/itor.12742

18. Kliucharev, G.A., Neverov, A.V. (2018). Project “5-100”: Some Interim Results. RUDN Journal of Sociology. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 100-116, doi: 10.22363/2313-2272-2018-18-1-100-116 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

19. Trubnikova, E.I. (2022). The Exchange of Gifts in the Academic Sphere: Predatory Practices, False Signals, and Conflicts of Interest in Excellence Programs. Mir Rossii = Universe of Russii. Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 25-48, doi: 10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-1-25-48 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

20. Fadeeva, I.M., Aleksutkina, V.S. (2022). How do Russian Researchers Evaluate Grants as a Tool for the Development of Science? Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 56-70, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2022.04.030 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

21. Dezhina, I.G., Kliucharev, G.A. (2021). International Collaborations of the University Science: Incentives and Obstacles. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. No. 6, pp. 3445, doi: 10.31857/S013216250014592-4 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

22. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Solazzi, M. (2011). Are Researchers That Collaborate More at the International Level Top Performers? An Investigation on the Italian University System. Journal of Informetrics. No. 5 (1), pp. 204-213, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.11.002

23. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Di Costa, F. (2019). The Collaboration Behavior of Top Scientists. Scientometrics. No. 118, pp. 215-232, doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2970-9

24. Sugimoto, C.R., Robinson-Garcia, N., Murray, D.S., Yegros-Yegros, A., Costas, R., Larivière, V. (2017). Scientists Have the Most Impact When They’re Free to Move. Nature. No. 55, pp. 29-31, doi: 10.1038/550029a

25. Krasnova, G.A., Burangulov, E.R. (2022). Analysis of the Principles, Models and Mechanisms of Financing of University Science in Russia. Upravleniye naukoy i naukometriya = Science Governance and Scientometrics. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 108-135, doi: 10.33873/2686-6706.2022.17-1.108135 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

26. Zharova, E.N., Agamirova, E.V. (2020). Monitoring the Tools of Financial Support Available to Young Researchers in Russia. Upravleniye naukoy i naukometriya = Science Governance and Scientometrics. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 356-409, doi: 10.33873/2686-6706.2020.15-3.356-409 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

27. Urazhok, T.V. (2021). Postgraduates’ Attitude Towards Postgraduate Education and Scientific and Lecturing Activity. Alma Mater. No. 1, pp. 57-64, doi: 10.20339/AM.01-21.057 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

28. Semenova, A.A. (2021). [The Attractiveness of a Scientific Career in Youth Assessments]. In: Asheulova N.A., Zenkevich S.I., Kupriyanov V.A. (Eds). Problemy deyatel’nosti uchenogo i nauchnykh kollektivov. Mezhdunarodnyi ezhegodnik [The Problems of Scientist and Scientific Groups Activity. International Annual Papers]. Vol. 7 (37). Saint-Petersburg: S.I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, pp. 143-154, doi: 10.24412/2414-9241-2021-7-143-154 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

29. Dushina, S.A., Nikolaenko, G.A., Evsikova, E.V. (2016). Time to Work in Russia? Young Scientists in the Context of Institutional Changes. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy = Sociology of Science and Technology. Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 28-50. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26630568_27628610.pdf (accessed 10.04.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

30. Vidrevich, M.B. (2023). Russian University Science: Main Problems and Ways to Solve Them. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii = Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. Vol. 239 (1), pp. 144-161, doi: 10.38197/2072-2060-2023-239-1144-161 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

31. Efimova, G.Z., Gribovskiy, M.V. (2023). Prestige of a University Teacher in Russia: Historical Retrospective and Current State. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 27, no.2, pp. 30-44, doi: 10.15826/umpa.2023.02.011 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

32. Gerasimova, O.Ya. (2022). Motivational and Value Orientations of Graduate Students and Their Career Trajectories. Ekonomika truda = Russian Journal of Labour Economics. Vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1631-1644, doi: 10.18334/et.9.10.116357 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

33. Labyntseva, I.S. (2021). Peculiarities of Motivation of Scientific Activity of Modern Graduate Students. Voprosy pedagogiki [Pedagogical Issues]. No. 6-1, pp. 210-216. Available at: https:// www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_46181242_61168496.pdf (accessed 10.04.2025). (In Russ.).

34. Rostovtseva, M.V., Volkova, O.V. (2021). Modern Russian Postgraduate Studies: Problems and Key Factors of Development. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie = Education and Self-Development. Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 149-164, doi: 10.26907/esd.19.3.11 (In Russ.).

35. Terentev, E., Rybakov, N., Bednyi, B. (2020). Why Embark on a PhD Today? A Typology of Motives for Doctoral Study in Russia. Voprosy Obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 1, pp. 40-69, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2020-1-40-69

36. Olkov, A.S., Kostikova, L.P., Fedotova, O.S. (2024). Research Activities of Postgraduate Students and Adjuncts: Results of the Online Survey. Nauchno-metodicheskii elektronnyi zhurnal “Kontsept” = Periodical Methodological Electronic Magazine Koncept. No. 10, pp. 139-155, doi: 10.24412/2304-120X-2024-11160 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).