Agency of Students and Graduates of Russian Universities in the Sphere of Labor and Employment: Educational Experience and Well-Being

The article offers an approach to identifying “agentic” students and graduates in the field of work and employment of university, and analyzes the differences between the respective groups in terms of their educational experience (with an emphasis on higher education) and well-being. To identify agency, understood as an activity related to proactive influence on surrounding structures, we refer to respondents’ self-identification of their current employment status, as well as their experience of project work in the job place (for corporate entrepreneurs). We call “agentic” those respondents who indicated entrepreneurship or self-employment/freelancing as their main source of income (due to the need for them to be agentic by creating a new structure in the economic field and ensure its functioning), as well as corporate entrepreneurs (that is, corporate employees with experience in project leadership). Corporate employees without project leading experience at their main workplace; respondents with partial integration in the labor market (for example, odd jobs); respondents outside the labor market. We found that individuals in “agentic” positions in the labor market are more likely to initiate changes in the educational process at the university, as well as participate in formal and informal organizations at the university and, in general, be proactive in educational activities. They are also characterized by higher levels of well-being. These findings indicate the important role of the university in the formation of educational and professional trajectories against the background of the growing demand for individual agency in conditions of increased variability of social structures (neo-structuration).

1. Sorokin, P.S. (2023). The Problem of “Agency” Through the Prism of a New Reality: Conditions and Perspectives. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. No. 3, pp. 103-114, doi: 10.31857/S013216250022927-2 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

2. Sorokin, P.S., Mironenko, I.A. (2025). The Replicability Crisis and Human Agency in the Neo-Structured World. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. Vol. 59, no. 12, doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09887-z

3. Sorokin, P.S., Frumin, I.D. (2022). Education as a Source for Transformative Agency: Theoretical and Practical Issues. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 1, pp. 116-137, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-116-137 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

4. Isdell, L., Wolf-Wendel, L. (2023). How the Structure and Demands of Student Affairs Reflect Ideal Worker Norms and Influence Work – Life Integration. In: M. Sallee. (Ed). Creating Sustainable Careers in Student Affairs. Routledge Publ., pp. 15-33, doi: 10.4324/9781003443834

5. Ruotsalainen, S., Elovainio, M., Jantunen, S., Sinervo, T. (2022). The Mediating Effect of Psychosocial Factors in the Relationship Between Self-Organizing Teams and Employee Wellbeing: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. Vol. 138, article no. 104415, doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104415

6. Adelaja, A.A., Akinbami, C.A.O., Jiboye, T., Ogbolu, G. (2023). Students’ Intention Towards Self-Employment: An Application of ELT Theory on the Effectiveness of Entrepreneurial Education Types. The International Journal of Management Education. Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100738

7. Korshunov, I.A., Shirkova, N.N., Sorokin, P.S. (2024). Employers’ Request for Employee Independence: Analysis of Vacancies on Recruiting Sites. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. No. 1, pp. 85-96, doi: 10.31857/S0132162524010085 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

8. Koreshnikova, Yu.N., Frumin, I.D., Pashchenko, T.V. (2020). Barriers to Creating Pedagogical Conditions for the Development of Critical Thinking in Russian Universities. Pedagogika = Pedagogics. Vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 45-54. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44030475 (accessed: 12.02.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

9. Koreshnikova, Yu.N., Sorokin, P.S. (2024). From Behaviorism to Neoconstructivism: a Review of Educational Theories for the Development of Independence in the Conditions of Neo-struction. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 4, pp. 126-150, doi: 10.17323/vo2024-17084 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Sen, I., Flöck, F., Weller, K., Weiß, B., Wagner, C. (2021). A Total Error Framework for Digital Traces of Human Behavior on Online Platforms. Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. 85, no. S1, pp. 399-422, doi: 10.1093/poq/nfab018

11. Van Quaquebeke, N., Salem, M., van Dijke, M., Wenzel, R. (2022). Conducting Organizational Survey and Experimental Research Online: From Convenient to Ambitious in Study Designs, Recruiting, and Data Quality. Organizational Psychology Review. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 268-305, doi: 10.1177/20413866221097571

12. Emelina, N.K., Rozhkova, K.V., Roshchin, S.Yu., Solntsev, S.A., Travkin, P.V. (2022) Vypuskniki vysshego obrazovaniya na rossijskom rynke truda: trendy i vyzovy [Higher Education Graduates in the Russian Labor Market: Trends and Challenges]. Moscow: HSE Publ., 160 p. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/588955762.pdf (accessed: 12.02.2025) (In Russ.).

13. Winborg, J., Hägg, G. (2023). The Role of Work-Integrated Learning in Preparing Students for a Corporate Entrepreneurial Career. Education+ Training. Vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 674-696, doi: 10.1108/ET-05-2021-0196

14. Schoon, I., Heckhausen, J. (2019). Conceptualizing Individual Agency in the Transition from School to Work: A Socio-Ecological Developmental Perspective. Adolescent Research Review. Vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 135-148, doi: 10.1007/s40894-019-00111-3

15. Jääskelä, P., Tolvanen, A., Marín, V.I., Poikkeus, A.M. (2023). Assessment of Students’ Agency in Finnish and Spanish University Courses: Analysis of Measurement Invariance. International Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 118, pp. 102-140, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102140

16. Rozhkova, K.V., Roshchin, S.Yu., Travkin, P.V. (2024). From Combining Study and Work to Combining Work and Study? The Changing Model of Russian Higher Education. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 2, pp. 286-322, doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2008-698-110 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

17. Lyz’, N.A., Istratova, O.N., Golubeva, E.V. (2023). Working Students: Educational Success and Subjective Well-being. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 80-96, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-2-80-96 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

18. Sorokin, P.S., Vyatskaya, Yu.A., Chernenko, S.E. (2023). Faktory uspekha predprinimatel’skikh proektov studentov i vypusknikov rossiyskikh vuzov [Success Factors of Entrepreneurial Projects of Students and Graduates of Russian Universities]. Vol. 43, issue 1. Moscow: HSE Publ., 32 p. Available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2023/02/01/2045962537/ib_1(43)_2023.pdf (accessed: 12.02.2025). (In Russ.).

19. Zaccoletti, S., Camacho, А., Correia, Т., Aguiar, С., Mason, L., Alves, R.A., Joгo, R.D. (2020). Parents’ Perceptions of Student Academic Motivation during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Cross-Country Comparison. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 11, pp. 592-670, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592670

20. Goshin, M.E., Sorokin, P.S., Grigoryev, D.S. (2024). The Main Factors of Schoolchildren Agency: Empirical Analysis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. No. 3, pp. 106-121, doi: 10.31857/S0132162524030093 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

21. Zeiser, K., Scholz, C., Cirks, V. (2018). Maximizing Student Agency: Implementing and Measuring Student-Centered Learning Practices. Boston; Washington, DC; Oakland: American Institutes for Research Publ. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED592084.pdf (accessed: 12.02.2025).

22. Vaughn, M. (2020). What Is Student Agency and Why Is It Needed Now More Than Ever? Theory Into Practice. Vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 109-118, doi: 10.1080/00405841.2019.1702393

23. Abramova, M.O., Filkina, A.V. (2023). Student Evaluation of Teaching: More Harm than Good? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 8-9, pp. 130-146, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-8-9-130-146 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

24. Efimov, D.B., Batishchev, A.S., Kostyuk, A.A., Makhson, A.M., Svoiskiy, M.Yu. (2024). Student Engagement Cultures in Russian Student Representation: Party-Goers, Pragmatists and Citizens. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 4, pp. 61-94, doi: 10.17323/vo-202418298 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

25. Besschetnova, O.V., Fomina, S.N., Besschetnova, O.V. (2025). Students’ Independent Work as a Factor in Forming Agency in Modern Higher Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 108-124, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-108-124 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

26. Kopsov, I. (2019). A New Model of Subjective Well-Being. Open Psychology Journal. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 102-115, doi: 10.2174/1874350101912010102

27. Emirbayer, M., Mische, A. (1998). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 962-1023, doi: 10.1086/231294

28. Grigorenko, E.Yu. (2009). [Psychological Well-Being of Students and Its Determining Factors]. Problemy razvitiya territorii = Problems of Territory’s Development. Vol. 2, pp. 98-105. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_15119772_45345437.pdf (accessed: 12.02.2025). (In Russ.).

29. Hojman, D.A., Miranda, Á. (2018). Agency, Human Dignity, and Subjective Well-Being. World Development. Vol. 101, pp. 1-15, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.029

30. Buchanan, K., Bardi, A. (2015). The Roles of Values, Behavior, and Value-Behavior Fit in the Relation of Agency and Communion to Well-Being. Journal of Personality. Vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 320333, doi: 10.1111/jopy.12106

31. Maralov, V.G., Kariev, A.D., Krezevskikh, O.V., Kudaka, M.A., Ageeva, L.E., Agranovich, E.N. (2022). Students’ Subjectness, Self-Efficacy and Psychological Well-Being: Comparative Re-search of Russian and Kazakhstan Students. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 31, no 10, pp. 135-149, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-10-135-149 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

32. Vella-Brodrick, D., Joshanloo, M., Slemp, G.R. (2023). Longitudinal Relationships Between Social Connection, Agency, and Emotional Well-Being: A 13-Year Study. The Journal of Positive Psychology. Vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 883-893, doi: 10.1080/17439760.2022.2131609

33. Tastan, S.B. (2015). The Role of Agentic and Communal Values in the Individuals’ Outcomes of Job Related Affective Well Being and Political Deviance. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 141-154, doi: 10.18662/rrem/2015.0701.10

34. Abele, A.E. (2014). Pursuit of Communal Values in an Agentic Manner: A Way to Happiness? Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 5, pp. 13-20, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01320

35. Anaf, J., Baum, F., Newman, L., Ziersch, A., Jolley, G. (2013). The Interplay Between Structure and Agency in Shaping the Mental Health Consequences of Job Loss. BMC Public Health. Vol. 13, article no. 110, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-110

36. Michalos, A.C. (ed.) (2014). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands Publ., 170 p., doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1

37. Reeve, J., Cheon, S.H., Yu, T.H. (2020). An Autonomy-Supportive Intervention to Develop Students’ Resilience by Boosting Agentic Engagement. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 325-338, doi: 10.1177/0165025420911103

38. Rafiana, N.N. (2024) Technopreneurship Strategy to Grow Entrepreneurship Career Options for Students in Higher Education. ADI Journal on Recent Innovation. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 110-126, doi: 10.34306/ajri.v5i2.995