Creative Partnerships between Humans and AI: A Fourth Learning Format?
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-12-10-32
Abstract
This paper examines the psychological well-being of university students across various learning formats (in-person, online, and hybrid) and reflects on the role artificial intelligence (AI) tools play in supporting this well-being. The paper analyzes the impact of the learning formats on the dynamics of anxiety and depression levels in students, on their coping strategies for academic stress and the risk of burnout.
In addition to differences related to the learning formats, the increasingly active integration of AI technologies into higher education is also becoming a factor of psychological well-being. This integration affects not only the modes of learning but also the structure of interactions between participants in the educational process and an individual’s subjective perception of resilience and learning satisfaction. In this context, it is essential to understand whether artificial intelligence can act as a mediator in reducing emotional stress, supporting reflection and self-regulation, or whether its widespread use may contribute to the emergence of new stressors, such as the exacerbated inequality and the uncertainty regarding the student’s role. A new concept of ‘creative partnerships’ between students, teachers, and AI agents is formulated suggesting a special type of educational connections. Meaningometry, multi-subjectness, and the algebra of reflexive statement constitute the three methodological pillars of the study. The concept of Communicative Artificial Intelligence (CAI) is considered as a foundational paradigm. It is shown that creative partnerships with AI incorporated in learning are not limited to their instrumental function, but rather open up opportunities for developing self-understanding and reflection skills in students, thereby creating the potential framework for a ‘fourth learning format’ focused on supporting psychological resilience.
The main features of the proposed model of creative partnerships are described, and prospects for its empirical verification, as well as ethical and pedagogical implications of integrating AI into the educational process, are discussed. Further research is outlined aimed at clarifying the conditions under which the use of AI can contribute to maintaining students’ psychological well-being.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. N. VikhrovaРоссия
Ekaterina N. Vikhrova – Cand.Sci. (Philology), Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages,
9, bldg. 3, Institutsky lane, Dolgoprudny, 141701.
Researcher ID: MTF-7487-2025.
V. A. Petrovsky
Россия
Vadim A. Petrovsky – Dr.Sci. (Psychology), Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Education, Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, Editor-in-Chief of “Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics”,
3, Krivokolenny lane, Moscow, 101000.
Researcher ID: L-7417-2015.
References
1. Puzanova, Zh.V., Larina, T.I. (2022). “Healthy Personality” of a Modern University Student as a Research Concept. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 151-166, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-7-151-166 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
2. Gafiyatullina, M.I., Karateev, O.V. (2022). Mental Health of University Students: a Quantitative Analysis of Russian Publications on Depression and Anxiety. Gumanitarnye nauki = Humanities. No. 1 (57). Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_48415192_48578164.pdf (accessed 07.10.2025). (In Russ ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Filkina, A.V., Abramova, M.O., Terentyev, E.A., Larionova, A.V. (2022). Psychological WellBeing of Russian University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Most Vulnerable Groups and the Impact of Learning Format. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 6, pp. 59-83, doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.6.2288 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Gorbunova, E.V., Krylova, I.E. (2023). Psychological Services in Russian Universities: What Do We Have and Where Are We Going? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 95-115, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-11-95-115 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
5. Gong, X.G., Wang, L.P., Rong, G., Zhang, D.N., Zhang, A.Y., Liu, C. (2023). Effects of Online Mindfulness-Based Interventions on the Mental Health of University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 14, article no. 1073647, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1073647
6. Hako, A.N. (2024). Mental Health Crisis at Higher Education Institutions: A Conceptual Review. In: Aloka, P. (Ed.) Mental Health Crisis in Higher Education. IGI Global, pp. 126-146, doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2833-0.ch008
7. American College Health Association. (2024). National College Health Assessment III: Reference Group Executive Summary Spring 2024. Silver Spring, MD: ACHA.
8. Roy, S., Biswas, A.K., Sharma, M. (2025). Stress, Anxiety, and Depression as Psychological Distress Among College and Undergraduate Students: A Scoping Review of Reviews Guided by the Socio-Ecological Model. Healthcare. Vol. 13 (16), article no. 1948, doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161948
9. Liu, Z., Xie, Y., Sun, Z., Yin, H., Shi, L. (2023). Factors Associated with Academic Burnout and Its Prevalence Among University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Medical Education. Vol. 23, article no. 317, doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04316-y
10. Ramón-Arbués, E., Gea-Caballero, V., Granada-López, J.M., Juárez-Vela, R., Pellicer-García, B., Antón-Solanas, I. (2020). The Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety and Stress and Their Associated Factors in College Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Vol. 17, no. 19, article no. 7001, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197001
11. Barusi, A., Kurniawati, F. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: A Study of Academic Burnout Among Undergraduate Students in Universities. International Journal of Science Education and Cultural Studies. Doi: 10.58291/ijsecs.v3i1.198
12. Steare, T., Gutiérrez Muñoz, Sullivan, A., Lewis, G. (2023). The Association Between Academic Pressure and Adolescent Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review. Journal of Affective Disorders. Vol. 339, pp. 302-317, doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.028
13. Pérez-Jorge, D., Boutaba-Alehyan, M., González-Contreras, A.I., Pérez-Pérez, I. (2025). Examining the Effects of Academic Stress on Student Well-Being in Higher Education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. Vol. 12, article no. 449, doi: 10.1057/s41599025-04698-y
14. Fatima, M., Tabassum, D., Bibi, S. (2024). Effects of Academic Stress on Mental Health Issues Among University Students. Journal of Social Sciences Development. Vol. 3, pp. 170-183, doi: 10.53664/JSSD/03-02-2024-14-170-182
15. Hammoudi Halat, D., Hallit, S., Younes, S., AlFikany, M., Khaled, S. et al. (2023). Exploring the Effects of Health Behaviors and Mental Health on Students’ Academic Achievement: A CrossSectional Study on Lebanese University Students. BMC Public Health. Vol. 23, article no. 1228, doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16184-8
16. Song, X., Hu, Q. (2024). The Relationship Between Freshman Students’ Mental Health and Academic Achievement: Chain Mediating Effect of Learning Adaptation and Academic Self-Efficacy. BMC Public Health. Vol. 24, article no. 3207, doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20738-9
17. Tang, Y., He, W. (2023). Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between University Students’ Anxiety and Academic Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 14, article no. 1018558, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1018558
18. Oliveira Silva, G., Aredes, N.D.A., Galdino-Júnior, H. (2021). Academic Performance, Adaptation and Mental Health of Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nurse Education in Practice. Vol. 55, article no. 103145, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103145
19. Plato. (2018). The Republic. ISBN: 978-0-521-48173-1. Cambrige University Press. 379 p. (Russian translation by Moscow: Eksmo. 448 p. ISBN: 978-5-04-094682-2).
20. Hegel, G.V.F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford University Press. 640 p. ISBN: 9780198245971. (Russian translation by B.G. Stolpner: Moscow : AST, 2018, 192 p. ISBN: 978-5-17108538-4).
21. Drelich-Zbroja A., Jamroz-Wiśniewska A., Kuczyńska M., Zbroja M., Cyranka W. et al. (2021). The Impact of Study Mode (Online vs. Hybrid) on Early Symptoms of Depression and Coping Strategies Among University Students in Poland in Time of COVID-19 Pandemic – Preliminary Study. Brain Sciences. Vol. 11, no. 12, article no. 1578, doi: 10.3390/brainsci11121578
22. Losa-Iglesias M.E., Calvo-Lobo C., Jiménez-Fernández R., Rodrнguez-Sanz D., Corral-Liria I. et al. (2023). Comparison Between Virtual and Hybrid Education for Psychological Factors and Academic Stress in Freshman Nursing Students: A Case-Control Study. BMC Nursing. Doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01477-5
23. Kashefian-Naeeini, S., Zarifsanaiey, N., Mehrabi, M. (2025). The Impact of Learner Background Variables on Academic Burnout in Online vs. Face-to-Face Classes Among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Having English Courses. Frontiers in Psychology. Educational Psychology Section. Vol. 16, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1484760
24. Harper, C.V., McCormick, L.M., Marron, L. (2024). Face-to-Face vs. Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Quantitative Analysis of Biological Science Student Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Vol. 21, no. 2, doi: 10.1186/s41239023-00435-0
25. Hendrowati, T.Y., Badrun, M., Siswoyo, Istiani, A. (2025). The Impact of Hybrid Learning on Student Engagement and Academic Performance in Post-Pandemic Science Education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 154-165, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i4.10701
26. Gudoniene, D., Staneviciene, E., Huet, I., Dickel, J., Dieng, D. et al. (2025). Hybrid Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. Vol. 17, no. 2, article no. 756, doi: 10.3390/su17020756.
27. Kalnitskaya, I.V. (2024). A Three-Dimensional Model of Student Engagement in Blended Learning. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Education. No. 3, doi: 10.31862/2218-8711-2024-3-233-242 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
28. Abdigapbarova, U., Sadirbekova, D., Nishanbayeva, S., Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2025). The Impact of Digital Hybrid Education Model on Teachers’ Engagement and Academic Performance in the Context of Kazakhstan. Scientific Reports. Vol. 15, no. 1, article no. 17865, doi: 10.1038/s41598025-02875-2
29. Kuzminov, Ya.I., Kruchinskaya, E.V., Gruzdev, I.A., Naumov, A.A. (2025). Falling Behind and Getting Ahead: Student Use of Generative AI in Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 9-35, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-6-9-35 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
30. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M., Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education – Where Are the Educators. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Doi: 10.1186/s41239019-0171-0
31. Klimova, B., Pikhart, M. (2025). Exploring the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Student and Academic Well-Being in Higher Education: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology. Educational Psychology Section. Vol. 16, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498132
32. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., Fadel, Ch. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Learning, Media and Technology. Vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 193208, doi: 10.1007/s11528-018-0344-z
33. Alsaiari, O., Baghaei, N., Lahza, H., Lodge, J.M. et al. (2024). Emotionally Enriched Feedback via Generative AI. Doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.15077
34. Nepal, S., Pillai, A., Campbell, W., Massachi, T., Heinz, M.V. et al. (2024). MindScape Study: Integrating LLM and Behavioral Sensing for Personalized AI-Driven Journaling Experiences. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. Vol. 8, no. 4, article no. 186, doi: 10.1145/3699761
35. Ehrlich C., Hennelly E.S., Wilde N., Lennon O., Beck A. et al. (2024). Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Enhanced Application for Student Wellbeing: Pilot Randomised Trial of the Mind Tutor. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. Vol. 9, pp. 435-454, doi: 10.1007/s41042-023-00133-2
36. Hussain, S.A., Ayub, F., Ahmed, N., Ziauddin. (2025). Cognitive Load Management Through Adaptive AI Learning System: Implications for Student Focus and Retention. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies. Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 701-719, doi: 10.59075/kpfrdv65
37. Freccero, A., Onwunle, M., Elliott, J., Podder, N., Purrinos De Oliveira, J., Dewa, L. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of Learning Analytics for Mental Health Support: Qualitative Study. JMIR Formative Research. Vol. 9, article no. e70327, doi: 10.2196/70327
38. Mantulenko, V.V. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Academic Performance,Cognitive Activity, and Quality of Student Learning. Kontsept = Concept. No. 6, pp. 251-272, doi: 10.24412/2304-120X-2025-11117 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
39. Khrustalev, A.A., Gorbatova, B.A. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Education. Molodoy Uchenyy = Young Scientist. No. 5 (504), pp. 197-199. Available at: https://moluch.ru/archive/504/110988/ (accessed 07.10.2025) (In Russ.).
40. Rabadanova, R.S., Seminskaya, E.S., Filatov, A.M. (2024). The Negative Aspects of Using Artificial Intelligence for Students in Solving Individual Educational Tasks. Applied Psychology and Pedagogy. No. 3, pp. 115-124, doi: 10.12737/2500-0543-2024-9-3-115-124
41. Asmolov, A.G. (2010). Socio-Cultural Modernization of Education: Strategy and Methodology. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Education. No. 4, pp. 4-18. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16319313 (accessed 07.10.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
42. Taleb, N.N. (2012). Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder. New York: Random House. ISBN: 978-1-4000-6782-4.
43. Laundon, M., Grant-Smith, D. (2023). Defining and Advancing a Systems Approach to Achieving Educator Wellbeing: An Integrative Review of Wellbeing in Higher Education. Student Success. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 104-119, doi: 10.5204/ssj.3191
44. Konstantinidis, A. (2024). An Integrative Review of the Literature on Factors Influencing Student Well-Being in the Learning Environment. International Journal of Educational Research Open. Vol. 7, article no. 100384, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100384
45. Worsley, J.D., Pennington, A., Corcoran, R. (2022). Supporting Mental Health and Wellbeing of University and College Students: A Systematic Review of Review-Level Evidence of Interventions. PLoS ONE. Vol. 17, no. 7, article no. e0266725, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266725
46. Itinson, K.S. (2021). Connectivism – Teaching in the Digital Age. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. Vol. 10, no. 4 (37), doi: 10.26140/bgz3-2021-1004-0021 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
47. Safonova, M.A., Safonov, A.A. (2020). Personalization of Education in Russia. Pedagogika = Pedagogy. No. 11. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44402194 (accessed 07.10.2025). (In Russ.).
48. Shchevlyagin, M. (2021). Personalized Learning: Key Elements, Teacher’s Role, and Digital Technology. Tendencies of Education Development. Global Challenges and Unequal Opportunities: Proceedings of the XVIII Annual International Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow: Delo Publishing House RANEPA. Pp. 277-290. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_48082745_89723336.pdf (accessed 07.10.2025). (In Russ.).
49. Brod, G. (2024). There Are Multiple Paths to Personalized Education, and They Should Be Combined. Current Directions in Psychological Science. Vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 153-158, doi: 10.1177/09637214241242459
50. Denishcheva, L.O., Safuanov, I.S., Semenyachenko, Yu.A. (2024). Personalized Higher Education Based on Microcourses: Possible Ways of Implementation. Obrazovanie i Nauka = Education and Science. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 40-68, doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2024-3-40-68 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
51. Megbowon, F.K. (2024). Experience and Perceived Impact of Personalization in Higher Education: Evidence from a University in South Africa. Personalization in Pedagogical Landscapes in the Digital Age – A Global Perspective. Doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1006596
52. du Plooy, E., Casteleijn, D., Franzsen, D. (2024). Personalised Adaptive Learning in Higher Education: A Scoping Review of Key Characteristics and Impact on Academic Performance and Engagement. Heliyon. Vol. 10, no. 21, article no. e39630, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630
53. Saiz-Manzanares, M.C., Osorio, C.I.G., Diez-Pastor, J.F., Martin, L.J.A. (2019). Will Personalized E-Learning Increase Deep Learning in Higher Education? Information Discovery and Delivery. Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 53-63, doi: 10.1108/IDD-08-2018-0039
54. Ali, M., Wahab, I., Huri, H.Z., Yusoff, M.S. (2025). Personalised Learning in Higher Education for Health Sciences: A Scoping Review. BMC Medical Education. Doi: 10.1186/s12909-02507565-1
55. Kazantseva, O.G. (2024). Personalized Learning for University Students: Results of an Empirical Study. Digital Humanities and Technologies in Education (DHTE 2024): Proceedings of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow: MGPPU Publishing House. Pp. 116-126. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_75053454_17566506.pdf (accessed 07.10.2025). (In Russ.).
56. Sysoev, P.V. (2025). Personalized Learning Based on Artificial Intelligence: How Ready Are Modern Students for New Educational Opportunities? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 51-71, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-51-71 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
57. Cong-Lem, N. (2022). Vygotsky’s, Leontiev’s and Engeström’s Cultural-Historical (Activity) Theories: Overview, Clarifications and Implications. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. Vol. 56, pp. 1091-1112, doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09703-6
58. Scholkmann, A., Tretow-Fish, T.A.B., Otrel-Cass, K., Lolle, E.L. (2023). Researching Student Competence Development Through the Lens of Cultural Historical Activity Theory. Teaching in Higher Education. Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 772-790, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2023.2280252
59. Lektorsky, V.A. (2023). The Psychological Theory of Activity by A.N. Leontiev and the Current Cognitive Studies. National Psychological Journal. Vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 67-83, doi: 10.11621/LPJ23-16
60. Chen, K.Z., Tseng, J.Y., Oakley, B. (2025). Transforming Online Teacher Training Through Expansive Learning: A Case Study Applying Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and the Change Laboratory Method. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. Vol. 34, pp. 1413-1430, doi: 10.1007/s40299-024-00954-y
61. Bocharova, E.E. (2019). Cultural and Historical Determination Factors for the Young People’s Social Activity Direction. Izvestiya Saratovskogo Universiteta = News of Saratov University. New Series. Series Acmeology of Education. Developmental Psychology, Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 348361, doi: 10.18500/2304-9790-2019-8-4-348-361 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
62. Medvedev, A.M., Zhulanova, I.V. (2021). Activity Approach as a Guideline of Modern Education: Initial Content and Risks of Reduction. Mir Nauki. Pedagogika i Psikhologiya = World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology. No. 2. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_46322887_51584298.pdf (accessed 07.10.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
63. Laakso, M., Fagerlund, Е., Pesonen, A.K., et al. (2021). Flourishing Students: The Efficacy of an Extensive Positive Education Program on Adolescents’ Positive and Negative Affect. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. Vol. 6, pp. 253-276, doi: 10.1007/s41042-02000048-2
64. Gilchrist, J.D., Gohari, M.R., Benson, L., Patte, K.A., Leatherdale, S.T. (2023). Reciprocal Associations Between Positive Emotions and Resilience Predict Flourishing Among Adolescents. Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada. Vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 313-320, doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.43.7.01
65. Shilko, R., Egorov, S., Zinchenko, Y., Emelin, V. (2022). Positive Education for Students’ Mental Health Support. European Psychiatry. Vol. 65 (S1), pp. S630-S630, doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1614
66. Pluskota, A. (2014). The Application of Positive Psychology in the Practice of Education. SpringerPlus. Vol. 3, article no. 147, doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-147
67. Wang, C.K.J., Liu, W.C., Kee, Y.H., Chian, L.K. (2019). Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness in the Classroom: Understanding Students’ Motivational Processes Using the Self-Determination Theory. Heliyon. Vol. 5, no. 7, article no. e01983, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983
68. Niemiec, C.P., Ryan, R.M. (2009). Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in the Classroom: Applying Self-Determination Theory to Educational Practice. Theory and Research in Education. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 133-144, doi: 10.1177/1477878509104318
69. Wehmeyer, M.L., Cheon, S.H., Lee, Y., Silver, M. (2021). Self-Determination in Positive Education. In: Kern, M.L., Wehmeyer, M.L. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Education. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-64537-3_9
70. Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Irnidayanti, Y., et al. (2016). Autonomous Motivation in the Indonesian Classroom: Relationship with Teacher Support Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. Vol. 25, pp. 441-451, doi: 10.1007/s40299-016-0282-5
71. Petrovsky, V.A. (2012). Coaching “I Can and I Want”. Obrazovatel’naya politika [Educational Policy]. No. 3 (59), pp. 12-16. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kouching-mogui-hochu (accessed 30.11.2025). (In Russ.).
72. Nikolskiy, V.S. (2025). Communicative Artificial Intelligence: Conceptualizing a New Reality in Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 152168, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-6-152-168 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
73. Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74. Rogers, C. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Boston. 420 p.
75. Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 208 p., doi: 10.1002/bs.3830140209
76. Seligman, M. (2012). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York: Simon & Schuster. 368 p. ISBN: 9781439190760.
77. Petrovsky, V.A. (2021). Reflective Problem Statements: An Algebraic Model. Iskusstvennyy Intellekt i Prinyatie Resheniy = Artificial Intelligence and Decision Making. No. 3, doi: 10.14357/20718594210304 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
78. Huizinga, J. (2016). Homo Ludens. New York: Angelico Press. 232 p. ISBN: 978-1621389996.
79. Chiotaki, D., Poulopoulos, V., Karpouzis, K. (2023). Adaptive Game-Based Learning in Education: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Computer Science. Vol. 5, article no. 1062350, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2023.1062350
80. Jacobs, E., Garbrecht, O., Kneer, R., Rohlfs, W. (2023). Game-Based Learning Apps in Engineering Education: Requirements, Design and Reception Among Students. European Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 448-481, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2023.2169106
81. Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M., Yang, Y., Malva, L., Hwang, G.-J. et al. (2021). From Gaming to Computational Thinking: An Adaptive Educational Computer Game-Based Learning Approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research. Vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 383-409, doi: 10.1177/0735633120965919
82. Bodnar, C., Clark, R., Davis, J. (2016). Student Perspectives on Application of Game-Based Learning Within a Graduate-Level Engineering Course. Frontiers in Education Conference. Pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757480
83. Petrovsky, V.A. (2021). Subjectness of Self in a Personological Retrospective. Mir Psikhologii = World of Psychology. Vol. 105, no. 1-2, pp. 174-194. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/554873395.pdf (accessed 07.10.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
84. Petrovsky, V.A. (2023). “Transvital Self”: An Experience of Personology. Kulturno-Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology. Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 13-22, doi: 10.17759/chp.2023190302 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
85. Osin, E.N., Leontiev, D.A. (2020). Brief Russian-Language Instruments to Measure Subjective Well-Being: Psychometric Properties and Comparative Analysis. Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya = Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes. No. 1, pp. 117-142, doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
86. Ryff, C.D., Keyes, C.L. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 719-727, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Review
JATS XML























