Perceptions of the Practices and the Experience of Securing Supplemental Funding among Doctoral Students

Insufficient financial support for doctoral students is a significant obstacle to increasing the number of on-time dissertation defenses. Many countries and universities, striving to enhance the effectiveness of their doctoral programmes, employ practices of additional funding awarded on a competitive basis to those candidates who are most likely to successfully defend high-quality dissertations on time. However, there is currently a lack of sufficient empirical research that fully assesses the effectiveness and implications of additional financial support for doctoral students. Drawing on the analysis of data from an online survey of Russian doctoral students (N = 231), this article examines the specifics of the students’ experience with the competitive application process for additional funding including both successful and unsuccessful attempts, their perceptions of the consequences of such funding, as well as the obstacles they face in securing it. The data analysis revealed that additional funding plays a significant role for doctoral students under the age of 30 who reside in university housing and are enrolled in mathematics and natural science programs. The majority of doctoral students rate the ability of such funding to resolve their financial problems and eliminate the need to seek supplementary income as low. However, they highly value the role that winning a competitive grant play in enhancing their integration into the academic community and boosting their confidence in their ability to complete their dissertation defense on time. In contrast to grants and direct monetary payments, employment for doctoral students is associated with a higher degree of integration into the academic community, greater confidence in the successful defense of their dissertation, as well as more positive assessments of their own financial well-being and their ability to focus on their dissertation research. The primary obstacles to applying for and obtaining additional funding are the insufficient amount of support, the low probability of securing it, and the lack of timely and accessible information about available funding opportunities. Informed by the findings of this study, the article’s conclusion discusses prospects for future research and outlines potential improvements to doctoral student financial support measures.

1. Bekova, S. (2021). Does Employment During Doctoral Training Reduce the PhD Completion Rate? Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1068-1080, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1672648

2. Cornwall, J., Mayland, E.C., van der Meer, J., Spronken-Smith, R.A., Tustin, C., Blyth, P. (2019). Stressors in Early-Stage Doctoral Students. Studies in Continuing Education. Vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 363-380, doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1534821

3. Maloshonok, N., Terentev, E. (2019). National Barriers to the Completion of Doctoral Programs at Russian Universities. Higher Education. Vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 195-211, doi: 10.1007/s10734-018-0267-9

4. Zhuchkova, S.V., Nefedova, A.I., Terentev, E.A., Smirnov, N.M. (2025). [Barriers in Preparing Dissertations in Russian Postgraduate Studies]. Sovremennaya Analitika Obrazovaniya = Modern Education Analytics, Vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 1-24. HSE University, Institute of Education. Available at: https://ioe.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/1049364285.pdf (accessed 11.09.2025). (In Russ.).

5. Babayeva, J., Maloshonok, N.G. (2025). A Systematic Review of Financial Support for Postgraduate Students: A Typology of Practices and Perspectives. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 86-107, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-86107 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

6. Horta, H., Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M. (2018). PhD Funding as a Determinant of PhD and Career Research Performance. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 542-570, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1185406

7. Nisticò, R. (2018). The Effect of PhD Funding on Postdegree Research Career and Publication Productivity. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 931-950, doi: 10.1111/OBES.12232

8. Mendoza, P., Villarreal III, P., Gunderson, A. (2014). Within-Year Retention among Ph.D. Students: The Effect of Debt, Assistantships, and Fellowships. Research in Higher Education. Vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 650-685, doi: 10.1007/s11162-014-9327-x

9. Smirnov, N.M. (2025). The Effectiveness of Grant Support for Postgraduate Students in Russia: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis of the RFBR Program.. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 77-99, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-3-77-99 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

10. Saygitov, R.T. (2014). The Impact of Funding through the RF President’s Grants for Young Scientists (the Field–Medicine) on Research Productivity: A Quasi-Experimental Study and a Brief Systematic Review. PloS One. Vol. 9, no. 1, article no. e86969, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086969

11. Larivière, V. (2013). PhD Students’ Excellence Scholarships and Their Relationship with Research Productivity, Scientific Impact, and Degree Completion. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 27-41, doi: 10.47678/CJHE.V43I2.2270

12. Gururaj, S., Heilig, J.V., Somers, P. (2010). Graduate Student Persistence: Evidence from Three Decades. Journal of Student Financial Aid. Vol. 40, no. 1, article no. 3, doi: 10.55504/08849153.1030

13. Horta, H., Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M. (2019). The Impact of Ph.D. Funding on Time to Ph.D. Completion. Research Evaluation. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 182-195, doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvz002

14. Sverdlik, A., Hall, N.C., McAlpine, L., Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD Experience: A Review of the Factors Influencing Doctoral Students’ Completion, Achievement, and Well-Being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. Vol. 13, pp. 361-388, doi: 10.28945/4113

15. Ampaw, F.D., Jaeger, A.J. (2012). Completing the Three Stages of Doctoral Education: An Event History Analysis. Research in Higher Education. Vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 640-660, doi: 10.1007/sl1162-011-9250-3

16. Slepykh, V. I., Rudakov, V. N. (2023). [The Experience of Combining Study and Work by Postgraduate Students and Its Role in the Career Trajectories of Postgraduate Graduates]. Monitoring Ekonomiki Obrazovaniya = Monitoring of the Economy of Education, HSE University. 36 p., no. 2 (44), doi: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2748-1 (In Russ.).

17. Alvero, A.J., Peña, C., Moore, A.R., Luqueño, L., Barron, C., et al. (2024). Time to Degree, Identity, and Grant Writing: Lessons Learned from a Mixed-Methods Longitudinal Case Study of Biosciences PhD Students. SAGE Open. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.1177/21582440241253662

18. Bol, T., de Vaan, M., van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew Effect in Science Funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Vol. 115, no. 19, pp. 48874890, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719557115

19. Graddy-Reed, A., Lanahan, L., D’Agostino, J. (2021). Training across the Academy: The Impact of R&D Funding on Graduate Students. Research Policy. Vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1-19, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104224

20. Estien, C.O., Quintana, B., Olivares-Zambrano, D. (2022). Reimagining the Broader Impacts Criterion in the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. Frontiers in Education. No. 7, article no. 977836, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.977836

21. Zhuchkova, S., Terentev, E., Saniyazova, A., Bekova, S. (2023). Departmental Academic Support for Doctoral Students in Russia: Categorisation and Effects. Higher Education Quarterly. Vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 215-231, doi: 10.1111/hequ.12389

22. Turner, G., McAlpine, L. (2011). Doctoral Experience as Researcher Preparation: Activities, Passion, Status. International Journal for Researcher Development. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46-60, doi: 10.1108/17597511111178014

23. Smirnov, N., Tarasova, E. (2025). Motivation Matters: How Enrollment Motives Shape Doctoral Experiences and Career Aspirations. PLoS One. Vol. 20, no. 9, article no. e0330679, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330679

24. Feizi, S., Elgar, F. (2023). Satisfaction, Research Productivity, and Socialization in Doctoral Students: Do Teaching Assistantship, Research Assistantship and the Advisory Relationship Play a Role? Heliyon. Vol. 9, no. 9, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19332

25. Szkody, E., Hobaica, S., Owens, S., Boland, J., Washburn, J.J., Bell, D. (2023). Financial Stress and Debt in Clinical Psychology Doctoral Students. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 835-853, doi: 10.1002/jclp.23451

26. Van der Haert, M., Arias Ortiz, E., Emplit, P., Halloin, V., Dehon, C. (2014). Are Dropout and Degree Completion in Doctoral Study Significantly Dependent on Type of Financial Support and Field of Research? Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1885-1909, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.806458

27. Breneman, D.W. (1976). The Ph.D. Production Function: The Case at Berkeley. University of California, Berkeley. Available at: https://scispace.com/pdf/the-ph-d-production-functionthe-case-at-berkeley-3yhdz8635d.pdf (accessed 11.09.2025).

28. De Valero, Y.F. (2001). Departmental Factors Affecting Time-To-Degree and Completion Rates of Doctoral Students at One Land-Grant Research Institution. The Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 341-367. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2649335.pdf (accessed 11.09.2025).

29. Cornwall, J., Mayland, E.C., van der Meer, J., Spronken-Smith, R.A., Tustin, C., Blyth, P. (2019). Stressors in early-stage doctoral students. Studies in Continuing Education. Vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 363-380, doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1534821

30. Rincon, B.E., George-Jackson, C.E. (2014). STEM Intervention Programs: Funding Practices and Challenges. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 429-444, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.927845

31. Cao, F., Li, H., Chen, X., You, Y., Xue, Y. (2024). Who Matters and Why? The Contributions of Different Sources of Social Support to Doctoral Students’ Academic Engagement. European Journal of Education. Doi: 10.1111/ejed.12649

32. Jairam, D., Kahl, D.H. (2012). Navigating the Doctoral Experience: The Role of Social Support in Successful Degree Completion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. Vol. 7, pp. 311-329, doi: 10.28945/1700

33. Pinelli, F., Higgins, E.T. (2024). Socialization in Higher Education: When Experiencing Shared Realities Can Benefit Students. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. Vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 33-55, doi: 10.1080/01973533.2023.2299403

34. Rigler Jr., K.L., Bowlin, L.K., Sweat, K., Watts, S., Throne, R. (2017). Agency, Socialization, and Support: A Critical Review of Doctoral Student Attrition. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Doctoral Education, University of Central Florida. Online Submission. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580853.pdf (accessed 24.09.2025).

35. Weidman, J.C., Stein, E.L. (2003). Socialization of Doctoral Students to Academic Norms. Research in Higher Education. Vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 641-656, doi: 10.1023/A:1026123508335

36. Bekova, S., Dzhafarova, Z. (2019). Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs: The Connection between Employment and Learning Outcomes of PhD Students. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. No. 1, pp. 87-108, doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2019-1-87-108

37. Gross, K., Bergstrom, C.T. (2019). Contest Models Highlight Inherent Inefficiencies of Scientific Funding Competitions. PLoS Biology. Vol. 17, no. 1, article no. e3000065, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000065

38. Galimberti, A. (2023). PhD Graduates’ Professional Transitions and Academic Habitus. The Role of Tacit Knowledge. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1563-1575, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2023.2252845

39. Van Rooij, E., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., Jansen, E. (2021). Factors that Influence PhD Candidates’ Success: The Importance of PhD Project Characteristics. Studies in Continuing Education. Vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 48-67, doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2019.1652158