From Permissive Practices to Institutional Norms: Ethical Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Russian Higher Education

A. G. Filipova; S. A. Skliarova

doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2026-35-6-31-54

From Permissive Practices to Institutional Norms: Ethical Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Russian Higher Education

A. G. Filipova, S. A. Skliarova

https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2026-35-6-31-54

Full Text:

PDF (Rus)

Generate QR code

Abstract

The relevance of this study stems from a contradiction between the widespread de facto use of artificial intelligence (AI) in Russian universities and the lack of formal rules governing this process. The aim of this work is to comprehensively analyze official documents from Russian universities that regulate the use of AI in education, including ethical aspects and risks. The methodology is based on a two-stage content analysis of publicly available university policy documents. The theoretical framework draws on neo-institutional theory, particularly the concepts of institutional isomorphism and the stages of institutionalization. The scientific novelty of the study lies not only in expanding the geography of AI policy research by including the Russian case but also in advancing neo-institutional analysis of regulation under conditions of technological uncertainty. The Russian material allows us to refine the dynamics of early-stage institutionalization: we show that the formation of AI policies is nonlinear, combining the borrowing of discursive formulas with the persistence of an “institutional vacuum” at the procedural level. We introduce a typology of adaptive and restrictive regulatory modes, interpreted as two stable patterns of institutional response to digital innovation, and demonstrate their simultaneous coexistence within a single national system. Ethical principles are interpreted as a specific mechanism for the symbolic legitimation of universities in the absence of detailed regulations. This complements existing approaches to analyzing institutional isomorphism and competitive differentiation among universities. Future research directions include analyzing how participants in the educational process internalize these rules and conducting longitudinal observations of the evolution of institutional forms.

Keywords

artificial intelligence, generative artificial intelligence, ethical principles, institutionalization, legitimation, higher education, content analysis, neo-institutional theory, academic integrity, AI policy, institutional isomorphism

About the Authors

A. G. Filipova

Vladivostok State University; Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation

Alexandra G. Filipova – Dr.Sci. (Sociology), Head of the Laboratory for Integrated Research on Childhood1, Senior Researcher, Institute of Childhood

Scopus Author ID: 57190731212

41 Gogolya str., Vladivostok, 690014

48 Moika River emb., St. Petersburg, 191186

S. A. Skliarova

Vladivostok State University
Russian Federation

Sofia A. Skliarova – Assistant at the Department of International Relations and Public Administration

41 Gogolya str., Vladivostok, 690014

References

1. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. Am4rican Sociological R4vi4w. Vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 147-160. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101 (accessed 17.02.2026).

2. Pratt, J. (2004). Institutional Isomorphism and Online learning in Australian Higher Edu-cation. In: Inaugural Acad4my of World Busin4ss, Mark4ting and Manag4m4nt D4v4lopm4nt Conf4r4nc4. Acad4my of World Busin4ss, Mark4ting and Manag4m4nt D4v4lopm4nt. Available at: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/7529/1/2004000718.pdf (accessed 17.02.2026).

3. Cardona Mejia, L.M., Pardo del Val, M., Dasi Coscollar, A. (2020). The Institutional Isomorphism in the Context of Organizational Changes in Higher Education Institutions. Int4rna-tional Journal of R4s4arch in Education and Sci4nc4 (IJRES). Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 61-73, doi: 10.46328/ijres.v6i1.639.

4. Baharuddin, N.B., Abd Rahman, N.H., Kamil, N.L.M. (2025). Digital Education in Malaysian Public Universities: A Neo-Institutional Perspective on Policy Implementation. Int4rnational Journal of Mod4rn Education. Vol. 7, no. 27, pp. 571-588, doi: 10.35631/IJMOE.7270355.

5. Nemirovskiy, V.G. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in the Mirror of the Neo-Institutional Approach: A Sociological Analysis. Sotsial’ny4 i gumanitarny4 nauki. Ot4ch4stv4nnaya i zarub4zhnaya lit4ratura. S4r. 11, Sotsiologiya = Social Sci4nc4s and Humaniti4s. Dom4stic and For4ign Lit4ratur4. S4ri4s 11, Sociology. No. 4, doi: 10.31249/rsoc/2024.04.03. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T. (2020). Sotsial’no4 konstruirovani4 r4al’nosti: Dogovor o sotsiologii znaniya [The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge]. Transl. from English by A.A. Nazarenko. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 323 p. ISBN: 5-85691-036-2. (In Russ.)

7. Owidi, S.O., Lyanda, J.N., Okono, E.O., Micheni, E.M. (2025). The Dark Side of Generative AI in Higher Education: Challenges, Ethical Concerns, and Implications. East African Journal of Arts and Social Sci4nc4s. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 526-543, doi: 10.37284/eajass.8.3.3690.

8. Sharma, R.C., Panja, S.K. (2025). Addressing Academic Dishonesty in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Generative AI’s Impact. Open Praxis. Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 251-269, doi: 10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.820.

9. AlBlooshi, S. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education, Opportunities, and Challenges: A Review. Fronti4rs in Education. Vol. 10, article no. 1683968, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1683968.

10. Valentini, A., Blancas, A. (2025). The Challenges of AI in Higher Education and Institutional Responses: Is There Room for Competency Frameworks? UNESCO IESALC Working Pap4r. Available at: https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/en/articles/challenges-ai-higher-education-and-imperative-competency-frameworks (accessed 17.02.2026).

11. Jukiewicz, M. (2025). How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Teaching and Influences Student Wellbeing in Future Education. Fronti4rs in Education. Vol. 10, article no. 1594572, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1594572.

12. Luo, J., Zheng, C., Yin, J., Teo, H.H. (2025). Design and Assessment of AI-based Learning Tools in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Int4rnational Journal of Educational T4chnology in High4r Education. Vol. 22, article no. 42, doi: 10.1186/s41239-025-00520-8.

13. Zawacki-Richter, O., Bai, J.Y.H., Lee, K., Slagter van Tryon, P.J., Prinsloo, P. (2024). New Advances in Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education? Int4rnational Journal of Educational T4chnology in High4r Education. Vol. 21, article no. 32, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00471-6.

14. Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Wegeia, V. et al. (2024). A Meta Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Call for Increased Ethics, Collaboration, and Rigour. Int4rnational Journal of Educational T4chnology in High4r Education. Vol. 21, pp. 1-24, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00467-2.

15. Kalnina, D., Nimante, D., Baranova, S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for Higher Education: Benefits and Challenges for Pre-Service Teachers. Fronti4rs in Education. Vol. 9, article no. 1501819, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1501819.

16. Baidoo-Anu, D., Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 52-62, doi: 10.61969/jai.1337500.

17. Li, M., Xie, Q., Enkhtur, A., Meng, S., Chen, L. et al. (2025). A Framework for Developing University Policies on Generative AI Governance: A Cross-National Comparative Study. arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.02636.

18. Isaifan, R.J. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Global Statistical Synthesis for Policy and Quality Assurance Reform. Education Sci4nc4s. Vol. 16, no. 3, article no. 483, doi: 10.3390/educsci16030483.

19. Karkoulian, S., Sayegh, N., Sayegh, N. (2025). ChatGPT Unveiled: Understanding Perceptions of Academic Integrity in Higher Education – A Qualitative Approach. Journal of Acad4mic Ethics. Vol. 23, pp. 1171-1188, doi: 10.1007/s10805-024-09543-6.

20. Bernstein, S., Rahman, A., Sharifi, N., Terbish, A., MacNeil, S. (2025). Beyond the Benefits: A Systematic Review of the Harms and Consequences of Generative AI in Computing Education. arXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04443 (accessed 17.02.2026).

21. Wu, Y. (2023). Integrating Generative AI in Education: How ChatGPT Brings Challenges for Future Learning and Teaching. Journal of Advanc4d R4s4arch in Education. Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.56397/JARE.2023.07.02.

22. Chan, C.K.Y., Colloton, T. (2024). G4n4rativ4 AI in High4r Education: Th4 ChatGPT Eff4ct. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003459026.

23. Pireci Sejdiu, N., Sejdiu, S. (2025). The Quiet Transformation of Higher Education in the AI Era. Op4n R4s4arch Europ4. Vol. 5, doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.20715.1.

24. McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., Hingle, A. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Evidence from an Analysis of Institutional Policies and Guidelines. arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.01659.

25. Ayanwale, M.A., Omeh, C.B., Oyeniran, F.M., Kanu, C.C. (2025). Ethical Compliance and In-stitutional Policy Support for Artificial Intelligence Integration in African TVET Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. PLoS On4. Vol. 20, no. 12, article no. e0335747, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335747.

26. Jayasinghe, S., Gamage, K.A.A., Yang, D., Cheng, C., Disanayake, C., Apeji, U.D. (2026). Six Institutional Intervention Areas to Support Ethical and Effective Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Narrative Review. Education Sci4nc4s. Vol. 16, no. 1, article no. 137, doi: 10.3390/educsci16010137.

27. Yang, J., Xie, W., Ni, J. (2025). A Framework for AI Ethics Literacy: Development, Validation, and Its Role In Fostering Students’ Self-Rated Learning Competence. Sci4ntific R4ports. Vol. 15, article no. 38030, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-21977-5.

28. Askari, M. (2025). Reliable But Supervised: Evaluating a Generative AI-rubric Model for Consistent and Fair Assessment in Postgraduate Education. Ass4ssm4nt & Evaluation in High4r Education. Published online 26 July, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2025.2537774.

29. Elzerman, G. (2026). AI Governance is a Duty of Care, Not a Branding Exercise. Tim4s High4r Education Campus. 23 February. Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/ai-governance-duty-care-not-branding-exercise (accessed 17.02.2026).

30. Abdusalamov, R.A. (2024). Main Directions of Legal Regulation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. Yuridich4skiy v4stnik Dag4stanskogo gosudarstv4nnogo univ4rsit4-ta = Law Bull4tin of Dag4stan Stat4 Univ4rsity. Vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 135-143, doi: 10.21779/2224-0241-2024-52-4-135-143 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

31. Ivakhnenko, E.N., Nikol’skiy, V.S. (2023). ChatGPT in Higher Education and Science: A Threat or a Valuable Resource? Vyssh44 obrazovani4 v Rossii = High4r Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 9-22, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-9-22 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

32. Verezubova, N., Mindlin, Yu., Sakovich, N. (2025). Methodological Aspects of Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pedagogical Activities. Sovr4m4nnaya nauka: aktual’ny4 probl4my t4orii i praktiki. S4riya: Gumanitarny4 nauki = Cont4mporary Sci4nc4: Curr4nt Th4ory and Practic4. S4ri4s: Humaniti4s. No. 8, pp. 74-78, doi: 10.37882/2223-2982.2025.08.09 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

33. Rakitov, A.I. (2018). Higher Education and Artificial Intelligence: Euphoria and Alarmism. Vyssh44 obrazovani4 v Rossii = High4r Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 41-49. Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1392 (accessed 17.02.2026). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

34. Voytov, I.V. (2025). Prospects for Legal Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in the Russian Federation. V4stnik Rossiyskoy pravovoy akad4mii = Bull4tin of th4 Rus-sian Law Acad4my. No. 5, pp. 161-172, doi: 10.33874/2072-9936-2025-0-5-161-172 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

35. Luchsheva, L.V. (2020). Social Problems of Using Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Tasks and Prospects. Nauchnyy Tatarstan. No. 4, pp. 84–89. Available at: https://tatarica.org/ru/razdely/biblioteka-tatarika/nauchnyj-tatarstan/2020/socialnye-problemy-ispolzovaniya-iskusstvennogo-intellekta-v-vysshem-obrazovanii-zadachi-i-perspektivy (accessed 17.02.2026). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

36. Verezubova, N.A., Yakovleva, O.A., Kishkinova, O.A. (2025). Ethical and Pedagogical Risks of Using Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. M4zhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i 4st4stv4nnykh nauk = Int4rnational Journal of Humaniti4s and Natural Sci4nc4s. No. 4-2 (103), pp. 82-86, doi: 10.24412/2500-1000-2025-4-2-82-86 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

37. Konstantinova, L.V., Vorozhikhin, V.V., Petrov, A.M., Titova, E.S., Shtykhno, D.A. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: Discussions and Forecasts. Otkryto4 obrazovani4 = Op4n Education. Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 36-48, doi: 10.21686/1818-4243-2023-2-36-48 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

38. Mukhlaeva, T.V. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence: Transformations in Education, Prospects and Dynamics. Ch4lov4k i obrazovani4 = Man and Education. No. 2, pp. 142-153, doi: 10.54884/1815-7041-2025-83-2-142-153 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

39. Zazhigalkin, A.V., Mansurov, T.T., Meretskov, O.V. (2024). Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Komp4t4ntnost’ = Comp4t4nc4. No. 6, pp. 10-16. Available at: https://www.asms.ru/news/vyshel-svezhiy-nomer-zhurnala-kompetentnost-6-2024.html (accessed 17.02.2026). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

40. Korenev, A.A., Shinakova, A.D. (2026). Regulation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Academic Environment in Russia and Abroad: Challenges and Prospects. Sovr4m4nnaya kommunikativistika = Mod4rn Communication Studi4s. Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 54-59, doi: 10.12737/2587-9103-2026-15-1-54-59 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

41. Ananin, D.P., Komarov, R.V., Remorenko, I.M. (2025). “When Honesty is Good, for Imitation it is Bad”: Strategies for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in a Russian University. Vyssh44 obrazovani4 v Rossii = High4r Education in Russia. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 31-50, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-31-50 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

42. Stacey, M., Mockler, N. (2024). Analysing Education Policy: Th4ory and M4thod. Ed. by M. Stacey, N. Mockler. London: Routledge, 276 p., doi: 10.4324/9781003353379.

43. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Cont4nt Analysis: An Introduction to Its M4thodology. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 441 p. ISBN: 978-1-4129-8319-0.

44. Stracke, C.M., Griffiths, D., Pappa, D., Bećirović, S., Polz, E. et al. (2025). Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Policies for Higher Education in Europe. Int4rnational Journal of Int4ractiv4 Multim4dia and Artificial Int4llig4nc4. Vol. 9, pp. 124-137, doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2025.02.011.

45. Aristombayeva, M., Satybaldiyeva, R., Maung, B.M., Lee, D. (2025). Guiding the Uncharted: The Emerging (and Missing) Policies on Generative AI in Higher Education. Fronti4rs in Education. Vol. 10, article no. 1644081, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1644081.

46. Xiao, P., Chen, Y., Bao, W. (2023). Waiting, Banning, and Embracing: An Empirical Analysis of Adapting Policies for Generative AI in Higher Education. arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arX-iv.2305.18617.

47. Rughiniș, C., Vulpe, S-N., Țurcanu, D., Rughiniș, R. (2025). AI at the Knowledge Gates: Institutional Policies and Hybrid Configurations in Universities and Publishers. Fronti4rs in Comput4r Sci4nc4. Vol. 7, article no. 1608276, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2025.1608276.

48. Song, Z., Kim, C. (2025). The International Status of Generative Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education. Cr4ativ4 Computing. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 195-218, doi: 10.61131/cc.2025.6.2.195.

49. Hofmann, P., Späthe, E., Brand, A., Lins, S., Sunyaev, A. (2024). AI-based Tools in Higher Education – A Comparative Analysis of University Guidelines. In: M4nsch und Comput4r 2024. ACM, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1145/3670653.3677513.

50. Perkins, M., Roe, J. (2023). Detection of GPT-4 Generated Text in Higher Education: Combining Academic Judgement and Software to Identify Generative AI Tool Misuse. Journal of Acad4mic Ethics. Vol. 22, pp. 89-113, doi: 10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6.

51. Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education: A Global Perspective of Institutional Adoption Policies and Guidelines. Comput4rs and Education: Artificial Int4llig4nc4. Vol. 8, article no. 100348, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348.