SCIENTIFIC AND PEDAGOGICAL WORKERS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF: CONFLICT OF INTEREST OR CONSTRUCTIVE INTERACTION?
Abstract
The article discusses the effectiveness of the system of university internal management providing the interaction of two structural units of an educational institution - chairs and managerial staff. This system is characterized by the internal contradictions decreasing its effectiveness. These contradictions are due to the conflict of interest between two main groups of workers. The author analyzes the causes, forms and the negative consequences of this conflict. The paper gives recommendations aimed at the prevention of such negative phenomena in the practice of University management through the use of complex methods of administrative, economic and psychological character.
Keywords
административно-управленческий персонал вуза,
внутривузовский менеджмент,
кафедры вуза,
конфликт интересов,
научно-педагогические работники,
стратегия вуза,
штабные департаменты вуза,
university administrative staff,
university management,
university departments,
faculty staff,
conflict of interest,
competence approach in education,
scientific-pedagogical workers,
university strategy,
administrative departments
About the Authors
Ashot R. Alaverdov
University «SYNERGY»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Gromova
University «SYNERGY»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Konoplya, A.I., Vasilenko, T.D. (2015). [Evaluation of competences: methodology and technologies (experience of Kursk State Medical University)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 1, pp. 103-108.
2. Rubin, Yu.B. (2016). [Creation of Graduates’ Entrepreneurial Competencies within the Educational Area of Baccalaureate]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 1, pp. 7-21.
3. Alaverdov, A.R., Yagodkina, I.A. (2013). [Competence Approach to Organization of Educational Process as a Competitive Advantage of the University]. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya [Modern Competition]. No. 2, pp. 43-56.
4. Shestak, O.I. (2013). [Marketing Approach to Education Quality Management in Modern Higher School]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 3, pp. 108-113.
5. Endovitsky, D.A., Bubnov, Yu.A., Gaidar, K.M. (2014). [Increased Volume of Documents Circulation as a Factor Decline of University’s Economic Efficiency]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 12, pp. 36-42.
6. Moskvina, N.B. (2014). [Professional Activity of Teacher of Higher Education Institution: the Problem of the Destruction of the Meanings]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 12, pp. 36-42.
7. Krasinskaya, L.F. (2016). [Modernization, Optimization, Bureaucratization ... That Expects Higher School Tomorrow?]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 3, pp. 36-41.
Review
Views:
596
Email this article 