A NEW APPROACH TO ESTIMATION OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH QUALITY
Abstract
The paper highlights the essence of the bibliometric approach to modeling and evaluation of scientific research results, considers the basic foundations of the theory of bibliometric indicators. The baseline data for the evaluation of these indicators are established. The author suggests two universal methods for this evaluation (measuring and the method of moments) and gives some examples of calculating these estimates by means of these methods. The study showed that the calculation of bibliometric indicators is only the first, preliminary stage of the assessment of research results, it should be followed by the expert evaluation.
About the Author
V. I. LEVIN
Penza State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Prof.
Address: 1-а, Baidukova pr., Penza, 440039, Russian Federation
References
1. Evidence Report “The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Quality in the UK Higher Education Systems. Available at: http://bookshop.universitiesuk.ac.uk/ downloads /bibliometrisc.pdf
2. Levin, V.I. (2017). [Quantitative Indicators of Scientific Activity: How to Use Them in Science and Society]. Alma mater. Vestnik vysshei shkoly [Alma mater. High School Herald]. No. 3 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Varshavsky, A.E., Ivanov, V.V., Markusova, V.A. (2011). [On an Adequate Assessment of the Effectiveness of Scientific Activity]. Vestnik RAN [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. No. 7, pp. 587-593. (In Russ.)
4. Mikhailov, O.V. (2011). [Criteria and Parameters of an Objective Assessment of the Quality of Scientific Activity]. Vestnik RAN [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. No. 7, pp. 622-625. (In Russ.)
5. Chebotarev, P.Yu. (2013). [Scientometrics: How to Treat with its Help, and Not to Cripple?]. Upravlenie bol’shimi sistemami [Management of Large systems]. Issue 44, pp. 14-31. (In Russ.)
6. Shtobva, S.D., Shtobva, E.V. (2013). [A Review of Scientometric Indicators for Assessing the Publication Activity of a Scientist]. Upravlenie bol’shimi sistemami [Management of Large systems]. Issue 44, pp. 262- 279. (In Russ.)
7. Polyanin, A.D. (2014). [Disadvantages of Citation Index and Hirsch Index and Using Other Scientometric Indicators]. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie i chislennye metody [Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Methods]. No. 1, pp 131-144 (In Russ.)
8. Bolotov, V.A., Kvelidze-Kuznetsova, N.N., Lapteva, V.V., Morozova, S.A. (2014). [Hirsch Index in Russian Index of Science Citation]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Questions on Education]. No. 1, pp. 165-167 (In Russ.)
9. Shipovalova, L.V. (2014). [Citation Index and Objectivity of experts]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 119-125 (In Russ.)
10. Levin, V.I. (2016). Hirsch Index and Evaluation of Researcher’s Contribution to Science. Alma mater. Vestnik vysshei shkoly [Alma mater. High School Herald]. No. 4, pp. 9-13 (In Russ.)
11. Imaev, V.I. (2016). [Technologies of Hirsch Index Increasing and Development of Imitation of Science]. V zashchitu nauki [In Defense of Science. Bulletin of RAS Commision]. No. 17, pp. 38-51 (In Russ.)
12. Samoilov, N.A. (2016). [About Criteria of Estimation of Publication Efficiency]. Alma mater. Vestnik vysshei shkoly [Alma mater. High School Herald]. No. 11, pp. 93-96 (In Russ.)
13. Ershtein, L.B. (2016). [Citation Index as a Method to Destroy Science in Russia and in the World]. Alma mater. Vestnik vysshei shkoly [Alma mater. High School Herald]. No. 11, pp. 97-101 (In Russ.)
14. Onosov A., Tumanov S., Savina N. (2016). Reform of Science and Scientometrics in the Space of Public Perception. Socrates. September, pp. 12-21. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
315
Email this article 