ON THE ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF BACHELOR'S THESIS
Abstract
The fight against plagiarism in educational organizations has has acquired a superfluous character. The originality level of a text has been chosen as a quality indicator of bachelor's thesis, while the completeness, logic and literacy of the exposition were relegated to a secondary position. In many cases, this is unreasonable, especially when it comes to specialties in which unambiguous language and citations of legislative and regulatory acts are required. Most of graduates' efforts are aimed at finding various linguistic methods that increase the uniqueness level of the paper. And this affects knowledge. Practical work also requires specialists who are ready to execute the already developed standards and not to interpret them. Thus, we need a change in the quality assessment approach to scientific papers. The article outlines the main provisions and proposals for the introduction of new approaches.
About the Author
S. V. Stepanova
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Economics), Assoc. Prof.,
20, building 6, K. Marks Prosp., Novosibirsk, 630073
References
1. Instrument i tol’ko. Interv’yu s Yuriem Chekhovichem (2013). [Only a Tool. Interview with Yury Chekhovich] Chastnyi correspondent [Private Correspondent]. May 13. Available at: http://www.chaskor.ru/article/antiplagiat_31963 (In Russ.)
2. NEintellektual’naja sistema «ANTIPLAGIAT» (2013) [NON-Intellectual System “ANTIPLAGIAT”]. Universitetskaja kniga [University Book]. July-august, pp. 72-74. Available at: http://www.unkniga.ru/vishee/1763-neintellektualnaya-sistema-antiplagiat.html (In Russ.)
3. [Statistical Yearbook of Russia] Rossiiskii statisticheskii ezhegodnik. (2016). Moscow: Rosstat Publ., pp. 207-209. (In Russ.)
4. Arsent’ev, D.A., Gerasimova, S.V. (2015). [Software Antiplagiat in Today University]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta pechati imeni Ivana Fedorova [Bulletin of Moscow State University of Printing Arts named after Ivan Fedorov]. No. 6, pp. 9-10. (In Russ.)
5. Koshevoi, O.S. (2015). [Peculiarities of Antiplagiat Usage in Educational Process of Higher School]. Nauchnye trudy Moskovskogo universiteta imeni S. Ju. Vitte: sb. nauch. statei [Proceedings of the Moscow University Named after S.U. Vitte]. Moscow, pp. 91-96. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Lekomtsev, A.S., Zakharin, S.I. (2015). [Features of Application of «Antiplagiat» software in the Learning Process]. Innovatsionnye modeli razvitiya kooperativnogo sektora ekonomiki [Innovative Models for the Development of the Cooperative Sector of the Economy: Coll. Sci. Papers on the Results of the ScientificPractical Conference of the Faculty of the Volgograd Cooperative Institute. ]. Rostov-on-Don, pp. 134-141. (In Russ.)
7. Lesnikov, V.A., Lyubimov, A.L., Chastikov, A.V. (2014). [Lessons in Checking Final Qualification Theses for Plagiarism]. Metodicheskie voprosy prepodavaniya infokommunikatsii v vysshei shkole [Methodological Issues of Teaching Infocommunications in Higher Education]. Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 22-29. (In Russ.)
8. Lipski, S.A. (2014). [About the Borrowing Vicarious Material in Science and in Educational Process (Discussion)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6, pp. 101-106. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Poezzhalov, V.M. [The Problems of Using the System “Antiplagiat”]. Available at: http://ksu.edu.kz/files/education/material_konf/innova_2015/poezzhalov_v_m_problemy_ispol_zovaniya_sistemy_antiplagiat.pdf (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
360
Email this article 