«PHILOSOPHY» AS AN EDUCATIONAL COURSE: THE CHANGE OF THE CONCEPT
Abstract
The article addresses the problem of the change of conceptual grounds of teaching the educational course of philosophy. The thematic waymarks we offer have been developed as a part of the Government Contract Project for the layout of the according conception of the course and the indicative working program of the discipline for undergraduate students of non-philosophical humanitarian specialties.
About the Authors
V. M. Karelin
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav M. Karelin - Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Prof.
Address: 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993
N. I. Kuznetsova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina N. Griftsova - Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., the Head of the Department of Philosophy,
Address: 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993
I. N. Griftsova
Moscow State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina N. Griftsova - Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., the Head of the Department of Philosophy, Institute for Social and Humanitarian Education
Address: 1/1, Malaya Pirogovskaya, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Rozov, M.A. (2010). [What Are We Waiting for from Philosophy? (The Notes ofan Elder Teacher)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8-9, pp. 20-29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Bryzgalina, E.V. (2010). [Philosophy of Education in the Context of Traditions and Innovations]. In: Chelovek vchera i segodnya: mezhdistsyplinarnye issledovania [Human Then and Now: Interdisciplinary Studies]. Issue 4. Moscow: IPHRAS Publ., pp. 3-18. (In Russ.)
3. Basovskaya, N.I. (1996). [The Natural-Geographical Factor in History]. Vestnik RGGU = RSUH Bulletin. No. 3, pp. 35-43. (In Russ.)
4. Bazhanov, V., Sholz, R.(Eds) (2015). Transdistsiplinarnost' v filosofii i nauke: podkhody, problemy, pers-pektivy [Transdisciplinarity in Philosophy and Science: Problems, Approaches, Prospects]. Moscow: Navigator Publ. 564 p. (In Russ.)
5. Ivakhnenko, E.N. (2015). [Transdisciplinarity in Action]. Filosofskie nauki = Philosophical Sciences. No. 12, pp. 134-135. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. L'interdisciplinarite - Problemes d'enseignement et de recherche. (1972). Eds: Leo Apostel, Guy Berger, Asa Briggs et al. Paris: Centre pour la Recherche et l'Innovation dans l'Enseignement, Organisation de Cooperation et de developpement economique.
7. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure ofScientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.
8. Styopin, V.S. (2012). [Scientific Rationality in the Technogenic Culture: Types and Historical Evolution]. Voprosy filosofii = Problems ofPhilosophy. No. 5, pp. 18-25. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Prayd, v., Medvedev, D.A. (2008). [Phenomenon of NBIC-Convergence: Reality and Expectations]. Filo-sofskie nauki = Philosophical Sciences. No. 1, pp. 97-117. (In Russ.)
10. Dubrovsky, D.I. (Ed). Global'noe budushchee. Konvergentnye tekhnologii (NBIKS) i transgumanistich-eskaya evolyutsiya [The Global Future. Convergent Technologies (NBICs) and Transhumanist Evolution] (2013). Moscow: MBA Publ. 272 p. (In Russ.)
11. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press. 228 p.
12. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity. SAGE Publications, Ltd. 260 p.
13. Polyakova, O.V. (2012). [The Transhumanity Movement as a Social-Cultural Phenomenon]. Vestnik RGGU = RSUH Bulletin. No. 17, pp. 189-198. (In Russ.)
14. Polyakova, O.V. (2015). [Transhumanism in Russia: Social Activities]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 8-9, pp. 154-161. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Yudin, B.G. (2001). [Morality, Biology, Law]. Vestnik RAN = RAS Bulletin. Vol. 71. No. 9, pp. 775-783. (In Russ.)
16. Yudin, B.G. (2006). [Social Fairness as a Problem ofBioethics]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill]. No. 2, pp. 115-117. (In Russ.)
17. Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences ofthe Biotechnology Revolution. USA; Peca-dor, 272 p.
18. Ortega y Gasset, J. (1932). The Revolt ofthe Masses. N.Y., L.: W.W. Norton & Company. 269 p.
19. Le Bon, G. (1898). The Psychology ofPeoples. N.Y. The Macmillan Co.
20. Moscovici, S. (1985). The Age of the Crowd. A Historical Treatise on Mass Psychology. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press; Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. 408 p.
Review
Views:
2601
Email this article 