ON THE FORM OF KNOWLEDGE IN EDUCATION: REIFICATION AND SYMBOLIC VIOLENCE
Abstract
This article deals with the problem of educational changes. Education invariance is related to inertia of its forms and self-reproduction of vested teaching practices, but first of all – to the current epistemological regime in education. Orientation of educational system at scientific samples of knowledge dehumanizes pedagogical relations, mariginalizes students’ creative activity, and blocks the latter’s innovative-pedagogical processes. As a result, education becomes a hurdle on the way to cultural and social development. The author suggests a solution of the problem in the objectivization of the situation, as well as in the analysis and change of implicit functioning education forms.
About the Author
D. KLUS-STANSKA
University of Gdańsk
Poland
Poland
Dr. hab., Prof., Department for the Study of Childhood and School, Institute of Pedagogy
References
1. Amsterdamski, S. (1984). [The Crisis of Scientism]. In: S. Nowak (Ed.) Wizje człowieka i społeczeństwa w teoriach i badaniach naukowych [Visions of Man and Society in Theories and Scientific Research]. Warsaw: PWN Publ., pp. 306–327. (In Polish)
2. Chalmers, A. F. (1993). Czym jest to, co zwiemy nauką? Wprowadzenie do współczesnej filozofii nauki [What is What We Call Science? Introduction to the Modern Philosophy of Science]. Wroclaw: Siedmiorog Publ., 216 p. (In Polish)
3. Mead, M. (1978). Kultura i tożsamość. Studium dystansu międzypokoleniowego [Culture and Identity. Study of Intergenerational Distance]. Warsaw: PWN, 149 p. (In Polish)
4. Sawisz, A. (1989). Szkoła a System Społeczny [School and the Social System]. Warsaw: WSIP, 162 p. (In Polish)
5. Zalewska, E. (2009). [Theoretical and Methodological Contexts of Research in a School Textbook in Ger-many: Between Conventional and Discursive-analytical Approaches]. In: D. Klus-Stanska, L. Hurlo, M. Lo-jko (Ed.) Paradygmaty współczesnej dydaktyki [Paradigms of Contemporary Didactics]. Krakow: Impuls Publ., pp. 275-287. (In Polish)
6. Klus-Stanska, D. (2000). [Why Do We Need Colloquial Knowledge at School?]. In: K. Kruszewski (Ed.) Pedagogika w pokoju nauczycielskim [Pedagogy in the Teachers’ Room]. Warsaw: WsiP, pp. 87-121. (In Polish)
7. Mead, M. (1988). Kul’tura i mir detstva [Culture and the World of Childhood]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 429 p. (In Russ.)
8. Bernstein, B. (1980). [Sociological Approach to the Process of Socialization: Comments on the Vulnerability to the Impact of the School]. In: G.W. Shugar, M. Smoczynska (Ed.) Badania nad rozwojem języka dziecka [Research on the Development of a Child’s Language]. Warsaw: PWN Publ., pp. 557-596. (In Polish)
9. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum. 163 p.
10. Moss-Kanter, R. (1972). The Organization Child: Experience Management in a Nursery School. Sociology of Education. No. 45, pp. 186-212.
11. Foucault, M. (1998). Nadzorować i karać. Narodziny więzienia [Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison]. Warsaw: Aletheia Publ., 310 p. (In Polish)
12. Klus-Stanska, D. (2009). [Developmental Cognitive Change]. In: D. Klus-Stanska, M. Szczepska-Pustkowska (Ed.) Pedagogika wczesnoszkolna – dyskursy, problemy, rozwiązania [Early School Pedagogy – Discourses, Problems, Solutions]. Warsaw: WAiP, pp. 457-504. (In Polish)
13. Klus-Stanska, D., Nowicka, M. (2006). [Teachers on the Way of Career Advancement – Between Pretense and Professionalization]. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji [Problems of Early Education]. No. 1 (3), pp. 51-61. (In Polish)
14. Murawska, B. (2004). Segregacja na progu szkoły podstawowej [Segregation at the Threshold of Primary School]. Warsaw: Institute of Public Affairs Publ., 82 p. (In Polish)
15. Necka, E. (1995). Proces twуrczy i jego ograniczenia [The Creative Process and its Limitations]. Krakow: Impuls Publ., 208 p. (In Polish)
16. Tkhagapsoyev, K.G., Sapunov, M.B. (2016). [Russian Educational Reality and Its Converted Forms]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 6 (202), pp.87-97. (In Russ.)
17. Baranski, J. Etykieta – rytuał estetyczny [Label – Aesthetic Ritual]. Available at: http://www.etnologia. uj.edu.pl/portal/images/Biblioteka/baranski2.pdf (In Polish)
18. Mouffe, Ch. (2008). Polityczność. Przewodnik Krytyki Politycznej [Political Character. Guidebook of Political Criticism]. Warsaw: Political Critic Publ., 176 p. (In Polish)
19. Sociological Forum. Available at: http://socjologia.pl/modules.php (In Polish)
20. Pawluczuk, W. (1978). Żywioł i forma. Wstęp do badań empirycznych nad kulturą współczesną [Element and Form. Introduction to Empirical Research on Contemporary Culture]. Warsaw: PIW, 245 p. (In Polish)
21. Czyzewski, M. (1997). [Towards the Theory of Public Discourse]. In: M. Czyzewski, S. Kowalski, A. Pi-otrowski (Eds.) Rytualny chaos. Studium dyskursu publicznego [Ritual Chaos. A Study of Public Discourse]. Krakow: Ureus Publ., pp. 42-115. (In Polish)
Review
Views:
471
Email this article 